Comparison Overview

Tiffany & Co.

VS

Gucci

Tiffany & Co.

727 5th Ave, New York, 10022, US
Last Update: 2026-04-02
View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.tiffany.com

In 1837 Charles Lewis Tiffany founded his company in New York City where his store was soon acclaimed as the palace of jewels for its exceptional gemstones. Since then TIFFANY & CO. has become synonymous with elegance, innovative design, fine craftsmanship and creative excellence. During the 20th century fame thrived worldwide with store network expansion and continuous cultural relevance, as exemplified by Truman Capote’s Breakfast at Tiffany’s and the film starring Audrey Hepburn. Today, with more than 13,000 employees, TIFFANY & CO. and its subsidiaries design, manufacture and market jewelry, watches and luxury accessories – including more than 5,000 skilled artisans who cut diamonds and craft jewelry in the Company’s workshops, realizing its commitment to superlative quality. The Company operates more than 300 TIFFANY & CO. retail stores worldwide as part of its omni-channel approach. To learn more about TIFFANY & CO. as well as its commitment to sustainability, please visit tiffany.com.

NAICS: 4483
NAICS Definition: Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores
Employees: 10,681
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Gucci

Via Don Lorenzo Perosi, 6, Casellina di Scandicci, 50018, IT
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 800 and 849
https://careers.gucci.com/

Founded in Florence, Italy in 1921, Gucci is one of the world’s leading luxury brands. Following the House’s centenary, Gucci forges ahead continuing to redefine fashion and luxury while celebrating creativity, Italian craftsmanship, and innovation. Gucci is part of the global luxury group Kering, which manages renowned Houses in fashion, leather goods, jewelry, and eyewear. Discover more about Gucci at www.gucci.com.

NAICS: 4483
NAICS Definition: Jewelry, Luggage, and Leather Goods Stores
Employees: 19,535
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tiffany-and-co.jpeg
Tiffany & Co.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gucci.jpeg
Gucci
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tiffany & Co.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gucci
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Average (This Year)

Tiffany & Co. has 60.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gucci in 2026.

Incident History — Tiffany & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tiffany & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gucci (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gucci cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tiffany-and-co.jpeg
Tiffany & Co.
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing, Compromised Employee Device
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gucci.jpeg
Gucci
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Credential Theft (Salesforce Logins), Social Engineering
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Exfiltration for Secondary Exploitation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Cloud Account (Salesforce), Credential Theft/Phishing (likely)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransom Demand), Data Theft for Resale
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Gucci company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tiffany & Co. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tiffany & Co. company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Gucci company.

In the current year, Tiffany & Co. company has reported more cyber incidents than Gucci company.

Neither Gucci company nor Tiffany & Co. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Gucci company and Tiffany & Co. company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Gucci company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Tiffany & Co. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Tiffany & Co. company nor Gucci company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tiffany & Co. nor Gucci holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gucci company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Tiffany & Co. company.

Gucci company employs more people globally than Tiffany & Co. company, reflecting its scale as a Retail Luxury Goods and Jewelry.

Neither Tiffany & Co. nor Gucci holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tiffany & Co. nor Gucci holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tiffany & Co. nor Gucci holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tiffany & Co. nor Gucci holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tiffany & Co. nor Gucci holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tiffany & Co. nor Gucci holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References