Anadolu Group Company Cyber Security Posture
anadolugroup.comAnadolu Group operates with the vision of being “The star that links Anatolia to the world and the world to Anatolia” and maintains its activities in 8 industries (beer, soft drink, retail, agriculture, automotive, stationery, energy and health) and in 20 countries with more than 80 companies, more than 90 production facilities, 6 R&D centers and more than 100,000 employees. The Group, which was founded by Yazıcı and Özilhan families in 1950, is a driving force of Turkish economy with its financial assets, its strong production capacity and the projects it is involved with. It acts in accordance with its mission of being a multinational and entrepreneurial group through its partnerships with leading brands and companies of the world such as AB InBev, The Coca-Cola Company, Faber-Castell, Isuzu, Kia, Honda, Honda Marine, Kohler, Johns Hopkins Medicine. --- Anadolu Grubu, “Anadolu’yu dünyaya, dünyayı Anadolu’ya bağlayan yıldız” olma vizyonuyla bugün 20 ülkede, 80’den fazla şirketi, 90’dan fazla üretim tesisi, 6 Ar-Ge merkezi ve 100.000’den fazla çalışanı ile faaliyetlerini bira, meşrubat, perakende, tarım, otomotiv, kırtasiye, enerji ve sağlık olmak üzere 8 sektörde sürdürüyor. 1950 yılında Yazıcı ve Özilhan aileleri tarafından kurulan Grup, hem rakamsal verileri ve üretim gücü hem de geliştirdiği ve içinde yer aldığı projelerle Türkiye ekonomisinin en büyük itici güçlerinden biri konumundadır. AB InBev, The Coca-Cola Company, Faber-Castell, Isuzu, Kia, Honda, Honda Marine, Kohler, Johns Hopkins Medicine gibi alanlarında dünyanın önde gelen isimleri olan markalarla ve şirketlerle kurduğu ortaklıklarla çok uluslu ve girişimci bir grup olma misyonu doğrultusunda hareket ediyor.
Anadolu Group Company Details
anadolu-group
29534 employees
122262.0
551
Holding Companies
anadolugroup.com
Scan still pending
ANA_1499714
In-progress
Anadolu Group Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Anadolu Group Global Score.png)
Anadolu Group Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Anadolu Group Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Anadolu Group Company Subsidiaries
Anadolu Group operates with the vision of being “The star that links Anatolia to the world and the world to Anatolia” and maintains its activities in 8 industries (beer, soft drink, retail, agriculture, automotive, stationery, energy and health) and in 20 countries with more than 80 companies, more than 90 production facilities, 6 R&D centers and more than 100,000 employees. The Group, which was founded by Yazıcı and Özilhan families in 1950, is a driving force of Turkish economy with its financial assets, its strong production capacity and the projects it is involved with. It acts in accordance with its mission of being a multinational and entrepreneurial group through its partnerships with leading brands and companies of the world such as AB InBev, The Coca-Cola Company, Faber-Castell, Isuzu, Kia, Honda, Honda Marine, Kohler, Johns Hopkins Medicine. --- Anadolu Grubu, “Anadolu’yu dünyaya, dünyayı Anadolu’ya bağlayan yıldız” olma vizyonuyla bugün 20 ülkede, 80’den fazla şirketi, 90’dan fazla üretim tesisi, 6 Ar-Ge merkezi ve 100.000’den fazla çalışanı ile faaliyetlerini bira, meşrubat, perakende, tarım, otomotiv, kırtasiye, enerji ve sağlık olmak üzere 8 sektörde sürdürüyor. 1950 yılında Yazıcı ve Özilhan aileleri tarafından kurulan Grup, hem rakamsal verileri ve üretim gücü hem de geliştirdiği ve içinde yer aldığı projelerle Türkiye ekonomisinin en büyük itici güçlerinden biri konumundadır. AB InBev, The Coca-Cola Company, Faber-Castell, Isuzu, Kia, Honda, Honda Marine, Kohler, Johns Hopkins Medicine gibi alanlarında dünyanın önde gelen isimleri olan markalarla ve şirketlerle kurduğu ortaklıklarla çok uluslu ve girişimci bir grup olma misyonu doğrultusunda hareket ediyor.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Anadolu Group Cyber Security News
Anadolu Efes speeds up threat detection and response using Microsoft Defender and Sentinel
Anadolu Efes has improved visibility and shortened detection and response times to an average of 15 minutes and 30 minutes, respectively.
Alphabet’s $32bn acquisition of Wiz marks Israeli milestone
Google's parent company, Alphabet, has agreed to acquire the cybersecurity startup Wiz for a staggering $32 billion, according to sources cited by Financial ...
South Korea's largest telecom operator suffers mass exodus of customers over data leak
According to new figures from the Korea Telecommunications Operations Association, SKT lost a total of 677,491 subscribers in April and May.
A U.S. antivirus maker is acquiring Kaspersky Lab's key customers after Commerce ban
Cybersecurity company Pango is acquiring all of Kaspersky Lab's U.S. antivirus customers following the Commerce Department's ban on sales of ...
Dozens of journalists, civil society members targeted by Israeli spyware in WhatsApp hack
Scores of journalists and civil society members were targeted on WhatsApp by Israeli spyware firm, Paragon Solutions, according to a report ...
Kremlin ‘blocks AB InBev Russian operation sale to Anadolu Efes’
The Russian government has reportedly blocked Anadolu Efes' move to buy Anheuser-Busch InBev's stake in their Russian joint venture.
Turkey reviews security of communication devices after Lebanon blasts, official says
Turkey is reviewing its measures to secure the communication devices used by its armed forces after the deadly blasts in Lebanon, a Turkish ...
Expert: Amateur hacker behind prolonged DDoS attack against X
The attack was alleged by Predicta Labs CEO Baptiste Robert to be conducted by a college student.
Why is the Middle East losing so much money to cybercrime?
"The Middle East is a hotbed for data breaches, primarily due to rapid digitization outpacing cybersecurity infrastructure," confirmed Mohammed ...
Anadolu Group Similar Companies
Koç Holding
Koç Holding is Turkey’s leading investment holding company and Koç Group is Turkey's largest industrial and services group in terms of revenues, exports, number of employees, taxes paid and market capitalization on Borsa Istanbul. Being the only Turkish company to be ranked in Fortune Global 500 Lis
SRG
Saeed Raddad Group (SRG) has had an influential and substantial presence in the commercial and business life of Saudi Arabia since 1982 with manpower of more than 34,000 employees. SRG companies operate in diversified business sectors having significant local & international operations. SRG is an in
Estithmar Holding
Estithmar Holding is a Qatari public listed company with a diverse portfolio of 51 companies operating in 4 strategic sectors. The company has a strong track record of growth and profitability, and is well-governed with a lean, optimized team that delivers quality in record time. With 91 nationaliti
Godrej Industries Group
Godrej was founded in 1897 by Ardeshir Godrej to help build India’s economic independence. A significant portion of our profits from our innovations was donated to India’s freedom movement. During the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918, we made the first soap from vegetable oil with no animal fat. In
Bolloré
Le Groupe Bolloré, qui a fêté ses deux cents ans d’histoire en 2022, est contrôlé majoritairement par la famille Bolloré. La stabilité de son actionnariat lui permet de mener une politique d’investissement à long terme. Depuis son origine, le Groupe continue de se démarquer grâce à sa capacité d’ada
Cengiz Holding
Cengiz Holding is on an upward trajectory of success, making a name for itself with huge investments in highly competitive industries and becoming known as a preferred partner for powerful companies. At the same time as making a significant contribution to the development of Turkey, Cengiz Holding
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Anadolu Group CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Anadolu Group has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Anadolu Group has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Anadolu Group operates with the vision of being “The star that links Anatolia to the world and the world to Anatolia” and maintains its activities in 8 industries (beer, soft drink, retail, agriculture, automotive, stationery, energy and health) and in 20 countries with more than 80 companies, more than 90 production facilities, 6 R&D centers and more than 100,000 employees. The Group, which was founded by Yazıcı and Özilhan families in 1950, is a driving force of Turkish economy with its financial assets, its strong production capacity and the projects it is involved with. It acts in accordance with its mission of being a multinational and entrepreneurial group through its partnerships with leading brands and companies of the world such as AB InBev, The Coca-Cola Company, Faber-Castell, Isuzu, Kia, Honda, Honda Marine, Kohler, Johns Hopkins Medicine. --- Anadolu Grubu, “Anadolu’yu dünyaya, dünyayı Anadolu’ya bağlayan yıldız” olma vizyonuyla bugün 20 ülkede, 80’den fazla şirketi, 90’dan fazla üretim tesisi, 6 Ar-Ge merkezi ve 100.000’den fazla çalışanı ile faaliyetlerini bira, meşrubat, perakende, tarım, otomotiv, kırtasiye, enerji ve sağlık olmak üzere 8 sektörde sürdürüyor. 1950 yılında Yazıcı ve Özilhan aileleri tarafından kurulan Grup, hem rakamsal verileri ve üretim gücü hem de geliştirdiği ve içinde yer aldığı projelerle Türkiye ekonomisinin en büyük itici güçlerinden biri konumundadır. AB InBev, The Coca-Cola Company, Faber-Castell, Isuzu, Kia, Honda, Honda Marine, Kohler, Johns Hopkins Medicine gibi alanlarında dünyanın önde gelen isimleri olan markalarla ve şirketlerle kurduğu ortaklıklarla çok uluslu ve girişimci bir grup olma misyonu doğrultusunda hareket ediyor..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
