UPMC
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
upmc
Website:
Employees number:
40,981
Number of followers:
192,034
NAICS:
62
Industry Type:
Homepage:
upmc.com
IP Addresses:
113
Company ID:
UPM_1816518
Scan Status:
Completed
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
UPMC Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score
upmc.comUPMC is a world-renowned, nonprofit health care provider and insurer committed to delivering exceptional, people-centered care and community services. Headquartered in Pittsburgh and affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences, UPMC is shaping the future of health through clinical and technological innovation, research, and education. Dedicated to advancing the well-being of our diverse communities, we provide nearly $2 billion annually in community benefits, more than any other health system in Pennsylvania. Our 100,000 employees — including more than 5,000 physicians — care for patients across more than 40 hospitals and 800 outpatient sites in Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland, as well as overseas. UPMC Insurance Services covers more than 4 million members, providing the highest-quality care at the most affordable price. To learn more, visit UPMC.com.
UPMC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
UPMC Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 550 and 599
UPMC
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
UPMC Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
UPMC
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
UPMC Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
3
Attack Types
3
UPMC’s electronic health vendor: UPMC Data Disclosure Claims Investigated by Lynch Carpenter
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: UPMC Investigates Potential Patient Data Disclosure Following Vendor Breach On March 17, 2026, Pittsburgh-based law firm Lynch Carpenter announced an investigation into a possible data exposure affecting patients of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). The incident stems from a security issue involving UPMC’s electronic health vendor, which operates a national network for exchanging medical information. UPMC confirmed that unauthorized access may have compromised patient records, though officials stated that Social Security numbers were not included. Exposed data could have included names, ages, diagnoses, and medical history. The health system is notifying affected individuals as part of its response. The breach highlights ongoing risks in third-party healthcare data systems, where vulnerabilities in interconnected networks can lead to unauthorized disclosures. UPMC has not disclosed the total number of patients impacted or the exact timeline of the exposure. Further details remain under investigation.
Northwell Health and UPMC: Hospitals Invest Heavily in Cybersecurity and Core Health IT Systems in 2026
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Healthcare Cybersecurity in Crisis: Record Breaches and Soaring Costs Drive 2026 Spending Surge The healthcare sector faces an escalating cybersecurity crisis as digital transformation collides with a relentless wave of attacks. In 2024 alone, over 276 million patient records were compromised an average of 758,000 records exposed daily while the financial toll of breaches surged. The U.S. healthcare industry saw the average cost of a data breach climb to nearly $11 million, with a single 2024 vendor outage affecting 190 million individuals and exceeding $3 billion in damages. Ransomware remains the dominant threat, evolving from traditional file-locking to rapid data-extortion attacks that exfiltrate sensitive information in minutes. Attackers increasingly target third-party vendors and cloud services, exploiting weak links in the supply chain. The rise of AI-driven cyberattacks has further accelerated threats, enabling hackers to automate reconnaissance and craft sophisticated phishing campaigns that outpace traditional defenses. ### Key Vulnerabilities Expanding the Attack Surface Healthcare’s complex IT ecosystems create persistent security gaps: - Legacy and patchwork systems: Hospitals operate a mix of mainframes, SaaS platforms, and custom tools, leading to inconsistent authentication, fragmented backups, and untested recovery protocols. - Internet of Medical Things (IoMT): Connected devices like infusion pumps and imaging equipment often run outdated firmware, making them prime targets. The FDA’s PATCH Act now mandates cybersecurity plans from manufacturers, but risks persist. - Third-party and supply-chain risks: Cloud-hosted EHRs, telehealth platforms, and imaging services introduce dependencies outside hospitals’ direct control. Experts warn that vendor outages will become the top operational resilience risk. - Shadow AI and internal misuse: Nearly 23% of clinicians use unsanctioned AI tools, creating security and compliance gaps due to lack of encryption and audit trails. ### Regulatory Pressures and Financial Imperatives Regulators are tightening requirements to address these threats. The HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is expected to finalize an updated HIPAA Security Rule in 2026, including a proposed "72-hour rule" mandating hospitals restore critical EHR functions within three days of an incident. Meanwhile, cyber insurance providers are tightening underwriting standards, requiring proof of robust controls for coverage. The financial stakes are higher than ever. Beyond direct breach costs, hospitals face lost revenue, reputational damage, and litigation. Boards are responding by increasing cybersecurity budgets, with 84% of CIOs planning a median 26% spending boost in 2026 the largest increase across IT priorities. ### Modernization as a Security Imperative Health systems are accelerating EHR modernization to reduce complexity and improve resilience. Major providers like HCA Healthcare, UPMC, and Northwell Health are consolidating onto unified platforms (e.g., Epic, Meditech Expanse) to eliminate silos, enforce consistent security controls, and enable AI-driven care. Key trends include: - Interoperability and data governance: Adoption of FHIR APIs and strong encryption to meet 21st Century Cures Act requirements, alongside investments in cloud data lakes and real-time pipelines. - AI and automation: Deployment of AI-driven anomaly detection and behavioral analytics to identify threats in real time, though only 1% of healthcare organizations consider themselves "AI mature." - Resilience-focused architecture: Network segmentation, immutable backups, 24/7 threat monitoring, and zero-trust identity controls to ensure continuity during attacks. ### The Path Forward Cybersecurity is no longer an IT issue but a board-level priority, intertwined with patient safety and operational continuity. Hospitals must balance innovation with security, embedding resilience into digital front-door experiences, remote monitoring, and AI diagnostics. Vendor governance is also tightening, with health systems demanding business continuity guarantees from partners. As 2026 approaches, the message is clear: healthcare’s digital future depends on proactive defense, modernized infrastructure, and a culture of cyber resilience.
UPMC
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences
Description: UPMC Cole has notified 790 patients treated at UPMC Cole that their personal information have been inappropriately accessed. There were two phishing attacks on June 7 and June 14 that were discovered through staff reports of the receipt of the e-mails. The phishing attacks were isolated to e-mail accounts and no medical records systems were breached.
UPMC Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for UPMC
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)
UPMC has 29.58% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
UPMC has 15.25% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types UPMC vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
UPMC reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — UPMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UPMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
UPMC Company Subsidiaries
UPMC is a world-renowned, nonprofit health care provider and insurer committed to delivering exceptional, people-centered care and community services. Headquartered in Pittsburgh and affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences, UPMC is shaping the future of health through clinical and technological innovation, research, and education. Dedicated to advancing the well-being of our diverse communities, we provide nearly $2 billion annually in community benefits, more than any other health system in Pennsylvania. Our 100,000 employees — including more than 5,000 physicians — care for patients across more than 40 hospitals and 800 outpatient sites in Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland, as well as overseas. UPMC Insurance Services covers more than 4 million members, providing the highest-quality care at the most affordable price. To learn more, visit UPMC.com.
Loading...
UPMC Similar Companies
Rede D'Or
A Rede D’Or é a maior rede de saúde da América Latina. São 79 hospitais e mais de 60 clínicas oncológicas com presença nos estados de AL, BA, CE, DF, MA, MG, MS, PA, PB, PE, PR, RJ, SE, SP. Referência em qualidade técnica, a Rede D’Or atua em serviços complementares como banco de sangue, diális
Baptist Health
Baptist Health South Florida is the region’s largest not-for-profit healthcare organization with 12 hospitals, more than 29,000 employees, 4,500 physicians, and 200 outpatient centers, urgent care facilities, and physician practices spanning across Miami-Dade, Monroe, Broward, and Palm Beach countie
For more than half a century, UCLA Health has provided the best in healthcare and the latest in medical technology to the people of Los Angeles and throughout the world. Comprised of Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, UCLA Medical Center Santa Monica, Resnick Neuropsychiatric Hospital at UCLA, UCLA
Jefferson Health
Thomas Jefferson University and Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals are partners in providing excellent clinical and compassionate care for our patients in the Philadelphia region, educating the health professionals of tomorrow in a variety of disciplines and discovering new knowledge that will de
Norton Healthcare is a leader in serving adult and pediatric patients from throughout Greater Louisville, Southern Indiana, the commonwealth of Kentucky and beyond. The not-for-profit hospital and health care system is Louisville’s second largest employer, with more than 18,600 employees, over 1,75
Erasmus MC
We are Erasmus MC. Our roots lie in Rotterdam, a city and port of international standing. We are the most innovative university medical center in the Netherlands and one of the world’s leading centers of scientific research. We are committed to achieving a healthy population and pursuing excellence
Wellstar Health System
At Wellstar Health System, our mission is to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. Nationally ranked and locally recognized for our high-quality care, inclusive culture and world-class doctors and caregivers, Wellstar is one of the largest, most integrated healthcare systems in
Advocate Health
Advocate Health is redefining how, when and where care is delivered to help people live well. We’re providing equitable care for all in our communities and using our combined strength and expertise to deliver better outcomes at a lower cost. Headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, we have a com
Bon Secours Mercy Health
On September 1, 2018 Bon Secours Health System and Mercy Health combined to become the United States’ fifth largest Catholic health care ministry and one of the nation’s 20 largest health care systems. With 48 hospitals, thousands of providers, over 1,000 points of care and over 60,000 employees Bon
.png)
UPMC CyberSecurity News
March 17, 2026 07:00 AM
UPMC Data Disclosure Claims Investigated by Lynch Carpenter
PITTSBURGH, March 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Lynch Carpenter is investigating a possible patient data disclosure at University of...
November 11, 2025 08:00 AM
UPMC Enterprises partners with Penguin Ai for development of new healthcare models
The aim is to find new uses of real-world data in AI development, and to help health systems move from fragmented, compliance-heavy...
June 11, 2025 07:00 AM
UPMC Ireland to implement MEDITECH Expanse EPR
Global healthcare provider UPMC Ireland has confirmed it will implement the MEDITECH Expanse electronic patient record (EPR).
April 30, 2025 07:00 AM
Timeline of active shooter incident inside UPMC Memorial that left 2 dead, 5 injured
The lives of many in the York community were forever changed when a gunman took hostages and opened fire inside UPMC Memorial Hospital on...
March 24, 2025 07:00 AM
FBI, healthcare agencies warn of credible threat against hospitals, after multi-city social media terror plot alert
Hospitals and healthcare networks across America are under threat. From ransomware and insider sabotage to shootings and credible terror alerts.
March 07, 2025 08:00 AM
HIMSS25: A look into UPMC's digital health ROI framework
UPMC uses a detailed ROI framework to quantify its digital health programs, including clinician time savings, cost reductions and patient engagement.
February 26, 2025 08:00 AM
Site of central Pa. hospital shooting had no metal detectors, UPMC staffers say
On Saturday, when a gunman walked into UPMC Memorial Hospital in West Manchester Township armed with a semiautomatic gun, he walked right...
October 09, 2024 07:00 AM
Clinical Asset Management leader TRIMEDX announces new
Welcomes Chief Commercial Officer Ted Dunham & Chief Technology Officer Jeff Monroe, promotes Jason Henley to president of cybersecurity...
August 06, 2024 07:00 AM
Pitt/UPMC AI Summer School Trains the Next Generation of Innovators
The University of Pittsburgh and UPMC developed a free week-long summer camp for high schoolers and recent graduates, introducing students to AI concepts.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
UPMC CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of UPMC
The official website of UPMC is http://www.upmc.com.
UPMC’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, UPMC’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 586, reflecting their Very Poor security posture.
How many security badges does UPMC’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, UPMC currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has UPMC been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, UPMC has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
Does UPMC have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, UPMC is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does UPMC have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, UPMC does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does UPMC comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, UPMC is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does UPMC have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, UPMC does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does UPMC comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, UPMC is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does UPMC have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,UPMC is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of UPMC
UPMC operates primarily in the Hospitals and Health Care industry.
Number of Employees at UPMC
UPMC employs approximately 40,981 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by UPMC
UPMC presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
UPMC’s LinkedIn Followers
UPMC’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 192,034 followers.
NAICS Classification of UPMC
UPMC is classified under the NAICS code 62, which corresponds to Health Care and Social Assistance.
UPMC’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, UPMC does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
UPMC’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, UPMC maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/upmc.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving UPMC
As of March 30, 2026, Rankiteo reports that UPMC has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
UPMC has an estimated 32,295 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at UPMC ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak, Ransomware and Breach.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on UPMC ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $3 billion.
How does UPMC detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an remediation measures with network segmentation, remediation measures with immutable backups, remediation measures with zero-trust identity controls, and recovery measures with 24/7 threat monitoring, recovery measures with ai-driven anomaly detection, and enhanced monitoring with 24/7 threat monitoring, and communication strategy with notifying affected individuals..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Phishing Attack at UPMC Cole
Description: UPMC Cole has notified 790 patients treated at UPMC Cole that their personal information have been inappropriately accessed. There were two phishing attacks on June 7 and June 14 that were discovered through staff reports of the receipt of the e-mails. The phishing attacks were isolated to e-mail accounts and no medical records systems were breached.
Date Detected: 2023-06-072023-06-14
Type: Phishing Attack
Attack Vector: Email
Vulnerability Exploited: Phishing
Title: Healthcare Cybersecurity Crisis: Record Breaches and Soaring Costs
Description: The healthcare sector faces an escalating cybersecurity crisis as digital transformation collides with a relentless wave of attacks. In 2024 alone, over 276 million patient records were compromised, with an average of 758,000 records exposed daily. The financial toll of breaches surged, with the U.S. healthcare industry seeing the average cost of a data breach climb to nearly $11 million. A single 2024 vendor outage affected 190 million individuals and exceeded $3 billion in damages. Ransomware remains the dominant threat, evolving into rapid data-extortion attacks that exfiltrate sensitive information in minutes. Attackers increasingly target third-party vendors and cloud services, exploiting weak links in the supply chain. The rise of AI-driven cyberattacks has further accelerated threats, enabling hackers to automate reconnaissance and craft sophisticated phishing campaigns.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party vendorsCloud servicesPhishingAI-driven cyberattacks
Vulnerability Exploited: Legacy systemsUnpatched IoMT devicesShadow AIWeak supply-chain securityInconsistent authentication
Motivation: Financial gainData extortion
Title: UPMC Investigates Potential Patient Data Disclosure Following Vendor Breach
Description: On March 17, 2026, Pittsburgh-based law firm Lynch Carpenter announced an investigation into a possible data exposure affecting patients of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). The incident stems from a security issue involving UPMC’s electronic health vendor, which operates a national network for exchanging medical information. UPMC confirmed that unauthorized access may have compromised patient records, though officials stated that Social Security numbers were not included. Exposed data could have included names, ages, diagnoses, and medical history. The health system is notifying affected individuals as part of its response.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2026-03-17
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party vendor compromise
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Phishing Attack UPM2344101122
Data Compromised: Personal Information
Systems Affected: Email Accounts
Incident : Data Breach UPMNOR1773678972
Financial Loss: $3 billion (single vendor outage)
Data Compromised: 276 million patient records (2024)
Systems Affected: EHRsIoMT devicesCloud-hosted platformsTelehealth services
Operational Impact: Vendor outages disrupting critical functions
Brand Reputation Impact: High
Identity Theft Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach UPM1773786562
Data Compromised: Patient records (names, ages, diagnoses, medical history)
Systems Affected: Electronic health vendor network
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to data exposure
Legal Liabilities: Possible legal investigation by Lynch Carpenter
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $1.00 billion.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Information, Patient Records, Personally Identifiable Information, and Patient records.
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Phishing Attack UPM2344101122
Entity Name: UPMC Cole
Entity Type: Hospital
Industry: Healthcare
Customers Affected: 790
Incident : Data Breach UPMNOR1773678972
Entity Name: HCA Healthcare
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: U.S.
Incident : Data Breach UPMNOR1773678972
Entity Name: UPMC
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: U.S.
Incident : Data Breach UPMNOR1773678972
Entity Name: Northwell Health
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: U.S.
Incident : Data Breach UPM1773786562
Entity Name: University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)
Entity Type: Healthcare Provider
Industry: Healthcare
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UPMNOR1773678972
Remediation Measures: Network segmentationImmutable backupsZero-trust identity controls
Recovery Measures: 24/7 threat monitoringAI-driven anomaly detection
Enhanced Monitoring: 24/7 threat monitoring
Incident : Data Breach UPM1773786562
Communication Strategy: Notifying affected individuals
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Phishing Attack UPM2344101122
Type of Data Compromised: Personal Information
Number of Records Exposed: 790
Incident : Data Breach UPMNOR1773678972
Type of Data Compromised: Patient records, Personally identifiable information
Number of Records Exposed: 276 million (2024)
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes (ransomware attacks)
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach UPM1773786562
Type of Data Compromised: Patient records
Sensitivity of Data: High (medical information)
Personally Identifiable Information: Names, ages, diagnoses, medical history
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Network segmentation, Immutable backups, Zero-trust identity controls, .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach UPMNOR1773678972
Data Exfiltration: Yes
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through 24/7 threat monitoring, AI-driven anomaly detection, .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UPMNOR1773678972
Regulations Violated: HIPAA (potential),
Regulatory Notifications: HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) updates
Incident : Data Breach UPM1773786562
Legal Actions: Investigation by Lynch Carpenter
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Investigation by Lynch Carpenter.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UPMNOR1773678972
Lessons Learned: Cybersecurity is a board-level priority intertwined with patient safety and operational continuity. Healthcare must modernize infrastructure, enforce vendor governance, and embed resilience into digital transformation.
Incident : Data Breach UPM1773786562
Lessons Learned: Highlights ongoing risks in third-party healthcare data systems and vulnerabilities in interconnected networks
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach UPMNOR1773678972
Recommendations: Accelerate EHR modernization to reduce complexity, Adopt FHIR APIs and strong encryption for interoperability, Implement AI-driven anomaly detection and behavioral analytics, Enforce network segmentation and zero-trust identity controls, Demand business continuity guarantees from vendors, Increase cybersecurity budgets and staff trainingAccelerate EHR modernization to reduce complexity, Adopt FHIR APIs and strong encryption for interoperability, Implement AI-driven anomaly detection and behavioral analytics, Enforce network segmentation and zero-trust identity controls, Demand business continuity guarantees from vendors, Increase cybersecurity budgets and staff trainingAccelerate EHR modernization to reduce complexity, Adopt FHIR APIs and strong encryption for interoperability, Implement AI-driven anomaly detection and behavioral analytics, Enforce network segmentation and zero-trust identity controls, Demand business continuity guarantees from vendors, Increase cybersecurity budgets and staff trainingAccelerate EHR modernization to reduce complexity, Adopt FHIR APIs and strong encryption for interoperability, Implement AI-driven anomaly detection and behavioral analytics, Enforce network segmentation and zero-trust identity controls, Demand business continuity guarantees from vendors, Increase cybersecurity budgets and staff trainingAccelerate EHR modernization to reduce complexity, Adopt FHIR APIs and strong encryption for interoperability, Implement AI-driven anomaly detection and behavioral analytics, Enforce network segmentation and zero-trust identity controls, Demand business continuity guarantees from vendors, Increase cybersecurity budgets and staff trainingAccelerate EHR modernization to reduce complexity, Adopt FHIR APIs and strong encryption for interoperability, Implement AI-driven anomaly detection and behavioral analytics, Enforce network segmentation and zero-trust identity controls, Demand business continuity guarantees from vendors, Increase cybersecurity budgets and staff training
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Cybersecurity is a board-level priority intertwined with patient safety and operational continuity. Healthcare must modernize infrastructure, enforce vendor governance, and embed resilience into digital transformation.Highlights ongoing risks in third-party healthcare data systems and vulnerabilities in interconnected networks.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Implement AI-driven anomaly detection and behavioral analytics, Accelerate EHR modernization to reduce complexity, Increase cybersecurity budgets and staff training, Adopt FHIR APIs and strong encryption for interoperability, Demand business continuity guarantees from vendors and Enforce network segmentation and zero-trust identity controls.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Phishing Attack UPM2344101122
Source: UPMC Cole
Incident : Data Breach UPMNOR1773678972
Source: Healthcare Cybersecurity Report 2024
Incident : Data Breach UPM1773786562
Source: Lynch Carpenter announcement
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: UPMC Cole, and Source: Healthcare Cybersecurity Report 2024, and Source: Lynch Carpenter announcement.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UPM1773786562
Investigation Status: Ongoing
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Notifying affected individuals.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UPM1773786562
Customer Advisories: Notifying affected individuals
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: was Notifying affected individuals.
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UPMNOR1773678972
Root Causes: Legacy And Patchwork Systems, Unpatched Iomt Devices, Third-Party And Supply-Chain Risks, Shadow Ai And Internal Misuse, Weak Authentication And Fragmented Backups,
Corrective Actions: Ehr Modernization, Network Segmentation And Immutable Backups, Zero-Trust Identity Controls, Ai-Driven Threat Detection, Vendor Governance And Business Continuity Guarantees,
Incident : Data Breach UPM1773786562
Root Causes: Third-party vendor security issue
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as 24/7 threat monitoring.
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Ehr Modernization, Network Segmentation And Immutable Backups, Zero-Trust Identity Controls, Ai-Driven Threat Detection, Vendor Governance And Business Continuity Guarantees, .
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2023-06-14.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2026-03-17.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was $3 billion (single vendor outage).
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal Information, 276 million patient records (2024), Patient records (names, ages, diagnoses and medical history).
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was EHRsIoMT devicesCloud-hosted platformsTelehealth services and .
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were 276 million patient records (2024), Patient records (names, ages, diagnoses, medical history) and Personal Information.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 276.0M.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Investigation by Lynch Carpenter.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Cybersecurity is a board-level priority intertwined with patient safety and operational continuity. Healthcare must modernize infrastructure, enforce vendor governance, and embed resilience into digital transformation., Highlights ongoing risks in third-party healthcare data systems and vulnerabilities in interconnected networks.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Implement AI-driven anomaly detection and behavioral analytics, Accelerate EHR modernization to reduce complexity, Increase cybersecurity budgets and staff training, Adopt FHIR APIs and strong encryption for interoperability, Demand business continuity guarantees from vendors and Enforce network segmentation and zero-trust identity controls.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are UPMC Cole, Lynch Carpenter announcement and Healthcare Cybersecurity Report 2024.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Notifying affected individuals.
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Legacy and patchwork systemsUnpatched IoMT devicesThird-party and supply-chain risksShadow AI and internal misuseWeak authentication and fragmented backups, Third-party vendor security issue.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was EHR modernizationNetwork segmentation and immutable backupsZero-trust identity controlsAI-driven threat detectionVendor governance and business continuity guarantees.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024. This affects the function setLanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94.
References
- https://github.com/Perl/perl5/commit/c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94
- https://lists.security.metacpan.org/cve-announce/msg/37638919/
- https://metacpan.org/release/PMQS/Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.221/source/Changes
- https://metacpan.org/release/SHAY/perl-5.40.4/changes
- https://metacpan.org/release/SHAY/perl-5.42.2/changes
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3381
Description
Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
A critical security vulnerability in parisneo/lollms versions up to 2.2.0 allows any authenticated user to accept or reject friend requests belonging to other users. The `respond_request()` function in `backend/routers/friends.py` does not implement proper authorization checks, enabling Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attacks. Specifically, the `/api/friends/requests/{friendship_id}` endpoint fails to verify whether the authenticated user is part of the friendship or the intended recipient of the request. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, privacy violations, and potential social engineering attacks. The issue has been addressed in version 2.2.0.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=upmc' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
