Comparison Overview

Norton Healthcare

VS

UPMC

Norton Healthcare

234 East Gray Street, Louisville, 40202, US
Last Update: 2026-03-28

Norton Healthcare is a leader in serving adult and pediatric patients from throughout Greater Louisville, Southern Indiana, the commonwealth of Kentucky and beyond. The not-for-profit hospital and health care system is Louisville’s second largest employer, with more than 18,600 employees, over 1,750 employed medical providers and nearly 3,000 total providers on its medical staff. Norton Healthcare has five Louisville-based hospitals with a total of 1,907 licensed beds. Norton West Louisville Hospital is scheduled to open in late 2024. The system also includes eight outpatient centers, 18 Norton Immediate Care Centers, eight Norton Prompt Care at Walgreens clinics and an expanded telehealth program. It provides care at more than 350 locations throughout Kentucky and Southern Indiana. The hospitals provide inpatient and outpatient general care as well as specialty care including heart, neuroscience, cancer, orthopedic, women’s and pediatric services. A strong research program provides access to clinical trials in a multitude of areas. Norton King’s Daughters’ Health in Madison, Indiana, also is part of Norton Healthcare. Read more at KDHMadison.org/About-Us. Since 2018, Norton Healthcare’s five Louisville hospitals and Norton Cancer Institute have been named LGBTQ+ Healthcare Equality Leaders by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, earning a top score of 100 on the Healthcare Equality Index (HEI). Norton Healthcare also was recognized in 2022 as one of the “Best Places to Work for Disability Inclusion” by the Disability Equality Index. To learn more about career opportunities, visit NortonHealthcareCareers.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 10,315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

UPMC

US Steel Tower, 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA, US, 15219
Last Update: 2026-03-25
Between 550 and 599

UPMC is a world-renowned, nonprofit health care provider and insurer committed to delivering exceptional, people-centered care and community services. Headquartered in Pittsburgh and affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences, UPMC is shaping the future of health through clinical and technological innovation, research, and education. Dedicated to advancing the well-being of our diverse communities, we provide nearly $2 billion annually in community benefits, more than any other health system in Pennsylvania. Our 100,000 employees — including more than 5,000 physicians — care for patients across more than 40 hospitals and 800 outpatient sites in Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland, as well as overseas. UPMC Insurance Services covers more than 4 million members, providing the highest-quality care at the most affordable price. To learn more, visit UPMC.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 40,981
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norton-healthcare.jpeg
Norton Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/upmc.jpeg
UPMC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Norton Healthcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UPMC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Norton Healthcare has 29.58% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

UPMC has 29.58% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Norton Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Norton Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UPMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UPMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/norton-healthcare.jpeg
Norton Healthcare
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unauthorized access to network storage devices
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/upmc.jpeg
UPMC
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party vendor compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Third-party vendors, Cloud services, Phishing, AI-driven cyberattacks
Motivation: Financial gain, Data extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2018
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog

FAQ

UPMC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Norton Healthcare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UPMC company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Norton Healthcare company.

In the current year, UPMC and Norton Healthcare have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

Both UPMC company and Norton Healthcare company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

UPMC company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Norton Healthcare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UPMC company nor Norton Healthcare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Norton Healthcare company nor UPMC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Norton Healthcare nor UPMC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UPMC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Norton Healthcare company.

UPMC company employs more people globally than Norton Healthcare company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Norton Healthcare nor UPMC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Norton Healthcare nor UPMC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Norton Healthcare nor UPMC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Norton Healthcare nor UPMC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Norton Healthcare nor UPMC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Norton Healthcare nor UPMC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024. This affects the function setLanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94.

Description

Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A critical security vulnerability in parisneo/lollms versions up to 2.2.0 allows any authenticated user to accept or reject friend requests belonging to other users. The `respond_request()` function in `backend/routers/friends.py` does not implement proper authorization checks, enabling Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attacks. Specifically, the `/api/friends/requests/{friendship_id}` endpoint fails to verify whether the authenticated user is part of the friendship or the intended recipient of the request. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, privacy violations, and potential social engineering attacks. The issue has been addressed in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N