Comparison Overview

Texas Health Resources

VS

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Texas Health Resources

612 E Lamar Blvd, Arlington, US
Last Update: 2026-03-27

At Texas Health Resources, our mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities we serve. We are one of the largest faith-based, nonprofit health systems in the United States with a team of more than 28,000 employees of wholly owned/operated facilities and consolidated joint ventures in the greater Dallas Fort Worth area. Our career growth and professional development opportunities are top-notch and our benefits are equally outstanding. Join our award-winning Texas Health family and become a part of a team that is improving the health of our communities daily. You belong here. Let us brag for a minute on just a few of our recent accomplishments. • Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For® 2025 • Business Group on Health Best Employers: Excellence in Health & Well-being Award 2025 • 20 Best Workplaces in Health Care by Great Place to Work® and Fortune 2025 • Companies That Care® by PEOPLE magazine and Great Place to Work® 2025 • America’s Best Large Employers by Forbes for 2025 • Fortune’s Best Workplaces for Women™ 2025 We are an Equal Opportunity Employer and do not discriminate against any employees or applicant for employment because of race, color, sex, age, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, status as a veteran, and basis of disability or any other federal, state or local protected class.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,844
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

1275 York Avenue, New York, 10065, US
Last Update: 2026-03-30
Between 750 and 799

The people of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) are united by a singular mission: ending cancer for life. Our specialized care teams provide personalized, compassionate, expert care to patients of all ages. Informed by basic research done at our Sloan Kettering Institute, scientists across MSK collaborate to conduct innovative translational and clinical research that is driving a revolution in our understanding of cancer as a disease and improving the ability to prevent, diagnose, and treat it. MSK is dedicated to training the next generation of scientists and clinicians, who go on to pursue our mission at MSK and around the globe. One of the world’s most respected comprehensive centers devoted exclusively to cancer, we have been recognized as one of the top two cancer hospitals in the country by U.S. News & World Report for more than 30 years.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,500
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-health-resources.jpeg
Texas Health Resources
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memorial-sloan-kettering-cancer-center.jpeg
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Texas Health Resources
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Texas Health Resources has 29.58% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in 2026.

Incident History — Texas Health Resources (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Health Resources cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-health-resources.jpeg
Texas Health Resources
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/memorial-sloan-kettering-cancer-center.jpeg
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Texas Health Resources company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Texas Health Resources company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, Texas Health Resources company has reported more cyber incidents than Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company.

Texas Health Resources company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Texas Health Resources company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company nor Texas Health Resources company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Texas Health Resources company nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Texas Health Resources company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company.

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center company employs more people globally than Texas Health Resources company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Texas Health Resources nor Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024. This affects the function setLanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94.

Description

Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A critical security vulnerability in parisneo/lollms versions up to 2.2.0 allows any authenticated user to accept or reject friend requests belonging to other users. The `respond_request()` function in `backend/routers/friends.py` does not implement proper authorization checks, enabling Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attacks. Specifically, the `/api/friends/requests/{friendship_id}` endpoint fails to verify whether the authenticated user is part of the friendship or the intended recipient of the request. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, privacy violations, and potential social engineering attacks. The issue has been addressed in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N