Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions

The Metropolitan Police Service is famed around the world and has a unique place in the history of policing. Our headquarters at New Scotland Yard - and its iconic revolving sign - has provided the backdrop to some of the most high profile and complex law enforcement investigations the world has ever seen. Founded by Sir Robert Peel in 1829, the original establishment of 1,000 officers policed a seven-mile radius from Charing Cross and a population of less than 2 million. Today, The Met employs 32,000 officers together with specialist support staff and more than 2,500 volunteer police officers in the Metropolitan Special Constabulary. As well as policing London’s 620 square miles and 8.9million population, The Met has national responsibility for a variety of specialist policing units and hosts the UK’s Counter Terrorism Policing HQ. The Met is one of the largest employers in London and with a broad range of roles, from neighbourhoods to firearms. We’re recruiting people who want to make a difference, to help people and begin a career in a brilliant organisation, performing an exciting and extremely rewarding role. Today, now more than ever, is the time to join the Met. www.met.police.uk/careers

Metropolitan Police A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Metropolitan Police

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

metpoliceuk

Employees number:

19,573

Number of followers:

175,509

NAICS:

92212

Industry Type:

Law Enforcement

Homepage:

police.uk

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

MET_1968359

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreMetropolitan Police Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 600 and 649

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metpoliceuk.jpeg
Metropolitan Police Law Enforcement
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Get a Score Increase
globalscoreMetropolitan Police Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metpoliceuk.jpeg
Metropolitan Police Law Enforcement
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Metropolitan Police Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
4
Attack Types
3
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
Metropolitan PoliceBreach5023/2026NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Dutch Police Confirm Phishing Attack with Limited Impact The Dutch National Police (Politie) disclosed a security breach stemming from a successful phishing attack, confirming that the incident had a limited impact and did not compromise citizens' data or investigative information. The agency’s Security Operations Center detected the attack swiftly and blocked the attackers' access to compromised systems. While the full scope of the breach remains under investigation, authorities stated that no sensitive citizen or operational data was exposed. A criminal investigation has been launched, though details including the timing of the attack, affected systems, and whether employee data was accessed have not been released. A police spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for further information. This incident follows a separate September 2024 data breach linked to a state-sponsored cyberattack, which resulted in the theft of work-related contact details for multiple officers, including names, email addresses, phone numbers, and, in some cases, private data. The ongoing investigation has not attributed the attack to a specific threat group or revealed the attack vector. In response to the earlier breach, the Dutch police implemented enhanced security measures, including continuous system monitoring and mandatory two-factor authentication for officer logins. Additionally, in February 2024, Dutch authorities arrested a 40-year-old man for attempting to extort the police using confidential documents accidentally shared by the agency.

Metropolitan PoliceRansomware75209/2023NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Police in Manchester, England, reported that a third-party provider who stores some of the company's personnel information had been the victim of a ransomware assault. Financial information is not thought to have been part of the compromised data, according to Greater Manchester Police (GMP). McFarlane said that GMP had spoken with the Information Commissioner's Office in Britain regarding the issue. The names, ranks, and vetting statuses of its officers and personnel were accessible through an illegal entry to one of its suppliers' IT systems, according to the Metropolitan Police of London.

Metropolitan PoliceData Leak60308/2023NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: The Metropolitan Police is investigating a possible data breach after unauthorized access was gained to the systems of one of its suppliers. The police department claimed that the corporation possessed names, ranks, pictures, vetting levels, and pay numbers for officers and personnel and that it was investigating whether any data had been accessed. A Met representative said the organization in question did not hold personal information like addresses, phone numbers, or financial information but declined to specify when the breach happened or how many employees may have been affected. The National Crime Agency (NCA) and the information commissioner have both been notified of the occurrence.

Metropolitan PoliceBreach6036/2018NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) the UK’s largest police force has been at the center of a rising wave of data breaches, recording 2,271 incidents since 2022, the highest among UK law enforcement agencies. These breaches stem from a mix of human error (e.g., misdirected emails, unauthorized data access, failure to redact sensitive details, or accidental publication of records) and cyber threats, including potential ransomware and malicious insider activity. The exposed data often includes highly sensitive personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers, and criminal records of victims, suspects, and even police personnel. A notable case involved the incorrect merging of victim and suspect records, leading to processing inaccuracies, compromised investigations, and potential leaks of sensitive data. Such breaches erode public trust, risk financial or psychological harm to affected individuals, and have already resulted in 291 compensation claims totaling £501,370 in payouts since 2022. The MPS’s repeated failures highlight systemic vulnerabilities in data handling, despite obligations under the Data Protection Act 2018. The escalating frequency of incidents (from 2,711 in 2022/23 to 4,759 in the latest year) underscores the urgent need for stricter protocols, staff training, and encryption measures to mitigate further exposure of critical law enforcement data.

Dutch National Police: Dutch Police discloses security breach after phishing attack
Breach
Severity: 50
Impact: 2
Seen: 3/2026
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Dutch Police Confirm Phishing Attack with Limited Impact The Dutch National Police (Politie) disclosed a security breach stemming from a successful phishing attack, confirming that the incident had a limited impact and did not compromise citizens' data or investigative information. The agency’s Security Operations Center detected the attack swiftly and blocked the attackers' access to compromised systems. While the full scope of the breach remains under investigation, authorities stated that no sensitive citizen or operational data was exposed. A criminal investigation has been launched, though details including the timing of the attack, affected systems, and whether employee data was accessed have not been released. A police spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for further information. This incident follows a separate September 2024 data breach linked to a state-sponsored cyberattack, which resulted in the theft of work-related contact details for multiple officers, including names, email addresses, phone numbers, and, in some cases, private data. The ongoing investigation has not attributed the attack to a specific threat group or revealed the attack vector. In response to the earlier breach, the Dutch police implemented enhanced security measures, including continuous system monitoring and mandatory two-factor authentication for officer logins. Additionally, in February 2024, Dutch authorities arrested a 40-year-old man for attempting to extort the police using confidential documents accidentally shared by the agency.

Metropolitan Police
Ransomware
Severity: 75
Impact: 2
Seen: 09/2023
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Police in Manchester, England, reported that a third-party provider who stores some of the company's personnel information had been the victim of a ransomware assault. Financial information is not thought to have been part of the compromised data, according to Greater Manchester Police (GMP). McFarlane said that GMP had spoken with the Information Commissioner's Office in Britain regarding the issue. The names, ranks, and vetting statuses of its officers and personnel were accessible through an illegal entry to one of its suppliers' IT systems, according to the Metropolitan Police of London.

Metropolitan Police
Data Leak
Severity: 60
Impact: 3
Seen: 08/2023
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: The Metropolitan Police is investigating a possible data breach after unauthorized access was gained to the systems of one of its suppliers. The police department claimed that the corporation possessed names, ranks, pictures, vetting levels, and pay numbers for officers and personnel and that it was investigating whether any data had been accessed. A Met representative said the organization in question did not hold personal information like addresses, phone numbers, or financial information but declined to specify when the breach happened or how many employees may have been affected. The National Crime Agency (NCA) and the information commissioner have both been notified of the occurrence.

Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)
Breach
Severity: 60
Impact: 3
Seen: 6/2018
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) the UK’s largest police force has been at the center of a rising wave of data breaches, recording 2,271 incidents since 2022, the highest among UK law enforcement agencies. These breaches stem from a mix of human error (e.g., misdirected emails, unauthorized data access, failure to redact sensitive details, or accidental publication of records) and cyber threats, including potential ransomware and malicious insider activity. The exposed data often includes highly sensitive personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers, and criminal records of victims, suspects, and even police personnel. A notable case involved the incorrect merging of victim and suspect records, leading to processing inaccuracies, compromised investigations, and potential leaks of sensitive data. Such breaches erode public trust, risk financial or psychological harm to affected individuals, and have already resulted in 291 compensation claims totaling £501,370 in payouts since 2022. The MPS’s repeated failures highlight systemic vulnerabilities in data handling, despite obligations under the Data Protection Act 2018. The escalating frequency of incidents (from 2,711 in 2022/23 to 4,759 in the latest year) underscores the urgent need for stricter protocols, staff training, and encryption measures to mitigate further exposure of critical law enforcement data.

