FEDECAI Company Cyber Security Posture
fedecai.orgFEDERACION ESPAÑOL-ANDORRANA DE EMPRESAS DE CALIDAD AMBIENTAL INTERIOR. FEDECAI se constituye como la Federación de Asociacines de Calidad Ambiental de Interiores, de España y Andorra. Es una Federación independiente, sin ánimo de lucro, de participación voluntaria y que posee un carácter neutral. Está integrada fundamentalmente por profesionales de muy distintas disciplinas, arquitectos, ingenieros, biólogos, abogados, empresarios y particulares afectados o concienciados, todos ellos con preocupaciones y conocimientos comunes sobre cuestiones de Calidad Ambiental Interior. Nos interesa en concreto, el estudio de las repercusiones que la construcción, concretamente la edificación y el urbanismo tienen en relación sobre todo a la salud de las personas usuarias de la misma, al medio ambiente más cercano a éstas en los enornos urbanos. FEDECAI nace impulsada por profesionales animados por el buen trabajado realizado por profesionales pioneros en esta materia y su incansable espíritus emprendedor, y entre sus socios se encuentran los profesionales y académicos de mayor prestigio y relevancia en el ámbito de la Calidad Ambiental Interior tanto de España como de Andorra. Pertenecen y constituyen FEDECAI: AAQAI de Andorra, ACECAI de Madrid, ACESEM de Cataluña, AVECAI de País Vasco, AVEMCAI de Valencia, y ASURCAI de Andalucía.
FEDECAI Company Details
fedecai
10,001+ employees
0
541
Environmental Services
fedecai.org
Scan still pending
FED_1748438
In-progress
FEDECAI Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
FEDECAI Global Score.png)
FEDECAI Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
FEDECAI Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
FEDECAI Company Subsidiaries
FEDERACION ESPAÑOL-ANDORRANA DE EMPRESAS DE CALIDAD AMBIENTAL INTERIOR. FEDECAI se constituye como la Federación de Asociacines de Calidad Ambiental de Interiores, de España y Andorra. Es una Federación independiente, sin ánimo de lucro, de participación voluntaria y que posee un carácter neutral. Está integrada fundamentalmente por profesionales de muy distintas disciplinas, arquitectos, ingenieros, biólogos, abogados, empresarios y particulares afectados o concienciados, todos ellos con preocupaciones y conocimientos comunes sobre cuestiones de Calidad Ambiental Interior. Nos interesa en concreto, el estudio de las repercusiones que la construcción, concretamente la edificación y el urbanismo tienen en relación sobre todo a la salud de las personas usuarias de la misma, al medio ambiente más cercano a éstas en los enornos urbanos. FEDECAI nace impulsada por profesionales animados por el buen trabajado realizado por profesionales pioneros en esta materia y su incansable espíritus emprendedor, y entre sus socios se encuentran los profesionales y académicos de mayor prestigio y relevancia en el ámbito de la Calidad Ambiental Interior tanto de España como de Andorra. Pertenecen y constituyen FEDECAI: AAQAI de Andorra, ACECAI de Madrid, ACESEM de Cataluña, AVECAI de País Vasco, AVEMCAI de Valencia, y ASURCAI de Andalucía.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
FEDECAI Cyber Security News
Cybersecurity venture funding bounces back after slow Q1
Cybersecurity startup funding in the second quarter looks to have recovered from an underwhelming Q1 on the back of megadeals.
A Trio of US Treasury Hacks Exposes a Pattern Making Banks Nervous
In three major hacks, Treasury didn't deploy cybersecurity measures that could have prevented the attacks or flagged the intruders sooner, ...
Cybersecurity Threat in the Age of AI: BCF Founder Cordell Robinson Urges a Culture Shift Toward Proactive Protection
“The biggest cyber threat today isn't machine learning; it's the culture of instant gratification that drives human behavior online,” says this ...
Why Teachers Need to Take Cybersecurity Seriously
We have to worry about protecting student privacy, keeping them safe in the online space and making sure that we're providing opportunities for ...
Why Cybersecurity Should Rethink Inclusion For Neurodivergent People
Cybersecurity is evolving, but is its culture? Explore how neurodivergent professionals are reshaping inclusion, leadership, ...
Deloitte Helps Companies Reshape Cybersecurity Process Using AI
Deloitte's new blueprints to help companies revamp their cybersecurity functions using artificial intelligence reflect a growing market need ...
GAO Assesses Risk Management Implementation at NASA
NASA is planning to invest $80 billion in developing spacecraft and systems for exploring the Earth, the moon and the solar system.
Over 95,000 Mainers affected by Hannaford cybersecurity breach
More than 2.2 million people, including over 95,000 Mainers, are among those affected by a cybersecurity breach that impacted IT systems at ...
5 Cybersecurity Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade
5 Cybersecurity Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade ; Palo Alto Networks (NASDAQ: PANW) ; CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) ; Zscaler (NASDAQ: ...
FEDECAI Similar Companies
PAPREC
Recycler, c'est transformer un déchet en matières premières, donner une seconde vie à ce qu'on aurait eu tendance, hier, à considérer comme définitivement inutile. Avec ses 300 sites dans 10 pays, Paprec s'inscrit quotidiennement dans cette démarche en collectant et traitant les déchets de
Clean Harbors
Clean Harbors is North America’s leading provider of environmental and industrial services. The Company serves a diverse customer base, including a majority of Fortune 500 companies. Its customer base spans a number of industries, including chemical, and manufacturing, as well as numerous government
Bureau Veritas Group
Bureau Veritas is a world leader in Testing, Inspection and Certification. Our mission is at the heart of key challenges: quality, health and safety, environmental protection and social responsibility. Through our wide range of expertise, impartiality and independence, we foster confidence between c
WM
WM is North America's leading provider of integrated environmental solutions. We partner with our customers and communities to manage and reduce waste from collection to disposal while recovering valuable resources and creating clean, renewable energy. We are on a quest for environmental performance
Dalkia
Dalkia : ensemble, relevons le défi climatique ! Depuis 85 ans, Dalkia, filiale du groupe EDF et leader dans les services énergétiques, investit et développe les énergies renouvelables et de récupération et accompagne ses clients dans la durée pour les aider à faire des économies d'énergie et à rédu
Rentokil Initial
Rentokil Initial plc employs 62,900 people across 90 countries - offering the experience and expertise of a multi-national organisation, whilst delivering services with the agility and characteristics of a local business. As world leaders in Pest Control and Hygiene & Well-being services, we deliv
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
FEDECAI CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, FEDECAI has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, FEDECAI has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as FEDERACION ESPAÑOL-ANDORRANA DE EMPRESAS DE CALIDAD AMBIENTAL INTERIOR. FEDECAI se constituye como la Federación de Asociacines de Calidad Ambiental de Interiores, de España y Andorra. Es una Federación independiente, sin ánimo de lucro, de participación voluntaria y que posee un carácter neutral. Está integrada fundamentalmente por profesionales de muy distintas disciplinas, arquitectos, ingenieros, biólogos, abogados, empresarios y particulares afectados o concienciados, todos ellos con preocupaciones y conocimientos comunes sobre cuestiones de Calidad Ambiental Interior. Nos interesa en concreto, el estudio de las repercusiones que la construcción, concretamente la edificación y el urbanismo tienen en relación sobre todo a la salud de las personas usuarias de la misma, al medio ambiente más cercano a éstas en los enornos urbanos. FEDECAI nace impulsada por profesionales animados por el buen trabajado realizado por profesionales pioneros en esta materia y su incansable espíritus emprendedor, y entre sus socios se encuentran los profesionales y académicos de mayor prestigio y relevancia en el ámbito de la Calidad Ambiental Interior tanto de España como de Andorra. Pertenecen y constituyen FEDECAI: AAQAI de Andorra, ACECAI de Madrid, ACESEM de Cataluña, AVECAI de País Vasco, AVEMCAI de Valencia, y ASURCAI de Andalucía..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
