Cengiz Holding Company Cyber Security Posture
cengizholding.com.trCengiz Holding is on an upward trajectory of success, making a name for itself with huge investments in highly competitive industries and becoming known as a preferred partner for powerful companies. At the same time as making a significant contribution to the development of Turkey, Cengiz Holding is constantly adding to its portfolio of success with huge investments like the Black Sea Coastal Highway, Istanbulโs New Airport, the High-speed Railway project, dams, power generation and distribution, natural gas distribution, mining operations and metal manufacturing plants. The Group has been investing in infrastructure projects since the foundation of Cengiz ฤฐnลaat in 1987. Its investments in the energy and mining industries, along with other corporate activities in these areas, have enabled it to grow into a huge family of 35 companies and affiliates with an annual revenue exceeding USD 5 billion. Through the work of Cengiz ฤฐnลaat, Cengiz Holding is involved in construction-infrastructure projects including highways, bridges, tunnels, dams, seaports, railways, subway systems, airports, pipelines, power plants, and mining and industrial facilities. The Group has maintained its growth in the energy field since 2000 by investing in hydraulic and thermal power plants equipped with the latest technological infrastructure and is currently active in power generation, power distribution, trade, sales and marketing, natural gas distribution and trade. Cengiz Holding started investing in the mining industry by acquiring Eti Bakฤฑr A.ล. and Eti Alรผminyum A.ล. within the scope of privatization. Eti Bakฤฑr A.ล. was acquired by the Holding in 2004 and continues its mining operations with the Samsun Smelting Facility, the only plant in Turkey capable of producing cathode copper from ore, and the Eti Bakฤฑr A.ล. Murgul Plant, which was acquired in 2006.
Cengiz Holding Company Details
cengiz-construction
10,001+ employees
105648
551
Holding Companies
cengizholding.com.tr
Scan still pending
CEN_1755359
In-progress
Cengiz Holding Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Cengiz Holding Global Score.png)
Cengiz Holding Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Cengiz Holding Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Cengiz Holding Company Subsidiaries
Cengiz Holding is on an upward trajectory of success, making a name for itself with huge investments in highly competitive industries and becoming known as a preferred partner for powerful companies. At the same time as making a significant contribution to the development of Turkey, Cengiz Holding is constantly adding to its portfolio of success with huge investments like the Black Sea Coastal Highway, Istanbulโs New Airport, the High-speed Railway project, dams, power generation and distribution, natural gas distribution, mining operations and metal manufacturing plants. The Group has been investing in infrastructure projects since the foundation of Cengiz ฤฐnลaat in 1987. Its investments in the energy and mining industries, along with other corporate activities in these areas, have enabled it to grow into a huge family of 35 companies and affiliates with an annual revenue exceeding USD 5 billion. Through the work of Cengiz ฤฐnลaat, Cengiz Holding is involved in construction-infrastructure projects including highways, bridges, tunnels, dams, seaports, railways, subway systems, airports, pipelines, power plants, and mining and industrial facilities. The Group has maintained its growth in the energy field since 2000 by investing in hydraulic and thermal power plants equipped with the latest technological infrastructure and is currently active in power generation, power distribution, trade, sales and marketing, natural gas distribution and trade. Cengiz Holding started investing in the mining industry by acquiring Eti Bakฤฑr A.ล. and Eti Alรผminyum A.ล. within the scope of privatization. Eti Bakฤฑr A.ล. was acquired by the Holding in 2004 and continues its mining operations with the Samsun Smelting Facility, the only plant in Turkey capable of producing cathode copper from ore, and the Eti Bakฤฑr A.ล. Murgul Plant, which was acquired in 2006.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Cengiz Holding Cyber Security News
Sustaining Select Efforts to Strengthen the Nation's Cybersecurity and Amending Executive Order 13694 and Executive Order 14144
The People's Republic of China presents the most active and persistent cyber threat to United States Government, private sector, and criticalย ...
Gartner: How Security Teams Can Turn Hype Into Opportunity
The talk concerned the waves of hype that can take over the cyber industry, either through optimism for emerging technologies like AI orย ...
Italy cuts ties with Israeli spyware firm Paragon amid surveillance scandal
Italy severs links with Paragon spyware after allegations of targeting critics and migrant rescuers spark outrage.
Cybersecurity Incident at United Natural Foods Impacting Orders
United Natural Foods Inc. has taken some of its systems offline while it investigates โunauthorized activityโ with outside cybersecurityย ...
A cybersecurity play set to run even higher, and how to trade this week's inflation reports
Frank Holland breaks down what traders are watching ahead of the new session.
Follow the Smoke | China-nexus Threat Actors Hammer At the Doors of Top Tier Targets
This research underscores the persistent threat Chinese cyberespionage actors pose to global industries and public sector organizations, whileย ...
Startup Guardz locks up $56M Series B
Guardz raised a $56 million Series B led by ClearSky to help managed service providers (MSPs) better secure small and medium-sizedย ...
Venture firm DataTribe raises $41 million to port government-led cybersecurity innovation to the private sector
Venture firm DataTribe raises $41 million to port government-led cybersecurity innovation to the private sector ... Leo Schwartz is a reporter atย ...
Google scam: Gmail, Google Calendar, Meet invites with phishing links used to deceive and defraud, cybersecurity experts warn
Scammers are using Gmail, Google Calendar and Meet invites with phishing links to deceive and defraud victims, Chicago cybersecurity expertsย ...
Cengiz Holding Similar Companies
SRG
Saeed Raddad Group (SRG) has had an influential and substantial presence in the commercial and business life of Saudi Arabia since 1982 with manpower of more than 34,000 employees. SRG companies operate in diversified business sectors having significant local & international operations. SRG is an in
Estithmar Holding
Estithmar Holding is a Qatari public listed company with a diverse portfolio of 51 companies operating in 4 strategic sectors. The company has a strong track record of growth and profitability, and is well-governed with a lean, optimized team that delivers quality in record time. With 91 nationaliti
Koรง Holding
Koรง Holding is Turkeyโs leading investment holding company and Koรง Group is Turkey's largest industrial and services group in terms of revenues, exports, number of employees, taxes paid and market capitalization on Borsa Istanbul. Being the only Turkish company to be ranked in Fortune Global 500 Lis
Anadolu Group
Anadolu Group operates with the vision of being โThe star that links Anatolia to the world and the world to Anatoliaโ and maintains its activities in 8 industries (beer, soft drink, retail, agriculture, automotive, stationery, energy and health) and in 20 countries with more than 80 companies, more
Godrej Industries Group
Godrej was founded in 1897 by Ardeshir Godrej to help build Indiaโรรดs economic independence. A significant portion of our profits from our innovations was donated to Indiaโรรดs freedom movement. During the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918, we made the first soap from vegetable oil with no animal fat. In
Bollorรฉ
Le Groupe Bollorรฉ, qui a fรชtรฉ ses deux cents ans dโhistoire en 2022, est contrรดlรฉ majoritairement par la famille Bollorรฉ. La stabilitรฉ de son actionnariat lui permet de mener une politique dโinvestissement ร long terme. Depuis son origine, le Groupe continue de se dรฉmarquer grรขce ร sa capacitรฉ dโada
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Cengiz Holding CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Cengiz Holding has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Cengiz Holding has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Cengiz Holding is on an upward trajectory of success, making a name for itself with huge investments in highly competitive industries and becoming known as a preferred partner for powerful companies. At the same time as making a significant contribution to the development of Turkey, Cengiz Holding is constantly adding to its portfolio of success with huge investments like the Black Sea Coastal Highway, Istanbulโs New Airport, the High-speed Railway project, dams, power generation and distribution, natural gas distribution, mining operations and metal manufacturing plants. The Group has been investing in infrastructure projects since the foundation of Cengiz ฤฐnลaat in 1987. Its investments in the energy and mining industries, along with other corporate activities in these areas, have enabled it to grow into a huge family of 35 companies and affiliates with an annual revenue exceeding USD 5 billion. Through the work of Cengiz ฤฐnลaat, Cengiz Holding is involved in construction-infrastructure projects including highways, bridges, tunnels, dams, seaports, railways, subway systems, airports, pipelines, power plants, and mining and industrial facilities. The Group has maintained its growth in the energy field since 2000 by investing in hydraulic and thermal power plants equipped with the latest technological infrastructure and is currently active in power generation, power distribution, trade, sales and marketing, natural gas distribution and trade. Cengiz Holding started investing in the mining industry by acquiring Eti Bakฤฑr A.ล. and Eti Alรผminyum A.ล. within the scope of privatization. Eti Bakฤฑr A.ล. was acquired by the Holding in 2004 and continues its mining operations with the Samsun Smelting Facility, the only plant in Turkey capable of producing cathode copper from ore, and the Eti Bakฤฑr A.ล. Murgul Plant, which was acquired in 2006..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
