Bank Pekao S.A. Company Cyber Security Posture
pekao.com.plBank Pekao S.A. powstał w 1929 roku. Obecnie jesteśmy jedną z największych instytucji finansowych w regionie Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej i drugim, pod względem wielkości bankiem w Polsce z ok. 230 mld zł aktywów. Dzięki znaczącej sieci oddziałów obsługujemy ponad 5,7 mln klientów. Jako wiodący bank korporacyjny współpracujemy z co drugą korporacją w Polsce. Status banku uniwersalnego opieramy na kluczowej na rynku pozycji w private banking, a także zarządzaniu aktywami i działalności maklerskiej. Zróżnicowany profil działalności Banku Pekao jest wspierany przez wiodący na rynku bilans i profil ryzyka odzwierciedlony w najniższych kosztach ryzyka, silnych wskaźnikach kapitałowych i odporności na warunki makroekonomiczne (jesteśmy w gronie trzech najbardziej odpornych wśród 48 banków w Europie w testach warunków skrajnych, przeprowadzonych przez EBA). Bank Polska Kasa Opieki Spółka Akcyjna z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Żubra 1, 01-066 Warszawa, wpisany do rejestru przedsiębiorców w Sądzie Rejonowym dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie, XIII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS: 0000014843, NIP: 526-00-06-841, REGON: 000010205, wysokość kapitału zakładowego i kapitału wpłaconego: 262 470 034 zł. Bank Pekao S.A., founded in 1929, is one of the largest financial institutions in the CEE region and top 3 universal bank in Poland with ca. PLN 200bn assets and market capitalization of ca. PLN 28bn. Through the second largest branch network, Bank Pekao serves over 5.5m retail customers. As the leading corporate bank in Poland, Bank Pekao serves every second among largest corporates in Poland. Status of a universal bank is underpinned by a market-leading private banking, asset management and brokerage operations.Bank Pekao S.A. has won many prestigious awards in Poland and internationally
BPS Company Details
bank-pekao
10,001+ employees
44690
522
Banking
pekao.com.pl
Scan still pending
BAN_2563524
In-progress
BPS Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
BPS Global Score.png)
Bank Pekao S.A. Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
Bank Pekao S.A. Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Bank Pekao S.A. Company Subsidiaries
Bank Pekao S.A. powstał w 1929 roku. Obecnie jesteśmy jedną z największych instytucji finansowych w regionie Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej i drugim, pod względem wielkości bankiem w Polsce z ok. 230 mld zł aktywów. Dzięki znaczącej sieci oddziałów obsługujemy ponad 5,7 mln klientów. Jako wiodący bank korporacyjny współpracujemy z co drugą korporacją w Polsce. Status banku uniwersalnego opieramy na kluczowej na rynku pozycji w private banking, a także zarządzaniu aktywami i działalności maklerskiej. Zróżnicowany profil działalności Banku Pekao jest wspierany przez wiodący na rynku bilans i profil ryzyka odzwierciedlony w najniższych kosztach ryzyka, silnych wskaźnikach kapitałowych i odporności na warunki makroekonomiczne (jesteśmy w gronie trzech najbardziej odpornych wśród 48 banków w Europie w testach warunków skrajnych, przeprowadzonych przez EBA). Bank Polska Kasa Opieki Spółka Akcyjna z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Żubra 1, 01-066 Warszawa, wpisany do rejestru przedsiębiorców w Sądzie Rejonowym dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie, XIII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS: 0000014843, NIP: 526-00-06-841, REGON: 000010205, wysokość kapitału zakładowego i kapitału wpłaconego: 262 470 034 zł. Bank Pekao S.A., founded in 1929, is one of the largest financial institutions in the CEE region and top 3 universal bank in Poland with ca. PLN 200bn assets and market capitalization of ca. PLN 28bn. Through the second largest branch network, Bank Pekao serves over 5.5m retail customers. As the leading corporate bank in Poland, Bank Pekao serves every second among largest corporates in Poland. Status of a universal bank is underpinned by a market-leading private banking, asset management and brokerage operations.Bank Pekao S.A. has won many prestigious awards in Poland and internationally
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
BPS Cyber Security News
PKO Bank Polski SA (PSZKF) Q3 2024 Earnings Call Highlights: Record Profits and Robust Growth ...
PKO Bank Polski SA (PSZKF) reports a strong quarter with significant customer growth and increased market share, despite facing ...
Poland - Factors to Watch June 4
The following are significant news stories, press reports and events on Wednesday. ALL TIMES GMT : INTEREST RATES On Wednesday, ...
The Raiffeisen Bank Cyber Attack Claimed By NoName Group
“We shut down the website of the Polish branch of Raiffeisen Bank,” the post of the NoName hacker group claimed. Raiffeisen Bank cyber attack. Pro- ...
Wealth Tech Awards 2025: Winners' profiles
“Siddhi seamlessly integrates digital efficiency with personalised engagement by automating routine tasks, providing real-time insights, and ...
Polish stock exchange, banks knocked offline by pro-Russian hackers
Just days after two bad actors were arrested for hacking into the Polish public railway system, it appears that pro-Russian hacktivists are now ...
Santander Open now supports transfers from non-SBP accounts
Santander Bank Polska customers can access Santander Open (the new payment initiation service) to send Elixir transfers from non-SBP accounts.
NoName Ups Cyber Attack On Spain At The Eve Of Elections
NoName has upped the cyber attack on Spain. Compounding the severity of the situation, the attacks coincided with the Spain elections day.
About inflation, ESG development strategy and social responsibility – says Paweł Strączyński, Vice President of Bank Pekao S.A. supervising the Financial Division
We finance huge investments related to the energy transformation. We want to be the bank of first choice in this area. In the case of smaller ...
BPS Similar Companies
BPER Banca
Da 150 anni scegliamo di crescere insieme alle persone che ci danno fiducia, nel territorio e per il territorio. BPER Banca oggi è una banca solida perché, forte delle proprie radici, è stata in grado di adattarsi ai cambiamenti facendone il proprio punto di forza. Dal 2009 ad oggi abbiamo affronta
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
Welkom op het LinkedIn-account van ABN AMRO. We staan 24/7 klaar om jouw vragen te beantwoorden. Onze taak is altijd om de klant te ondersteunen op het moment dat het er echt op aankomt. Dat is onze verantwoordelijkheid. Dat maakt ons relevant. En wat er vandaag de dag toe doet voor de klant is de
Bank of Baroda
Founded in 1908 by Maharaja Sir Sayaji Rao Gaekwad III, Bank of Baroda is a top notch Public Sector Bank with a business of around Rs.10 trillion and network of 8100+ branches of which 105 overseas branches / offices are located in 17 countries excluding India spanning across Europe, US, Africa, As
Nonghyup Bank
Nonghyup Bank is a banking company based out of 120 Tongil-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, South Korea. Show more Show less
Garanti BBVA
With a digitalization and people oriented vision, we contribute to our economy and society. We make great efforts to help you make the best financial decisions by offering you the opportunities of the future with our dynamic business model, pioneering technology and innovative products and services.
China CITIC Bank
Overview Thinking on the corporate banking of small and medium sized commercial banks • Ranked the 99th among 2008 Global Top 500 Financial Brands • Chen Xiaoxian, the Bank’s President, was granted “Top 10 Financial Figures” Award in the fourth consecutive year • Selection activity about the ranki
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
BPS CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, BPS has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, BPS has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Bank Pekao S.A. powstał w 1929 roku. Obecnie jesteśmy jedną z największych instytucji finansowych w regionie Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej i drugim, pod względem wielkości bankiem w Polsce z ok. 230 mld zł aktywów. Dzięki znaczącej sieci oddziałów obsługujemy ponad 5,7 mln klientów. Jako wiodący bank korporacyjny współpracujemy z co drugą korporacją w Polsce. Status banku uniwersalnego opieramy na kluczowej na rynku pozycji w private banking, a także zarządzaniu aktywami i działalności maklerskiej. Zróżnicowany profil działalności Banku Pekao jest wspierany przez wiodący na rynku bilans i profil ryzyka odzwierciedlony w najniższych kosztach ryzyka, silnych wskaźnikach kapitałowych i odporności na warunki makroekonomiczne (jesteśmy w gronie trzech najbardziej odpornych wśród 48 banków w Europie w testach warunków skrajnych, przeprowadzonych przez EBA). Bank Polska Kasa Opieki Spółka Akcyjna z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Żubra 1, 01-066 Warszawa, wpisany do rejestru przedsiębiorców w Sądzie Rejonowym dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie, XIII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS: 0000014843, NIP: 526-00-06-841, REGON: 000010205, wysokość kapitału zakładowego i kapitału wpłaconego: 262 470 034 zł. Bank Pekao S.A., founded in 1929, is one of the largest financial institutions in the CEE region and top 3 universal bank in Poland with ca. PLN 200bn assets and market capitalization of ca. PLN 28bn. Through the second largest branch network, Bank Pekao serves over 5.5m retail customers. As the leading corporate bank in Poland, Bank Pekao serves every second among largest corporates in Poland. Status of a universal bank is underpinned by a market-leading private banking, asset management and brokerage operations.Bank Pekao S.A. has won many prestigious awards in Poland and internationally.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
