Sutter Health
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
sutter-health
Website:
Employees number:
25,099
Number of followers:
214,387
NAICS:
62
Industry Type:
Homepage:
sutterhealth.org
IP Addresses:
120
Company ID:
SUT_1275121
Scan Status:
Completed
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
Sutter Health Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score
sutterhealth.orgSutter Health is a not-for-profit, people-centered healthcare system providing comprehensive care throughout California. Sutter Health is committed to innovative, high-quality patient care and community partnerships, and innovative, high-quality patient care. Today, Sutter Health is pursuing a bold new plan to reach more people and make excellent healthcare more connected and accessible. The health system’s 57,000+ staff and clinicians and 12,000+ affiliated physicians currently serve more than 3 million patients with a focus on expanding opportunities to serve patients, people and communities better. Sutter Health provides exceptional, affordable care through its hospitals, medical groups, ambulatory surgery centers, urgent care clinics, telehealth, home health and hospice services. Dedicated to transforming healthcare, at Sutter Health, getting better never stops. Learn more about how Sutter Health is transforming healthcare at sutterhealth.org and vitals.sutterhealth.org.
Sutter Health A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Sutter Health Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 650 and 699
Sutter Health
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Sutter Health Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Sutter Health
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Sutter Health Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
5
Attack Types
1
Sutter Health, Lemonaid Health, & Redeemer Health Settle Pixel Data Breach Lawsuits
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Sutter Health, Lemonaid Health, and Redeemer Health Settle Pixel Data Breach Lawsuits Three healthcare providers Sutter Health, Lemonaid Health, and Redeemer Health have reached settlements in class action lawsuits alleging unauthorized disclosures of patient data via website tracking technologies, including pixels, cookies, and web beacons. These tools, commonly used for analytics and marketing, were accused of transmitting protected health information (PHI) to third parties like Meta and Google without proper consent or compliance with HIPAA regulations. Sutter Health The California-based nonprofit health system faced consolidated lawsuits (*Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II v. Sutter Health*) over claims that its website and patient portal shared PHI with third parties. The case proceeded on allegations of violating the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and breaching express and implied contracts. A $21.5 million settlement was approved, with no admission of wrongdoing. Class members California residents who accessed Sutter’s MyHealthOnline portal between June 10, 2020, and March 20, 2020 may receive up to $90 each. Remaining funds will go to privacy-focused nonprofits. The final fairness hearing is set for February 27, 2026, with a claim deadline of January 28, 2026. Lemonaid Health The telemedicine provider, owned by 23andMe, settled a lawsuit (*A.J. v. Lemonaid Health*) alleging its website shared PHI with Meta and Google via tracking pixels. The case was transferred to bankruptcy court after the defendants filed for Chapter 11. A $3.25 million settlement fund was established, with approximately 35,000 class members eligible for one-time payments. The final fairness hearing is scheduled for January 20, 2026, with objections due by January 5, 2026, and claims by February 23, 2026. Redeemer Health The Pennsylvania-based Catholic healthcare provider settled consolidated lawsuits (*Doe v. Redeemer Health*) over allegations that its websites and patient portals transmitted PHI to third parties without consent. The settlement offers class members a $25 cash payment and a year of dark web monitoring via CyEx Privacy Shield Pro. The final approval hearing is set for February 9, 2026, with claims due by January 9, 2026. All three cases highlight the risks of tracking technologies in healthcare, where PHI exposure can lead to legal and regulatory scrutiny. The settlements reflect ongoing concerns over compliance with HIPAA and state privacy laws.
Sutter Health
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The U.S. healthcare services business Welltok revealed a data breach that affected around 8.5 million patients. The business was one among the targets of a widespread hacking campaign that took advantage of a zero-day vulnerability in the MOVEit Transfer programme. The exposed information includes patient information, including phone numbers, physical addresses, email addresses, and full names. Threat actors also obtained specific health insurance details, Medicare/Medicaid ID numbers, and Social Security numbers (SSNs) for some of the affected individuals. The following organisations, on behalf of which Welltok is delivering notice to affected individuals, are Asuris Northwest Health, BridgeSpan Health, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Corewell Health, Faith Regional Health Services, Mass General, Brigham Health Plan, Priority Health, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon, Regence BlueShield, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah, Regence Blue Shield of Idaho, St. Bernards Healthcare, and Sutter Health.
Sutter Health
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General disclosed a data breach affecting Sutter Health, a major healthcare provider, on November 3, 2023. The incident originated on May 30, 2023, when an unidentified threat actor exploited a vulnerability in the MOVEit Transfer server, a third-party file transfer tool used by the organization. The attacker successfully exfiltrated sensitive personal data, including patient names and other personally identifiable information (PII). While the breach exposed confidential records, no evidence of misuse or further malicious activity (e.g., financial fraud, identity theft, or ransom demands) has been reported as of the disclosure.The breach highlights vulnerabilities in third-party software supply chains, which cybercriminals increasingly target to access high-value data. Sutter Health, which operates a network of hospitals and medical facilities, likely faced operational and reputational risks due to the exposure of patient data, though the immediate financial or systemic impact appears contained. The incident aligns with broader trends in healthcare cyberattacks, where protected health information (PHI) remains a prime target for exploitation in underground markets or follow-on attacks. Regulatory scrutiny and potential compliance penalties (e.g., under HIPAA) may follow, given the sensitive nature of the compromised data.
Sutter Health
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: A Sutter Health employees were fired for accessing medical information without permission. However, they declined to state how many employees were fired and whose medical records they allegedly looked up. Their privacy auditing and monitoring technology have detected inappropriate access, and the individuals involved are no longer employed by Sutter Health. They are notifying the person, or persons, whose data was accessed.
Sutter Health
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: On February 7, 2018, the California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Sutter Health that occurred on October 11-12, 2017. The breach was the result of a phishing attack on a vendor, Salem and Green, allowing unauthorized access to personal information, including names, Social Security numbers, and California driver’s license numbers, for individuals affiliated with Sutter Health.
Sutter Health Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Sutter Health
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sutter Health in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sutter Health in 2026.
Incident Types Sutter Health vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sutter Health in 2026.
Incident History — Sutter Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sutter Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Sutter Health Company Subsidiaries
Sutter Health is a not-for-profit, people-centered healthcare system providing comprehensive care throughout California. Sutter Health is committed to innovative, high-quality patient care and community partnerships, and innovative, high-quality patient care. Today, Sutter Health is pursuing a bold new plan to reach more people and make excellent healthcare more connected and accessible. The health system’s 57,000+ staff and clinicians and 12,000+ affiliated physicians currently serve more than 3 million patients with a focus on expanding opportunities to serve patients, people and communities better. Sutter Health provides exceptional, affordable care through its hospitals, medical groups, ambulatory surgery centers, urgent care clinics, telehealth, home health and hospice services. Dedicated to transforming healthcare, at Sutter Health, getting better never stops. Learn more about how Sutter Health is transforming healthcare at sutterhealth.org and vitals.sutterhealth.org.
Loading...
Sutter Health Similar Companies
UMC Utrecht
The University Medical Center Utrecht is one of the largest academic healthcare institutions in the Netherlands. We provide the best healthcare for today’s patients, and we also work towards a healthy society in the future. Our organization has three core tasks: care, research and education. Ca
Helios Health GmbH
Based on our extensive expertise and know how we seek to ensure high quality, efficient and patient focused healthcare, locally as well as within an international environment. For this purpose Helios Health was founded in 2017. Helios Health combines Helios Germany (Helios Kliniken) and Helios Spa
Ministry Of Health, Malaysia (KKM)
The Ministry of Health (Malay: Kementerian Kesihatan), abbreviated MOH, is a ministry of the Government of Malaysia that is responsible for health system: health behavior, cancer, public health, health management, medical research, health systems research, respiratory medicine, health promotion, hea
UnitedHealth Group is a health care and well-being company with a mission to help people live healthier lives and help make the health system work better for everyone. We are 340,000 colleagues in two distinct and complementary businesses working to help build a modern, high-performing health syste
Texas Children's Hospital
Texas Children’s Hospital is a world-class pediatric facility, nationally recognized as a top children’s hospital, and voted one of the best places to work in Houston for nine years running. We’re committed to creating a healthy community for children by providing the best pediatric care possible, t
Fairview Health Services
Fairview Health Services is Minnesota’s choice for healthcare. We’re an industry-leading, award-winning, nonprofit offering a full network of healthcare services. Our broad network is designed to be ready for our patients’ every need, while delivering quality care with compassion. Our care portfoli
Ochsner Health
Ochsner Health is the leading nonprofit healthcare provider in Louisiana, Mississippi and across the Gulf South, delivering expert care at its 47 hospitals and more than 370 health and urgent care centers. Ochsner is nationally recognized for inspiring healthier lives and stronger communities thro
Emory Healthcare
Emory Healthcare is the most comprehensive health care system in Georgia. We offer 11 hospitals, the Emory Clinic, more than 250 provider locations, and more than 2,800 physicians specializing in 70 different medical subspecialties. Meaning we can provide treatments and services that may not be avai
Siemens Healthineers is a leading medtech company with over 125 years of experience. We pioneer breakthroughs in healthcare. For everyone. Everywhere. Sustainably. Our portfolio, spanning in vitro and in vivo diagnostics to image-guided therapy and cancer care, is crucial for clinical decision-makin
.png)
Sutter Health CyberSecurity News
March 18, 2026 04:28 AM
Sutter Health plans to acquire Allina Health in $26B mega-merger
They're looking to create a 39-hospital system. Allina would join Sutter Health, and the California system vows to invest $2 billion in...
March 17, 2026 07:00 AM
Sutter Health to combine with Midwest provider Allina in expansion beyond California
Sutter Health's CPMC Pacific Campus in San Francisco is shown in 2018. The Northern California health giant announced Tuesday it plans to...
January 30, 2026 08:00 AM
Sutter Health Cases Show Hospitals Are Not Immune From Antitrust Exposure
Judges ruled against Sutter at trial and appellate levels despite critical services provided, reversing dismissals and evidentiary...
January 28, 2026 08:00 AM
Sutter Health and Pro Football Hall of Famer Steve Young Partner to Champion Youth Health and Wellness
Collaboration Kicks Off with a Girls Youth Flag Football Clinic at Palo Alto High School, 50 Embarcadero Road, on Saturday, Jan.
October 25, 2025 07:00 AM
Sutter Recognized for Using Technology to Improve Care
NORTHERN CALIF. — Two years into a digital transformation, Sutter Health has results to show and accolades to tout.
October 21, 2025 07:00 AM
5 minutes with Sutter Health’s CHRO
Learning and development has proven key to fighting burnout and ensuring the success of the health system's people managers, Deborah Yount...
September 20, 2025 07:00 AM
London teenager orchestrated 'help desk' extortion scheme against 47 U.S. companies that netted $115
A 19-year old is facing a maximum 95 years in prison for allegedly calling company help desks and convincing employees to reset passwords in...
September 19, 2025 07:00 AM
Cybersecurity News: Google patches zero-day, Copilot’s forced installation, Scattered Spider arrests
Google patches sixth Chrome zero-day, Microsoft to force install Copilot app in October, Two more Scattered Spider teen suspects arrested.
September 18, 2025 07:00 AM
UK arrests 2 more alleged Scattered Spider hackers over London transit system breach
Authorities say one of the suspects also hacked several U.S. healthcare firms.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Sutter Health CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Sutter Health
The official website of Sutter Health is http://www.sutterhealth.org.
Sutter Health’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Sutter Health’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 664, reflecting their Weak security posture.
How many security badges does Sutter Health’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Sutter Health currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has Sutter Health been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, Sutter Health has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
Does Sutter Health have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Sutter Health is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Sutter Health have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Sutter Health does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Sutter Health comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Sutter Health is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Sutter Health have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Sutter Health does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Sutter Health comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Sutter Health is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Sutter Health have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Sutter Health is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Sutter Health
Sutter Health operates primarily in the Hospitals and Health Care industry.
Number of Employees at Sutter Health
Sutter Health employs approximately 25,099 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Sutter Health
Sutter Health presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Sutter Health’s LinkedIn Followers
Sutter Health’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 214,387 followers.
NAICS Classification of Sutter Health
Sutter Health is classified under the NAICS code 62, which corresponds to Health Care and Social Assistance.
Sutter Health’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, Sutter Health has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/sutter-health.
Sutter Health’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Sutter Health maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sutter-health.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Sutter Health
As of March 30, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Sutter Health has experienced 5 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Sutter Health has an estimated 32,297 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Sutter Health ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Sutter Health ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $0.
How does Sutter Health detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with termination of employees, and remediation measures with notification of affected individuals, and communication strategy with notification of affected individuals, and communication strategy with public disclosure via california office of the attorney general, and communication strategy with settlement announcements, legal filings..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Sutter Health Employee Data Breach
Description: Sutter Health employees were fired for accessing medical information without permission. The privacy auditing and monitoring technology detected inappropriate access, and the individuals involved are no longer employed by Sutter Health. They are notifying the person, or persons, whose data was accessed.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Vulnerability Exploited: Unauthorized Access
Threat Actor: Employees
Motivation: Unknown
Title: Welltok Data Breach
Description: The U.S. healthcare services business Welltok revealed a data breach that affected around 8.5 million patients. The business was one among the targets of a widespread hacking campaign that took advantage of a zero-day vulnerability in the MOVEit Transfer programme. The exposed information includes patient information, including phone numbers, physical addresses, email addresses, and full names. Threat actors also obtained specific health insurance details, Medicare/Medicaid ID numbers, and Social Security numbers (SSNs) for some of the affected individuals.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-day vulnerability in MOVEit Transfer programme
Vulnerability Exploited: MOVEit Transfer programme
Title: Sutter Health Data Breach
Description: A data breach involving Sutter Health occurred on October 11-12, 2017, due to a phishing attack on a vendor, Salem and Green, resulting in unauthorized access to personal information.
Date Detected: 2018-02-07
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2018-02-07
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Human
Title: Sutter Health MOVEit Transfer Data Breach
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Sutter Health on November 3, 2023. The breach occurred on May 30, 2023, when an unknown actor accessed the MOVEit Transfer server and exfiltrated personal data, including names and other personal information, though no evidence of misuse has been reported.
Date Detected: 2023-05-30
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-11-03
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of MOVEit Transfer Server Vulnerability
Vulnerability Exploited: MOVEit Transfer (CVE-2023-34362 or related)
Threat Actor: Unknown
Title: Sutter Health, Lemonaid Health, & Redeemer Health Settle Pixel Data Breach Lawsuits
Description: Settlements have been agreed to resolve class action lawsuits against three healthcare providers – Sutter Health, Lemonaid Health, & Redeemer Health – that alleged unlawful disclosures of individually identifiable patient information to third parties via website tracking technologies such as pixels.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Website Tracking Technologies (Pixels, Cookies, Web Beacons, JavaScript)
Vulnerability Exploited: Improper use of tracking technologies on authenticated pages (patient portals) without HIPAA-compliant authorizations or business associate agreements
Motivation: Data Collection for Marketing/Third-Party Use
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Phishing attack on vendor and MOVEit Transfer server vulnerability.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SUT03315722
Data Compromised: Medical Information
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Data Compromised: Phone numbers, Physical addresses, Email addresses, Full names, Health insurance details, Medicare/medicaid id numbers, Social security numbers (ssns)
Incident : Data Breach SUT151080425
Data Compromised: Names, Social security numbers, California driver’s license numbers
Incident : Data Breach SUT004091825
Data Compromised: Names, Other personal information
Systems Affected: MOVEit Transfer server
Identity Theft Risk: Potential (no evidence of misuse reported)
Incident : Data Breach SUT1765814693
Data Compromised: Personally identifiable health information (PHI), protected health information (HIPAA-protected data)
Systems Affected: WebsitesPatient Portals
Brand Reputation Impact: Likely negative impact due to lawsuits and settlements
Legal Liabilities: Class action lawsuits, regulatory scrutiny
Identity Theft Risk: High (exposure of PHI and PII)
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $0.00.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Medical Information, Personal Information, Health Insurance Details, Medicare/Medicaid Id Numbers, Social Security Numbers, , Personal Information, , Personal Data, Names, , Personally Identifiable Health Information (Phi), Protected Health Information (Hipaa-Protected Data) and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SUT03315722
Entity Name: Sutter Health
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Asuris Northwest Health
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: BridgeSpan Health
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Corewell Health
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Faith Regional Health Services
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Mass General
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Brigham Health Plan
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Priority Health
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Regence BlueShield
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Regence Blue Shield of Idaho
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: St. Bernards Healthcare
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Entity Name: Sutter Health
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Incident : Data Breach SUT151080425
Entity Name: Sutter Health
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: California
Incident : Data Breach SUT004091825
Entity Name: Sutter Health
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: California, USA
Incident : Data Breach SUT1765814693
Entity Name: Sutter Health
Entity Type: Non-profit Integrated Health Delivery System
Industry: Healthcare
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Customers Affected: California residents who logged into Sutter Health MyHealthOnline portal (June 10, 2025, to March 20, 2020)
Incident : Data Breach SUT1765814693
Entity Name: Lemonaid Health
Entity Type: Telemedicine Platform Provider
Industry: Healthcare/Telemedicine
Location: USA
Customers Affected: Approximately 35,000 class members
Incident : Data Breach SUT1765814693
Entity Name: Redeemer Health
Entity Type: Catholic Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania, USA
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SUT03315722
Containment Measures: Termination of Employees
Remediation Measures: Notification of Affected Individuals
Communication Strategy: Notification of Affected Individuals
Incident : Data Breach SUT004091825
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via California Office of the Attorney General
Incident : Data Breach SUT1765814693
Communication Strategy: Settlement announcements, legal filings
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach SUT03315722
Type of Data Compromised: Medical Information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information, Health insurance details, Medicare/medicaid id numbers, Social security numbers
Number of Records Exposed: 8.5 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach SUT151080425
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: namesSocial Security numbersCalifornia driver’s license numbers
Incident : Data Breach SUT004091825
Type of Data Compromised: Personal data, Names
Sensitivity of Data: Moderate (personal information)
Incident : Data Breach SUT1765814693
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable health information (phi), Protected health information (hipaa-protected data)
Sensitivity of Data: High (health-related, personally identifiable)
Data Exfiltration: Transmitted to third parties (Meta, Google, etc.)
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (health information, user activity data)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Notification of Affected Individuals.
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by termination of employees.
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SUT004091825
Regulations Violated: Potential HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) violations,
Regulatory Notifications: California Office of the Attorney General
Incident : Data Breach SUT1765814693
Regulations Violated: HIPAA, California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), State privacy laws, Wiretapping laws,
Legal Actions: Class action lawsuits, partial vacatur of HHS guidance
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Class action lawsuits, partial vacatur of HHS guidance.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SUT1765814693
Lessons Learned: Healthcare organizations must ensure compliance with HIPAA when using tracking technologies on authenticated pages (e.g., patient portals). Business associate agreements or HIPAA-compliant authorizations are required for third-party data sharing.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach SUT1765814693
Recommendations: Review and audit website tracking technologies for compliance with HIPAA and state privacy laws., Obtain HIPAA-compliant authorizations or establish business associate agreements for third-party tracking tools on authenticated pages., Monitor regulatory guidance on tracking technologies and adjust practices accordingly., Implement enhanced monitoring and controls for data shared with third parties.Review and audit website tracking technologies for compliance with HIPAA and state privacy laws., Obtain HIPAA-compliant authorizations or establish business associate agreements for third-party tracking tools on authenticated pages., Monitor regulatory guidance on tracking technologies and adjust practices accordingly., Implement enhanced monitoring and controls for data shared with third parties.Review and audit website tracking technologies for compliance with HIPAA and state privacy laws., Obtain HIPAA-compliant authorizations or establish business associate agreements for third-party tracking tools on authenticated pages., Monitor regulatory guidance on tracking technologies and adjust practices accordingly., Implement enhanced monitoring and controls for data shared with third parties.Review and audit website tracking technologies for compliance with HIPAA and state privacy laws., Obtain HIPAA-compliant authorizations or establish business associate agreements for third-party tracking tools on authenticated pages., Monitor regulatory guidance on tracking technologies and adjust practices accordingly., Implement enhanced monitoring and controls for data shared with third parties.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Healthcare organizations must ensure compliance with HIPAA when using tracking technologies on authenticated pages (e.g., patient portals). Business associate agreements or HIPAA-compliant authorizations are required for third-party data sharing.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SUT44271123
Source: Welltok Data Breach Notice
Incident : Data Breach SUT151080425
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2018-02-07
Incident : Data Breach SUT004091825
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2023-11-03
Incident : Data Breach SUT1765814693
Source: HIPAA Journal
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Welltok Data Breach Notice, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2018-02-07, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2023-11-03, and Source: HIPAA Journal.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SUT03315722
Investigation Status: Completed
Incident : Data Breach SUT004091825
Investigation Status: Ongoing (no evidence of misuse reported as of disclosure)
Incident : Data Breach SUT1765814693
Investigation Status: Settled (preliminary approval granted, final fairness hearings scheduled)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Notification of Affected Individuals, Public disclosure via California Office of the Attorney General, Settlement announcements and legal filings.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SUT03315722
Customer Advisories: Notification of Affected Individuals
Incident : Data Breach SUT1765814693
Customer Advisories: Class members notified of settlement terms and claim deadlines
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Notification of Affected Individuals and Class members notified of settlement terms and claim deadlines.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SUT151080425
Entry Point: Phishing attack on vendor
Incident : Data Breach SUT004091825
Entry Point: MOVEit Transfer server vulnerability
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach SUT03315722
Root Causes: Unauthorized Access by Employees
Corrective Actions: Termination of Employees, Notification of Affected Individuals
Incident : Data Breach SUT151080425
Root Causes: Phishing attack on vendor
Incident : Data Breach SUT004091825
Root Causes: Exploitation Of Unpatched Moveit Transfer Vulnerability,
Incident : Data Breach SUT1765814693
Root Causes: Improper use of tracking technologies on patient portals without HIPAA-compliant safeguards, leading to unauthorized data sharing with third parties (Meta, Google, etc.).
Corrective Actions: Settlements include cash payments to affected individuals and, in some cases, credit monitoring services (e.g., CyEx Privacy Shield Pro for Redeemer Health).
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Termination of Employees, Notification of Affected Individuals, Settlements include cash payments to affected individuals and, in some cases, credit monitoring services (e.g., CyEx Privacy Shield Pro for Redeemer Health)..
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Employees and Unknown.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2018-02-07.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2023-11-03.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {'Sutter Health': '$21,500,000 settlement', 'Lemonaid Health': '$3,250,000 settlement', 'Redeemer Health': None}.
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Medical Information, Phone numbers, Physical addresses, Email addresses, Full names, Health insurance details, Medicare/Medicaid ID numbers, Social Security numbers (SSNs), , names, Social Security numbers, California driver’s license numbers, , Names, Other personal information, , Personally identifiable health information (PHI) and protected health information (HIPAA-protected data).
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was MOVEit Transfer server and WebsitesPatient Portals.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Termination of Employees.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Medicare/Medicaid ID numbers, Physical addresses, California driver’s license numbers, Names, Other personal information, Health insurance details, Phone numbers, Medical Information, Personally identifiable health information (PHI), protected health information (HIPAA-protected data), Social Security numbers, Email addresses, names, Full names and Social Security numbers (SSNs).
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 8.5M.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Class action lawsuits, partial vacatur of HHS guidance.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Healthcare organizations must ensure compliance with HIPAA when using tracking technologies on authenticated pages (e.g., patient portals). Business associate agreements or HIPAA-compliant authorizations are required for third-party data sharing.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Monitor regulatory guidance on tracking technologies and adjust practices accordingly., Implement enhanced monitoring and controls for data shared with third parties., Obtain HIPAA-compliant authorizations or establish business associate agreements for third-party tracking tools on authenticated pages. and Review and audit website tracking technologies for compliance with HIPAA and state privacy laws..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are California Office of the Attorney General, Welltok Data Breach Notice and HIPAA Journal.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Completed.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Notification of Affected Individuals and Class members notified of settlement terms and claim deadlines.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an Phishing attack on vendor and MOVEit Transfer server vulnerability.
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Unauthorized Access by Employees, Phishing attack on vendor, Exploitation of unpatched MOVEit Transfer vulnerability, Improper use of tracking technologies on patient portals without HIPAA-compliant safeguards, leading to unauthorized data sharing with third parties (Meta, Google, etc.)..
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Termination of Employees, Notification of Affected Individuals, Settlements include cash payments to affected individuals and, in some cases, credit monitoring services (e.g., CyEx Privacy Shield Pro for Redeemer Health)..
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024. This affects the function setLanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94.
References
- https://github.com/Perl/perl5/commit/c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94
- https://lists.security.metacpan.org/cve-announce/msg/37638919/
- https://metacpan.org/release/PMQS/Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.221/source/Changes
- https://metacpan.org/release/SHAY/perl-5.40.4/changes
- https://metacpan.org/release/SHAY/perl-5.42.2/changes
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3381
Description
Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
A critical security vulnerability in parisneo/lollms versions up to 2.2.0 allows any authenticated user to accept or reject friend requests belonging to other users. The `respond_request()` function in `backend/routers/friends.py` does not implement proper authorization checks, enabling Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attacks. Specifically, the `/api/friends/requests/{friendship_id}` endpoint fails to verify whether the authenticated user is part of the friendship or the intended recipient of the request. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, privacy violations, and potential social engineering attacks. The issue has been addressed in version 2.2.0.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=sutter-health' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
