SRG Company Cyber Security Posture

srg.com.sa

Saeed Raddad Group (SRG) has had an influential and substantial presence in the commercial and business life of Saudi Arabia since 1982 with manpower of more than 34,000 employees. SRG companies operate in diversified business sectors having significant local & international operations. SRG is an investment holding powerhouse headquartered in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. The Group, which has a diverse portfolio of market leading businesses across the Construction, Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Travel & Tourism, Manpower, Pharmaceutical and Trading sectors, is the regionโ€šร„รดs preferred investment partner and employer of choice. SRG main subsidiaries are, SRACO group, UCC group, GTS, Dammam palace, Manifa, Napesco, TST, and Alrazi pharma. Show more Show less

SRG Company Details

Linkedin ID:

sraco

Employees number:

10,001+ employees

Number of followers:

80653

NAICS:

551

Industry Type:

Holding Companies

Homepage:

srg.com.sa

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

SRG_1214333

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreSRG Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

Ailogo

SRG Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

SRG Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
0
Attack Types
0
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView

SRG Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Saeed Raddad Group (SRG) has had an influential and substantial presence in the commercial and business life of Saudi Arabia since 1982 with manpower of more than 34,000 employees. SRG companies operate in diversified business sectors having significant local & international operations. SRG is an investment holding powerhouse headquartered in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. The Group, which has a diverse portfolio of market leading businesses across the Construction, Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Travel & Tourism, Manpower, Pharmaceutical and Trading sectors, is the regionโ€šร„รดs preferred investment partner and employer of choice. SRG main subsidiaries are, SRACO group, UCC group, GTS, Dammam palace, Manifa, Napesco, TST, and Alrazi pharma. Show more Show less

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=sraco' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

SRG Cyber Security News

2025-05-27T07:00:00.000Z
Hackers Are Calling Your Office: FBI Alerts Law Firms to Luna Moth's Stealth Phishing Campaign

Luna Moth uses spoofed IT domains and callback phishing to access law firm data, bypassing detection with legitimate tools.

2025-05-26T07:00:00.000Z
FBI Issues on Silent Ransom Group Using Fake IT Support Calls to Target Victims

Since emerging in 2022, SRG has gained notoriety for its advanced callback phishing schemes, often posing as legitimate businesses offeringย ...

2025-05-26T13:58:45.000Z
FBI alerts law firms to rising threat of Silent Ransom Groupโ€™s extortion tactics

FBI issued warning regarding the Silent Ransom Group which has increasingly focused its extortion efforts on law firms across the US.

2025-05-27T07:00:00.000Z
FBI Warns Law Firms: Hackers Are Calling Offices in Stealth Phishing Scam

The FBI warns law firms of a stealth phishing scam where hackers call victims, pose as IT staff, and use remote access tools to stealย ...

2025-05-27T18:45:30.000Z
FBI Warns About Silent Ransom Group Targeting Law Firms

The Silent Ransom Group - aka Luna Moth, Chatty Spider and UNC3753 - has developed effective vishing attack methods for targeting law firms, the FBI warns.

2025-05-25T07:00:00.000Z
FBI Warns of Silent Ransom Group Targeting Law Firms via Scam Calls

FBI warns law firms: Silent Ransom Group uses phishing emails and fake IT calls to steal data, demanding ransom to prevent public leaks.

2025-05-23T07:00:00.000Z
FBI warns of Luna Moth extortion attacks targeting law firms

The FBI warned that an extortion gang known as the Silent Ransom Group has been targeting U.S. law firms over the last two years in callbackย ...

2024-11-26T08:00:00.000Z
Cybersecurity jobs available right now: November 26, 2024

Here are the worldwide cybersecurity job openings available as of November 26, 2024, including on-site, hybrid, and remote roles.

2025-05-15T07:00:00.000Z
Dark Web Profile: Silent Ransom Group (LeakedData)

Silent Ransom Group (SRG), also known as Luna Moth or apparently LeakedData, is a cybercriminal organization that emerged in early 2022ย ...

similarCompanies

SRG Similar Companies

Anadolu Group

Anadolu Group operates with the vision of being โ€œThe star that links Anatolia to the world and the world to Anatoliaโ€ and maintains its activities in 8 industries (beer, soft drink, retail, agriculture, automotive, stationery, energy and health) and in 20 countries with more than 80 companies, more

Cengiz Holding

Cengiz Holding is on an upward trajectory of success, making a name for itself with huge investments in highly competitive industries and becoming known as a preferred partner for powerful companies. At the same time as making a significant contribution to the development of Turkey, Cengiz Holding

Estithmar Holding

Estithmar Holding is a Qatari public listed company with a diverse portfolio of 51 companies operating in 4 strategic sectors. The company has a strong track record of growth and profitability, and is well-governed with a lean, optimized team that delivers quality in record time. With 91 nationaliti

Godrej Industries Group

Godrej was founded in 1897 by Ardeshir Godrej to help build Indiaโ€šร„รดs economic independence. A significant portion of our profits from our innovations was donated to Indiaโ€šร„รดs freedom movement. During the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918, we made the first soap from vegetable oil with no animal fat. In

Bollorรฉ

Le Groupe Bollorรฉ, qui a fรชtรฉ ses deux cents ans dโ€™histoire en 2022, est contrรดlรฉ majoritairement par la famille Bollorรฉ. La stabilitรฉ de son actionnariat lui permet de mener une politique dโ€™investissement ร  long terme. Depuis son origine, le Groupe continue de se dรฉmarquer grรขce ร  sa capacitรฉ dโ€™ada

Koรง Holding

Koรง Holding is Turkeyโ€™s leading investment holding company and Koรง Group is Turkey's largest industrial and services group in terms of revenues, exports, number of employees, taxes paid and market capitalization on Borsa Istanbul. Being the only Turkish company to be ranked in Fortune Global 500 Lis

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

SRG CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, SRG has faced 0 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, SRG has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Saeed Raddad Group (SRG) has had an influential and substantial presence in the commercial and business life of Saudi Arabia since 1982 with manpower of more than 34,000 employees. SRG companies operate in diversified business sectors having significant local & international operations. SRG is an investment holding powerhouse headquartered in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. The Group, which has a diverse portfolio of market leading businesses across the Construction, Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Travel & Tourism, Manpower, Pharmaceutical and Trading sectors, is the regionโ€šร„รดs preferred investment partner and employer of choice. SRG main subsidiaries are, SRACO group, UCC group, GTS, Dammam palace, Manifa, Napesco, TST, and Alrazi pharma. Show more Show less.

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge