VTB Georgia Company Cyber Security Posture
vtb.geแแแแแแ แแแแแ แฃแแแแแ แกแแแฃแ แ แกแแแแแแ แแแกแขแแขแฃแขแแ, แ แแแแแแช แแแแฎแแแ แแแแแก แแแแแแแแ แแแ แแแแแ แชแแฃแแ แกแแแแแแ แแ แแแฃแฅแขแแแแก แกแ แฃแ แกแแแฅแขแ แก แกแแแแแแแแก. แแแแแ, แ แแแแ แช แแแแแแแก แกแแแ แแแจแแ แแกแ แคแแแแแกแฃแ แ แฏแแฃแคแแก แฌแแแ แ, แกแแฅแแ แแแแแแจแ แแแฆแแแ แกแขแแแแแ แขแแก แแแแกแแฎแฃแ แแแแก แกแแแแแแแแก แแกแฎแแแ แแแแแแแแแแก, แแชแแ แ แแ แกแแจแฃแแแ แแแแแแกแก แแ แคแแแแแฃแ แแแ แแแก. แแแแแแก แแแแจแแแแแแแแ แแ แแแ แแขแแขแก แฌแแ แแแแแแแแก แแฅแกแแแฃแแแฃแ แ แแแฆแแแขแแฅแแแแแแแฃแ แ แแ แแแฃแฅแขแแแแก แแ แแแแแแแแ แแแ แแแกแขแแแชแแฃแ แ แแแแกแแฎแฃแ แแแแก แจแแแแแแแแแ. แแแแแแแฃแ แ แกแแ แแแขแแแแ แกแแแแแแขแแก Standard and Poor`s -แแก แแแแ แแแแแแ แแแแแก แแแแแญแแแฃแแ แแฅแแก แ แแแขแแแแ BB-/B. แกแแฅแแ แแแแแแจแ แแแแแ 36 แฌแแ แขแแแแ แแแแ แแ แแแก.
VTB Georgia Company Details
vtb-georgia
275 employees
6320
522
Banking
vtb.ge
Scan still pending
VTB_1433063
In-progress
VTB Georgia Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
VTB Georgia Global Score.png)
VTB Georgia Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
VTB Georgia Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTB Georgia | Cyber Attack | 100 | 6 | 12/2022 | VTB223071222 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the economy of a geographical regionDescription: VTB Bank, Russiaโs second-largest financial institution suffered a cyberattack after a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack caused its website and mobile apps to go down. The pro-Ukraine hacktivist group โIT Army of Ukraineโ claimed responsibility for the attack. The purpose of the attack was to cause inconvenience to the bankโs customers by hindering the banking services operations. | |||||||
VTB Georgia Company Subsidiaries
แแแแแแ แแแแแ แฃแแแแแ แกแแแฃแ แ แกแแแแแแ แแแกแขแแขแฃแขแแ, แ แแแแแแช แแแแฎแแแ แแแแแก แแแแแแแแ แแแ แแแแแ แชแแฃแแ แกแแแแแแ แแ แแแฃแฅแขแแแแก แกแ แฃแ แกแแแฅแขแ แก แกแแแแแแแแก. แแแแแ, แ แแแแ แช แแแแแแแก แกแแแ แแแจแแ แแกแ แคแแแแแกแฃแ แ แฏแแฃแคแแก แฌแแแ แ, แกแแฅแแ แแแแแแจแ แแแฆแแแ แกแขแแแแแ แขแแก แแแแกแแฎแฃแ แแแแก แกแแแแแแแแก แแกแฎแแแ แแแแแแแแแแก, แแชแแ แ แแ แกแแจแฃแแแ แแแแแแกแก แแ แคแแแแแฃแ แแแ แแแก. แแแแแแก แแแแจแแแแแแแแ แแ แแแ แแขแแขแก แฌแแ แแแแแแแแก แแฅแกแแแฃแแแฃแ แ แแแฆแแแขแแฅแแแแแแแฃแ แ แแ แแแฃแฅแขแแแแก แแ แแแแแแแแ แแแ แแแกแขแแแชแแฃแ แ แแแแกแแฎแฃแ แแแแก แจแแแแแแแแแ. แแแแแแแฃแ แ แกแแ แแแขแแแแ แกแแแแแแขแแก Standard and Poor`s -แแก แแแแ แแแแแแ แแแแแก แแแแแญแแแฃแแ แแฅแแก แ แแแขแแแแ BB-/B. แกแแฅแแ แแแแแแจแ แแแแแ 36 แฌแแ แขแแแแ แแแแ แแ แแแก.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
VTB Georgia Cyber Security News
Bosch secures VTB Arena Park with its video surveillance and access control systems
At an estimated cost of US$ 1.5 billion, the modern VTB Arena Park combines sports, entertainment, commercial and residential facilities. A first challengeย ...
