PT Pos Indonesia (Persero) Company Cyber Security Posture
posindonesia.co.idPos Indonesia is an Indonesian state-owned company (BUMN) engaged in postal services. Pos Indonesia was appointed by the government to be the national logistics platform for its wide and comprehensive network that spreads throughout Indonesia. Pos Indonesia was established in Jakarta on August 26, 1746. Since its establishment, Pos Indonesia has undergone many changes in name, status, and function before finally becoming PT Pos Indonesia in 1995. In this year, Pos Indonesia also developed its business model from mail delivery service to freight forwarding and logistics service. There are at least 4,800 online post offices with 58,700 points of sales in the form of post offices, Agen Pos, Mobile Postal Service, and others. Pos Indonesia has a dedicated network, reliable distribution system, track and trace system, excellent service, speed, accuracy, and competitive prices. Pos Indonesia has postal services (retail services) in the form of mail and package delivery services. This service includes domestic and international shipping. For domestic shipping, Pos Indonesia provides Q9 Sameday Service, Pos Express, and Pos Kilat Khusus. As for international shipping, Pos Indonesia provides QIX, EMS, Pos Ekspor, and Paket Pos Cepat Internasional. In addition, Pos Indonesia also provides e-commerce financial services through the Pospay and QPOSin AJA applications. For international financial services, Pos Indonesia provides Wesel Pos service. Pos Indonesia also sells postal items such as seals, stamps, philatelic products, and others.
PPI( Company Details
pt-pos-indonesia-persero
10,001+ employees
0
none
Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage
posindonesia.co.id
Scan still pending
PT _1631637
In-progress
PPI( Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 200 and 800
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
PPI( Global Score.png)
PT Pos Indonesia (Persero) Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 200 and 800 |
PT Pos Indonesia (Persero) Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
PT Pos Indonesia (Persero) Company Subsidiaries
Pos Indonesia is an Indonesian state-owned company (BUMN) engaged in postal services. Pos Indonesia was appointed by the government to be the national logistics platform for its wide and comprehensive network that spreads throughout Indonesia. Pos Indonesia was established in Jakarta on August 26, 1746. Since its establishment, Pos Indonesia has undergone many changes in name, status, and function before finally becoming PT Pos Indonesia in 1995. In this year, Pos Indonesia also developed its business model from mail delivery service to freight forwarding and logistics service. There are at least 4,800 online post offices with 58,700 points of sales in the form of post offices, Agen Pos, Mobile Postal Service, and others. Pos Indonesia has a dedicated network, reliable distribution system, track and trace system, excellent service, speed, accuracy, and competitive prices. Pos Indonesia has postal services (retail services) in the form of mail and package delivery services. This service includes domestic and international shipping. For domestic shipping, Pos Indonesia provides Q9 Sameday Service, Pos Express, and Pos Kilat Khusus. As for international shipping, Pos Indonesia provides QIX, EMS, Pos Ekspor, and Paket Pos Cepat Internasional. In addition, Pos Indonesia also provides e-commerce financial services through the Pospay and QPOSin AJA applications. For international financial services, Pos Indonesia provides Wesel Pos service. Pos Indonesia also sells postal items such as seals, stamps, philatelic products, and others.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
PPI( Cyber Security News
Bank BTN focuses Capex on IT security
BTN implements 3 (three) layers of cyber security: IT security, IT management risk, and compliance and IT audit. These 3 layers will give ...
PPI( Similar Companies
Rhenus Logistics
The Rhenus Group is one of the leading logistics specialists with global business operations and annual turnover amounting to EUR 7.5 billion. 40,000 employees work at 1,320 business sites in more than 70 countries and develop innovative solutions along the complete supply chain. Whether providing t
Yusen Logistics
Yusen Logistics is the insight-driven, customer-centric logistics partner to global business. We deliver this through an extended range of services from International Freight Forwarding and Contract Logistics to Supply Chain Solutions and Industry insights covering the full supply chain. We invest
ADNOC Logistics & Services
ADNOC L&S is the region’s largest shipping and integrated logistics company and a global energy maritime logistics leader with a world-class asset base. It is the maritime logistics arm of ADNOC Group, a key enabler to ADNOC’s strategy and a catalyst for Abu Dhabi’s growth and diversification, deliv
CMA CGM
The CMA CGM Group is a global player in sea, land, air and logistics solutions. Present in 160 countries, it employs 160,000 people, of which nearly 6,000 in Marseille where its head office is located. The world's 3rd largest shipping company, CMA CGM serves more than 420 ports across 5 continents
DHL Express
Leading the way in international logistics across an unparalleled network of 220 countries and territories. With decades of experience, we’re your ideal partner for flexible, sustainable shipping to support your growing business and help you expand into new markets. DHL website terms and conditions
Nagel-Group
Our motivation Over 500 million people in Europe have to be supplied with fresh food every day. We contribute to ensuring this is possible. About us The Nagel-Group, which specialises in food logistics, employs over 11,000 people at more than 130 locations. With around 7,000 vehicles, the Nagel-Gro
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
PPI( CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, PPI( has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, PPI( has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Pos Indonesia is an Indonesian state-owned company (BUMN) engaged in postal services. Pos Indonesia was appointed by the government to be the national logistics platform for its wide and comprehensive network that spreads throughout Indonesia. Pos Indonesia was established in Jakarta on August 26, 1746. Since its establishment, Pos Indonesia has undergone many changes in name, status, and function before finally becoming PT Pos Indonesia in 1995. In this year, Pos Indonesia also developed its business model from mail delivery service to freight forwarding and logistics service. There are at least 4,800 online post offices with 58,700 points of sales in the form of post offices, Agen Pos, Mobile Postal Service, and others. Pos Indonesia has a dedicated network, reliable distribution system, track and trace system, excellent service, speed, accuracy, and competitive prices. Pos Indonesia has postal services (retail services) in the form of mail and package delivery services. This service includes domestic and international shipping. For domestic shipping, Pos Indonesia provides Q9 Sameday Service, Pos Express, and Pos Kilat Khusus. As for international shipping, Pos Indonesia provides QIX, EMS, Pos Ekspor, and Paket Pos Cepat Internasional. In addition, Pos Indonesia also provides e-commerce financial services through the Pospay and QPOSin AJA applications. For international financial services, Pos Indonesia provides Wesel Pos service. Pos Indonesia also sells postal items such as seals, stamps, philatelic products, and others..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
