Liderman Company Cyber Security Posture
liderman.com.pe“Somos la empresa de seguridad de mayor prestigio en el Perú" Comenzamos en el año 1989, con solo 4 hombres de Seguridad, que creyeron en nuestro estilo de liderazgo y decidieron apostar por la PASIÓN, darle SENTIDO de PROPÓSITO a nuestras vidas y hacer algo DIFERENTE en el sector. Durante estos más de 30 años, nos hemos enfocado en el CORAZÓN de nuestros LIDERMAN, en ganarnos su COMPROMISO, velar por su CRECIMIENTO profesional y CALIDAD de VIDA familiar. Sentido de Propósito: ¡Todo lo que hagamos o digamos, sea para hacer feliz y el bien al otro!! Visión: Brindar un servicio especializado, priorizando la calidad, cuidado del medio ambiente, protección de la vida y salud; para superar las necesidades conocidas y no descubiertas aún, de nuestros clientes. Misión: Recibir de los clientes la delegación de los asuntos de seguridad y atenderlos con máxima eficiencia. Valores: Honestidad Creatividad e Innovación. Solidaridad. Comunicación. Vocación de Servicio. Trabajo en Equipo. Sentido del Humor.
Liderman Company Details
liderman
10,001+ employees
28381
561
Security and Investigations
liderman.com.pe
Scan still pending
LID_4761942
In-progress
Liderman Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Liderman Global Score.png)
Liderman Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Liderman Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Liderman Company Subsidiaries
“Somos la empresa de seguridad de mayor prestigio en el Perú" Comenzamos en el año 1989, con solo 4 hombres de Seguridad, que creyeron en nuestro estilo de liderazgo y decidieron apostar por la PASIÓN, darle SENTIDO de PROPÓSITO a nuestras vidas y hacer algo DIFERENTE en el sector. Durante estos más de 30 años, nos hemos enfocado en el CORAZÓN de nuestros LIDERMAN, en ganarnos su COMPROMISO, velar por su CRECIMIENTO profesional y CALIDAD de VIDA familiar. Sentido de Propósito: ¡Todo lo que hagamos o digamos, sea para hacer feliz y el bien al otro!! Visión: Brindar un servicio especializado, priorizando la calidad, cuidado del medio ambiente, protección de la vida y salud; para superar las necesidades conocidas y no descubiertas aún, de nuestros clientes. Misión: Recibir de los clientes la delegación de los asuntos de seguridad y atenderlos con máxima eficiencia. Valores: Honestidad Creatividad e Innovación. Solidaridad. Comunicación. Vocación de Servicio. Trabajo en Equipo. Sentido del Humor.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Liderman Cyber Security News
Read this year’s Android Security Paper for the latest on mobile protections
To share and document the latest Android security capabilities, we've published an update to the Android Security Paper. The paper provides a ...
Google security director calls for 'harmony' in standards
Authorities are aiming to bolster user security by implementing new sets of regulations — which may undermine the industry's competition if done ...
Google Blocks Unsafe Android App Sideloading in India for Improved Fraud Protection
The development comes nearly a year after Google launched DigiKavach (meaning "digital armor") in India to combat online financial fraud and ...
We’re one step closer to a global cybersecurity standard for smart home devices
A new product security program from the group behind Matter looks to bring a globally recognized cybersecurity mark to smart home devices.
Derived credentials explained, the balance of security and user experience on mobile devices
NIST-compliant multi-factor authentication reduces IT friction, improves security for government users of smartphones and tablets.
Google launches online fraud protection pilot for Android phones in India
As per the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), in the first four months of 2024 alone, Indians reportedly lost over Rs 1,750 crore ...
Launching enhanced fraud protection pilot in India
Fraud and scams cost consumers more than $1 trillion in losses globally, and it's one of the most common forms of cyber crime that India ...
Check these settings to protect your Android device from malware scams
Here is a guide on how you can ensure your Android phone is shielded from the malware menace. Look out for the new software update.
Google updates security to detect more malicious apps and tackle scam scourge
After stealing passwords and banking credentials, scammers would perform unauthorised transactions on victims' banking apps, either wiping out ...
Liderman Similar Companies
ORIONSECURE
At ORIONSECURE, we are a leading provider of both Traditional and New-Age Security Services. ORIONSECURE is the flagship & holding company of the larger ORION Group. At ORION we protect and support your people, premises and assets through our end to end solutions for : - Security Services - Facilit
Fidelity Services Group
Fidelity Services Group is Southern Africa’s largest integrated security solutions provider and the industry leader in protection innovation. Excellence in service delivery and implementation are fundamental to our impressive record of accomplishments. By keeping abreast of the latest trends and te
CHECKMATE SERVICES PVT LTD
CSPL is Pan India company with presence in almost all states and in some neighbouring countries also. We have our Corporate Office at Vadodara, our MD is Mr Vikram Mahurkar. We have our Branches in all States. We carry out training of 15 days for all guards at our Training School located at
Securitas Nederland
Door de juiste inzet van mens, kennis en techniek vinden we de ideale ‘veiligheidsbalans’ voor iedere situatie. Dat begint altijd met heel goed luisteren om zo te doorgronden wat de specifieke omstandigheden en wensen van de klant zijn. Vervolgens groeien we samen naar de gewenste situatie waarin de
GardaWorld
GardaWorld is the world’s largest privately-owned security services company, offering cash services, physical and specialized security solutions, and with our Crisis24 portal, the dissemination of verified information related to international security. GardaWorld est la plus importante entreprise
G4S
G4S is a leading security and facility services company that provides proactive security services and cutting-edge smart technology to deliver tailored, integrated security solutions that allow clients to focus on their core business. Through a global workforce of approximately 800,000 people, we le
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Liderman CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Liderman has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Liderman has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as “Somos la empresa de seguridad de mayor prestigio en el Perú" Comenzamos en el año 1989, con solo 4 hombres de Seguridad, que creyeron en nuestro estilo de liderazgo y decidieron apostar por la PASIÓN, darle SENTIDO de PROPÓSITO a nuestras vidas y hacer algo DIFERENTE en el sector. Durante estos más de 30 años, nos hemos enfocado en el CORAZÓN de nuestros LIDERMAN, en ganarnos su COMPROMISO, velar por su CRECIMIENTO profesional y CALIDAD de VIDA familiar. Sentido de Propósito: ¡Todo lo que hagamos o digamos, sea para hacer feliz y el bien al otro!! Visión: Brindar un servicio especializado, priorizando la calidad, cuidado del medio ambiente, protección de la vida y salud; para superar las necesidades conocidas y no descubiertas aún, de nuestros clientes. Misión: Recibir de los clientes la delegación de los asuntos de seguridad y atenderlos con máxima eficiencia. Valores: Honestidad Creatividad e Innovación. Solidaridad. Comunicación. Vocación de Servicio. Trabajo en Equipo. Sentido del Humor..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
