TC
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
tiffany-and-co
Website:
Employees number:
10,681
Number of followers:
1,165,592
NAICS:
4483
Industry Type:
Homepage:
tiffany.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
TIF_1455496
Scan Status:
In-progress
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
Tiffany & Co. Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score
tiffany.comIn 1837 Charles Lewis Tiffany founded his company in New York City where his store was soon acclaimed as the palace of jewels for its exceptional gemstones. Since then TIFFANY & CO. has become synonymous with elegance, innovative design, fine craftsmanship and creative excellence. During the 20th century fame thrived worldwide with store network expansion and continuous cultural relevance, as exemplified by Truman Capote’s Breakfast at Tiffany’s and the film starring Audrey Hepburn. Today, with more than 13,000 employees, TIFFANY & CO. and its subsidiaries design, manufacture and market jewelry, watches and luxury accessories – including more than 5,000 skilled artisans who cut diamonds and craft jewelry in the Company’s workshops, realizing its commitment to superlative quality. The Company operates more than 300 TIFFANY & CO. retail stores worldwide as part of its omni-channel approach. To learn more about TIFFANY & CO. as well as its commitment to sustainability, please visit tiffany.com.
Tiffany & Co. A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
TC Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 0 and 549
TC
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
TC Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
TC
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
TC Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
3
Attack Types
1
SalesforceTiffany Korea, Louis Vuitton Korea and Christian Dior Couture Korea: Korean units of Louis Vuitton, Dior, Tiffany fined $24.9 mil. over customer data leaks
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: South Korea Fines Luxury Brands $24.9M for Major Data Breaches South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) has imposed a combined 36 billion won ($24.9 million) in fines on the Korean subsidiaries of Louis Vuitton, Dior, and Tiffany for failing to protect customer data from cyberattacks. Louis Vuitton Korea received the largest penalty 21.4 billion won after hackers breached its systems on three occasions, exposing the personal data of 3.6 million customers, including names, phone numbers, and birth dates. The PIPC cited poor security practices for remote logins, which allowed an external actor to compromise an employee device. Christian Dior Couture Korea was fined 12.2 billion won following a breach affecting 1.95 million users, where employees were tricked into granting system access to malicious actors. The company remained unaware of the incident for three months. Meanwhile, Tiffany Korea faced a 2.4 billion won fine after a breach exposed the data of 4,600 customers, including names and email addresses. In a separate case, the PIPC penalized BKR (Burger King Korea) 924 million won for illegally collecting personal data from minors under 13 without guardian consent. MGC Global (Mega MGC Coffee) was fined 642 million won for sending unsolicited marketing messages to customers who had not opted in. Additionally, eight other food and beverage companies were fined for violating data protection laws. The penalties highlight growing regulatory scrutiny over corporate data security and compliance with South Korea’s privacy laws.
Tiffany & Co.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: On or around May 12, 2025, Tiffany & Co., a luxury jewelry retailer, suffered a cybersecurity breach after a threat actor ('Market Exchange') infiltrated its systems. The attack exposed personally identifiable information (PII) of at least 2,590 confirmed individuals, including names, addresses, emails, phone numbers, sales transactions, client reference numbers, and Tiffany gift card details (with PINs). The actor later claimed possession of a broader database containing records of ~720,000 high-spending U.S. customers, predominantly women. The breach was disclosed to authorities and affected individuals in September 2025, with notifications sent via mail. While no financial fraud was immediately reported, the exposure of gift card PINs and detailed customer profiles poses risks of identity theft, phishing, and unauthorized transactions. Tiffany & Co. engaged cybersecurity experts and law enforcement but did not confirm whether ransomware or additional system compromises (e.g., operational disruption) occurred. The incident highlights vulnerabilities in customer data protection within high-end retail.
Japan Airlines, Tiffany, Dior, Volvo Group and Louis Vuitton: South Korea fines Louis Vuitton, Dior and Tiffany $24.9 million over customer data breaches
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: South Korea Fines Luxury Brands $24.9 Million Over Data Breaches South Korea’s privacy regulator has levied fines totaling 36 billion won ($24.9 million) against the Korean subsidiaries of Louis Vuitton, Dior, and Tiffany following separate data breaches that exposed millions of customers’ personal information. The penalties stem from investigations confirming unauthorized access to sensitive customer data, though specific details on the breaches’ scope and timing remain undisclosed. The fines highlight growing regulatory scrutiny over data protection in South Korea, where authorities are enforcing stricter compliance with privacy laws. The incident underscores the financial and reputational risks for global brands handling large-scale consumer data. In related cybersecurity developments, Japan Airlines reported that up to 28,000 customers were affected by unauthorized access to its baggage service system, while Volvo Group disclosed that 16,991 employees were impacted as part of a broader Conduent data breach, which has now exposed 25 million individuals. These incidents reflect the escalating threat landscape for both corporate and personal data security.
TC Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for TC
Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Average (This Year)
Tiffany & Co. has 60.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Tiffany & Co. has 14.53% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types TC vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Avg (This Year)
Tiffany & Co. reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — TC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
TC Company Subsidiaries
In 1837 Charles Lewis Tiffany founded his company in New York City where his store was soon acclaimed as the palace of jewels for its exceptional gemstones. Since then TIFFANY & CO. has become synonymous with elegance, innovative design, fine craftsmanship and creative excellence. During the 20th century fame thrived worldwide with store network expansion and continuous cultural relevance, as exemplified by Truman Capote’s Breakfast at Tiffany’s and the film starring Audrey Hepburn. Today, with more than 13,000 employees, TIFFANY & CO. and its subsidiaries design, manufacture and market jewelry, watches and luxury accessories – including more than 5,000 skilled artisans who cut diamonds and craft jewelry in the Company’s workshops, realizing its commitment to superlative quality. The Company operates more than 300 TIFFANY & CO. retail stores worldwide as part of its omni-channel approach. To learn more about TIFFANY & CO. as well as its commitment to sustainability, please visit tiffany.com.
Loading...
TC Similar Companies
Gucci
Founded in Florence, Italy in 1921, Gucci is one of the world’s leading luxury brands. Following the House’s centenary, Gucci forges ahead continuing to redefine fashion and luxury while celebrating creativity, Italian craftsmanship, and innovation. Gucci is part of the global luxury group Kering,
Christian Dior Couture
Welcome to Christian Dior Couture, House of Dreams, House of Talents. Christian Dior was the designer of dreams. In founding his House in 1947, marked by the revolution of the New Look, he metamorphosed his reveries into wonderful creations. His visionary spirit never ceased to make Clients all ove
Chanel is a private company and world leader in creating, manufacturing and distributing luxury products, including Ready-to-Wear, Accessories, Fragrances, Makeup, Skincare, Jewellery and Watches. Founded by Gabrielle Chanel in 1910, the House remains dedicated to exceptional craftsmanship and offer
Prada Group
Pioneer of a dialogue with contemporary society across diverse cultural spheres and an influential leader in luxury fashion, Prada Group founds its identity on essential values such as creative independence, transformation, and sustainable development, offering its brands a shared vision to interpre
Kering is a global, family-led luxury group, home to people whose passion and expertise nurture creative Houses across ready-to-wear and couture, leather goods, jewelry, eyewear and beauty: Gucci, Saint Laurent, Bottega Veneta, Balenciaga, McQueen, Brioni, Boucheron, Pomellato, Dodo, Qeelin, Ginori
Louis Vuitton
For more than 150 years, men and women at Louis Vuitton have shared the same spirit of excellence and passion, reaffirming their expertise every day, the world over. With us, every career is a journey, filled with excitement and challenge, desire and daring. There is no better way to reveal your pot
Swatch Group
Swatch Group is the world's number one manufacturer of finished watches. With its 16 watch brands, the Group is present in all price segments, and is also active in the manufacture and sale of jewelry, watch movements and components. Swatch Group unites, among other companies, the following watch b
Cartier
A reference in the world of luxury, Cartier, whose name is synonymous with open-mindedness and curiosity, stands out with its creations and finds beauty wherever it may lie. The Maison has several areas of expression. From jewelry to high jewelry, from watchmaking to fragrances and leather goods an
LVMH is the world leader in luxury. A family group founded in 1987 and headed by Chairman and CEO Bernard Arnault, LVMH is now home to 75 iconic Maisons, which embody a distinctive art de vivre blending heritage and modernity. With reported sales of 86.2 billion euros in 2023 and 6000 stores around
.png)
TC CyberSecurity News
April 03, 2026 02:53 AM
'Byeon Yo-han ♥' Tiffany, happy news after marriage.."Waiting for that moment"
Girls' Generation member and actor Tiffany Young is taking more active steps after getting married.On the 3rd, Tiffany posted a message and...
April 03, 2026 01:31 AM
Byun Yo-han ♥ Girls' Generation's response to Tiffany's marriage.."There's a member who cried" [I'm cold-hearted]
Tiffany unveils wedding-related Girls' Generation reaction.Tiffany and Hyoyeon of Girls' Generation will appear on JTBC's entertainment...
April 03, 2026 12:57 AM
Tiffany Fell
Apr 2, 2026; 11 mins ago; 0 · Facebook · Twitter · WhatsApp · SMS · Email; Print; Copy article link; Save. Tiffany Fell.
April 03, 2026 12:10 AM
sns cosmetics SNS Pro Dipping & Acrylic Powder - Tiffany Blue Collection - 027 CS-23 SHE_S A HOT TAMALE
Cosmetics / Sns Cosmetics / sns cosmetics SNS Pro Dipping & Acrylic Powder - Tiffany Blue Collection - 027 CS-23 SHE_S A HOT TAMALE New Arrivals.
April 02, 2026 11:59 PM
Tiffany Young, Newlywed with Byun Yo-han, Cast in Musical "Yumi's Cells"
Tiffany Young, who recently registered her marriage with actor Byun Yo-han and became the first Girls' Generation member to get married,...
April 02, 2026 11:53 PM
Tiffany Young, Girls' Generation's first married member, ties the knot with Byun Yo-han... Hyoyeon jokes, “It’s a relief she even got married” (Please Take Care of My Refrigerator)
Tiffany Young, the first member of Girls' Generation to get married, shares her thoughts on marrying actor Byun Yo-han.
April 02, 2026 11:04 PM
sns cosmetics SNS Pro Gel Nail Polish Duo - Tiffany Blue Collection - 068 BO262 PURPLISH ROYALS
Cosmetics / Sns Cosmetics / sns cosmetics SNS Pro Gel Nail Polish Duo - Tiffany Blue Collection - 068 BO262 PURPLISH ROYALS on Sale.
April 02, 2026 09:46 PM
Tiffany Young Signs with Pacific Music Group, New Music Planned for 2026
Pacific Music Group (PMG), the Pan-Asian global music and entertainment company founded by NE-YO, Sonu Nigam, MC Jin, and veteran executive...
April 02, 2026 09:09 PM
Walter Ronald Vore Obituary (2026) - Armada, MI - Tiffany-Young-Hauss Modetz Chapel
Obituary published on Legacy.com by Tiffany-Young-Hauss Modetz Chapel on Apr. 2, 2026. Obituary to follow. To plant trees in memory, please visit the...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
TC CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Tiffany & Co.
The official website of Tiffany & Co. is http://www.tiffany.com.
Tiffany & Co.’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Tiffany & Co.’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 493, reflecting their Critical security posture.
How many security badges does Tiffany & Co.’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Tiffany & Co. currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has Tiffany & Co. been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, Tiffany & Co. has been affected by multiple supply chain cyber incidents. The affected supply chain sources and their corresponding incident IDs are:
- Salesforce (Incident ID: TIFLVMCHR1770865579)
- Salesforce (Incident ID: LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674)
Does Tiffany & Co. have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Tiffany & Co. is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Tiffany & Co. have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Tiffany & Co. does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Tiffany & Co. comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Tiffany & Co. is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Tiffany & Co. have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Tiffany & Co. does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Tiffany & Co. comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Tiffany & Co. is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Tiffany & Co. have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Tiffany & Co. is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Tiffany & Co.
Tiffany & Co. operates primarily in the Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry industry.
Number of Employees at Tiffany & Co.
Tiffany & Co. employs approximately 10,681 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Tiffany & Co.
Tiffany & Co. presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Tiffany & Co.’s LinkedIn Followers
Tiffany & Co.’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 1,165,592 followers.
NAICS Classification of Tiffany & Co.
Tiffany & Co. is classified under the NAICS code 4483, which corresponds to Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores.
Tiffany & Co.’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Tiffany & Co. does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Tiffany & Co.’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Tiffany & Co. maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tiffany-and-co.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Tiffany & Co.
As of April 03, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Tiffany & Co. has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Tiffany & Co. has an estimated 1,423 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Tiffany & Co. ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Tiffany & Co. ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $72 billion.
How does Tiffany & Co. detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with cybersecurity experts engaged, and and communication strategy with mail notifications to impacted individuals (sent 2025-09-16), communication strategy with disclosure to maine attorney general's office (2025-09-16)..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Tiffany & Co. Customer and Gift Card Data Breach (2025)
Description: On or around May 12, 2025, Tiffany and Company, an American luxury jewelry and specialty design house, experienced a significant cybersecurity incident. An investigation determined that a cybercriminal gained unauthorized access to sensitive customer and gift card data, compromising personally identifiable information (PII) of at least 2,590 individuals. The exposed data included customer names, addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, sales transactions, internal client reference numbers, and Tiffany gift card numbers with PINs. A threat actor known as 'Market Exchange' claimed responsibility, alleging possession of a database containing information on approximately 720,000 high-spending female consumers in the U.S.
Date Detected: 2025-05-12
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-09-16
Type: Data Breach
Threat Actor: Market Exchange
Title: South Korea Fines Luxury Brands for Major Data Breaches
Description: South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) imposed fines totaling 36 billion won ($24.9 million) on the Korean subsidiaries of Louis Vuitton, Dior, and Tiffany for failing to protect customer data from cyberattacks. Louis Vuitton Korea was fined 21.4 billion won after hackers breached its systems three times, exposing 3.6 million customers' data. Dior Korea was fined 12.2 billion won for a breach affecting 1.95 million users, and Tiffany Korea was fined 2.4 billion won for exposing 4,600 customers' data.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: PhishingCompromised Employee Device
Vulnerability Exploited: Poor security practices for remote logins
Threat Actor: External Actor
Title: South Korea Fines Luxury Brands Over Data Breaches
Description: South Korea’s privacy regulator has levied fines totaling 36 billion won ($24.9 million) against the Korean subsidiaries of Louis Vuitton, Dior, and Tiffany following separate data breaches that exposed millions of customers’ personal information.
Type: Data Breach
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TIF5392553091725
Data Compromised: Customer names, Addresses, Email addresses, Phone numbers, Sales transactions, Internal client reference numbers, Tiffany gift card numbers with pins
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational harm due to exposure of high-profile customer data
Identity Theft Risk: High (PII and gift card details exposed)
Payment Information Risk: Moderate (gift card numbers with PINs exposed)
Incident : Data Breach TIFLVMCHR1770865579
Financial Loss: 36 billion won ($24.9 million) in fines
Identity Theft Risk: True
Incident : Data Breach LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674
Financial Loss: 36 billion won ($24.9 million) in fines
Data Compromised: Personal information of millions of customers
Brand Reputation Impact: Reputational risks for global brands
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $24.00 billion.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Gift Card Data (Numbers With Pins), Sales Transaction Records, , Names, Phone Numbers, Birth Dates, Email Addresses, and Personal information.
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TIF5392553091725
Entity Name: Tiffany & Co.
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Luxury Retail (Jewelry)
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 2,590 (confirmed); 720,000 (claimed by threat actor)
Incident : Data Breach TIFLVMCHR1770865579
Entity Name: Louis Vuitton Korea
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Luxury Retail
Location: South Korea
Customers Affected: 3.6 million
Incident : Data Breach TIFLVMCHR1770865579
Entity Name: Christian Dior Couture Korea
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Luxury Retail
Location: South Korea
Customers Affected: 1.95 million
Incident : Data Breach TIFLVMCHR1770865579
Entity Name: Tiffany Korea
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Luxury Retail
Location: South Korea
Customers Affected: 4,600
Incident : Data Breach LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674
Entity Name: Louis Vuitton Korea
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Luxury Retail
Location: South Korea
Customers Affected: Millions
Incident : Data Breach LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674
Entity Name: Dior Korea
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Luxury Retail
Location: South Korea
Customers Affected: Millions
Incident : Data Breach LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674
Entity Name: Tiffany Korea
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Luxury Retail
Location: South Korea
Customers Affected: Millions
Incident : Data Breach LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674
Entity Name: Japan Airlines
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Aviation
Location: Japan
Customers Affected: 28,000
Incident : Data Breach LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674
Entity Name: Volvo Group
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Automotive
Customers Affected: 16,991 employees
Incident : Data Breach LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674
Entity Name: Conduent
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Business Process Services
Customers Affected: 25 million individuals
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TIF5392553091725
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Cybersecurity experts engaged
Communication Strategy: Mail notifications to impacted individuals (sent 2025-09-16)Disclosure to Maine Attorney General's office (2025-09-16)
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Cybersecurity experts engaged.
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach TIF5392553091725
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Gift card data (numbers with pins), Sales transaction records
Number of Records Exposed: 2,590 (confirmed); 720,000 (claimed)
Sensitivity of Data: High (PII + financial transaction data)
Incident : Data Breach TIFLVMCHR1770865579
Type of Data Compromised: Names, Phone numbers, Birth dates, Email addresses
Number of Records Exposed: 3.6 million, 1.95 million, 4,600
Sensitivity of Data: Personally Identifiable Information (PII)
Incident : Data Breach LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach TIF5392553091725
Data Exfiltration: True
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TIF5392553091725
Regulatory Notifications: authority: Maine Attorney General's Office, date: 2025-09-16
Incident : Data Breach TIFLVMCHR1770865579
Regulations Violated: South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act
Fines Imposed: 36 billion won ($24.9 million)
Incident : Data Breach LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674
Regulations Violated: South Korea privacy laws
Fines Imposed: 36 billion won ($24.9 million)
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674
Lessons Learned: Growing regulatory scrutiny over data protection in South Korea and stricter compliance enforcement.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach TIF5392553091725
Recommendations: Monitor financial accounts and credit reports for signs of identity theft, Consider placing fraud alerts or credit freezes with major credit bureaus, Be cautious of unsolicited emails or phone calls requesting personal informationMonitor financial accounts and credit reports for signs of identity theft, Consider placing fraud alerts or credit freezes with major credit bureaus, Be cautious of unsolicited emails or phone calls requesting personal informationMonitor financial accounts and credit reports for signs of identity theft, Consider placing fraud alerts or credit freezes with major credit bureaus, Be cautious of unsolicited emails or phone calls requesting personal information
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Growing regulatory scrutiny over data protection in South Korea and stricter compliance enforcement.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TIF5392553091725
Source: Tiffany & Co. Official Website
Incident : Data Breach TIF5392553091725
Source: Maine Attorney General's Office Disclosure
Date Accessed: 2025-09-16
Incident : Data Breach TIF5392553091725
Source: Dark Web Marketplace Posting by 'Market Exchange'
Date Accessed: 2025-07-07
Incident : Data Breach TIFLVMCHR1770865579
Source: Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC)
Incident : Data Breach LOUPARVOLTIFJAP1770908674
Source: Cyber Incident Description
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Tiffany & Co. Official Website, and Source: Maine Attorney General's Office DisclosureDate Accessed: 2025-09-16, and Source: Dark Web Marketplace Posting by 'Market Exchange'Date Accessed: 2025-07-07, and Source: Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC), and Source: Cyber Incident Description.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TIF5392553091725
Investigation Status: Completed (as of 2025-09-09)
Incident : Data Breach TIFLVMCHR1770865579
Investigation Status: Completed
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Mail Notifications To Impacted Individuals (Sent 2025-09-16) and Disclosure To Maine Attorney General'S Office (2025-09-16).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TIF5392553091725
Customer Advisories: Review notices from Tiffany & Co.Monitor for identity theftConsider credit freezes/fraud alerts
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Review Notices From Tiffany & Co., Monitor For Identity Theft, Consider Credit Freezes/Fraud Alerts and .
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TIF5392553091725
High Value Targets: High-spending female consumers (per threat actor claim)
Data Sold on Dark Web: High-spending female consumers (per threat actor claim)
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TIFLVMCHR1770865579
Root Causes: Poor Security Practices For Remote Logins, Phishing Attacks,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Cybersecurity experts engaged.
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Market Exchange and External Actor.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-05-12.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-09-16.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Customer names, Addresses, Email addresses, Phone numbers, Sales transactions, Internal client reference numbers, Tiffany gift card numbers with PINs, , and Personal information of millions of customers.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was Cybersecurity experts engaged.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Phone numbers, Addresses, Personal information of millions of customers, Sales transactions, Internal client reference numbers, Tiffany gift card numbers with PINs, Email addresses and Customer names.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 6.3M.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation ?
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was 36 billion won ($24.9 million), 36 billion won ($24.9 million).
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Growing regulatory scrutiny over data protection in South Korea and stricter compliance enforcement.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Be cautious of unsolicited emails or phone calls requesting personal information, Consider placing fraud alerts or credit freezes with major credit bureaus and Monitor financial accounts and credit reports for signs of identity theft.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Tiffany & Co. Official Website, Maine Attorney General's Office Disclosure, Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC), Cyber Incident Description and Dark Web Marketplace Posting by 'Market Exchange'.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Completed (as of 2025-09-09).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Review notices from Tiffany & Co.Monitor for identity theftConsider credit freezes/fraud alerts.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
A vulnerability was found in Nothings stb up to 1.26. Impacted is the function stbtt_InitFont_internal in the library stb_truetype.h of the component TTF File Handler. Performing a manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read in VS6ComFile!get_macro_mem_COM. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain a stack-based buffer overflow in VS6ComFile!CSaveData::_conv_AnimationItem. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to arbitrary code execution on the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6MemInIF!set_temp_type_default. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6ComFile!load_link_inf. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=tiffany-and-co' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