Ailogo

Metropolitan Police Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for Metropolitan Police

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

Metropolitan Police has 54.75% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Metropolitan Police has 13.79% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident Types Metropolitan Police vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

Metropolitan Police reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.

Incident History — Metropolitan Police (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metropolitan Police cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Metropolitan Police Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

The Metropolitan Police Service is famed around the world and has a unique place in the history of policing. Our headquarters at New Scotland Yard - and its iconic revolving sign - has provided the backdrop to some of the most high profile and complex law enforcement investigations the world has ever seen. Founded by Sir Robert Peel in 1829, the original establishment of 1,000 officers policed a seven-mile radius from Charing Cross and a population of less than 2 million. Today, The Met employs 32,000 officers together with specialist support staff and more than 2,500 volunteer police officers in the Metropolitan Special Constabulary. As well as policing London’s 620 square miles and 8.9million population, The Met has national responsibility for a variety of specialist policing units and hosts the UK’s Counter Terrorism Policing HQ. The Met is one of the largest employers in London and with a broad range of roles, from neighbourhoods to firearms. We’re recruiting people who want to make a difference, to help people and begin a career in a brilliant organisation, performing an exciting and extremely rewarding role. Today, now more than ever, is the time to join the Met. www.met.police.uk/careers

Loading...
similarCompanies

Metropolitan Police Similar Companies

Policing in South Africa. I am attached to the newly formed Directorate for Priority Crime Investigations. Formally I was attached to the Detecitve Service and have been conduction investigations for over 25 years. I have also been attached to the National Inspectorate Division of the SAPS for soem

GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA

Gendarmería Nacional Argentina (GNA) es una Fuerza de Seguridad de naturaleza militar, que cumple funciones en la seguridad interior, defensa nacional, auxilio a la Justicia Federal y apoyo a la Política Exterior de la RA. Es una de las cuatro Fuerzas que integran el Ministerio de Seguridad de l

Swedish Police Authority

Vi gör hela Sverige tryggt och säkert! Att arbeta inom polisen är ett av de finaste uppdrag man kan ha. Du bidrar till samhället genom att göra hela Sverige tryggt och säkert. Oavsett om du jobbar i en civil roll eller som polis, är möjligheterna att växa med en större uppgift många. Vi är Sverig

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

This is the official Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) LinkedIn account and is used to build awareness of workplace culture, engagement opportunities, and the FBI mission. The FBI does not collect comments or messages through this account. The FBI is the premier law enforcement agency in the

Government of India

he Government of India, officially known as the Union Government, and also known as the Central Government, was established by the Constitution of India, and is the governing authority of a union of 28 states and seven union territories, collectively called the Republic of India. It is seated in New

Politie Nederland

Politiemensen staan midden in de maatschappij, dicht op het nieuws. De politie is daar waar het gebeurt. Het optreden van agenten ligt altijd onder een vergrootglas. Bij de politie ben je 24 uur per dag en voor iedereen in onze diverse samenleving. Integer, moedig, betrouwbaar en verbindend zijn daa

New York City Police Department

Welcome to the Official NYPD LinkedIn Page. For emergencies, dial 911. To submit crime tips & information, visit www.NYPDcrimestoppers.com or call 800-577-TIPS. The mission of the New York City Police Department is to enhance the quality of life in New York City by working in partnership with the c

newsone

Metropolitan Police CyberSecurity News

February 25, 2026 08:00 AM
City of Kenmare looks to upgrade cybersecurity system

A small town in the Minot area is upgrading its cybersecurity system, which it hopes will increase confidence from city residents.

