Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions

The year is 1954. Dave and Jim*, two budding entrepreneurs, are on a mission to re-design the perfect broiler, one that will infuse flame-grilled goodness into every burger. And that's how our brand was born. Today the Burger King Corporation, its affiliates and its franchisees collectively operate more than 17,000 restaurants in more than 100 countries and U.S. territories, serving over 11 million guests per day and they’re still coming back for that flame-grilled flavor. The Burger King® brand is owned by Restaurant Brands International Inc. (“RBI”), which owns three of the world’s iconic quick service restaurant brands – Burger King®, Tim Hortons®, and Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen®. But we still have room to grow – and that’s where you come in. We need strong operations, bold marketing, and the best people around to make these brands great. And if we like what we see, there’s no limit to how far you could go here. For more information and exciting career opportunities, please RBI’s website at www.rbicareers.com. For more information about Burger King Corporation, please visit the company’s website at www.bk.com or follow us on Facebook and Twitter. Burger King is a registered trademark of Burger King Corporation. All rights reserved. Please visit www.bk.com for more information on Burger King Corporation trademarks. * Dave Egerton and Jim McLamore, original founders of the Burger King® brand.

Burger King A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Burger King

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

burger-king

Employees number:

126,433

Number of followers:

711,467

NAICS:

7225

Industry Type:

Restaurants

Homepage:

bk.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

BUR_1233888

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreBurger King Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 750 and 799

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burger-king.jpeg
Burger King Restaurants
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Get a Score Increase
globalscoreBurger King Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burger-king.jpeg
Burger King Restaurants
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Burger King Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
5
Attack Types
3
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
Burger KingBreach8549/2025NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Ethical hackers BobDaHacker and BobTheShoplifter exposed severe security vulnerabilities within Restaurant Brands International (RBI), the parent company of Burger King, Tim Hortons, and Popeyes. The flaws included hard-coded passwords (e.g., 'admin') in HTML and drive-through systems, plain-text passwords sent via email, and an unrestricted API allowing unauthorized admin access. The hackers gained entry to employee accounts, internal configurations, raw audio recordings of drive-through conversations (containing customer personal data processed by AI), and even restaurant bathroom rating systems. The breaches revealed catastrophic oversight in cybersecurity fundamentals, with no basic safeguards like antivirus checks or system audits. While the ethical hackers responsibly disclosed the issues and confirmed no customer data was retained, the exposure demonstrated how easily malicious actors could have exploited these gaps. RBI reportedly fixed the vulnerabilities post-disclosure but did not publicly acknowledge the researchers, raising concerns about long-term security improvements. The incident underscores systemic negligence in protecting 30,000+ global outlets from potential data leaks, financial fraud, or operational disruptions.

Burger KingVulnerability8547/2025ParadoxParadox
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A vulnerability in McHire, the AI-powered recruitment platform used by a vast majority of McDonald’s franchisees, exposed the personal information of over 64 million job applicants. The vulnerability allowed unauthorised access to sensitive data, including names, email addresses, phone numbers, and home addresses. The issue was due to an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) on an internal API and weak default credentials. The incident was swiftly addressed by Paradox.ai and McDonald's, but it highlighted the risks associated with rushing AI deployments without proper security measures.

Restaurant Brands InternationalBreach8549/2024NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Grubhub Breach Highlights Growing Third-Party Cyber Risks in the Restaurant Industry In early 2025, Grubhub one of the largest third-party vendors serving the U.S. restaurant sector fell victim to a cyber incident originating from one of its own service providers. The breach underscored a troubling trend: restaurants are increasingly targeted through vulnerabilities in their interconnected digital supply chains. The problem extends beyond isolated incidents. In September 2024, ethical hackers uncovered "catastrophic" flaws in Restaurant Brands Inc.’s systems, affecting Burger King and Popeyes. These included hard-coded passwords that could disrupt operations, raising concerns that malicious actors may have already exploited similar weaknesses. On average, restaurant breaches go undetected for 212 days, giving attackers ample time to steal payment card data, loyalty program details, and employee records. The industry’s rapid digitization has expanded its attack surface. Approximately 80% of restaurant transactions are now electronic, with tech powering everything from point-of-sale systems to kitchen management and third-party delivery platforms. However, this reliance on vendors and their vendors creates a high-risk ecosystem. Third-party breaches now account for 30% of all cyber incidents, doubling in the past year. The financial toll is severe. Hospitality cyber incidents cost between $3.4 million and $3.9 million per breach, driven by lost business, forensic investigations, and regulatory penalties. For individual operators, the impact is even more acute. A mid-sized franchisee with 15 locations faced additional costs after a breach via its payroll provider, including state-mandated notifications, business interruption, and credit monitoring for affected customers. To mitigate these risks, experts emphasize the need for rigorous vendor audits. Key steps include assessing vendors’ security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS. Contracts should also clarify indemnities, as even robust vendor protections may not fully shield operators from fallout. Cyber insurance has become a critical safeguard, covering first- and third-party liabilities. However, policies must be carefully structured to address exposures like wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption. The evolving regulatory landscape with varying state laws adds another layer of complexity, as some insurers exclude coverage for emerging compliance risks. The Grubhub incident serves as a stark reminder: in an industry where digital dependencies are unavoidable, third-party vulnerabilities are a persistent and escalating threat.

Burger KingData Leak60308/2023NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Burger King, the world's largest fast food chain, exposed sensitive credentials to the public twice, endangering their systems and data. Burger King in France exposed private information to the public as a result of a website configuration error, the Cybernews investigation team found. People who applied for jobs at Burger King in France may have been impacted because the impacted website processed job applications. It's not the first time Burger King has exposed sensitive information; supposedly, the France branch exposed personally identifying information (PII) of children who purchased Burger King menus due to a similar misconfiguration.

Burger KingData Leak85405/2019NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A French online shop Kool King specifically tailored to be used by kids who bought Burger King menus exposed nearly 37,900 records after a cyber attack. The data was leaked because the database storing it was misconfigured, allowing anyone with an Internet connection and the knowledge to find it to get to the records stored within. Since the database was not secured in any way and publicly accessible, anyone who reached it could then edit, download, or even destroy the data without needing admin credentials. The information compromised contained personally identifiable information (PII) such as emails, passwords, names, phones, DOB, voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, etc.100

Restaurant Brands International (RBI)
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 9/2025
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Ethical hackers BobDaHacker and BobTheShoplifter exposed severe security vulnerabilities within Restaurant Brands International (RBI), the parent company of Burger King, Tim Hortons, and Popeyes. The flaws included hard-coded passwords (e.g., 'admin') in HTML and drive-through systems, plain-text passwords sent via email, and an unrestricted API allowing unauthorized admin access. The hackers gained entry to employee accounts, internal configurations, raw audio recordings of drive-through conversations (containing customer personal data processed by AI), and even restaurant bathroom rating systems. The breaches revealed catastrophic oversight in cybersecurity fundamentals, with no basic safeguards like antivirus checks or system audits. While the ethical hackers responsibly disclosed the issues and confirmed no customer data was retained, the exposure demonstrated how easily malicious actors could have exploited these gaps. RBI reportedly fixed the vulnerabilities post-disclosure but did not publicly acknowledge the researchers, raising concerns about long-term security improvements. The incident underscores systemic negligence in protecting 30,000+ global outlets from potential data leaks, financial fraud, or operational disruptions.

McDonald's
Vulnerability
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 7/2025
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: ParadoxParadox
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A vulnerability in McHire, the AI-powered recruitment platform used by a vast majority of McDonald’s franchisees, exposed the personal information of over 64 million job applicants. The vulnerability allowed unauthorised access to sensitive data, including names, email addresses, phone numbers, and home addresses. The issue was due to an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) on an internal API and weak default credentials. The incident was swiftly addressed by Paradox.ai and McDonald's, but it highlighted the risks associated with rushing AI deployments without proper security measures.

Grubhub, Popeyes and Restaurant Brands Inc.: What Restaurants Need to Know About Managing Third-Party Cyber Risks
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 9/2024
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Grubhub Breach Highlights Growing Third-Party Cyber Risks in the Restaurant Industry In early 2025, Grubhub one of the largest third-party vendors serving the U.S. restaurant sector fell victim to a cyber incident originating from one of its own service providers. The breach underscored a troubling trend: restaurants are increasingly targeted through vulnerabilities in their interconnected digital supply chains. The problem extends beyond isolated incidents. In September 2024, ethical hackers uncovered "catastrophic" flaws in Restaurant Brands Inc.’s systems, affecting Burger King and Popeyes. These included hard-coded passwords that could disrupt operations, raising concerns that malicious actors may have already exploited similar weaknesses. On average, restaurant breaches go undetected for 212 days, giving attackers ample time to steal payment card data, loyalty program details, and employee records. The industry’s rapid digitization has expanded its attack surface. Approximately 80% of restaurant transactions are now electronic, with tech powering everything from point-of-sale systems to kitchen management and third-party delivery platforms. However, this reliance on vendors and their vendors creates a high-risk ecosystem. Third-party breaches now account for 30% of all cyber incidents, doubling in the past year. The financial toll is severe. Hospitality cyber incidents cost between $3.4 million and $3.9 million per breach, driven by lost business, forensic investigations, and regulatory penalties. For individual operators, the impact is even more acute. A mid-sized franchisee with 15 locations faced additional costs after a breach via its payroll provider, including state-mandated notifications, business interruption, and credit monitoring for affected customers. To mitigate these risks, experts emphasize the need for rigorous vendor audits. Key steps include assessing vendors’ security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS. Contracts should also clarify indemnities, as even robust vendor protections may not fully shield operators from fallout. Cyber insurance has become a critical safeguard, covering first- and third-party liabilities. However, policies must be carefully structured to address exposures like wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption. The evolving regulatory landscape with varying state laws adds another layer of complexity, as some insurers exclude coverage for emerging compliance risks. The Grubhub incident serves as a stark reminder: in an industry where digital dependencies are unavoidable, third-party vulnerabilities are a persistent and escalating threat.

Burger King
Data Leak
Severity: 60
Impact: 3
Seen: 08/2023
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Burger King, the world's largest fast food chain, exposed sensitive credentials to the public twice, endangering their systems and data. Burger King in France exposed private information to the public as a result of a website configuration error, the Cybernews investigation team found. People who applied for jobs at Burger King in France may have been impacted because the impacted website processed job applications. It's not the first time Burger King has exposed sensitive information; supposedly, the France branch exposed personally identifying information (PII) of children who purchased Burger King menus due to a similar misconfiguration.

Burger King
Data Leak
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 05/2019
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A French online shop Kool King specifically tailored to be used by kids who bought Burger King menus exposed nearly 37,900 records after a cyber attack. The data was leaked because the database storing it was misconfigured, allowing anyone with an Internet connection and the knowledge to find it to get to the records stored within. Since the database was not secured in any way and publicly accessible, anyone who reached it could then edit, download, or even destroy the data without needing admin credentials. The information compromised contained personally identifiable information (PII) such as emails, passwords, names, phones, DOB, voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, etc.100

Ailogo

Burger King Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for Burger King

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burger King in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burger King in 2026.

Incident Types Burger King vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burger King in 2026.

Incident History — Burger King (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burger King cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Burger King Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

The year is 1954. Dave and Jim*, two budding entrepreneurs, are on a mission to re-design the perfect broiler, one that will infuse flame-grilled goodness into every burger. And that's how our brand was born. Today the Burger King Corporation, its affiliates and its franchisees collectively operate more than 17,000 restaurants in more than 100 countries and U.S. territories, serving over 11 million guests per day and they’re still coming back for that flame-grilled flavor. The Burger King® brand is owned by Restaurant Brands International Inc. (“RBI”), which owns three of the world’s iconic quick service restaurant brands – Burger King®, Tim Hortons®, and Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen®. But we still have room to grow – and that’s where you come in. We need strong operations, bold marketing, and the best people around to make these brands great. And if we like what we see, there’s no limit to how far you could go here. For more information and exciting career opportunities, please RBI’s website at www.rbicareers.com. For more information about Burger King Corporation, please visit the company’s website at www.bk.com or follow us on Facebook and Twitter. Burger King is a registered trademark of Burger King Corporation. All rights reserved. Please visit www.bk.com for more information on Burger King Corporation trademarks. * Dave Egerton and Jim McLamore, original founders of the Burger King® brand.

Loading...
similarCompanies

Burger King Similar Companies

Outback Steakhouse

Made with an Australian flair, born under the Tampa sun. Outback Steakhouse is an Australian-inspired restaurant providing high quality delicious food with Aussie hospitality since 1988. Our success is based on our belief that if we take care of Our People, the institution of Outback will take care

Subway

Subway is one of the world's largest quick service restaurant brands, serving freshly made-to-order sandwiches, wraps, salads and bowls to millions of guests, across over 100 countries in more than 37,000 restaurants every day. Subway restaurants are owned and operated by Subway franchisees – a ne

Somos um grande ecossistema de restaurantes que reúne marcas internacionais como Burger King®, Popeyes®, Starbucks® e Subway®. E, por trás de cada receita de sucesso, estão os Zampers: gente que faz acontecer, que joga junto e que deixa sua marca todos os dias. Aqui, a gente acredita que o verdad

Arby's

Arby’s, founded in 1964, is the second-largest sandwich restaurant brand in the world with more than 3,400 restaurants in seven countries. Arby’s is part of the Inspire Brands family of restaurants. For more information, visit Arbys.com and InspireBrands.com With the current growth and momentum of

Culver's Restaurants

With strong, Midwestern family values and genuine hometown hospitality, Culver’s® has proudly served its signature ButterBurgers® and Fresh Frozen Custard since we opened our first restaurant in 1984. There are now over 1,000 Culver’s restaurants in 26 states, with more than 50,000 team members offe

Jack in the Box

Jack in the Box has always been the place for those who live outside the box. Where you can try new things and order what you want when you want it. Now, let’s get to the facts! Did you know Jack in the Box was founded on February 21, 1951, by a businessman named Robert O. Peterson in San Diego, Cal

Bloomin' Brands, Inc.

Since the first Outback Steakhouse opened, our family of brands has expanded to include Carrabba's Italian Grill, Bonefish Grill, and Fleming's Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar. Together, these unique, Founder-inspired restaurants make up Bloomin' Brands, Inc. Today, we are one of the world's largest cas

TGI Fridays

In 1965, TGI Fridays opened its first location in New York City. Today, there are 380 plus restaurants in 30 plus countries offering high-quality, authentic American food and legendary drinks, bringing together all people from all places. The freeing and liberating spirit of "Friday"​ combined with

Domino's

Domino’s is a purpose-inspired, performance-driven company powered by exceptional people who are committed to feeding the power of possible—one pizza at a time. Founded in 1960 with a single store in Ypsilanti, Michigan, Domino’s has grown into one of the most recognized and leading pizza brands in

newsone

Burger King CyberSecurity News

March 14, 2026 07:00 AM
Burger King Statistics By Revenue, Restaurants, Growth Strategy And Global Brand Performance (2026)

Burger King Statistics - The company reported a 10% increase in adjusted operating income, which reached USD 123 million during Q3 2025.

March 03, 2026 08:00 AM
Burger King Tests AI Headsets to Track Employee Courtesy

Burger King is currently testing AI-powered headsets in 500 U.S. restaurants that can recite recipes, alert managers about low inventory,...

February 27, 2026 08:00 AM
Burger King Rolls Out AI to Guide Workers

Burger King is currently testing AI-powered headsets in 500 U.S. restaurants that can recite recipes, alert managers when inventories are...

February 26, 2026 08:00 AM
Burger King Tests AI Headsets to Track Employee Interactions

Burger King is currently testing AI-powered headsets in 500 U.S. restaurants that can recite recipes, alert managers about low inventory,...

February 24, 2026 08:00 AM
Burger King France, Wendy’s UK allegedly hacked, data leaked | brief | SC Media

Burger King France and Wendy's UK were alleged to have been compromised by the threat actor "Eliasxy," who published datasets allegedly...

November 06, 2025 12:13 AM
Burger King Braces for the Demise of the Penny

Burger King is struggling with change. Specifically, pennies. On a recent call, Burger King's technology specialists quickly moved on from cybersecurity and...

September 26, 2025 07:00 AM
In Other News: LockBit 5.0, Department of War Cybersecurity Framework, OnePlus Vulnerability

Co-op lost £206 million due to cyberattack, South Korean credit card company hacked, Maryland Transit Administration ransomware attack.

September 19, 2025 07:00 AM
In Other News: 600k Hit by Healthcare Breaches, Major ShinyHunters Hacks, DeepSeek’s Coding Bias

Noteworthy stories that might have slipped under the radar: Eve Security seed funding, Claroty report, patches from WatchGuard and Nokia.

September 15, 2025 07:00 AM
Burger King Uses DMCA to Remove Blog on Drive-Thru Security Flaws

Ethical hacker BobDaHacker published an in-depth report demonstrating how attackers could bypass authentication, eavesdrop on customer...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

Burger King CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Burger King

The official website of Burger King is http://www.bk.com.

Burger King’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Burger King’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 775, reflecting their Fair security posture.

How many security badges does Burger King’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Burger King currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Burger King been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Burger King has been affected by a supply chain cyber incident involving Paradox, with the incident ID MCD344071125.

Does Burger King have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Burger King is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Burger King have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Burger King does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Burger King comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Burger King is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Burger King have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Burger King does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Burger King comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Burger King is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Burger King have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Burger King is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Burger King

Burger King operates primarily in the Restaurants industry.

Number of Employees at Burger King

Burger King employs approximately 126,433 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Burger King

Burger King presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Burger King’s LinkedIn Followers

Burger King’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 711,467 followers.

NAICS Classification of Burger King

Burger King is classified under the NAICS code 7225, which corresponds to Restaurants and Other Eating Places.

Burger King’s Presence on Crunchbase

Yes, Burger King has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/burger-king.

Burger King’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Burger King maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/burger-king.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Burger King

As of April 02, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Burger King has experienced 5 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Burger King has an estimated 4,932 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Burger King ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak, Breach and Vulnerability.

What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Burger King ?

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $3.40 million.

How does Burger King detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with changed default administrative credentials, containment measures with resolved idor vulnerability, and remediation measures with removed default credentials, remediation measures with fixed idor vulnerability, and incident response plan activated with yes (after ethical hacker disclosure), and containment measures with patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly), and communication strategy with no public acknowledgment of ethical hackers or incident details..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Kool King Data Breach

Description: A French online shop Kool King specifically tailored to be used by kids who bought Burger King menus exposed nearly 37,900 records after a cyber attack. The data was leaked because the database storing it was misconfigured, allowing anyone with an Internet connection and the knowledge to find it to get to the records stored within. Since the database was not secured in any way and publicly accessible, anyone who reached it could then edit, download, or even destroy the data without needing admin credentials. The information compromised contained personally identifiable information (PII) such as emails, passwords, names, phones, DOB, voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, etc.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Misconfigured Database

Vulnerability Exploited: Publicly Accessible Database

Incident : Data Exposure

Title: Burger King Data Exposure Incidents

Description: Burger King, the world's largest fast food chain, exposed sensitive credentials to the public twice, endangering their systems and data.

Type: Data Exposure

Attack Vector: Website Configuration Error

Vulnerability Exploited: Website Misconfiguration

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Major Security Flaw in McDonald’s AI Hiring Tool McHire Exposed 64M Job Applications

Description: An IDOR vulnerability and weak default credentials in McHire, the AI-powered recruitment platform used by McDonald’s franchisees, led to a massive leak of personal data.

Date Detected: 2025-06-30

Date Resolved: 2025-07-01

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Weak Default CredentialsInsecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR)

Vulnerability Exploited: Default CredentialsIDOR

Incident : Unauthorized Access

Title: Hard-coded passwords exposed Burger King’s fragile security infrastructure worldwide

Description: Hackers accessed employee accounts and internal configurations with shocking ease due to weak security practices at Restaurant Brands International (RBI), the parent company of Burger King, Tim Hortons, and Popeyes. Ethical hackers BobDaHacker and BobTheShoplifter discovered hard-coded passwords (e.g., 'admin'), plain-text passwords sent via email, and unsecured APIs that allowed unrestricted access. The vulnerabilities exposed internal systems, employee accounts, drive-through audio recordings (containing customer PII), and even restaurant bathroom rating screens. The hackers described RBI’s security as 'catastrophic,' highlighting systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity fundamentals. RBI reportedly fixed the issues after disclosure but did not publicly acknowledge the ethical hackers.

Type: Unauthorized Access

Attack Vector: Hard-coded CredentialsPlain-text Passwords in EmailsUnrestricted API AccessDefault/Weak Passwords (e.g., 'admin')

Vulnerability Exploited: Hard-coded passwords in HTML/APIsLack of password encryptionMissing access controlsPoor credential management

Threat Actor: BobDaHacker (Ethical Hacker)BobTheShoplifter (Ethical Hacker)

Motivation: Ethical Hacking / Responsible Disclosure

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Grubhub Breach Highlights Growing Third-Party Cyber Risks in the Restaurant Industry

Description: In early 2025, Grubhub, one of the largest third-party vendors serving the U.S. restaurant sector, fell victim to a cyber incident originating from one of its own service providers. The breach underscored a troubling trend: restaurants are increasingly targeted through vulnerabilities in their interconnected digital supply chains.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Third-Party Vendor Compromise

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Weak Default Credentials and Hard-coded password in HTMLDefault 'admin' password in drive-through tabletsUnrestricted API signup.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323

Data Compromised: Emails, Passwords, Names, Phones, Dob, Voucher codes, Links to the externally stored certificates

Systems Affected: Database

Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923

Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Children's pii

Systems Affected: Job Application WebsiteOnline Ordering System

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Data Compromised: Names, Email addresses, Phone numbers, Home addresses, Authentication tokens, Raw chat messages

Systems Affected: McHire PlatformOlivia Chatbot

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Data Compromised: Employee account credentials, Internal system configurations, Drive-through audio recordings (potential pii), Restaurant operational data (e.g., bathroom rating screens)

Systems Affected: Equipment ordering websiteDrive-through tablet systemsAI-powered customer/staff evaluation systemsRestaurant management APIsBathroom rating screens

Operational Impact: High (potential for unauthorized access to critical systems, customer data exposure, and operational disruption)

Brand Reputation Impact: High (public exposure of systemic security failures across global brands: Burger King, Tim Hortons, Popeyes)

Identity Theft Risk: Moderate (drive-through audio recordings may contain customer PII)

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Financial Loss: $3.4 million - $3.9 million per breach (industry average)

Data Compromised: Payment card data, loyalty program details, employee records

Systems Affected: Third-party delivery platforms, point-of-sale systems, kitchen management systems

Operational Impact: Business interruption, forensic investigations, regulatory penalties

Legal Liabilities: State-mandated notifications, credit monitoring for affected customers

Payment Information Risk: High

What is the average financial loss per incident ?

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $680.00 thousand.

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Emails, Passwords, Names, Phones, Dob, Voucher Codes, Links To The Externally Stored Certificates, , Pii, Children'S Pii, , Personal Information, Contact Information, Authentication Tokens, Chat Messages, , Employee Credentials, Internal Configurations, Audio Recordings (Potential Pii), Operational Data, , Payment Card Data, Loyalty Program Details, Employee Records and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323

Entity Name: Kool King

Entity Type: Online Shop

Industry: Retail

Location: France

Customers Affected: 37900

Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923

Entity Name: Burger King

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Fast Food

Location: France

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Entity Name: McDonald’s

Entity Type: Corporation

Industry: Fast Food

Location: Global

Size: Large

Customers Affected: 64 million job applicants

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Entity Name: Restaurant Brands International (RBI)

Entity Type: Parent Company

Industry: Fast Food / Hospitality

Location: Global (30,000+ outlets)

Size: Large Enterprise

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Entity Name: Burger King

Entity Type: Subsidiary

Industry: Fast Food

Location: Global

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Entity Name: Tim Hortons

Entity Type: Subsidiary

Industry: Fast Food / Coffee

Location: Primarily Canada/US

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Entity Name: Popeyes

Entity Type: Subsidiary

Industry: Fast Food

Location: Global

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Entity Name: Grubhub

Entity Type: Third-Party Vendor

Industry: Restaurant/Delivery

Location: U.S.

Size: Large

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Entity Name: Burger King

Entity Type: Restaurant Chain

Industry: Fast Food

Location: U.S.

Size: Large

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Entity Name: Popeyes

Entity Type: Restaurant Chain

Industry: Fast Food

Location: U.S.

Size: Large

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Entity Name: Mid-sized franchisee (15 locations)

Entity Type: Restaurant Operator

Industry: Fast Food

Size: Medium

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Containment Measures: Changed default administrative credentialsResolved IDOR vulnerability

Remediation Measures: Removed default credentialsFixed IDOR vulnerability

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes (after ethical hacker disclosure)

Containment Measures: Patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly)

Communication Strategy: No public acknowledgment of ethical hackers or incident details

What is the company's incident response plan?

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes (after ethical hacker disclosure).

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323

Type of Data Compromised: Emails, Passwords, Names, Phones, Dob, Voucher codes, Links to the externally stored certificates

Number of Records Exposed: 37900

Sensitivity of Data: High

Personally Identifiable Information: emailspasswordsnamesphonesDOB

Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923

Type of Data Compromised: Pii, Children's pii

Personally Identifiable Information: Job ApplicantsChildren's PII

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Type of Data Compromised: Personal information, Contact information, Authentication tokens, Chat messages

Number of Records Exposed: 64 million

Sensitivity of Data: High

Personally Identifiable Information: NamesEmail AddressesPhone NumbersHome Addresses

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Type of Data Compromised: Employee credentials, Internal configurations, Audio recordings (potential pii), Operational data

Sensitivity of Data: Moderate to High (includes PII in audio recordings and system access credentials)

Data Exfiltration: No (ethical hackers did not retain data)

Data Encryption: No (passwords stored in plain-text)

Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (in drive-through audio recordings)

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Type of Data Compromised: Payment card data, Loyalty program details, Employee records

Sensitivity of Data: High

Personally Identifiable Information: Yes

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Removed default credentials, Fixed IDOR vulnerability, .

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by changed default administrative credentials, resolved idor vulnerability, , patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly) and .

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Regulatory Notifications: State-mandated notifications

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Lessons Learned: The incident highlights the importance of basic security hygiene and governance around AI systems that collect or process personal data.

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Lessons Learned: Systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity practices (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials, unrestricted APIs) can expose global enterprises to severe risks. Ethical hacking revealed critical gaps in access controls, credential management, and operational security across RBI’s brands.

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Lessons Learned: Third-party vulnerabilities are a persistent and escalating threat in the restaurant industry due to interconnected digital supply chains. Rigorous vendor audits, cyber insurance, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS are critical for mitigation.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Recommendations: Implement proper authentication, auditability, and integration into broader risk workflows, Treat AI as a regulated asset and implement frameworks that ensure accountabilityImplement proper authentication, auditability, and integration into broader risk workflows, Treat AI as a regulated asset and implement frameworks that ensure accountability

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Recommendations: Implement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system access

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Recommendations: Conduct rigorous vendor audits assessing security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS., Clarify indemnities in vendor contracts to mitigate fallout from third-party breaches., Structure cyber insurance policies to cover first- and third-party liabilities, including wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption., Enhance monitoring and detection capabilities to reduce the average breach detection time (currently 212 days in the industry).Conduct rigorous vendor audits assessing security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS., Clarify indemnities in vendor contracts to mitigate fallout from third-party breaches., Structure cyber insurance policies to cover first- and third-party liabilities, including wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption., Enhance monitoring and detection capabilities to reduce the average breach detection time (currently 212 days in the industry).Conduct rigorous vendor audits assessing security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS., Clarify indemnities in vendor contracts to mitigate fallout from third-party breaches., Structure cyber insurance policies to cover first- and third-party liabilities, including wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption., Enhance monitoring and detection capabilities to reduce the average breach detection time (currently 212 days in the industry).Conduct rigorous vendor audits assessing security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS., Clarify indemnities in vendor contracts to mitigate fallout from third-party breaches., Structure cyber insurance policies to cover first- and third-party liabilities, including wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption., Enhance monitoring and detection capabilities to reduce the average breach detection time (currently 212 days in the industry).

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are The incident highlights the importance of basic security hygiene and governance around AI systems that collect or process personal data.Systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity practices (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials, unrestricted APIs) can expose global enterprises to severe risks. Ethical hacking revealed critical gaps in access controls, credential management, and operational security across RBI’s brands.Third-party vulnerabilities are a persistent and escalating threat in the restaurant industry due to interconnected digital supply chains. Rigorous vendor audits, cyber insurance, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS are critical for mitigation.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923

Source: Cybernews Investigation Team

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Source: Reddit

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Source: Ian Carroll

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Source: Tom’s Hardware

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Source: Ethical Hackers’ Blog (Archived)

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Source: Ethical hackers (September 2024)

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Cybernews Investigation Team, and Source: Reddit, and Source: Ian Carroll, and Source: Tom’s Hardware, and Source: Ethical Hackers’ Blog (Archived), and Source: Ethical hackers (September 2024).

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Investigation Status: Completed (by ethical hackers; RBI applied fixes but no public report)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through No public acknowledgment of ethical hackers or incident details.

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Entry Point: Weak Default Credentials

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Entry Point: Hard-Coded Password In Html, Default 'Admin' Password In Drive-Through Tablets, Unrestricted Api Signup,

High Value Targets: Employee Accounts, Internal Configurations, Drive-Through Audio Systems, Restaurant Management Apis,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Employee Accounts, Internal Configurations, Drive-Through Audio Systems, Restaurant Management Apis,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323

Root Causes: Misconfigured Database

Incident : Data Breach MCD344071125

Root Causes: Weak Default Credentials, Idor Vulnerability,

Corrective Actions: Changed Default Administrative Credentials, Resolved Idor Vulnerability,

Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125

Root Causes: Lack Of Basic Cybersecurity Hygiene (E.G., Hard-Coded Passwords, Plain-Text Credentials), Absence Of Access Controls (E.G., Unrestricted Api Access), Inadequate System Audits And Vulnerability Assessments, Poor Credential Management Practices, Corporate Neglect Of Security Fundamentals Despite Global Scale,

Corrective Actions: Patches Applied To Reported Vulnerabilities (Per Rbi), No Public Confirmation Of Broader Security Overhaul Or Policy Changes,

Incident : Data Breach GRUPOPRES1769017007

Root Causes: Third-party vendor vulnerabilities, hard-coded passwords, lack of rigorous vendor audits, and inadequate cybersecurity measures in the restaurant industry's digital supply chain.

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Changed Default Administrative Credentials, Resolved Idor Vulnerability, , Patches Applied To Reported Vulnerabilities (Per Rbi), No Public Confirmation Of Broader Security Overhaul Or Policy Changes, .

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an BobDaHacker (Ethical Hacker)BobTheShoplifter (Ethical Hacker).

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-06-30.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025.

What was the most recent incident resolved ?

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on 2025-07-01.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was $3.4 million - $3.9 million per breach (industry average).

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were emails, passwords, names, phones, DOB, voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, , Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Children's PII, , Names, Email Addresses, Phone Numbers, Home Addresses, Authentication Tokens, Raw Chat Messages, , Employee account credentials, Internal system configurations, Drive-through audio recordings (potential PII), Restaurant operational data (e.g., bathroom rating screens), , Payment card data, loyalty program details and employee records.

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Job Application WebsiteOnline Ordering System and McHire PlatformOlivia Chatbot and Equipment ordering websiteDrive-through tablet systemsAI-powered customer/staff evaluation systemsRestaurant management APIsBathroom rating screens and .

Response to the Incidents

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Changed default administrative credentialsResolved IDOR vulnerability and Patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly).

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Raw Chat Messages, Children's PII, Employee account credentials, Payment card data, loyalty program details, employee records, voucher codes, emails, Phone Numbers, names, Drive-through audio recordings (potential PII), Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Restaurant operational data (e.g., bathroom rating screens), Names, links to the externally stored certificates, Authentication Tokens, Home Addresses, passwords, phones, DOB, Email Addresses and Internal system configurations.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 64.0M.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was The incident highlights the importance of basic security hygiene and governance around AI systems that collect or process personal data., Systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity practices (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials, unrestricted APIs) can expose global enterprises to severe risks. Ethical hacking revealed critical gaps in access controls, credential management, and operational security across RBI’s brands., Third-party vulnerabilities are a persistent and escalating threat in the restaurant industry due to interconnected digital supply chains. Rigorous vendor audits, cyber insurance, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS are critical for mitigation.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system access, Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Implement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Conduct rigorous vendor audits assessing security policies, response plans, staff training, and compliance with standards like SOC and PCI DSS., Treat AI as a regulated asset and implement frameworks that ensure accountability, Structure cyber insurance policies to cover first- and third-party liabilities, including wire transfer fraud, credit card breaches, and business interruption., Implement proper authentication, auditability, and integration into broader risk workflows, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Enhance monitoring and detection capabilities to reduce the average breach detection time (currently 212 days in the industry)., Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Clarify indemnities in vendor contracts to mitigate fallout from third-party breaches. and Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Tom’s Hardware, Ethical Hackers’ Blog (Archived), Ethical hackers (September 2024), Reddit, Ian Carroll and Cybernews Investigation Team.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Completed (by ethical hackers; RBI applied fixes but no public report).

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Weak Default Credentials.

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Misconfigured Database, Weak Default CredentialsIDOR Vulnerability, Lack of basic cybersecurity hygiene (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials)Absence of access controls (e.g., unrestricted API access)Inadequate system audits and vulnerability assessmentsPoor credential management practicesCorporate neglect of security fundamentals despite global scale, Third-party vendor vulnerabilities, hard-coded passwords, lack of rigorous vendor audits, and inadequate cybersecurity measures in the restaurant industry's digital supply chain..

What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Changed default administrative credentialsResolved IDOR vulnerability, Patches applied to reported vulnerabilities (per RBI)No public confirmation of broader security overhaul or policy changes.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Nothings stb up to 1.26. Impacted is the function stbtt_InitFont_internal in the library stb_truetype.h of the component TTF File Handler. Performing a manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read in VS6ComFile!get_macro_mem_COM. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain a stack-based buffer overflow in VS6ComFile!CSaveData::_conv_AnimationItem. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to arbitrary code execution on the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6MemInIF!set_temp_type_default. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6ComFile!load_link_inf. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=burger-king' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge