Comparison Overview

Omni La Mansión del Rio

VS

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts

Omni La Mansión del Rio

112 College St, San Antonio, 78205, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.omnihotels.com/hotels/san-antonio-la-mansion-del-rio

The Omni La Mansion del Rio is ideally nestled along the historic Riverwalk among the banks of the Paseo del Rio in downtown San Antonio. It is within easy walking distance of the famous Alamo, El Mercado, La Villita District, Spanish governor’s Palace, San Antonio Convention Center and other well-known landmarks. Omni La Mansion del Rio’s associates enjoy a dynamic and exciting work environment, comprehensive training and mentoring, along with the pride that comes from working for a company with a reputation for exceptional service. We embody a culture of respect, gratitude and empowerment day in and day out. If you are a friendly, motivated person, with a passion to serve others, the Omni La Mansion del Rio may be your perfect match.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 50
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts

Dubai Media City, Dubai, 500569, AE
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 800 and 849
https://www.fairmont.com/

Located in the heart of each destination we call home, a stay at any Fairmont hotel is truly unforgettable. Known for grand and awe-inspiring properties and thoughtful and engaging colleagues who aim to make each and every stay a cherished and memorable experience, we have been the stage for some of the most significant moments in global history. As a part of ALL - the Accor Live Limitless Lifestyle Loyalty Program, with 90 exceptional addresses in 32 countries, we are as favored by world leaders and business travelers as we are by families and those with a penchant for luxurious travels. Fairmont Hotels stand at the intersection of elegance and culture, where significant occasions are honored and pivotal global events unfold. Wherever we are situated, our hotels become the cultural and social heart of the community; so immersed in local traditions and so deeply connected to our surroundings, Fairmont Hotels are seen as an essential part of their respective destinations.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 22,565
Subsidiaries: 120
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omni-la-mansion-del-rio.jpeg
Omni La Mansión del Rio
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairmont-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Fairmont Hotels & Resorts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Omni La Mansión del Rio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fairmont Hotels & Resorts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Omni La Mansión del Rio in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fairmont Hotels & Resorts in 2026.

Incident History — Omni La Mansión del Rio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Omni La Mansión del Rio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fairmont Hotels & Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omni-la-mansion-del-rio.jpeg
Omni La Mansión del Rio
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Cloud Storage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfigured AWS S3 bucket
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Legacy Protocols (BACnet, Modbus), Unpatched Known Vulnerabilities (75% of orgs affected per Claroty), Default/Hardcoded Credentials, Open Ports/Exposed Systems (via Shodan), Third-Party Remote Access Tools (Lack of MFA), Outdated Operating Systems (e.g., Windows 7), Weak Network Segmentation (Lateral Movement to Corporate Networks)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransomware), Operational Disruption, Data Theft, Espionage (State-Backed Potential)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairmont-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Fairmont Hotels & Resorts
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Omni La Mansión del Rio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Omni La Mansión del Rio company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company.

In the current year, Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company and Omni La Mansión del Rio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company nor Omni La Mansión del Rio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company and Omni La Mansión del Rio company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Omni La Mansión del Rio company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Omni La Mansión del Rio company nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Omni La Mansión del Rio nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Omni La Mansión del Rio company.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company employs more people globally than Omni La Mansión del Rio company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Omni La Mansión del Rio nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Omni La Mansión del Rio nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Omni La Mansión del Rio nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Omni La Mansión del Rio nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Omni La Mansión del Rio nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Omni La Mansión del Rio nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References