Nagel-Group Company Cyber Security Posture
nagel-group.comOur motivation Over 500 million people in Europe have to be supplied with fresh food every day. We contribute to ensuring this is possible. About us The Nagel-Group, which specialises in food logistics, employs over 11,000 people at more than 130 locations. With around 7,000 vehicles, the Nagel-Group moves more than 105,000 shipments every day. Recently the company reported a turnover of 2,2 billion euros. Our competencies lie in individual solutions along the entire supply chain. As specialists in temperature controlled logistics, we work together with our customers to develop the right solution โรรฎ tailor-made and efficient. We use the latest IT systems and uniform and certified quality standards for all modules throughout Europe. Our values Our employees are the foundation of our success. They show dedication and commitment in pursuing one goal: to provide the best service for our customers and their sensitive products. They find effective solutions by using their know-how and creativity. Our offer to our employees is fair, inspiring, and responsible. Whether as truck driver or in the areas of transport planning, IT, quality management, sales, export, warehouse, accounting, customer service, HR; the food logistics sector is versatile. As a family-owned business, we are aware of our responsibility to our employees. Over 11,000 employees have placed their trust in us and are part of the Nagel-Group family. Join us on our journey - we look forward to welcoming you.
Nagel-Group Company Details
nagel-group
10,001+ employees
12623
none
Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage
nagel-group.com
Scan still pending
NAG_9588275
In-progress
Nagel-Group Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 200 and 800
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Nagel-Group Global Score.png)
Nagel-Group Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 200 and 800 |
Nagel-Group Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Nagel-Group Company Subsidiaries
Our motivation Over 500 million people in Europe have to be supplied with fresh food every day. We contribute to ensuring this is possible. About us The Nagel-Group, which specialises in food logistics, employs over 11,000 people at more than 130 locations. With around 7,000 vehicles, the Nagel-Group moves more than 105,000 shipments every day. Recently the company reported a turnover of 2,2 billion euros. Our competencies lie in individual solutions along the entire supply chain. As specialists in temperature controlled logistics, we work together with our customers to develop the right solution โรรฎ tailor-made and efficient. We use the latest IT systems and uniform and certified quality standards for all modules throughout Europe. Our values Our employees are the foundation of our success. They show dedication and commitment in pursuing one goal: to provide the best service for our customers and their sensitive products. They find effective solutions by using their know-how and creativity. Our offer to our employees is fair, inspiring, and responsible. Whether as truck driver or in the areas of transport planning, IT, quality management, sales, export, warehouse, accounting, customer service, HR; the food logistics sector is versatile. As a family-owned business, we are aware of our responsibility to our employees. Over 11,000 employees have placed their trust in us and are part of the Nagel-Group family. Join us on our journey - we look forward to welcoming you.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Nagel-Group Cyber Security News
Italy seizes $36 million from Kuehne+Nagel and Iperal in labour supply probe
Tax police have seized 33 million euros ($36 million) from the Italian unit of Swiss logistics group Kuehne+Nagel International andย ...
News UK supermarket supply chains hit by cyber attack on Blue Yonder
A cyber-attack against Blue Yonder has added further worries to logistics companies around ongoing geopolitical instability.
Logistics firm Kuehne+Nagel to profit from complexities around global trade war
Swiss logistics group Kuehne und Nagel (KNIN.S) on Tuesday said it has been capitalizing on increasingly complex global trade issues.
Strategies for Resilience and Innovation in Times of Disruption
By staying agile, adaptable, and forward-thinking, organizations can not only weather the storm of disruption but emerge stronger and moreย ...
Shadowy 'hacktivists' in focus amid claim of Israeli role in Iranian protests
In February this year, the self-styled hacktivist group said it gained access to millions of files by hacking the servers of the Iranianย ...
Microsoft outage disrupts flight and cargo operations
The outage was primarily attributed to a problem with CrowdStrike Falcon, a cybersecurity platform used by Microsoft.
Freight forwarder Kuehne+Nagel to open new site at Texas-Mexico border
Swiss logistics group Kuehne und Nagel said on Tuesday it would open a new road logistics facility in Texas, close to the Mexican border,ย ...
Kuehne + Nagel uses โagile structureโ to weather 1H 2020
Global freight forwarder Kuehne + Nagel Group (OTCMKTS: KHNGY) used its โagile structure, rigorous cost management and high-quality serviceย ...
The Top 25 Cybersecurity Executives for 2024
A cybersecurity expert and successful entrepreneur, Ken Xie is Founder, Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer of Fortinet, aย ...
Nagel-Group Similar Companies
Aras Kargo
1979 yฤฑlฤฑnda Celal Aras tarafฤฑndan kurulan Aras Daฤฤฑtฤฑm ve Pazarlama, eriลtiฤi daฤฤฑtฤฑm aฤฤฑ gรผcรผyle, bu gรผcรผn taลฤฑmacฤฑlฤฑkta da kullanฤฑlmasฤฑ kararฤฑ alฤฑnarak 1989'da faaliyete geรงen Aras Kargo'nun da temellerini oluลturmuลtur. Kuruluลundan itibaren sektรถre getirdiฤi yeniliklerle hizmet kalitesini geliล
DHL Express
Leading the way in international logistics across an unparalleled network of 220 countries and territories. With decades of experience, weโre your ideal partner for flexible, sustainable shipping to support your growing business and help you expand into new markets. DHL website terms and conditions
Rhenus Logistics
The Rhenus Group is one of the leading logistics specialists with global business operations and annual turnover amounting to EUR 7.5 billion. 40,000 employees work at 1,320 business sites in more than 70 countries and develop innovative solutions along the complete supply chain. Whether providing t
DFDS LOGISTICS NL
DFDS is ontstaan in 1866 toen 4 Deense stoomschipbedrijven samengevoegd werden tot Det Forenede Dampskibs-Selskab. Door de oprichting van DFDS werd het eenvoudiger om op internationaal niveau handel met elkaar te bedrijven. Dit zorgde ervoor dat ondernemers in alle soorten en maten (economisch) kond
Aramex South Africa
Aramex is a provider of comprehensive logistics and transportation solutions. Established in 1982, as an express operator, Aramex rapidly transformed itself into a global brand recognized for its customized services and innovative multi-product offering. Our range of services includes international
Knight-Swift Transportation
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc., formerly Swift Transportation Company, provides truckload services in North America. The Company also provides rail intermodal and non-asset based freight brokerage and logistics management services. The Company provides its services across United States, M
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Nagel-Group CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Nagel-Group has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Nagel-Group has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Our motivation Over 500 million people in Europe have to be supplied with fresh food every day. We contribute to ensuring this is possible. About us The Nagel-Group, which specialises in food logistics, employs over 11,000 people at more than 130 locations. With around 7,000 vehicles, the Nagel-Group moves more than 105,000 shipments every day. Recently the company reported a turnover of 2,2 billion euros. Our competencies lie in individual solutions along the entire supply chain. As specialists in temperature controlled logistics, we work together with our customers to develop the right solution โรรฎ tailor-made and efficient. We use the latest IT systems and uniform and certified quality standards for all modules throughout Europe. Our values Our employees are the foundation of our success. They show dedication and commitment in pursuing one goal: to provide the best service for our customers and their sensitive products. They find effective solutions by using their know-how and creativity. Our offer to our employees is fair, inspiring, and responsible. Whether as truck driver or in the areas of transport planning, IT, quality management, sales, export, warehouse, accounting, customer service, HR; the food logistics sector is versatile. As a family-owned business, we are aware of our responsibility to our employees. Over 11,000 employees have placed their trust in us and are part of the Nagel-Group family. Join us on our journey - we look forward to welcoming you..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
