LAA
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
the-legal-aid-agency
Employees number:
354
Number of followers:
19,426
NAICS:
5411
Industry Type:
Homepage:
justice.gov.uk
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
THE_1520505
Scan Status:
In-progress
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
The Legal Aid Agency Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score
justice.gov.ukThe Legal Aid Agency provides both civil and criminal legal aid and advice in England and Wales. Our work is essential to the fair, effective and efficient operation of the civil and criminal justice systems. We are a delivery organisation which commissions and procures legal aid services from providers (solicitors, barristers and the not-for-profit sector). The Legal Aid Agency is an executive agency of the Ministry of Justice. It came into existence on 1 April 2013 following the abolition of the Legal Services Commission as a result of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Act 2012. The Act created the new statutory office of the Director of Legal Casework. The Director will take decisions on the funding of individual cases. Processes have been put in place to ensure the Legal Aid Agency is able to demonstrate independence of decision-making. There will be an annual report published about these decisions.
The Legal Aid Agency A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
LAA Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
LAA
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
LAA Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
LAA
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
LAA Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
4
Attack Types
2
Ministry of Justice (UK)
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: A report by NordPass and NordStellar revealed that 3,014 passwords belonging to UK civil servants including those from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) were exposed on the dark web. The MoJ was the most affected institution, with 36 unique exposed passwords, many of which were weak, reused, or easily guessable (e.g., *'12345678'* or *'password'*). The breach stemmed from poor cyber hygiene, including password recycling across accounts and failure to enforce strong authentication policies. The exposure poses significant risks not only to the MoJ’s internal operations but also to national security, as compromised credentials could enable unauthorized access to sensitive government systems. Civil servants’ accounts, if hijacked, might facilitate phishing attacks, data leaks, or lateral movement into broader public infrastructure. The incident underscores systemic vulnerabilities in public-sector cybersecurity, where weak password practices jeopardize both employee data and citizen trust. While no direct data theft was confirmed, the potential for escalation such as targeted attacks on justice systems or exploitation of administrative privileges remains high. The report urges mandatory password managers, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and regular credential rotation to mitigate future risks.
Ministry of Justice: MoJ spent £50M on security at Legal Aid Agency before attack
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: UK Ministry of Justice Faces Criticism Over £50M Cybersecurity Failures in Legal Aid Agency Breach The UK’s Ministry of Justice (MoJ) spent £50 million ($67 million) on cybersecurity upgrades for the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) before a major cyberattack exposed critical vulnerabilities, according to a report by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). Despite the investment, the attack described as one of the most sensitive in British history went undetected for four months, raising concerns over the MoJ’s risk management. The LAA’s cybersecurity risks had been flagged as "extremely high" on its risk register since 2021, prompting three rounds of funding (£8.5M, £10.5M, and £32M) to address gaps. However, the attack began in December 2024 and was only discovered in April 2025, with servers taken offline nearly a month later in May. A portion of the £10.5M funding was used to deploy a new threat detection system, though its operational timeline remains unclear. The breach’s full scope emerged on May 16, 2025, when investigators confirmed attackers had accessed not only legal aid providers’ financial data but also sensitive information on legal aid applicants. The LAA immediately shut down systems, secured an injunction to prevent data leaks, and activated contingency measures. While no providers exited the market, the disruption forced manual processes, straining legal sector workers and delaying case management. To maintain operations, the LAA issued average monthly payments to providers based on pre-attack data, later recovering funds at a 25% rate meaning a 20-week contingency period would take 20 months to recoup. MoJ permanent secretary Dr. Jo Farrar acknowledged the LAA may require additional funding to fully modernize its IT systems, though budget allocations remain uncertain. The PAC report criticized the MoJ’s handling of the incident, questioning public confidence in its ability to secure personal data. Farrar defended the department’s efforts, citing a comprehensive review of all systems and ongoing investments to counter increasingly sophisticated threats. However, the attack underscores persistent risks in high-priority government systems.
Ministry of Justice UK
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: The employee’s sensitive personal data of UK Ministry of Justice was compromised in an unauthorized access gained to the servers of Justice Academy, an online learning platform used by MoJ. The compromised information includes full name, staff identification information, email address, national insurance number, and details of where they work and with which department or agency. MoJ has reported about 2,152 data breaches and several cyber incidents in the 12 months.
Legal Aid Agency (Ministry of Justice, UK)
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Hackers breached the Legal Aid Agency’s online platform, accessing and exfiltrating a massive trove of sensitive personal data from over 2 million legal aid applicants (2010–present) in England and Wales. The compromised data includes full names, contact details, dates of birth, national ID numbers, criminal histories, employment status, and financial records (debts, payments, contributions). The attackers, engaged in data extortion, threatened to publish the data online, posing severe risks to vulnerable individuals such as domestic violence survivors whose safety depends on confidentiality. Despite a legal injunction against distribution, the anonymity of the hackers (likely operating from hostile jurisdictions) renders enforcement ineffective. The agency shut down its online service to contain the breach, disrupting critical public legal services. The incident underscores systemic vulnerabilities in non-CNI public services, where data leaks can have life-threatening consequences (e.g., exposed addresses enabling physical harm).
LAA Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for LAA
Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The Legal Aid Agency in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The Legal Aid Agency in 2026.
Incident Types LAA vs Legal Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The Legal Aid Agency in 2026.
Incident History — LAA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LAA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
LAA Company Subsidiaries
The Legal Aid Agency provides both civil and criminal legal aid and advice in England and Wales. Our work is essential to the fair, effective and efficient operation of the civil and criminal justice systems. We are a delivery organisation which commissions and procures legal aid services from providers (solicitors, barristers and the not-for-profit sector). The Legal Aid Agency is an executive agency of the Ministry of Justice. It came into existence on 1 April 2013 following the abolition of the Legal Services Commission as a result of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Act 2012. The Act created the new statutory office of the Director of Legal Casework. The Director will take decisions on the funding of individual cases. Processes have been put in place to ensure the Legal Aid Agency is able to demonstrate independence of decision-making. There will be an annual report published about these decisions.
Loading...
LAA Similar Companies
Law Center for Better Housing
Law Center for Better Housing (LCBH) is recognized as a leading public interest law firm specializing in housing law and policy. Founded in 1980 by a small group of lawyers concerned about deteriorating apartment buildings and housing abandonment in the Rogers Park neighborhood, LCBH now serves all
DS Avocats - Asia
DS Avocats was Founded in 1972 and reflects an extraordinary team adventure unfolding across four continents. With offices in Singapour, Vietnam and our Desks in India and Indonesia, we provide efficient and innovative assistance to our clients in South-East Asia for all their expansion and develop
Murray Moyer, PLLC
Murray Moyer is a tax resolution law firm owned and operated in the state of North Carolina. With a stable of senior staff who have worked both in the private sector and on the regulatory side of the industry, we have seen your case before. We approach every client relationship with the understandi
Kaufman Dolowich LLP
Kaufman Dolowich LLP is a leading national law firm representing clients across a wide range of industries in key practice areas, including labor and employment, directors and officers liability, professional liability, commercial litigation, insurance coverage and litigation, data privacy and cybe
HSB COVID-19 Resource Center
Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd continues to closely monitor the shifting landscape of COVID-19 and we have been taking steps to protect the safety of our people and to ensure our ability to continue to serve our clients and communities. We have put together the following resources that we hope may also be
Whitmer & Ehrman LLC
We work together every day, exclusively on matters of business insolvency and reorganization, receivership, debt restructuring, disputed assets, and bankruptcy. In federal and state courts, we represent appointed fiduciaries or serve as court-appointed fiduciaries ourselves, and have represented eve
Johnston|Thomas Mortgage Banking
Mortgage Repurchase Defense and Indemnification Issues Although the financial crisis is now over and repurchase demand volume has dramatically decreased, Johnston | Thomas gained invaluable experience from the thousands of repurchase and indemnification demands that we handled both in mitigation, l
Duke Advisory Group
Duke Advisory Group is an eDiscovery consulting and service company conveniently based in Dallas, Texas, and serves clients globally. We have saved our clients 50% of what they pay others on average. Our knowledge and innovative approach to technology allows us to assess our client’s needs and manag
Latitude Express
Latitude Express provides experienced attorneys, paralegals and other legal professionals to assist law firms and corporate legal departments in a variety of traditional contract service areas on a project basis: • Litigation and transactions • Legal research • Risk management and compliance • D
.png)
LAA CyberSecurity News
March 16, 2026 07:00 AM
Working for ICE
Career paths in management, information technology, law, mission support, public affairs and community outreach are available within the agency.
February 26, 2026 08:00 AM
Government cuts cyber-attack fix times by 84% and launches new profession to protect public services
The government has launched a new vulnerability monitoring service (VMS) to reduce cyber risks and speed up fixes, and a new Cyber...
January 06, 2026 08:00 AM
Ransomware trends, statistics and facts in 2026
Ransomware continues to plague businesses, people and nations. Learn the latest ransomware trends and get expert assessments on what to...
December 30, 2025 08:00 AM
Cybersecurity and Credit Union System Resilience Annual Report to Congress
This report summarizes the current cybersecurity threat landscape, highlights the agency's key cybersecurity initiatives, and outlines the agency's ongoing...
November 19, 2025 08:00 AM
The Role of M.L.S. in Managing Cybersecurity Legal Challenges
A Master of Legal Studies can prepare future compliance and risk management professionals to analyze and interpret regulatory frameworks.
November 17, 2025 08:00 AM
Military Objective or Civilian Object? The Italian National Cybersecurity Agency's Status in Case of Armed Conflict
From an IHL perspective, the ACN occupies a nuanced position within Italy's national cybersecurity architecture.
October 20, 2025 07:00 AM
2025 Cyber Incident Trends: What Your Business Needs to Know
Malicious actors continue to exploit our connected digital ecosystem, disrupting organizations across all sectors.
October 17, 2025 07:00 AM
Outdated Cybersecurity Practices: Why the Legal Market Must Evolve
Law firms and legal departments are prime targets for cyberattacks, but many firms still rely on outdated defenses that leave critical gaps...
October 01, 2025 07:00 AM
New world, new rules: Cybersecurity in an era of uncertainty - The C-suite playbook
Check out the latest findings from PwC's 2026 Global Digital Insights Survey, reflecting the views of over 3800 executives.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
LAA CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of The Legal Aid Agency
The official website of The Legal Aid Agency is http://www.justice.gov.uk/about/laa.
The Legal Aid Agency’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, The Legal Aid Agency’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 753, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does The Legal Aid Agency’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, The Legal Aid Agency currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has The Legal Aid Agency been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, The Legal Aid Agency has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
Does The Legal Aid Agency have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, The Legal Aid Agency is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does The Legal Aid Agency have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, The Legal Aid Agency does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does The Legal Aid Agency comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, The Legal Aid Agency is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does The Legal Aid Agency have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, The Legal Aid Agency does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does The Legal Aid Agency comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, The Legal Aid Agency is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does The Legal Aid Agency have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,The Legal Aid Agency is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of The Legal Aid Agency
The Legal Aid Agency operates primarily in the Legal Services industry.
Number of Employees at The Legal Aid Agency
The Legal Aid Agency employs approximately 354 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by The Legal Aid Agency
The Legal Aid Agency presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
The Legal Aid Agency’s LinkedIn Followers
The Legal Aid Agency’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 19,426 followers.
NAICS Classification of The Legal Aid Agency
The Legal Aid Agency is classified under the NAICS code 5411, which corresponds to Legal Services.
The Legal Aid Agency’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, The Legal Aid Agency does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
The Legal Aid Agency’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, The Legal Aid Agency maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-legal-aid-agency.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving The Legal Aid Agency
As of April 02, 2026, Rankiteo reports that The Legal Aid Agency has experienced 4 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
The Legal Aid Agency has an estimated 7,767 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at The Legal Aid Agency ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach and Cyber Attack.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on The Legal Aid Agency ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $50 million.
How does The Legal Aid Agency detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with nordpass, third party assistance with nordstellar (research and disclosure), and remediation measures with urged adoption of strong, unique passwords; regular password rotation, and communication strategy with public report by nordpass/nordstellar; media coverage (e.g., techradar), and incident response plan activated with yes (moj and legal aid agency working with ncsc and nca), and third party assistance with national cyber security centre (ncsc), third party assistance with national crime agency (nca), and law enforcement notified with yes (nca involved), and containment measures with legal injunction against data distribution, containment measures with online service taken offline, and remediation measures with bolstering security of systems with ncsc support, and communication strategy with public disclosure via moj statement, communication strategy with apology from legal aid agency ceo jane harbottle, communication strategy with warnings to law firms about compromised financial data, and enhanced monitoring with likely (implied by 'bolstering security' but not explicitly stated), and incident response plan activated with yes, and containment measures with servers taken offline in may 2025, injunction to prevent data publication on the web/dark web, and remediation measures with implementation of contingency measures, manual processes for legal aid management, and recovery measures with recovery of overpaid funds from legal aid providers (25% repayment rate), and communication strategy with advisories to legal aid providers in april 2025; further updates in may 2025, and enhanced monitoring with new threat detection system (operational status unclear)..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Unauthorized Access to UK Ministry of Justice Servers
Description: The employee’s sensitive personal data of UK Ministry of Justice was compromised in an unauthorized access gained to the servers of Justice Academy, an online learning platform used by MoJ. The compromised information includes full name, staff identification information, email address, national insurance number, and details of where they work and with which department or agency.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Title: Exposure of Over 3,000 UK Civil Servant Passwords on the Dark Web
Description: Hundreds of civil servants in the UK had their business passwords exposed on the dark web, posing risks to public institutions and national interests. The Ministry of Justice was the most affected. The incident highlights poor password hygiene, with many passwords being weak and reused across accounts. NordPass and NordStellar conducted the research, cross-referencing over 5,500 organizations across six countries, identifying 3,014 exposed passwords linked to UK civil servants.
Type: data breach
Attack Vector: dark web exposureweak/reused passwords
Vulnerability Exploited: Poor password hygiene (weak, reused, or easily guessable passwords)
Title: Data Breach at UK Ministry of Justice's Legal Aid Agency
Description: Hackers accessed a large amount of personal and sensitive information from individuals who applied for legal aid in England and Wales via the Legal Aid Agency’s online platform since 2010. The breach potentially exposed data of over 2 million people, including criminal histories, financial details, and personally identifiable information (PII). The hackers threatened to publish the data online, posing significant risks to vulnerable individuals, including victims of domestic violence. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) secured a legal injunction against the distribution of the data, but its effectiveness remains uncertain. The Legal Aid Agency took its online service offline as a precautionary measure.
Date Detected: 2024-04-23
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-05-20
Type: Data Breach
Motivation: Financial GainData Extortion
Title: Cyberattack on the UK's Legal Aid Agency (LAA)
Description: The UK's Ministry of Justice (MoJ) disclosed a high-profile cyberattack on the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) after spending £50 million on cybersecurity improvements. The attack, considered one of the most sensitive in British history, began in December 2024 but was not detected until April 2025. The LAA initially underestimated the extent of the breach, later discovering that legal aid applicant data was compromised. Systems were taken offline in May 2025, and contingency measures were enacted to maintain access to legal aid services.
Date Detected: 2025-04
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10
Type: Data Breach, Cyberattack
Motivation: Criminal purposes
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Dark web (exposed credentials).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach MIN164115322
Data Compromised: Full name, Staff identification information, Email address, National insurance number, Work details, Department or agency details
Systems Affected: Justice Academy servers
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Data Compromised: Passwords (3,014 unique exposures)
Operational Impact: Potential unauthorized access to public institution systems, risk to national strategic interests
Brand Reputation Impact: Negative perception of public sector cybersecurity practices
Identity Theft Risk: High (due to reused passwords across accounts)
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Data Compromised: Contact details (names, addresses), Dates of birth, National id numbers, Criminal history, Employment status, Financial data (contribution amounts, debts, payments)
Systems Affected: Legal Aid Agency’s online platform
Downtime: Legal Aid Agency’s online service taken offline (duration unspecified)
Operational Impact: Disruption to legal aid application processing; potential long-term reputational and operational damage to the Legal Aid Agency and MoJ
Customer Complaints: Expected (specific numbers not provided)
Brand Reputation Impact: Severe (public trust in MoJ and Legal Aid Agency undermined, particularly among vulnerable populations)
Legal Liabilities: Potential lawsuits from affected individuals; regulatory scrutiny over data protection failures
Identity Theft Risk: High (due to exposure of PII and financial data)
Payment Information Risk: High (financial data such as debts and payments compromised)
Incident : Data Breach, Cyberattack UK-1767792855
Financial Loss: £50 million spent on cybersecurity improvements; overpayment to legal aid providers during contingency period
Data Compromised: Legal aid applicant data, legal aid provider financial data (account and transaction data), personally identifiable information
Systems Affected: LAA servers, legal aid systems
Downtime: Systems taken offline in May 2025; manual processes implemented
Operational Impact: Manual processes for managing caseloads, delayed recovery of overpaid funds (20 months estimated), profound impact on legal sector workers' wellbeing
Brand Reputation Impact: Loss of public confidence in MoJ's ability to secure personal data
Identity Theft Risk: High (personally identifiable information compromised)
Payment Information Risk: High (financial data such as account and transaction data accessed)
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $12.50 million.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Information, , Passwords/Credentials, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Criminal History, Financial Data, Employment Status, National Id Numbers, , Legal Aid Applicant Data, Legal Aid Provider Financial Data, Personally Identifiable Information and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach MIN164115322
Entity Name: UK Ministry of Justice
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Government
Location: United Kingdom
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Entity Name: Ministry of Justice (UK)
Entity Type: Government Ministry
Industry: Public Administration / Justice
Location: United Kingdom
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Entity Name: Ministry of Defence (UK)
Entity Type: Government Ministry
Industry: Defense
Location: United Kingdom
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Entity Name: Aberdeen City Council
Entity Type: Local Government
Industry: Public Administration
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Entity Name: Department for Work and Pensions (UK)
Entity Type: Government Department
Industry: Social Services
Location: United Kingdom
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Entity Name: National and Federal Parliaments (UK)
Entity Type: Legislative Body
Industry: Government
Location: United Kingdom
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Entity Name: Local and Regional Governments (UK)
Entity Type: Public Institutions
Industry: Government
Location: United Kingdom
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Entity Name: Municipalities (UK)
Entity Type: Local Government
Industry: Public Administration
Location: United Kingdom
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Entity Name: Ministry of Justice (MoJ), UK
Entity Type: Government Ministry
Industry: Public Sector / Legal Services
Location: United Kingdom (England and Wales)
Customers Affected: Potentially over 2 million legal aid applicants since 2010
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Entity Name: Legal Aid Agency
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Legal Services
Location: United Kingdom (England and Wales)
Customers Affected: Potentially over 2 million legal aid applicants since 2010
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Entity Name: Legal aid applicants (individuals)
Entity Type: General Public
Location: United Kingdom (England and Wales)
Customers Affected: Potentially over 2 million
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Entity Name: Law firms, non-profits, and barristers (legal aid providers)
Entity Type: Private Sector, Non-Profit
Industry: Legal Services
Location: United Kingdom (England and Wales)
Incident : Data Breach, Cyberattack UK-1767792855
Entity Name: Legal Aid Agency (LAA)
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Legal, Public Sector
Location: United Kingdom
Customers Affected: Legal aid applicants, legal aid providers
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Third Party Assistance: Nordpass, Nordstellar (Research And Disclosure).
Remediation Measures: Urged adoption of strong, unique passwords; regular password rotation
Communication Strategy: Public report by NordPass/NordStellar; media coverage (e.g., TechRadar)
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes (MoJ and Legal Aid Agency working with NCSC and NCA)
Third Party Assistance: National Cyber Security Centre (Ncsc), National Crime Agency (Nca).
Law Enforcement Notified: Yes (NCA involved)
Containment Measures: Legal injunction against data distributionOnline service taken offline
Remediation Measures: Bolstering security of systems with NCSC support
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via MoJ statementApology from Legal Aid Agency CEO Jane HarbottleWarnings to law firms about compromised financial data
Enhanced Monitoring: Likely (implied by 'bolstering security' but not explicitly stated)
Incident : Data Breach, Cyberattack UK-1767792855
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes
Containment Measures: Servers taken offline in May 2025, injunction to prevent data publication on the web/dark web
Remediation Measures: Implementation of contingency measures, manual processes for legal aid management
Recovery Measures: Recovery of overpaid funds from legal aid providers (25% repayment rate)
Communication Strategy: Advisories to legal aid providers in April 2025; further updates in May 2025
Enhanced Monitoring: New threat detection system (operational status unclear)
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes (MoJ and Legal Aid Agency working with NCSC and NCA), Yes.
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through NordPass, NordStellar (research and disclosure), , National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), National Crime Agency (NCA), .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach MIN164115322
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: full namestaff identification informationemail addressnational insurance numberwork detailsdepartment or agency details
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Type of Data Compromised: Passwords/credentials
Number of Records Exposed: 3014
Sensitivity of Data: High (government/ civil servant credentials)
Data Exfiltration: Yes (exposed on dark web)
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Criminal history, Financial data, Employment status, National id numbers
Number of Records Exposed: Over 2 million (claimed by hackers; MoJ did not confirm exact number)
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes criminal histories, financial details, and PII of vulnerable individuals)
Data Exfiltration: Yes (hackers downloaded significant amounts of data)
Personally Identifiable Information: NamesAddressesDates of birthNational ID numbersFinancial details (contributions, debts, payments)
Incident : Data Breach, Cyberattack UK-1767792855
Type of Data Compromised: Legal aid applicant data, Legal aid provider financial data, Personally identifiable information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes (potential publication on the web/dark web)
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Urged adoption of strong, unique passwords; regular password rotation, , Bolstering security of systems with NCSC support, , Implementation of contingency measures, manual processes for legal aid management.
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by legal injunction against data distribution, online service taken offline, , servers taken offline in may 2025 and injunction to prevent data publication on the web/dark web.
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Data Exfiltration: Yes (data extortion incident)
Incident : Data Breach, Cyberattack UK-1767792855
Data Exfiltration: Yes
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Recovery of overpaid funds from legal aid providers (25% repayment rate).
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Regulations Violated: UK GDPR, Data Protection Act 2018 (likely),
Legal Actions: Legal injunction secured against data distribution,
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Legal injunction secured against data distribution, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Lessons Learned: Poor password hygiene (weak, reused passwords) remains a critical vulnerability in both public and private sectors., Exposed credentials of civil servants pose risks to national security and public trust., Cross-organizational password reuse exacerbates exposure risks.
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Lessons Learned: Vulnerabilities in public sector digital services can have severe consequences for marginalized populations., Legal injunctions may be ineffective against anonymous, jurisdictionally hostile threat actors., Critical public services (e.g., legal aid) may lack the same resilience as traditional critical national infrastructure (CNI)., Proactive law enforcement capabilities are needed to target high-risk data breaches selectively.
Incident : Data Breach, Cyberattack UK-1767792855
Lessons Learned: Underestimation of breach extent, delays in detection and response, need for accelerated IT transformation and additional funding for cybersecurity improvements
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Recommendations: Enforce strong, unique password policies across all public sector accounts., Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for sensitive systems., Regularly audit and rotate passwords, especially for high-value targets (e.g., government employees)., Monitor dark web for exposed credentials proactively., Educate employees on cyber hygiene and risks of password reuse.Enforce strong, unique password policies across all public sector accounts., Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for sensitive systems., Regularly audit and rotate passwords, especially for high-value targets (e.g., government employees)., Monitor dark web for exposed credentials proactively., Educate employees on cyber hygiene and risks of password reuse.Enforce strong, unique password policies across all public sector accounts., Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for sensitive systems., Regularly audit and rotate passwords, especially for high-value targets (e.g., government employees)., Monitor dark web for exposed credentials proactively., Educate employees on cyber hygiene and risks of password reuse.Enforce strong, unique password policies across all public sector accounts., Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for sensitive systems., Regularly audit and rotate passwords, especially for high-value targets (e.g., government employees)., Monitor dark web for exposed credentials proactively., Educate employees on cyber hygiene and risks of password reuse.Enforce strong, unique password policies across all public sector accounts., Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for sensitive systems., Regularly audit and rotate passwords, especially for high-value targets (e.g., government employees)., Monitor dark web for exposed credentials proactively., Educate employees on cyber hygiene and risks of password reuse.
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Recommendations: Enhance cybersecurity measures for public-facing digital services, particularly those handling sensitive data., Prioritize protection of public services alongside traditional CNI in national cybersecurity strategies., Improve incident response coordination between government agencies (e.g., MoJ, NCSC, NCA)., Provide support (e.g., credit monitoring, identity theft protection) to affected individuals, especially vulnerable groups., Conduct a thorough review of the Legal Aid Agency’s data protection practices and third-party risk management.Enhance cybersecurity measures for public-facing digital services, particularly those handling sensitive data., Prioritize protection of public services alongside traditional CNI in national cybersecurity strategies., Improve incident response coordination between government agencies (e.g., MoJ, NCSC, NCA)., Provide support (e.g., credit monitoring, identity theft protection) to affected individuals, especially vulnerable groups., Conduct a thorough review of the Legal Aid Agency’s data protection practices and third-party risk management.Enhance cybersecurity measures for public-facing digital services, particularly those handling sensitive data., Prioritize protection of public services alongside traditional CNI in national cybersecurity strategies., Improve incident response coordination between government agencies (e.g., MoJ, NCSC, NCA)., Provide support (e.g., credit monitoring, identity theft protection) to affected individuals, especially vulnerable groups., Conduct a thorough review of the Legal Aid Agency’s data protection practices and third-party risk management.Enhance cybersecurity measures for public-facing digital services, particularly those handling sensitive data., Prioritize protection of public services alongside traditional CNI in national cybersecurity strategies., Improve incident response coordination between government agencies (e.g., MoJ, NCSC, NCA)., Provide support (e.g., credit monitoring, identity theft protection) to affected individuals, especially vulnerable groups., Conduct a thorough review of the Legal Aid Agency’s data protection practices and third-party risk management.Enhance cybersecurity measures for public-facing digital services, particularly those handling sensitive data., Prioritize protection of public services alongside traditional CNI in national cybersecurity strategies., Improve incident response coordination between government agencies (e.g., MoJ, NCSC, NCA)., Provide support (e.g., credit monitoring, identity theft protection) to affected individuals, especially vulnerable groups., Conduct a thorough review of the Legal Aid Agency’s data protection practices and third-party risk management.
Incident : Data Breach, Cyberattack UK-1767792855
Recommendations: Accelerate IT transformation, allocate additional funding for cybersecurity, improve threat detection and response times, enhance public confidence in data security
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Poor password hygiene (weak, reused passwords) remains a critical vulnerability in both public and private sectors.,Exposed credentials of civil servants pose risks to national security and public trust.,Cross-organizational password reuse exacerbates exposure risks.Vulnerabilities in public sector digital services can have severe consequences for marginalized populations.,Legal injunctions may be ineffective against anonymous, jurisdictionally hostile threat actors.,Critical public services (e.g., legal aid) may lack the same resilience as traditional critical national infrastructure (CNI).,Proactive law enforcement capabilities are needed to target high-risk data breaches selectively.Underestimation of breach extent, delays in detection and response, need for accelerated IT transformation and additional funding for cybersecurity improvements.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Provide support (e.g., credit monitoring, identity theft protection) to affected individuals, especially vulnerable groups., Improve incident response coordination between government agencies (e.g., MoJ, NCSC, NCA)., Accelerate IT transformation, allocate additional funding for cybersecurity, improve threat detection and response times, enhance public confidence in data security, Prioritize protection of public services alongside traditional CNI in national cybersecurity strategies., Conduct a thorough review of the Legal Aid Agency’s data protection practices and third-party risk management., Enhance cybersecurity measures for public-facing digital services and particularly those handling sensitive data..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Source: NordPass & NordStellar Report
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Source: Sky News
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Source: Ministry of Justice (MoJ) public statement
Date Accessed: 2024-05-20
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Source: Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) - Gareth Mott
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Source: Law Society of England and Wales - Richard Atkinson
Incident : Data Breach, Cyberattack UK-1767792855
Source: Public Accounts Committee (PAC) Report
Incident : Data Breach, Cyberattack UK-1767792855
Source: The Register
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: NordPass & NordStellar Report, and Source: TechRadar ProUrl: https://www.techradar.com, and Source: Sky News, and Source: Ministry of Justice (MoJ) public statementDate Accessed: 2024-05-20, and Source: Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) - Gareth Mott, and Source: Law Society of England and Wales - Richard Atkinson, and Source: Public Accounts Committee (PAC) Report, and Source: The Register.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Investigation Status: Completed (by NordPass/NordStellar)
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Investigation Status: Ongoing (NCA, NCSC, and MoJ collaborating)
Incident : Data Breach, Cyberattack UK-1767792855
Investigation Status: Ongoing
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Report By Nordpass/Nordstellar; Media Coverage (E.G., Techradar), Public Disclosure Via Moj Statement, Apology From Legal Aid Agency Ceo Jane Harbottle, Warnings To Law Firms About Compromised Financial Data and Advisories to legal aid providers in April 2025; further updates in May 2025.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Stakeholder Advisories: Public Report Urging Improved Cyber Hygiene.
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Stakeholder Advisories: Warnings Issued To Law Firms About Compromised Financial Data., Public Apology And Updates From Legal Aid Agency Ceo Jane Harbottle..
Customer Advisories: MoJ statement acknowledging the breach and potential impact on legal aid applicants.Recommendations for affected individuals to monitor for identity theft or fraud (implied but not explicitly detailed).
Incident : Data Breach, Cyberattack UK-1767792855
Stakeholder Advisories: Daily senior-level discussions between LAA and MoJ (April 23 - May 16, 2025)
Customer Advisories: Legal aid providers informed in April 2025 about potential financial data exposure; further updates in May 2025 regarding legal aid applicant data
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Public Report Urging Improved Cyber Hygiene, Warnings Issued To Law Firms About Compromised Financial Data., Public Apology And Updates From Legal Aid Agency Ceo Jane Harbottle., Moj Statement Acknowledging The Breach And Potential Impact On Legal Aid Applicants., Recommendations For Affected Individuals To Monitor For Identity Theft Or Fraud (Implied But Not Explicitly Detailed)., , Daily senior-level discussions between LAA and MoJ (April 23 - May 16, 2025) and Legal aid providers informed in April 2025 about potential financial data exposure; further updates in May 2025 regarding legal aid applicant data.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Entry Point: Dark web (exposed credentials)
High Value Targets: Ministry Of Justice, Ministry Of Defence, Department For Work And Pensions,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Ministry Of Justice, Ministry Of Defence, Department For Work And Pensions,
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
High Value Targets: Legal Aid Applicant Data (Including Criminal Histories And Financial Details),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Legal Aid Applicant Data (Including Criminal Histories And Financial Details),
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : data breach UK-0592305101625
Root Causes: Weak Password Policies (E.G., Passwords Like '12345678' Or 'Password')., Password Reuse Across Multiple Accounts/Services., Lack Of Proactive Monitoring For Credential Exposure.,
Corrective Actions: Public Awareness Campaign On Password Hygiene., Recommendations For Password Managers And Mfa Adoption.,
Incident : Data Breach THE31101331112625
Corrective Actions: Online Service Taken Offline To Prevent Further Access., Security Enhancements Implemented With Ncsc Support., Legal Injunction Secured To Deter Data Distribution.,
Incident : Data Breach, Cyberattack UK-1767792855
Root Causes: Security shortcomings identified since 2021, delayed threat detection, underestimation of breach extent, delayed system shutdown
Corrective Actions: Implementation of new threat detection system, contingency measures, manual processes, recovery of overpaid funds, comprehensive review of MoJ systems
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Nordpass, Nordstellar (Research And Disclosure), , National Cyber Security Centre (Ncsc), National Crime Agency (Nca), , Likely (implied by 'bolstering security' but not explicitly stated), New threat detection system (operational status unclear).
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Public Awareness Campaign On Password Hygiene., Recommendations For Password Managers And Mfa Adoption., , Online Service Taken Offline To Prevent Further Access., Security Enhancements Implemented With Ncsc Support., Legal Injunction Secured To Deter Data Distribution., , Implementation of new threat detection system, contingency measures, manual processes, recovery of overpaid funds, comprehensive review of MoJ systems.
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2024-04-23.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-10.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was £50 million spent on cybersecurity improvements; overpayment to legal aid providers during contingency period.
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were full name, staff identification information, email address, national insurance number, work details, department or agency details, , passwords (3,014 unique exposures), , Contact details (names, addresses), Dates of birth, National ID numbers, Criminal history, Employment status, Financial data (contribution amounts, debts, payments), , Legal aid applicant data, legal aid provider financial data (account and transaction data) and personally identifiable information.
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Justice Academy servers and Legal Aid Agency’s online platform and .
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was nordpass, nordstellar (research and disclosure), , national cyber security centre (ncsc), national crime agency (nca), .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Legal injunction against data distributionOnline service taken offline, Servers taken offline in May 2025 and injunction to prevent data publication on the web/dark web.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Dates of birth, passwords (3,014 unique exposures), Employment status, department or agency details, National ID numbers, Criminal history, Contact details (names, addresses), full name, Financial data (contribution amounts, debts, payments), Legal aid applicant data, legal aid provider financial data (account and transaction data), personally identifiable information, staff identification information, work details, email address and national insurance number.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 2.0M.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Legal injunction secured against data distribution, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Proactive law enforcement capabilities are needed to target high-risk data breaches selectively., Underestimation of breach extent, delays in detection and response, need for accelerated IT transformation and additional funding for cybersecurity improvements.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Provide support (e.g., credit monitoring, identity theft protection) to affected individuals, especially vulnerable groups., Improve incident response coordination between government agencies (e.g., MoJ, NCSC, NCA)., Accelerate IT transformation, allocate additional funding for cybersecurity, improve threat detection and response times, enhance public confidence in data security, Regularly audit and rotate passwords, especially for high-value targets (e.g., government employees)., Educate employees on cyber hygiene and risks of password reuse., Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for sensitive systems., Prioritize protection of public services alongside traditional CNI in national cybersecurity strategies., Conduct a thorough review of the Legal Aid Agency’s data protection practices and third-party risk management., Monitor dark web for exposed credentials proactively., Enhance cybersecurity measures for public-facing digital services, particularly those handling sensitive data., Enforce strong and unique password policies across all public sector accounts..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are NordPass & NordStellar Report, TechRadar Pro, Public Accounts Committee (PAC) Report, Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) - Gareth Mott, Sky News, Law Society of England and Wales - Richard Atkinson, The Register and Ministry of Justice (MoJ) public statement.
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.techradar.com .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Completed (by NordPass/NordStellar).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Public report urging improved cyber hygiene, Warnings issued to law firms about compromised financial data., Public apology and updates from Legal Aid Agency CEO Jane Harbottle., Daily senior-level discussions between LAA and MoJ (April 23 - May 16, 2025), .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an MoJ statement acknowledging the breach and potential impact on legal aid applicants.Recommendations for affected individuals to monitor for identity theft or fraud (implied but not explicitly detailed). and Legal aid providers informed in April 2025 about potential financial data exposure; further updates in May 2025 regarding legal aid applicant data.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Dark web (exposed credentials).
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Weak password policies (e.g., passwords like '12345678' or 'password').Password reuse across multiple accounts/services.Lack of proactive monitoring for credential exposure., Security shortcomings identified since 2021, delayed threat detection, underestimation of breach extent, delayed system shutdown.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Public awareness campaign on password hygiene.Recommendations for password managers and MFA adoption., Online service taken offline to prevent further access.Security enhancements implemented with NCSC support.Legal injunction secured to deter data distribution., Implementation of new threat detection system, contingency measures, manual processes, recovery of overpaid funds, comprehensive review of MoJ systems.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
A vulnerability was found in Nothings stb up to 1.26. Impacted is the function stbtt_InitFont_internal in the library stb_truetype.h of the component TTF File Handler. Performing a manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read in VS6ComFile!get_macro_mem_COM. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain a stack-based buffer overflow in VS6ComFile!CSaveData::_conv_AnimationItem. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to arbitrary code execution on the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6MemInIF!set_temp_type_default. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6ComFile!load_link_inf. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=the-legal-aid-agency' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
