Securitas France Company Cyber Security Posture
securitas.frSecuritas vous apporte son savoir‑faire et ses compétences dans la sécurisation de votre entreprise. Les services présentés ici peuvent s'intégrer à votre solution de sécurité afin de répondre au mieux à vos besoins et à vos attentes. See a different world. Article 1 : Une autorisation d'exercer numéro AUT-092-2123-02-13-20240338180 est délivrée à SECURITAS FRANCE SARL, sis 253 Quai de la Bataille de Stalingrad, 92130 ISSY LES MOULINEAUX et de numéro SIRET ou autre référence 30449785204226. Article 2 : Elle autorise son bénéficiaire à exercer la ou les activités privées de sécurité suivantes : - Surveillance ou gardiennage Article 3 : En application des articles L612-16 et L612-17 du code de la sécurité intérieure, la présente autorisation d'exercer peut être retirée ou suspendue à tout moment si les conditions initiales de sa délivrance ne sont plus remplies.
Securitas France Company Details
securitas-france
10,001+ employees
39313
561
Security and Investigations
securitas.fr
Scan still pending
SEC_1307836
In-progress
Securitas France Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Securitas France Global Score.png)
Securitas France Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Securitas France Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Securitas France Company Subsidiaries
Securitas vous apporte son savoir‑faire et ses compétences dans la sécurisation de votre entreprise. Les services présentés ici peuvent s'intégrer à votre solution de sécurité afin de répondre au mieux à vos besoins et à vos attentes. See a different world. Article 1 : Une autorisation d'exercer numéro AUT-092-2123-02-13-20240338180 est délivrée à SECURITAS FRANCE SARL, sis 253 Quai de la Bataille de Stalingrad, 92130 ISSY LES MOULINEAUX et de numéro SIRET ou autre référence 30449785204226. Article 2 : Elle autorise son bénéficiaire à exercer la ou les activités privées de sécurité suivantes : - Surveillance ou gardiennage Article 3 : En application des articles L612-16 et L612-17 du code de la sécurité intérieure, la présente autorisation d'exercer peut être retirée ou suspendue à tout moment si les conditions initiales de sa délivrance ne sont plus remplies.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Securitas France Cyber Security News
Securitas divests airport security business to WO Group
Swedish security firm Securitas has completed the sale of its airport security business in France to WO Group for an undisclosed sum.
Securitas tops Q4 profit forecast boosted by strong growth in Europe
It reached a margin of 6.9% last year. Securitas proposed a dividend of 4.50 crowns per share for 2024, up from the 3.80 crowns per share it ...
Securitas Technology officially launches
March 15 marked the official launch of Securitas Technology, a provider of integrated security systems that brings together decades of experience.
Securitas Technology launches as powerhouse security companies unite under new name
Securitas Technology, a world-leading provider of integrated security systems, has officially launched, bringing together two of the leaders ...
An exploit could lead to remote shutdown of security systems: who is responsible?
A leak of critical information could lead to a security systems shutdown. It's unclear which of the parties involved bears responsibility.
Someone Stole This Security Company CEOs’ Identity and Filed for Bankruptcy
The chief executive of the Swedish security firm Securitas was declared bankrupt this week after his identity was stolen.
Securitas completes $3.2 billion acquisition of Stanley Security underlining faith in electronic security services market
Securitas is set to acquire Stanley Black & Decker's electronic security business – Stanley Security - for $3.2 billion.
Securitas Electronic Security Donates to Dallas Fallen Officer Foundation
Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. has donated $6,500 to the Dallas Fallen Officer Foundation (DFOF). The donation was part of the community ...
Securitas - Undervalued Global Security Solutions (OTCMKTS:SCTBF)
Securitas is one of the world's largest security services company with 370,000 employees in more than 56 countries.
Securitas France Similar Companies
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Securitas knows Security. It is our only business. As The Leader in Protective Services, we invest in people, knowledge and technology to deliver customized, cost-effective and class-leading solutions. Our parent company, Securitas AB, is a global company headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden and emplo
NISA Industrial Services pvt Ltd
Late Commander Datar. Singh. Sahi on retirement after 30 years of illustrious service in the Indian Navy, co-founded NISA along with his son and co-founder Mr. Paramjeet Singh Sahi, in 1973. Poised on their combination of youth and experience in specialised expertise in Security Management Systems,
G4S
G4S is a leading security and facility services company that provides proactive security services and cutting-edge smart technology to deliver tailored, integrated security solutions that allow clients to focus on their core business. Through a global workforce of approximately 800,000 people, we le
CHECKMATE SERVICES PVT LTD
CSPL is Pan India company with presence in almost all states and in some neighbouring countries also. We have our Corporate Office at Vadodara, our MD is Mr Vikram Mahurkar. We have our Branches in all States. We carry out training of 15 days for all guards at our Training School located at
Gendarmerie Nationale
Force humaine de près de 100 000 hommes et femmes placée sous l’autorité du ministère de l’Intérieur, la Gendarmerie nationale est une institution militaire garante de la sécurité et de la paix de nos concitoyens, et de la protection de leurs biens. Elle assure des missions de police judi
Liderman
“Somos la empresa de seguridad de mayor prestigio en el Perú" Comenzamos en el año 1989, con solo 4 hombres de Seguridad, que creyeron en nuestro estilo de liderazgo y decidieron apostar por la PASIÓN, darle SENTIDO de PROPÓSITO a nuestras vidas y hacer algo DIFERENTE en el sector. Durante estos
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Securitas France CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Securitas France has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Securitas France has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Securitas vous apporte son savoir‑faire et ses compétences dans la sécurisation de votre entreprise. Les services présentés ici peuvent s'intégrer à votre solution de sécurité afin de répondre au mieux à vos besoins et à vos attentes. See a different world. Article 1 : Une autorisation d'exercer numéro AUT-092-2123-02-13-20240338180 est délivrée à SECURITAS FRANCE SARL, sis 253 Quai de la Bataille de Stalingrad, 92130 ISSY LES MOULINEAUX et de numéro SIRET ou autre référence 30449785204226. Article 2 : Elle autorise son bénéficiaire à exercer la ou les activités privées de sécurité suivantes : - Surveillance ou gardiennage Article 3 : En application des articles L612-16 et L612-17 du code de la sécurité intérieure, la présente autorisation d'exercer peut être retirée ou suspendue à tout moment si les conditions initiales de sa délivrance ne sont plus remplies..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
