Comparison Overview

Royal BAM Group

VS

Bouygues Construction

Royal BAM Group

Runnenburg 9, Bunnik, NL, 3981 AZ
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

🏗️ Building a sustainable tomorrow at BAM! As leaders in the construction industry, we are committed to pioneering sustainable practices that not only enhance our projects but also contribute to a better future for generations to come. Our strategy revolves around focusing to protect profitability, transforming to strengthen competitive advantage, and expanding for future growth. Join us in making possible by prioritising sustainability in everything we do. 🌍

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 15,560
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bouygues Construction

Challenger, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78 280, FR
Last Update: 2026-04-04

Bouygues Construction employs 35,600 people around the world, all driven by the greatest and most exciting responsibility of all – building for life. For our customers in more than 50 countries, we deliver much more than projects. We build to create spaces, connections and opportunities. We improve daily life for millions of people by creating structures and buildings that welcome life in all its diversity, serving all our needs: housing, healthcare, education, work, tourism, leisure activities, public services, etc. We are aware that everything we build is here to stay, and our legacy as builders will be with us for generations to come. This is why every day, we look for new solutions in order to design, renovate, and build differently. Our aim is to address the critical imperatives of the environmental transition: we are committed to making construction sustainable and less resource-intensive. We support the development of low-carbon energy production and public transport infrastructures, and we construct and renovate buildings and neighbourhoods using low-carbon materials, optimising the design of our structures and taking account of their lifecycle. Because the men and women of Bouygues Construction are our most precious asset, we ensure that everyone is safe at all times, and that human rights and ethical standards are respected. Finally, we are committed to ensuring that everyone can achieve their full potential in their work by building a career path that reflects the values we hold dear: respect, commitment, pioneering and sharing.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 24,731
Subsidiaries: 119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-bam-group.jpeg
Royal BAM Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bouygues-construction.jpeg
Bouygues Construction
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Royal BAM Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bouygues Construction
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal BAM Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bouygues Construction in 2026.

Incident History — Royal BAM Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal BAM Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bouygues Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bouygues Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-bam-group.jpeg
Royal BAM Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bouygues-construction.jpeg
Bouygues Construction
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain, Data exfiltration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Bouygues Construction company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Royal BAM Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bouygues Construction company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Royal BAM Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bouygues Construction company and Royal BAM Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Bouygues Construction company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Royal BAM Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Bouygues Construction company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Royal BAM Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Bouygues Construction company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Royal BAM Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Royal BAM Group company nor Bouygues Construction company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bouygues Construction holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bouygues Construction company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Royal BAM Group company.

Bouygues Construction company employs more people globally than Royal BAM Group company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bouygues Construction holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bouygues Construction holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bouygues Construction holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bouygues Construction holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bouygues Construction holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Royal BAM Group nor Bouygues Construction holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H