VTB Georgia Similar Companies
Bank Saderat Iran
As a private bank , BSI was established in 1952 . with around 3000 active branches , BSI runs the largest banking network in Iran . In 2000 , BSI started offering electronic online services , and now pioneers in the number of online branches ATM . machines , and point of sale terminals with remarkab
Bank Pekao S.A.
Bank Pekao S.A. powstaล w 1929 roku. Obecnie jesteลmy jednฤ z najwiฤkszych instytucji finansowych w regionie Europy ลrodkowo-Wschodniej i drugim, pod wzglฤdem wielkoลci bankiem w Polsce z ok. 230 mld zล aktywรณw. Dziฤki znaczฤ cej sieci oddziaลรณw obsลugujemy ponad 5,7 mln klientรณw. Jako wiodฤ cy bank k
KeyBank
At KeyBank weโve made a promise to our clients that they will always have a champion in us. To deliver on our promise, weโre committed to building a team of engaged employees who do the right thing for our clients and shareholders, and help them achieve financial wellness each and every day. Headqu
Bank Mellat
Bank Mellat was established on 1979/12/20 by virtue of the resolution dated 1979/9/29 adopted by the General Assembly of Banks and pursuant to the provision of article 17 of the Bill on administering the Banks, with a paid up capital of Rls 33.5 bn as a merger of ten pre-revolution private banks com
Bank Mega
Perjalanan Bank Mega berawal pada tahun 1969, dengan nama PT Bank Karman di Surabaya. Kemudian bertransformasi menjadi Mega Bank pada tahun 1992, dan berpindah lokasi ke Jakarta. Pada tahun 1996, Chairul Tanjung dengan PARA GROUP, yang kini dikenal dengan CT Corpora, mengambil alih dan membuat gebra
UniCredit
UniCredit exists to empower communities to progress. To deliver for all our stakeholders across Europe and unlock the potential within each individual and community we serve. We are a pan-European bank: our 13 banks across the continent work together as one, leveraging the strength of the collectiv
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
VTB Georgia CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, VTB Georgia has faced 1 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as แแแแแแ แแแแแ แฃแแแแแ แกแแแฃแ แ แกแแแแแแ แแแกแขแแขแฃแขแแ, แ แแแแแแช แแแแฎแแแ แแแแแก แแแแแแแแ แแแ แแแแแ แชแแฃแแ แกแแแแแแ แแ แแแฃแฅแขแแแแก แกแ แฃแ แกแแแฅแขแ แก แกแแแแแแแแก. แแแแแ, แ แแแแ แช แแแแแแแก แกแแแ แแแจแแ แแกแ แคแแแแแกแฃแ แ แฏแแฃแคแแก แฌแแแ แ, แกแแฅแแ แแแแแแจแ แแแฆแแแ แกแขแแแแแ แขแแก แแแแกแแฎแฃแ แแแแก แกแแแแแแแแก แแกแฎแแแ แแแแแแแแแแก, แแชแแ แ แแ แกแแจแฃแแแ แแแแแแกแก แแ แคแแแแแฃแ แแแ แแแก. แแแแแแก แแแแจแแแแแแแแ แแ แแแ แแขแแขแก แฌแแ แแแแแแแแก แแฅแกแแแฃแแแฃแ แ แแแฆแแแขแแฅแแแแแแแฃแ แ แแ แแแฃแฅแขแแแแก แแ แแแแแแแแ แแแ แแแกแขแแแชแแฃแ แ แแแแกแแฎแฃแ แแแแก แจแแแแแแแแแ. แแแแแแแฃแ แ แกแแ แแแขแแแแ แกแแแแแแขแแก Standard and Poor`s -แแก แแแแ แแแแแแ แแแแแก แแแแแญแแแฃแแ แแฅแแก แ แแแขแแแแ BB-/B. แกแแฅแแ แแแแแแจแ แแแแแ 36 แฌแแ แขแแแแ แแแแ แแ แแแก..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
