The Metropolitan Police Service is famed around the world and has a unique place in the history of policing. Our headquarters at New Scotland Yard - and its iconic revolving sign - has provided the backdrop to some of the most high profile and complex law enforcement investigations the world has ever seen. Founded by Sir Robert Peel in 1829, the original establishment of 1,000 officers policed a seven-mile radius from Charing Cross and a population of less than 2 million. Today, The Met employs 32,000 officers together with specialist support staff and more than 2,500 volunteer police officers in the Metropolitan Special Constabulary. As well as policing London’s 620 square miles and 8.9million population, The Met has national responsibility for a variety of specialist policing units and hosts the UK’s Counter Terrorism Policing HQ. The Met is one of the largest employers in London and with a broad range of roles, from neighbourhoods to firearms. We’re recruiting people who want to make a difference, to help people and begin a career in a brilliant organisation, performing an exciting and extremely rewarding role. Today, now more than ever, is the time to join the Met. www.met.police.uk/careers

Metropolitan Police A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Metropolitan Police

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

metpoliceuk

Employees number:

19,573

Number of followers:

175,509

NAICS:

92212

Industry Type:

Law Enforcement

Homepage:

police.uk

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

MET_1968359

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreMetropolitan Police Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 600 and 649

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metpoliceuk.jpeg
Metropolitan Police Law Enforcement
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Get a Score Increase
globalscoreMetropolitan Police Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metpoliceuk.jpeg
Metropolitan Police Law Enforcement
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Metropolitan Police

Poor
Current Score
615
Caa (Poor)
01000
4 incidents
-61.0 avg impact

Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.

APRIL 2026
615
MARCH 2026
675
Breach
25 Mar 2026 • Dutch National Police: Dutch Police discloses security breach after phishing attack
Dutch Police Phishing Attack with Limited Impact

**Dutch Police Confirm Phishing Attack with Limited Impact** The Dutch National Police (Politie) disclosed a security breach stemming from a successful phishing attack, confirming that the incident had a limited impact and did not compromise citizens' data or investigative information. The agency’s Security Operations Center detected the attack swiftly and blocked the attackers' access to compromised systems. While the full scope of the breach remains under investigation, authorities stated that no sensitive citizen or operational data was exposed. A criminal investigation has been launched, though details including the timing of the attack, affected systems, and whether employee data was accessed have not been released. A police spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for further information. This incident follows a separate September 2024 data breach linked to a state-sponsored cyberattack, which resulted in the theft of work-related contact details for multiple officers, including names, email addresses, phone numbers, and, in some cases, private data. The ongoing investigation has not attributed the attack to a specific threat group or revealed the attack vector. In response to the earlier breach, the Dutch police implemented enhanced security measures, including continuous system monitoring and mandatory two-factor authentication for officer logins. Additionally, in February 2024, Dutch authorities arrested a 40-year-old man for attempting to extort the police using confidential documents accidentally shared by the agency.

614
medium -61
MET1774599822
Phishing Attack
Phishing
Data Compromised: No sensitive citizen or operational data was exposed
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes Containment Measures: Attackers' access to compromised systems was blocked Enhanced Monitoring: Continuous system monitoring implemented post-incident
['Ongoing']
Corrective Actions: Mandatory two-factor authentication for officer logins
FEBRUARY 2026
673
JANUARY 2026
671
DECEMBER 2025
667
NOVEMBER 2025
667
OCTOBER 2025
665
SEPTEMBER 2025
662
AUGUST 2025
660
JULY 2025
658
JUNE 2025
655
MAY 2025
653
SEPTEMBER 2023
697
Ransomware
01 Sep 2023 • Metropolitan Police
Ransomware Attack on Third-Party Provider of Greater Manchester Police

Police in Manchester, England, reported that a third-party provider who stores some of the company's personnel information had been the victim of a ransomware assault. Financial information is not thought to have been part of the compromised data, according to Greater Manchester Police (GMP). McFarlane said that GMP had spoken with the Information Commissioner's Office in Britain regarding the issue. The names, ranks, and vetting statuses of its officers and personnel were accessible through an illegal entry to one of its suppliers' IT systems, according to the Metropolitan Police of London.

589
high -108
MET102117923
Ransomware
Illegal entry to IT systems
Data Theft
names ranks vetting statuses
Personnel information Sensitivity Of Data: High names ranks vetting statuses
Information Commissioner's Office in Britain
AUGUST 2023
761
Data Leak
01 Aug 2023 • Metropolitan Police
Metropolitan Police Supplier Data Breach

The Metropolitan Police is investigating a possible data breach after unauthorized access was gained to the systems of one of its suppliers. The police department claimed that the corporation possessed names, ranks, pictures, vetting levels, and pay numbers for officers and personnel and that it was investigating whether any data had been accessed. A Met representative said the organization in question did not hold personal information like addresses, phone numbers, or financial information but declined to specify when the breach happened or how many employees may have been affected. The National Crime Agency (NCA) and the information commissioner have both been notified of the occurrence.

695
high -66
MET9516923
Data Breach
Unauthorized Access
Names Ranks Pictures Vetting Levels Pay Numbers
National Crime Agency (NCA) Information Commissioner
Names Ranks Pictures Vetting Levels Pay Numbers
National Crime Agency (NCA) Information Commissioner
['Ongoing']
JUNE 2018
787
Breach
16 Jun 2018 • Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)
Surge in UK Police Data Breaches (2022–2024)

The **Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)**—the UK’s largest police force—has been at the center of a rising wave of data breaches, recording **2,271 incidents** since 2022, the highest among UK law enforcement agencies. These breaches stem from a mix of **human error** (e.g., misdirected emails, unauthorized data access, failure to redact sensitive details, or accidental publication of records) and **cyber threats**, including potential ransomware and malicious insider activity. The exposed data often includes highly sensitive personal information—such as names, addresses, phone numbers, and criminal records—of victims, suspects, and even police personnel. A notable case involved the **incorrect merging of victim and suspect records**, leading to processing inaccuracies, compromised investigations, and potential leaks of sensitive data. Such breaches erode public trust, risk financial or psychological harm to affected individuals, and have already resulted in **291 compensation claims** totaling **£501,370** in payouts since 2022. The MPS’s repeated failures highlight systemic vulnerabilities in data handling, despite obligations under the **Data Protection Act 2018**. The escalating frequency of incidents (from 2,711 in 2022/23 to 4,759 in the latest year) underscores the urgent need for stricter protocols, staff training, and encryption measures to mitigate further exposure of critical law enforcement data.

697
high -90
MET1092910091025
Data Breach Human Error Cyberattack Ransomware Insider Threat
Phishing Misdirected Emails Unauthorized Access Lost/Stolen Devices Accidental Publication Malicious Insiders Ransomware
Poor Data Handling Protocols Lack of Encryption Insufficient Staff Training Weak Access Controls
Financial Gain Data Theft Disruption Accidental
Financial Loss: £501,370 (compensation payouts) Names Phone Numbers Emails Addresses Sensitive Investigation Records Disrupted Investigations Inaccurate Personal Data Processing Loss of Public Trust Customer Complaints: 291 claims lodged Brand Reputation Impact: High (eroded public trust in law enforcement data security) ICO Reprimands Data Protection Act 2018 Violations Identity Theft Risk: High
Staff Training on Data Handling Device Encryption Strict Data Sharing/Retention Policies
Personally Identifiable Information (PII) Investigation Records Crime Victim/Suspect Data Sensitivity Of Data: High (law enforcement records, PII) Data Exfiltration: Likely (in some cases) Data Encryption: Lack of encryption cited as a vulnerability Emails Documents Database Records Names Phone Numbers Emails Addresses
Data Protection Act 2018 ICO Reprimand (West Midlands Police, 2024) 291 Compensation Claims Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO)
Human error and insufficient data protection measures (e.g., training, encryption) are major contributors to breaches. Police forces must enforce stricter access controls, redact sensitive data, and improve incident response to prevent financial and reputational damage.
Mandate comprehensive data handling training for all staff Implement encryption for all devices storing sensitive data Enforce strict access controls and audit logs for data access Establish clear protocols for data sharing and retention Conduct regular security audits and risk assessments Enhance public transparency in breach disclosures
['Ongoing (multiple incidents; some resolved with ICO actions)']
Misdirected Emails Lost/Stolen Devices Unauthorized Access Phishing Crime Victim/Suspect Records Sensitive Investigation Data
Human error (e.g., misdirected emails, unauthorized access) Inadequate training on data handling Lack of encryption for sensitive data Weak access controls Cyberattacks (e.g., ransomware, phishing) Enhanced staff training programs Implementation of device encryption Stricter data access and redaction policies ICO oversight and reprimands for non-compliance

Frequently Asked Questions

According to Rankiteo, the current A.I.-based Cyber Score for Metropolitan Police is 615, which corresponds to a Poor rating.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for March 2026 was 675.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for February 2026 was 673.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for January 2026 was 671.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for December 2025 was 667.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for November 2025 was 667.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for October 2025 was 665.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for September 2025 was 662.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for August 2025 was 660.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for July 2025 was 658.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for June 2025 was 655.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for May 2025 was 653.

Over the past 12 months, the average per-incident point impact on Metropolitan Police’s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score has been -61.0 points.

You can access Metropolitan Police’s cyber incident details on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/metpoliceuk.

You can find the summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: Rankiteo Algorithm.

You can view Metropolitan Police’s profile page on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/metpoliceuk.

With scores of 18.5/20 from OpenAI ChatGPT, 20/20 from Mistral AI, and 17/20 from Claude AI, the A.I. Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology is validated as a market leader.