February 04, 2026 08:00 AM
Cybersecurity News: Metro bug, more social bans, leaky Moltbook

Metro bug, more social bans, leaky Moltbook, Iron Mountain downplays recent breach impact, CISA is silently updating vulnerability notices.

January 31, 2026 01:55 AM
Scammers impersonate Billings officials' emails, prompting cybersecurity concerns

City officials in Billings are reviewing cybersecurity practices after the email accounts of the city's police and fire chiefs were compromised this week.

January 01, 2026 08:00 AM
Sensitive data 'likely taken' in Westminster council cyber attack

A London council has revealed that potentially sensitive and personal information was likely "copied and taken" by hackers during a cyber...

January 01, 2026 08:00 AM
Inside the Times Square phone store that powers New Year’s Eve emergency communications

For public safety agencies, a AT&T store in Times Square has become a valuable asset during New Year's Eve celebrations.

December 04, 2025 08:00 AM
Police arrest high school student over cyberattack on net cafe operator

The 17-year-old student from Osaka allegedly obtained about 7.25 million sets of Kaikatsu Club membership information with a program he...

November 28, 2025 08:00 AM
Data copied in Kensington and Chelsea council cyber attack

The council is urging residents to be extra vigilant when receiving calls, emails or text messages.

November 25, 2025 08:00 AM
Several London councils thought be affected by cyber-attacks

Several London councils are believed to have been targeted in cyber-attacks within the past few days. The Royal Borough of Kensington...

November 03, 2025 08:00 AM
Hack Exposes Kansas City’s Secret Police Misconduct List

A major breach of the Kansas City, Kansas, Police Department reveals, for the first time, a list of alleged officer misconduct including...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

Metropolitan Police CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Metropolitan Police

The official website of Metropolitan Police is http://www.met.police.uk.

Metropolitan Police’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Police’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 614, reflecting their Poor security posture.

How many security badges does Metropolitan Police’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Police currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Metropolitan Police been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Police has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Metropolitan Police have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Police is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Metropolitan Police have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Police does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Metropolitan Police comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Police is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Metropolitan Police have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Police does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Metropolitan Police comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Police is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Metropolitan Police have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Metropolitan Police is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Metropolitan Police

Metropolitan Police operates primarily in the Law Enforcement industry.

Number of Employees at Metropolitan Police

Metropolitan Police employs approximately 19,573 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Metropolitan Police

Metropolitan Police presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Metropolitan Police’s LinkedIn Followers

Metropolitan Police’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 175,509 followers.

NAICS Classification of Metropolitan Police

Metropolitan Police is classified under the NAICS code 92212, which corresponds to Police Protection.

Metropolitan Police’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Metropolitan Police does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Metropolitan Police’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Metropolitan Police maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/metpoliceuk.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Metropolitan Police

As of April 02, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Metropolitan Police has experienced 4 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Metropolitan Police has an estimated 1,607 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Metropolitan Police ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware, Data Leak and Breach.

What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Metropolitan Police ?

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $501.37 thousand.

How does Metropolitan Police detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an law enforcement notified with national crime agency (nca), law enforcement notified with information commissioner, and remediation measures with staff training on data handling, remediation measures with device encryption, remediation measures with strict data sharing/retention policies, and incident response plan activated with yes, and containment measures with attackers' access to compromised systems was blocked, and enhanced monitoring with continuous system monitoring implemented post-incident..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Metropolitan Police Supplier Data Breach

Description: The Metropolitan Police is investigating a possible data breach after unauthorized access was gained to the systems of one of its suppliers. The supplier had access to names, ranks, pictures, vetting levels, and pay numbers for officers and personnel.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access

Incident : Ransomware

Title: Ransomware Attack on Third-Party Provider of Greater Manchester Police

Description: Police in Manchester, England, reported that a third-party provider who stores some of the company's personnel information had been the victim of a ransomware assault. Financial information is not thought to have been part of the compromised data, according to Greater Manchester Police (GMP). McFarlane said that GMP had spoken with the Information Commissioner's Office in Britain regarding the issue. The names, ranks, and vetting statuses of its officers and personnel were accessible through an illegal entry to one of its suppliers' IT systems, according to the Metropolitan Police of London.

Type: Ransomware

Attack Vector: Illegal entry to IT systems

Motivation: Data Theft

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Surge in UK Police Data Breaches (2022–2024)

Description: A significant increase in data breaches within UK police forces, driven by both human error and cyber threats, has exposed sensitive personal information. Over 13,000 incidents were reported in the past three years, involving unauthorized access, misdirected communications, device theft, and accidental data publication. The breaches have led to financial losses, psychological harm, and compensation claims totaling £501,370. High-profile cases include the Metropolitan Police Service (2,271 breaches) and Police Scotland (1,398 breaches), with regulatory reprimands issued by the ICO for violations of the Data Protection Act 2018.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: PhishingMisdirected EmailsUnauthorized AccessLost/Stolen DevicesAccidental PublicationMalicious InsidersRansomware

Vulnerability Exploited: Poor Data Handling ProtocolsLack of EncryptionInsufficient Staff TrainingWeak Access Controls

Threat Actor: CybercriminalsMalicious InsidersHuman Error

Motivation: Financial GainData TheftDisruptionAccidental

Incident : Phishing Attack

Title: Dutch Police Phishing Attack with Limited Impact

Description: The Dutch National Police (Politie) disclosed a security breach stemming from a successful phishing attack, confirming that the incident had a limited impact and did not compromise citizens' data or investigative information. The agency’s Security Operations Center detected the attack swiftly and blocked the attackers' access to compromised systems.

Type: Phishing Attack

Attack Vector: Phishing

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Misdirected EmailsLost/Stolen DevicesUnauthorized AccessPhishing.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MET9516923

Data Compromised: Names, Ranks, Pictures, Vetting levels, Pay numbers

Incident : Ransomware MET102117923

Data Compromised: Names, Ranks, Vetting statuses

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Financial Loss: £501,370 (compensation payouts)

Data Compromised: Names, Phone numbers, Emails, Addresses, Sensitive investigation records

Operational Impact: Disrupted InvestigationsInaccurate Personal Data ProcessingLoss of Public Trust

Customer Complaints: 291 claims lodged

Brand Reputation Impact: High (eroded public trust in law enforcement data security)

Legal Liabilities: ICO ReprimandsData Protection Act 2018 Violations

Identity Theft Risk: High

Incident : Phishing Attack MET1774599822

Data Compromised: No sensitive citizen or operational data was exposed

What is the average financial loss per incident ?

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $125.34 thousand.

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Names, Ranks, Pictures, Vetting Levels, Pay Numbers, , Personnel Information, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Investigation Records, Crime Victim/Suspect Data and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MET9516923

Entity Name: Metropolitan Police Supplier

Entity Type: Corporation

Incident : Ransomware MET102117923

Entity Name: Greater Manchester Police

Entity Type: Law Enforcement

Industry: Government

Location: Manchester, England

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Entity Name: Metropolitan Police Service

Entity Type: Law Enforcement Agency

Industry: Public Sector

Location: United Kingdom

Customers Affected: 2,271 incidents

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Entity Name: Police Scotland

Entity Type: Law Enforcement Agency

Industry: Public Sector

Location: Scotland, UK

Customers Affected: 1,398 incidents

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Entity Name: West Midlands Police

Entity Type: Law Enforcement Agency

Industry: Public Sector

Location: West Midlands, UK

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Entity Name: UK Police Forces (Collective)

Entity Type: Law Enforcement Agencies

Industry: Public Sector

Location: United Kingdom

Customers Affected: 13,000+ incidents (2022–2024)

Incident : Phishing Attack MET1774599822

Entity Name: Dutch National Police (Politie)

Entity Type: Government Agency

Industry: Law Enforcement

Location: Netherlands

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MET9516923

Law Enforcement Notified: National Crime Agency (NCA), Information Commissioner,

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Remediation Measures: Staff Training on Data HandlingDevice EncryptionStrict Data Sharing/Retention Policies

Incident : Phishing Attack MET1774599822

Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes

Containment Measures: Attackers' access to compromised systems was blocked

Enhanced Monitoring: Continuous system monitoring implemented post-incident

What is the company's incident response plan?

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes.

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach MET9516923

Type of Data Compromised: Names, Ranks, Pictures, Vetting levels, Pay numbers

Incident : Ransomware MET102117923

Type of Data Compromised: Personnel information

Sensitivity of Data: High

Personally Identifiable Information: namesranksvetting statuses

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Investigation records, Crime victim/suspect data

Sensitivity of Data: High (law enforcement records, PII)

Data Exfiltration: Likely (in some cases)

Data Encryption: Lack of encryption cited as a vulnerability

File Types Exposed: EmailsDocumentsDatabase Records

Personally Identifiable Information: NamesPhone NumbersEmailsAddresses

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Staff Training on Data Handling, Device Encryption, Strict Data Sharing/Retention Policies, .

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by attackers' access to compromised systems was blocked.

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MET9516923

Regulatory Notifications: National Crime Agency (NCA)Information Commissioner

Incident : Ransomware MET102117923

Regulatory Notifications: Information Commissioner's Office in Britain

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Regulations Violated: Data Protection Act 2018,

Legal Actions: ICO Reprimand (West Midlands Police, 2024), 291 Compensation Claims,

Regulatory Notifications: Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO)

How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through ICO Reprimand (West Midlands Police, 2024), 291 Compensation Claims, .

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Lessons Learned: Human error and insufficient data protection measures (e.g., training, encryption) are major contributors to breaches. Police forces must enforce stricter access controls, redact sensitive data, and improve incident response to prevent financial and reputational damage.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Recommendations: Mandate comprehensive data handling training for all staff, Implement encryption for all devices storing sensitive data, Enforce strict access controls and audit logs for data access, Establish clear protocols for data sharing and retention, Conduct regular security audits and risk assessments, Enhance public transparency in breach disclosuresMandate comprehensive data handling training for all staff, Implement encryption for all devices storing sensitive data, Enforce strict access controls and audit logs for data access, Establish clear protocols for data sharing and retention, Conduct regular security audits and risk assessments, Enhance public transparency in breach disclosuresMandate comprehensive data handling training for all staff, Implement encryption for all devices storing sensitive data, Enforce strict access controls and audit logs for data access, Establish clear protocols for data sharing and retention, Conduct regular security audits and risk assessments, Enhance public transparency in breach disclosuresMandate comprehensive data handling training for all staff, Implement encryption for all devices storing sensitive data, Enforce strict access controls and audit logs for data access, Establish clear protocols for data sharing and retention, Conduct regular security audits and risk assessments, Enhance public transparency in breach disclosuresMandate comprehensive data handling training for all staff, Implement encryption for all devices storing sensitive data, Enforce strict access controls and audit logs for data access, Establish clear protocols for data sharing and retention, Conduct regular security audits and risk assessments, Enhance public transparency in breach disclosuresMandate comprehensive data handling training for all staff, Implement encryption for all devices storing sensitive data, Enforce strict access controls and audit logs for data access, Establish clear protocols for data sharing and retention, Conduct regular security audits and risk assessments, Enhance public transparency in breach disclosures

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Human error and insufficient data protection measures (e.g., training, encryption) are major contributors to breaches. Police forces must enforce stricter access controls, redact sensitive data, and improve incident response to prevent financial and reputational damage.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Source: Data Breach Claims UK

Date Accessed: 2024

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Source: VPNoverview Study (2020)

Date Accessed: 2020

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Source: Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) Reprimand (2024)

Date Accessed: 2024

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Source: JF Law (Bethan Simons, Solicitor)

Incident : Phishing Attack MET1774599822

Source: Cyber Incident Description

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Data Breach Claims UKDate Accessed: 2024, and Source: VPNoverview Study (2020)Date Accessed: 2020, and Source: Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) Reprimand (2024)Date Accessed: 2024, and Source: JF Law (Bethan Simons, Solicitor), and Source: Cyber Incident Description.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MET9516923

Investigation Status: Ongoing

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Investigation Status: Ongoing (multiple incidents; some resolved with ICO actions)

Incident : Phishing Attack MET1774599822

Investigation Status: Ongoing

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Entry Point: Misdirected Emails, Lost/Stolen Devices, Unauthorized Access, Phishing,

High Value Targets: Crime Victim/Suspect Records, Sensitive Investigation Data,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Crime Victim/Suspect Records, Sensitive Investigation Data,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach MET1092910091025

Root Causes: Human Error (E.G., Misdirected Emails, Unauthorized Access), Inadequate Training On Data Handling, Lack Of Encryption For Sensitive Data, Weak Access Controls, Cyberattacks (E.G., Ransomware, Phishing),

Corrective Actions: Enhanced Staff Training Programs, Implementation Of Device Encryption, Stricter Data Access And Redaction Policies, Ico Oversight And Reprimands For Non-Compliance,

Incident : Phishing Attack MET1774599822

Corrective Actions: Mandatory two-factor authentication for officer logins

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Continuous system monitoring implemented post-incident.

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Enhanced Staff Training Programs, Implementation Of Device Encryption, Stricter Data Access And Redaction Policies, Ico Oversight And Reprimands For Non-Compliance, , Mandatory two-factor authentication for officer logins.

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an CybercriminalsMalicious InsidersHuman Error.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2024.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was £501,370 (compensation payouts).

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Names, Ranks, Pictures, Vetting Levels, Pay Numbers, , names, ranks, vetting statuses, , Names, Phone Numbers, Emails, Addresses, Sensitive Investigation Records, and No sensitive citizen or operational data was exposed.

Response to the Incidents

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Attackers' access to compromised systems was blocked.

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Ranks, Addresses, Pictures, Phone Numbers, ranks, vetting statuses, Emails, Sensitive Investigation Records, No sensitive citizen or operational data was exposed, Names, Vetting Levels, names and Pay Numbers.

Regulatory Compliance

What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was ICO Reprimand (West Midlands Police, 2024), 291 Compensation Claims, .

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Human error and insufficient data protection measures (e.g., training, encryption) are major contributors to breaches. Police forces must enforce stricter access controls, redact sensitive data, and improve incident response to prevent financial and reputational damage.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Mandate comprehensive data handling training for all staff, Implement encryption for all devices storing sensitive data, Enhance public transparency in breach disclosures, Conduct regular security audits and risk assessments, Enforce strict access controls and audit logs for data access and Establish clear protocols for data sharing and retention.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Data Breach Claims UK, Cyber Incident Description, VPNoverview Study (2020), JF Law (Bethan Simons, Solicitor) and Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) Reprimand (2024).

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.

Initial Access Broker

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Human error (e.g., misdirected emails, unauthorized access)Inadequate training on data handlingLack of encryption for sensitive dataWeak access controlsCyberattacks (e.g., ransomware, phishing).

What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Enhanced staff training programsImplementation of device encryptionStricter data access and redaction policiesICO oversight and reprimands for non-compliance, Mandatory two-factor authentication for officer logins.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Nothings stb up to 1.26. Impacted is the function stbtt_InitFont_internal in the library stb_truetype.h of the component TTF File Handler. Performing a manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read in VS6ComFile!get_macro_mem_COM. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain a stack-based buffer overflow in VS6ComFile!CSaveData::_conv_AnimationItem. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to arbitrary code execution on the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6MemInIF!set_temp_type_default. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6ComFile!load_link_inf. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=metpoliceuk' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge