NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) Company Cyber Security Posture
nsw.gov.auAs environmental steward & regulator we are committed to a sustainable future. Our people are proud to play a role in protecting NSW’s natural environment. We partner with Aboriginal people, industry & the wider community to protect, restore & enhance our diverse environments.
NEPA( Company Details
nsw-epa
775 employees
20123
541
Environmental Services
nsw.gov.au
Scan still pending
NSW_1807008
In-progress
NEPA( Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
NEPA( Global Score.png)
NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSW Office of Local Government | Breach | 100 | 6 | 02/2022 | NSW234711522 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the economy of a geographical regionDescription: The NSW government's QR code data breach accidently exposed the regional addresses of more than 500,000 organisations including defence sites, a missile maintenance unit and domestic violence shelters The addresses collected by the NSW government including correctional facilities, critical infrastructure networks including power stations and tunnel entry sites as well as dozens of shelters and crisis accommodation centres for women across the state was also found NSW data website. The cyber experts raised the alarm to the NSW government to secure the data immediately. | |||||||
| NSW Department of Education | Cyber Attack | 100 | 5 | 07/2021 | NSW16403223 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization’s existenceDescription: The New South Wales (NSW) education department in Australia stated that their internal system had been a victim of a cyber attack. The department took some systems offline while conducting its investigation because protecting student and staff data is of the utmost importance. The department has reported the issue to the state's police and federal government organizations and collaborated with Cyber Security NSW to find a solution. | |||||||
| NSW Police Force | Data Leak | 85 | 3 | 08/2020 | NSW212518123 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: The NSW Police leaked the emails of over 150 complainants. The Complainants contacted them in order to raise concerns regarding officers’ use of force following the Sydney Black Lives Matter protest. According to section 169A of the Police Act 1990 (NSW) a member of the NSW Police Force must not disclose to any person the identity of a complainant unless the disclosure is made in accordance with guidelines established by the Commissioner, with the consent of the complainant, in a situation where it is required by law, or for the purposes of any legal proceedings before a court or tribunal. It was a complete betrayal of public trust and accountability. | |||||||
| Transport for NSW | Data Leak | 60 | 3 | 02/2021 | TRA23379923 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: A cyber attack on an Accellion-owned file transfer system has been identified as having an effect on Transport for New South Wales (TfNSW). Some Transport for NSW information was obtained prior to the attack on Accellion servers being stopped. According to TfNSW, the state government investigation is being managed by Cyber Security NSW with the aid of forensic experts. In order to investigate the implications of the incident, particularly how it may have affected customer data, the organisation said it is closely collaborating with Cyber Security NSW. | |||||||
NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) Company Subsidiaries
As environmental steward & regulator we are committed to a sustainable future. Our people are proud to play a role in protecting NSW’s natural environment. We partner with Aboriginal people, industry & the wider community to protect, restore & enhance our diverse environments.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
NEPA( Cyber Security News
Christmas lay-offs hit NSW Environmental Protection Agency
Christmas lay-offs hit NSW Environmental Protection Agency. Contractors are shown the door as the budget hits bite. A dispute is to be lodged at ...
Considering the impact of Australia’s net zero reform agenda on property and infrastructure project delivery
A recent suite of proposed reforms by the Federal and New South Wales Governments aimed at achieving net zero targets will entrench environmental compliance.
NSW EPA releases Climate Change Assessment Requirements and Guidance for Large GHG Emitters
The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) recently released for public comment its draft Climate Change Assessment Requirements (CCARs) and draft Guide ...
e-waste recycler Sircel pockets $5 million raise amidst acquisitive mood
Sircel claims to be the only company capable of diverting up to 100% of end-of-life electronics – from consumer items to civic infrastructure – ...
NSW EPA appoints new CEO
Mr Chappel said he was thrilled to have been appointed the next CEO. “I look forward to working with the highly capable EPA team to improve our ...
UN PRI bolsters APAC expertise
The UN-supported Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is strengthening its position as the region's sustainable investor network. UN PRI ...
NSW community invited to have a say on Sunnyside rail bridge
The Tenterfield community in New South Wales is invited to have a say on the historical and cultural importance of the non-operational Sunnyside ...
EPA Christmas contractor cull delayed by NSW Industrial Relations Commission
Having recently been subjected to a reasonable spanking at the NSW Industrial Relations Commission, the EPA has parked its rash of terminations ...
Byron Shire & NR Councils working together on recycling campaign
This campaign aims to build on the recycling efforts of all Northern Rivers residents, including those in the Byron Shire, who have a kerbside ...
NEPA( Similar Companies
Eiffage Énergie Systèmes
Rejoindre Eiffage, c’est rejoindre une entreprise animée d’un esprit de famille unique. Nous recherchons des talents qui valorisent l’esprit d’équipe et l’entraide. Des talents qui souhaitent découvrir, progresser, innover dans un collectif engagé pour construire un avenir à taille humaine. Nous av
FEDECAI
FEDERACION ESPAÑOL-ANDORRANA DE EMPRESAS DE CALIDAD AMBIENTAL INTERIOR. FEDECAI se constituye como la Federación de Asociacines de Calidad Ambiental de Interiores, de España y Andorra. Es una Federación independiente, sin ánimo de lucro, de participación voluntaria y que posee un carác
RSK Group
RSK is a global leader in the delivery of sustainable solutions. Working in engineering and technical services, we work in sectors crucially linked to future global sustainability such as water, energy, food and drink, infrastructure, urban development, mining and waste. Our RSK family consists of
AGBAR
With more than 150 years of experience, at Agbar we continue to anticipate and adapt to respond to the needs of our environment, with the aim of improving people's quality of life. With the strength of alliances, we promote innovative solutions for the sustainable management of water and the enviro
Clean Harbors
Clean Harbors is North America’s leading provider of environmental and industrial services. The Company serves a diverse customer base, including a majority of Fortune 500 companies. Its customer base spans a number of industries, including chemical, and manufacturing, as well as numerous government
SOCOTEC
SOCOTEC has built its reputation over 70 years as an independent third party assisting companies in the areas of quality, health and safety, and the environment. Through its inspection and measurement, assistance and consultancy, and training and certification services, SOCOTEC helps to optimize t
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
NEPA( CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, NEPA( has faced 4 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack', 'Breach', 'Data Leak'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as As environmental steward & regulator we are committed to a sustainable future. Our people are proud to play a role in protecting NSW’s natural environment. We partner with Aboriginal people, industry & the wider community to protect, restore & enhance our diverse environments..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Data Leak'].
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
