Bank Saderat Iran Company Cyber Security Posture

bsi.ir

As a private bank , BSI was established in 1952 . with around 3000 active branches , BSI runs the largest banking network in Iran . In 2000 , BSI started offering electronic online services , and now pioneers in the number of online branches ATM . machines , and point of sale terminals with remarkable share of the market . With close to 60 years of banking experience, a deep sense of commitment to its basic principle and a full implementation of usury-free Islamic banking, BSI, as a credible popular bank always attempts to maintain its top position among other rivals through following the lead in international banking and customerโ€“oriented principles and offering quality banking services. In addition, BSI has a leading role in achieving customer satisfaction and developing the economy of our Islamic country. From the very beginning, BSI endeavored to encourage innovation in banking services in line with its customer โ€“ oriented marketing strategy . The first BSI overseas branch was established in Hamburg, Germany in 1961, which was followed by opening of other overseas branches Including London , Frankfurt , paris , Athens , Ashkabad , Muscat , Qatar , (2 branches ) , UAE ( 8 branches plus one Regional Office ) , Lebanon (5 branches plus one Regional Office ) . Now BSI has the full or partial ownership of 4subsidiaries and independent overseas bank including BSI , PLC in London . The overall BSI banking units currently stands at 25 . Although ,our overseas branches are providing retail banking services, their core business remains to be Trade Finance. In 2013.03.20 , BSI has IRR 22,906,142 million ( $ 1,868 million ) as share capital. Its capital adequacy ratio and profit was 7.87% and IRR 4,992,689 million ( $ 407 million ) respectively . At present, the capital of bank Saderat Iran has increased to IRR 57800 billion (USD 4.7 billion)

BSI Company Details

Linkedin ID:

bank-saderat-iran

Employees number:

10,001+ employees

Number of followers:

0

NAICS:

522

Industry Type:

Banking

Homepage:

bsi.ir

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

BAN_5874114

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreBSI Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 800 and 900

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

Ailogo

Bank Saderat Iran Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 800 and 900

Bank Saderat Iran Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
0
Attack Types
0
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView

Bank Saderat Iran Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

As a private bank , BSI was established in 1952 . with around 3000 active branches , BSI runs the largest banking network in Iran . In 2000 , BSI started offering electronic online services , and now pioneers in the number of online branches ATM . machines , and point of sale terminals with remarkable share of the market . With close to 60 years of banking experience, a deep sense of commitment to its basic principle and a full implementation of usury-free Islamic banking, BSI, as a credible popular bank always attempts to maintain its top position among other rivals through following the lead in international banking and customerโ€“oriented principles and offering quality banking services. In addition, BSI has a leading role in achieving customer satisfaction and developing the economy of our Islamic country. From the very beginning, BSI endeavored to encourage innovation in banking services in line with its customer โ€“ oriented marketing strategy . The first BSI overseas branch was established in Hamburg, Germany in 1961, which was followed by opening of other overseas branches Including London , Frankfurt , paris , Athens , Ashkabad , Muscat , Qatar , (2 branches ) , UAE ( 8 branches plus one Regional Office ) , Lebanon (5 branches plus one Regional Office ) . Now BSI has the full or partial ownership of 4subsidiaries and independent overseas bank including BSI , PLC in London . The overall BSI banking units currently stands at 25 . Although ,our overseas branches are providing retail banking services, their core business remains to be Trade Finance. In 2013.03.20 , BSI has IRR 22,906,142 million ( $ 1,868 million ) as share capital. Its capital adequacy ratio and profit was 7.87% and IRR 4,992,689 million ( $ 407 million ) respectively . At present, the capital of bank Saderat Iran has increased to IRR 57800 billion (USD 4.7 billion)

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=bank-saderat-iran' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

BSI Cyber Security News

2024-08-16T07:00:00.000Z
Reports of cyber attack on Iran's banks, false

Reports of a cyber attack targeting Iranian banks could be fake news, Ynet has learned. On Wednesday, Iranian opposition outlet Iranย ...

2023-08-14T07:00:00.000Z
Charming Kitten Targets Iranian Dissidents with Advanced Cyber Attacks

Germany's BfV warns of ongoing cyber attacks by Charming Kitten, targeting Iranians in Germany.

2023-11-30T08:00:00.000Z
Deluge of Nearly 300 Fake Apps Floods Iranian Banking Sector

No Iranian bank customers are safe from financially motivated cybercriminals wielding convincing but fake mobile apps.

2025-05-28T16:04:00.000Z
Banking Cyber Security Market Size and Outlook by Application, Type, and Geographic Scope

The banking cybersecurity market is experiencing rapid growth due to the increasing frequency and sophistication of cyber threats targetingย ...

2023-06-21T07:00:00.000Z
Iran and the GCC connectivity agenda: Implication for Washingtonโ€™s Iran policy

It can also reduce the threat to Israel, as both Iran and Israel become more connected to the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. In aย ...

2023-11-29T08:00:00.000Z
200+ Malicious Android Apps Targeting Iranian Banks: Experts Warn

A new report reveals an ongoing Android malware campaign targeting Iranian banks with over 200 malicious apps.

2023-12-01T08:00:00.000Z
Hundreds of Fake Apps Floods Iranian Banking Sector

A cybercampaign targeting customers of Iranian banks has grown in magnitude in recent months, with nearly 300 malicious Android appsย ...

2010-04-02T07:00:00.000Z
To Pressure Iran, the U.S. Leans on Dubai

The Obama Administration is hard at work courting Russian and Chinese support for toughening up the U.N. sanctions regime against Iran.

2012-04-17T07:00:00.000Z
Banking System Vulnerability - 3 million bank accounts hacked in Iran

Iran's Central Bank has announced that the electronic information of 3 million customers of 10 Iranian banks have been compromised.

similarCompanies

BSI Similar Companies

PT. BANK NEGARA INDONESIA (Persero) Tbk.

Since its establishment in 1946, BNI has been part of the dynamic of national development in Indonesia. Now BNI has grown and developed into a solid national bank with a sustainable financial performance. โ€˜Serving the Country, Pride of the Nationโ€, BNI continues to increase its contribution for the

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK

The dream started two decades ago by Mr. Sanjay Agarwal, a merit holder Chartered Accountant and a first generation entrepreneur, along with his proficient team. Together, the dexterous team embarked on a journey of excellence while enriching lives along the way. What started off as a dream to be

The People's Bank of China

The People's Bank of China (PBC) was established on December 1, 1948 based on the consolidation of the Huabei Bank, the Beihai Bank and the Xibei Farmer Bank. In September 1983, the State Council decided to have the PBC function as a central bank. The Law of the People's Republic of China on the Peo

Bank of Baroda

Founded in 1908 by Maharaja Sir Sayaji Rao Gaekwad III, Bank of Baroda is a top notch Public Sector Bank with a business of around Rs.10 trillion and network of 8100+ branches of which 105 overseas branches / offices are located in 17 countries excluding India spanning across Europe, US, Africa, As

BNP Paribas Fortis

At BNP Paribas Fortis, we strive to be a trusted financial companion for all our customers. No matter how big or small their dreams and challenges, we are there to help. As the go-to source for all things banking, our customers can count on us for reliable guidance. We are ready to help them make

Santander UK

Our purpose at Santander UK is to help people and businesses prosper. We are a leading financial services provider, offering a wide range of personal and commercial financial products and services, with around 15 million customers across our Retail and Corporate Businesses. ย  We have set ourselves a

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

BSI CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, BSI has faced 0 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, BSI has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as As a private bank , BSI was established in 1952 . with around 3000 active branches , BSI runs the largest banking network in Iran . In 2000 , BSI started offering electronic online services , and now pioneers in the number of online branches ATM . machines , and point of sale terminals with remarkable share of the market . With close to 60 years of banking experience, a deep sense of commitment to its basic principle and a full implementation of usury-free Islamic banking, BSI, as a credible popular bank always attempts to maintain its top position among other rivals through following the lead in international banking and customerโ€“oriented principles and offering quality banking services. In addition, BSI has a leading role in achieving customer satisfaction and developing the economy of our Islamic country. From the very beginning, BSI endeavored to encourage innovation in banking services in line with its customer โ€“ oriented marketing strategy . The first BSI overseas branch was established in Hamburg, Germany in 1961, which was followed by opening of other overseas branches Including London , Frankfurt , paris , Athens , Ashkabad , Muscat , Qatar , (2 branches ) , UAE ( 8 branches plus one Regional Office ) , Lebanon (5 branches plus one Regional Office ) . Now BSI has the full or partial ownership of 4subsidiaries and independent overseas bank including BSI , PLC in London . The overall BSI banking units currently stands at 25 . Although ,our overseas branches are providing retail banking services, their core business remains to be Trade Finance. In 2013.03.20 , BSI has IRR 22,906,142 million ( $ 1,868 million ) as share capital. Its capital adequacy ratio and profit was 7.87% and IRR 4,992,689 million ( $ 407 million ) respectively . At present, the capital of bank Saderat Iran has increased to IRR 57800 billion (USD 4.7 billion).

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge