OLVG Company Cyber Security Posture
olvg.nlOLVG is het enige grote topklinische opleidingsziekenhuis in Amsterdam dat letterlijk en figuurlijk midden in het dynamische hoofdstedelijke leven staat. OLVG wil voor patiënten, verwijzers, verzekeraars en andere zorginstellingen hét ziekenhuis zijn waar excellente medische behandelingen en een gezonde bedrijfsvoering samengaan met buitengewone gastvrijheid. In juni 2015 zijn het Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis en het Sint Lucas Andreas Ziekenhuis juridisch gefuseerd. De ziekenhuizen gaan samen verder als één ziekenhuis op twee hoofdlocaties in Amsterdam-Oost en Amsterdam-West, met de beste topklinische zorg voor alle mensen in Amsterdam en de regio. De ziekenhuizen behouden ieder hun volwaardige aanbod voor de basiszorg en blijven alle patiënten ontvangen. Samen beschikken de locaties over een groot aantal medische specialismen en bijzondere functies, zoals het Neuro-, Hart- en HIV-behandelcentrum.
OLVG Company Details
olvg
4031 employees
35738
62
Hospitals and Health Care
olvg.nl
Scan still pending
OLV_1754994
In-progress
OLVG Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
OLVG Global Score.png)
OLVG Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
OLVG Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLVG | Breach | 60 | 3 | 02/2023 | OLV153519223 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: Since years, students employed part-time by the OLVG hospital group in Amsterdam have had full access to the medical records database. The Volkskrant reported on Friday that they were now permitted to access private information about friends, family members, and renowned people. A philosophy student who scheduled hospital phone calls revealed the breach. Though they were supposed to be allowed to work wherever in the hospital, due to a glitch in the programme, all pupils had access to private files. | |||||||
OLVG Company Subsidiaries
OLVG is het enige grote topklinische opleidingsziekenhuis in Amsterdam dat letterlijk en figuurlijk midden in het dynamische hoofdstedelijke leven staat. OLVG wil voor patiënten, verwijzers, verzekeraars en andere zorginstellingen hét ziekenhuis zijn waar excellente medische behandelingen en een gezonde bedrijfsvoering samengaan met buitengewone gastvrijheid. In juni 2015 zijn het Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis en het Sint Lucas Andreas Ziekenhuis juridisch gefuseerd. De ziekenhuizen gaan samen verder als één ziekenhuis op twee hoofdlocaties in Amsterdam-Oost en Amsterdam-West, met de beste topklinische zorg voor alle mensen in Amsterdam en de regio. De ziekenhuizen behouden ieder hun volwaardige aanbod voor de basiszorg en blijven alle patiënten ontvangen. Samen beschikken de locaties over een groot aantal medische specialismen en bijzondere functies, zoals het Neuro-, Hart- en HIV-behandelcentrum.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
OLVG Cyber Security News
Cybersecurity venture funding bounces back after slow Q1
Cybersecurity startup funding in the second quarter looks to have recovered from an underwhelming Q1 on the back of megadeals.
Cybersecurity Threat in the Age of AI: BCF Founder Cordell Robinson Urges a Culture Shift Toward Proactive Protection
“The biggest cyber threat today isn't machine learning; it's the culture of instant gratification that drives human behavior online,” says this ...
A Trio of US Treasury Hacks Exposes a Pattern Making Banks Nervous
In three major hacks, Treasury didn't deploy cybersecurity measures that could have prevented the attacks or flagged the intruders sooner, ...
Why Teachers Need to Take Cybersecurity Seriously
We have to worry about protecting student privacy, keeping them safe in the online space and making sure that we're providing opportunities for ...
Why Cybersecurity Should Rethink Inclusion For Neurodivergent People
Cybersecurity is evolving, but is its culture? Explore how neurodivergent professionals are reshaping inclusion, leadership, ...
Deloitte Helps Companies Reshape Cybersecurity Process Using AI
Deloitte's new blueprints to help companies revamp their cybersecurity functions using artificial intelligence reflect a growing market need ...
GAO Assesses Risk Management Implementation at NASA
NASA is planning to invest $80 billion in developing spacecraft and systems for exploring the Earth, the moon and the solar system.
5 Cybersecurity Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade
5 Cybersecurity Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade ; Palo Alto Networks (NASDAQ: PANW) ; CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) ; Zscaler (NASDAQ: ...
CrowdStrike or Check Point: Bank of America Selects the Superior Cybersecurity Stock to Buy
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium for 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
OLVG Similar Companies
KPJ Healthcare Bhd
Since its inception in 1981 as the first private specialist hospital in Johor, KPJ Healthcare has served communities and neighbourhoods nationwide for over 40 years. Our fundamental purpose since day 1 is the delivery of exceptional diagnosis, health treatment and care for all our patients. KPJ He
UPMC
UPMC is a world-renowned, nonprofit health care provider and insurer committed to delivering exceptional, people-centered care and community services. Headquartered in Pittsburgh and affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences, UPMC is shaping the future of health thr
Aster DM Healthcare
From a single medical centre to a performance-driven healthcare enterprise spread across more than 366 medical establishments, including 34 hospitals, 131 clinics and 502 pharmacies in 7 countries and growing, Aster DM Healthcare has transitioned into being the leading healthcare authority across th
Unilabs
We are one of Europe’s leading suppliers of clinical laboratory testing and medical diagnostic imaging services to private and public healthcare providers, local governments, insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies and the general public. We operate laboratory and medical diagnostic imaging
Baylor Scott & White Health
With us by your side, there's no stopping you. It's why we're creating a new kind of healthcare at Baylor Scott & White. And we're just getting started. As the largest not-for-profit health system in the state of Texas, Baylor Scott & White promotes the health and well-being of every individual, fa
Brookdale
Relationships are the heart of our culture. They help us create a sense of family among our residents, associates and patients. Integrity is our soul. It guides us to be open in our communication with each other, and it enables us to make the right decisions for the people who have entrusted us with
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
OLVG CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, OLVG has faced 1 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Breach'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as OLVG is het enige grote topklinische opleidingsziekenhuis in Amsterdam dat letterlijk en figuurlijk midden in het dynamische hoofdstedelijke leven staat. OLVG wil voor patiënten, verwijzers, verzekeraars en andere zorginstellingen hét ziekenhuis zijn waar excellente medische behandelingen en een gezonde bedrijfsvoering samengaan met buitengewone gastvrijheid. In juni 2015 zijn het Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis en het Sint Lucas Andreas Ziekenhuis juridisch gefuseerd. De ziekenhuizen gaan samen verder als één ziekenhuis op twee hoofdlocaties in Amsterdam-Oost en Amsterdam-West, met de beste topklinische zorg voor alle mensen in Amsterdam en de regio. De ziekenhuizen behouden ieder hun volwaardige aanbod voor de basiszorg en blijven alle patiënten ontvangen. Samen beschikken de locaties over een groot aantal medische specialismen en bijzondere functies, zoals het Neuro-, Hart- en HIV-behandelcentrum..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
