Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions

Founded in New Orleans in 1972, POPEYES® has more than 45 years of history and culinary tradition. Popeyes distinguishes itself with a unique New Orleans-style menu featuring spicy chicken, chicken tenders, fried shrimp, and other regional items. The chain's passion for its Louisiana heritage and flavorful authentic food has allowed Popeyes to become one of the world's largest chicken quick-service restaurants with over 3,600 restaurants in the U.S. and around the world.

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

PLK

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

popeyes-louisiana-kitchen

Employees number:

27,523

Number of followers:

97,134

NAICS:

7225

Industry Type:

Restaurants

Homepage:

popeyes.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

POP_1311365

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scorePLK Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/popeyes-louisiana-kitchen.jpeg
PLK Restaurants
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Get a Score Increase
globalscorePLK Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/popeyes-louisiana-kitchen.jpeg
PLK Restaurants
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

PLK Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
2
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
Popeyes Louisiana KitchenVulnerability8547/2025ParadoxParadox
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A vulnerability in McHire, the AI-powered recruitment platform used by a vast majority of McDonald’s franchisees, exposed the personal information of over 64 million job applicants. The vulnerability allowed unauthorised access to sensitive data, including names, email addresses, phone numbers, and home addresses. The issue was due to an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) on an internal API and weak default credentials. The incident was swiftly addressed by Paradox.ai and McDonald's, but it highlighted the risks associated with rushing AI deployments without proper security measures.

Popeyes Louisiana KitchenBreach8549/2024NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Grubhub Breach Highlights Growing Third-Party Cyber Risks in the Restaurant Industry In early 2025, Grubhub one of the largest third-party vendors serving the U.S. restaurant sector fell victim to a cyber incident originating from one of its own service providers. The breach underscored a troubling trend: restaurants are increasingly targeted through vulnerabilities in their interconnected digital supply chains. The problem extends beyond isolated incidents. In September 2024, ethical hackers uncovered "catastrophic" flaws in Restaurant Brands Inc.’s systems, affecting Burger King and Popeyes. These included hard-coded passwords that could disrupt operations, raising concerns that malicious actors may have already exploited similar weaknesses. On average, restaurant breaches go undetected for 212 days, giving attackers ample time to steal payment card data, loyalty program details, and employee records. The industry’s rapid digitization has expanded its attack surface. Approximately 80% of restaurant transactions are now electronic, with tech powering everything from point-of-sale systems to kitchen management and third-party delivery platforms. However, this reliance on vendors and their vendors creates a high-risk ecosystem. Third-party breaches now account for 30% of all cyber incidents, doubling in the past year. The financial toll is severe. Hospitality cyber incidents cost between $3.4 million and $3.9 million per breach, driven by lost business, forensic investigations, and regulatory penalties. For individual operators, the impact is even more acute. A mid-sized franchisee with 15 locations faced additional costs after a breach via its payroll provider, including state-mandated notifications, business interruption, and credit monitoring for affected customers. To mitigate these risks, experts emphasize the need for rigorous vendor audits. Key steps include assessing vendors’ security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS. Contracts should also clarify indemnities, as even robust vendor protections may not fully shield operators from fallout. Cyber insurance has become a critical safeguard, covering first- and third-party liabilities. However, policies must be carefully structured to address exposures like wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption. The evolving regulatory landscape with varying state laws adds another layer of complexity, as some insurers exclude coverage for emerging compliance risks. The Grubhub incident serves as a stark reminder: in an industry where digital dependencies are unavoidable, third-party vulnerabilities are a persistent and escalating threat.

McDonald's
Vulnerability
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 7/2025
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: ParadoxParadox
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A vulnerability in McHire, the AI-powered recruitment platform used by a vast majority of McDonald’s franchisees, exposed the personal information of over 64 million job applicants. The vulnerability allowed unauthorised access to sensitive data, including names, email addresses, phone numbers, and home addresses. The issue was due to an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) on an internal API and weak default credentials. The incident was swiftly addressed by Paradox.ai and McDonald's, but it highlighted the risks associated with rushing AI deployments without proper security measures.

Grubhub, Popeyes and Restaurant Brands Inc.: What Restaurants Need to Know About Managing Third-Party Cyber Risks
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 9/2024
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Grubhub Breach Highlights Growing Third-Party Cyber Risks in the Restaurant Industry In early 2025, Grubhub one of the largest third-party vendors serving the U.S. restaurant sector fell victim to a cyber incident originating from one of its own service providers. The breach underscored a troubling trend: restaurants are increasingly targeted through vulnerabilities in their interconnected digital supply chains. The problem extends beyond isolated incidents. In September 2024, ethical hackers uncovered "catastrophic" flaws in Restaurant Brands Inc.’s systems, affecting Burger King and Popeyes. These included hard-coded passwords that could disrupt operations, raising concerns that malicious actors may have already exploited similar weaknesses. On average, restaurant breaches go undetected for 212 days, giving attackers ample time to steal payment card data, loyalty program details, and employee records. The industry’s rapid digitization has expanded its attack surface. Approximately 80% of restaurant transactions are now electronic, with tech powering everything from point-of-sale systems to kitchen management and third-party delivery platforms. However, this reliance on vendors and their vendors creates a high-risk ecosystem. Third-party breaches now account for 30% of all cyber incidents, doubling in the past year. The financial toll is severe. Hospitality cyber incidents cost between $3.4 million and $3.9 million per breach, driven by lost business, forensic investigations, and regulatory penalties. For individual operators, the impact is even more acute. A mid-sized franchisee with 15 locations faced additional costs after a breach via its payroll provider, including state-mandated notifications, business interruption, and credit monitoring for affected customers. To mitigate these risks, experts emphasize the need for rigorous vendor audits. Key steps include assessing vendors’ security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS. Contracts should also clarify indemnities, as even robust vendor protections may not fully shield operators from fallout. Cyber insurance has become a critical safeguard, covering first- and third-party liabilities. However, policies must be carefully structured to address exposures like wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption. The evolving regulatory landscape with varying state laws adds another layer of complexity, as some insurers exclude coverage for emerging compliance risks. The Grubhub incident serves as a stark reminder: in an industry where digital dependencies are unavoidable, third-party vulnerabilities are a persistent and escalating threat.

Ailogo

PLK Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for PLK

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen in 2026.

Incident Types PLK vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen in 2026.

Incident History — PLK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PLK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

PLK Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Founded in New Orleans in 1972, POPEYES® has more than 45 years of history and culinary tradition. Popeyes distinguishes itself with a unique New Orleans-style menu featuring spicy chicken, chicken tenders, fried shrimp, and other regional items. The chain's passion for its Louisiana heritage and flavorful authentic food has allowed Popeyes to become one of the world's largest chicken quick-service restaurants with over 3,600 restaurants in the U.S. and around the world.

Loading...
similarCompanies

PLK Similar Companies

Somos um grande ecossistema de restaurantes que reúne marcas internacionais como Burger King®, Popeyes®, Starbucks® e Subway®. E, por trás de cada receita de sucesso, estão os Zampers: gente que faz acontecer, que joga junto e que deixa sua marca todos os dias. Aqui, a gente acredita que o verdad

In-N-Out Burger

In-N-Out Burger was founded in 1948 by Harry and Esther Snyder in Baldwin Park, California, and remains privately owned and operated. Under the direction of the Snyder family, the company has opened restaurants throughout California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Texas, Oregon, Colorado, and Idaho. In-N-

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

At its Atlanta headquarters, known as the Corporate Support Center, Chick-fil-A, Inc. offers full-time careers in various fields such as Digital Transformation & Technology, Financial Services & Accounting, Enterprise Analytics, Restaurant Development, Early Talent Programs and more. Our team of mor

Taco Bell

Taco Bell was born and raised in California and has been around since 1962. We went from selling everyone’s favorite Crunchy Tacos on the West Coast to a global brand with 8,200+ restaurants, 350 franchise organizations, that serve 42+ million fans each week around the globe. We’re not only the larg

Red Lobster

With over 30,000 employees and more than 500 restaurants in the United States and Canada, Red Lobster is the world’s largest seafood restaurant company. Our vision is to be where the world goes for seafood now and for generations. Red Lobster is an innovative, values-based company that focuses on

P.F. Chang's

P.F. Chang’s is a restaurant concept that honors the 2,000-year-old Asian tradition of wok cooking and believes in making food from scratch every day in every restaurant. Since inception, P.F. Chang’s chefs hand-roll dim sum, hand chop and slice all vegetables and meats, handcraft every sauce and w

TGI Fridays

In 1965, TGI Fridays opened its first location in New York City. Today, there are 380 plus restaurants in 30 plus countries offering high-quality, authentic American food and legendary drinks, bringing together all people from all places. The freeing and liberating spirit of "Friday"​ combined with

Darden

Darden’s family of restaurants features some of the most recognizable and successful brands in full-service dining — Olive Garden, LongHorn Steakhouse, Yard House, Ruth's Chris Steak House, Cheddar’s Scratch Kitchen, The Capital Grille, Chuy's, Seasons 52, Eddie V's and Bahama Breeze. We own and ope

Jimmy John's

THE SANDWICH OF SANDWICHES℠ At Jimmy John's, we don't make sandwiches. We make The Sandwich of Sandwiches℠. We use fresh vegetables because we don't hate salads, we just feel bad for them. We hand-slice our provolone cheese and meats in-house every day, because packaged pre-sliced meats doesn't ha

newsone

PLK CyberSecurity News

March 27, 2026 04:29 PM
Popeyes Beats Biometric Suit Over Workplace Fingerprint Scans

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen Inc. defeated for now a proposed class action alleging it collected employees's fingerprints without proper...

September 09, 2025 07:00 AM
Popeyes, Tim Hortons, Burger King platforms have "catastrophic" vulnerabilities, say hackers

Researchers found a host of vulnerabilities in the platforms run by RBI to service Burger King, Tim Horton's, and Popeyes.

February 19, 2022 08:00 AM
Investing in poultry technology? Cybersecurity is key

Learn why cybersecurity plays a vital role in protecting poultry processing plants and production facilities against malicious data...

October 29, 2019 07:00 AM
Fortinet buys Israeli cybersecurity firm EnSilo

Fortinet said it has completed the acquisition of Israeli cybersecurity company enSilo. No financial details were disclosed but the...

April 09, 2019 07:00 AM
Brunch with Peter Thiel turned into a pitch meeting for CEO Tim Junio

The evolving nature of Expanse reflects the circuitous path of its founder and CEO, Tim Junio. His initial interest in computer science...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

PLK CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen

The official website of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is http://www.popeyes.com.

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 722, reflecting their Moderate security posture.

How many security badges does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen has been affected by a supply chain cyber incident involving Paradox, with the incident ID MCD344071125.

Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen operates primarily in the Restaurants industry.

Number of Employees at Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen employs approximately 27,523 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s LinkedIn Followers

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 97,134 followers.

NAICS Classification of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is classified under the NAICS code 7225, which corresponds to Restaurants and Other Eating Places.

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/popeyes-louisiana-kitchen.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen

As of April 02, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen has an estimated 4,932 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach and Vulnerability.

What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen ?

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $3.40 million.

How does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with changed default administrative credentials, containment measures with resolved idor vulnerability, and remediation measures with removed default credentials, remediation measures with fixed idor vulnerability..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Major Security Flaw in McDonald’s AI Hiring Tool McHire Exposed 64M Job Applications

Description: An IDOR vulnerability and weak default credentials in McHire, the AI-powered recruitment platform used by McDonald’s franchisees, led to a massive leak of personal data.

Date Detected: 2025-06-30

Date Resolved: 2025-07-01

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Weak Default CredentialsInsecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR)

Vulnerability Exploited: Default CredentialsIDOR

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Grubhub Breach Highlights Growing Third-Party Cyber Risks in the Restaurant Industry

Description: In early 2025, Grubhub, one of the largest third-party vendors serving the U.S. restaurant sector, fell victim to a cyber incident originating from one of its own service providers. The breach underscored a troubling trend: restaurants are increasingly targeted through vulnerabilities in their interconnected digital supply chains.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Third-Party Vendor Compromise

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Weak Default Credentials.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Data Compromised: Names, Email addresses, Phone numbers, Home addresses, Authentication tokens, Raw chat messages

Systems Affected: McHire PlatformOlivia Chatbot

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Financial Loss: $3.4 million - $3.9 million per breach (industry average)

Data Compromised: Payment card data, loyalty program details, employee records

Systems Affected: Third-party delivery platforms, point-of-sale systems, kitchen management systems

Operational Impact: Business interruption, forensic investigations, regulatory penalties

Legal Liabilities: State-mandated notifications, credit monitoring for affected customers

Payment Information Risk: High

What is the average financial loss per incident ?

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $1.70 million.

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Information, Contact Information, Authentication Tokens, Chat Messages, , Payment Card Data, Loyalty Program Details, Employee Records and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Entity Name: McDonald’s

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Fast Food

Location: Global

Size: Large

Customers Affected: 64 million job applicants

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Entity Name: Grubhub

Entity Type: Third-Party Vendor

Industry: Restaurant/Delivery

Location: U.S.

Size: Large

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Entity Name: Burger King

Entity Type: Restaurant Chain

Industry: Fast Food

Location: U.S.

Size: Large

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Entity Name: Popeyes

Entity Type: Restaurant Chain

Industry: Fast Food

Location: U.S.

Size: Large

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Entity Name: Mid-sized franchisee (15 locations)

Entity Type: Restaurant Operator

Industry: Fast Food

Size: Medium

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Containment Measures: Changed default administrative credentialsResolved IDOR vulnerability

Remediation Measures: Removed default credentialsFixed IDOR vulnerability

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Type of Data Compromised: Personal information, Contact information, Authentication tokens, Chat messages

Number of Records Exposed: 64 million

Sensitivity of Data: High

Personally Identifiable Information: NamesEmail AddressesPhone NumbersHome Addresses

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Type of Data Compromised: Payment card data, Loyalty program details, Employee records

Sensitivity of Data: High

Personally Identifiable Information: Yes

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Removed default credentials, Fixed IDOR vulnerability, .

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by changed default administrative credentials, resolved idor vulnerability and .

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Regulatory Notifications: State-mandated notifications

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Lessons Learned: The incident highlights the importance of basic security hygiene and governance around AI systems that collect or process personal data.

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Lessons Learned: Third-party vulnerabilities are a persistent and escalating threat in the restaurant industry due to interconnected digital supply chains. Rigorous vendor audits, cyber insurance, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS are critical for mitigation.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Recommendations: Implement proper authentication, auditability, and integration into broader risk workflows, Treat AI as a regulated asset and implement frameworks that ensure accountabilityImplement proper authentication, auditability, and integration into broader risk workflows, Treat AI as a regulated asset and implement frameworks that ensure accountability

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Recommendations: Conduct rigorous vendor audits assessing security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS., Clarify indemnities in vendor contracts to mitigate fallout from third-party breaches., Structure cyber insurance policies to cover first- and third-party liabilities, including wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption., Enhance monitoring and detection capabilities to reduce the average breach detection time (currently 212 days in the industry).Conduct rigorous vendor audits assessing security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS., Clarify indemnities in vendor contracts to mitigate fallout from third-party breaches., Structure cyber insurance policies to cover first- and third-party liabilities, including wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption., Enhance monitoring and detection capabilities to reduce the average breach detection time (currently 212 days in the industry).Conduct rigorous vendor audits assessing security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS., Clarify indemnities in vendor contracts to mitigate fallout from third-party breaches., Structure cyber insurance policies to cover first- and third-party liabilities, including wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption., Enhance monitoring and detection capabilities to reduce the average breach detection time (currently 212 days in the industry).Conduct rigorous vendor audits assessing security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS., Clarify indemnities in vendor contracts to mitigate fallout from third-party breaches., Structure cyber insurance policies to cover first- and third-party liabilities, including wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption., Enhance monitoring and detection capabilities to reduce the average breach detection time (currently 212 days in the industry).

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are The incident highlights the importance of basic security hygiene and governance around AI systems that collect or process personal data.Third-party vulnerabilities are a persistent and escalating threat in the restaurant industry due to interconnected digital supply chains. Rigorous vendor audits, cyber insurance, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS are critical for mitigation.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Source: Reddit

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Source: Ian Carroll

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Source: Ethical hackers (September 2024)

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Reddit, and Source: Ian Carroll, and Source: Ethical hackers (September 2024).

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Entry Point: Weak Default Credentials

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Root Causes: Weak Default Credentials, Idor Vulnerability,

Corrective Actions: Changed Default Administrative Credentials, Resolved Idor Vulnerability,

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Root Causes: Third-party vendor vulnerabilities, hard-coded passwords, lack of rigorous vendor audits, and inadequate cybersecurity measures in the restaurant industry's digital supply chain.

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Changed Default Administrative Credentials, Resolved Idor Vulnerability, .

Additional Questions

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-06-30.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025.

What was the most recent incident resolved ?

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on 2025-07-01.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was $3.4 million - $3.9 million per breach (industry average).

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Names, Email Addresses, Phone Numbers, Home Addresses, Authentication Tokens, Raw Chat Messages, , Payment card data, loyalty program details and employee records.

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was McHire PlatformOlivia Chatbot and .

Response to the Incidents

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Changed default administrative credentialsResolved IDOR vulnerability.

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Phone Numbers, Authentication Tokens, Email Addresses, Raw Chat Messages, Home Addresses, Names, Payment card data, loyalty program details and employee records.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 64.0M.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was The incident highlights the importance of basic security hygiene and governance around AI systems that collect or process personal data., Third-party vulnerabilities are a persistent and escalating threat in the restaurant industry due to interconnected digital supply chains. Rigorous vendor audits, cyber insurance, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS are critical for mitigation.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Implement proper authentication, auditability, and integration into broader risk workflows, Conduct rigorous vendor audits assessing security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS., Treat AI as a regulated asset and implement frameworks that ensure accountability, Clarify indemnities in vendor contracts to mitigate fallout from third-party breaches., Structure cyber insurance policies to cover first- and third-party liabilities, including wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption. and Enhance monitoring and detection capabilities to reduce the average breach detection time (currently 212 days in the industry)..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Ian Carroll, Reddit and Ethical hackers (September 2024).

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Weak Default Credentials.

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Weak Default CredentialsIDOR Vulnerability, Third-party vendor vulnerabilities, hard-coded passwords, lack of rigorous vendor audits, and inadequate cybersecurity measures in the restaurant industry's digital supply chain..

What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Changed default administrative credentialsResolved IDOR vulnerability.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Nothings stb up to 1.26. Impacted is the function stbtt_InitFont_internal in the library stb_truetype.h of the component TTF File Handler. Performing a manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read in VS6ComFile!get_macro_mem_COM. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain a stack-based buffer overflow in VS6ComFile!CSaveData::_conv_AnimationItem. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to arbitrary code execution on the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6MemInIF!set_temp_type_default. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6ComFile!load_link_inf. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=popeyes-louisiana-kitchen' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge