Politi Company Cyber Security Posture

politi.dk

MANGE FAGLIGHEDER SAMMEN I politiet arbejder mere end 16.000 medarbejdere sammen om at forebygge og forhindre kriminalitet, så Danmark er et trygt og sikkert sted at bo og leve. Vi er alle dybt engagerede og motiverede for at gøre en forskel for andre mennesker og for samfundet som helhed. Langt størstedelen af politiets medarbejdere er uddannede fra Politiskolen, men derudover arbejder cirka 4.500 personer med andre fagligheder hver dag med opgaver inden for it-udvikling, juridisk rådgivning, presse og kommunikation, indkøb af politiets udstyr, forebyggelse af kriminalitet, samarbejde med kommuner og organisationer, personale og uddannelse, kriminalteknik og store efterforskningsopgaver. Her på politiets LinkedIn-profil vil vi gerne give dig et indblik i de mange opgaver i politiet, som du ikke hører om hver dag. Hvad laver analytikeren og datalogen fx i vores efterforskningsafdeling? Hvordan sikrer vores softwareudvikler eller softwarearkitekt at den mobilapp, de udvkler, opfylder de behov som politikollegerne på gaden har? Hvordan håndterer vores økonomer og jurister store indkøb af politiudstyr? Hvordan indgår journalisten i krisehåndtering? Hvad underviser psykologen i på Politiskolen? Følg os, hvis du vil orienteres om nye ledige stillinger i politiet. Vi kan slet ikke fortælle om dem alle her på LinkedIn, så klik ind på www.politi.dk/job-i-politiet for det fulde overblik.

Politi Company Details

Linkedin ID:

politi

Employees number:

10,001+ employees

Number of followers:

0

NAICS:

922

Industry Type:

Law Enforcement

Homepage:

politi.dk

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

POL_2526547

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scorePoliti Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

globalscorePoliti Global Score
blurone
Ailogo

Politi Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

Politi Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
0
Attack Types
0
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView

Politi Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

MANGE FAGLIGHEDER SAMMEN I politiet arbejder mere end 16.000 medarbejdere sammen om at forebygge og forhindre kriminalitet, så Danmark er et trygt og sikkert sted at bo og leve. Vi er alle dybt engagerede og motiverede for at gøre en forskel for andre mennesker og for samfundet som helhed. Langt størstedelen af politiets medarbejdere er uddannede fra Politiskolen, men derudover arbejder cirka 4.500 personer med andre fagligheder hver dag med opgaver inden for it-udvikling, juridisk rådgivning, presse og kommunikation, indkøb af politiets udstyr, forebyggelse af kriminalitet, samarbejde med kommuner og organisationer, personale og uddannelse, kriminalteknik og store efterforskningsopgaver. Her på politiets LinkedIn-profil vil vi gerne give dig et indblik i de mange opgaver i politiet, som du ikke hører om hver dag. Hvad laver analytikeren og datalogen fx i vores efterforskningsafdeling? Hvordan sikrer vores softwareudvikler eller softwarearkitekt at den mobilapp, de udvkler, opfylder de behov som politikollegerne på gaden har? Hvordan håndterer vores økonomer og jurister store indkøb af politiudstyr? Hvordan indgår journalisten i krisehåndtering? Hvad underviser psykologen i på Politiskolen? Følg os, hvis du vil orienteres om nye ledige stillinger i politiet. Vi kan slet ikke fortælle om dem alle her på LinkedIn, så klik ind på www.politi.dk/job-i-politiet for det fulde overblik.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=politi' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

Politi Cyber Security News

2025-04-10T07:00:00.000Z
Trump’s revenge politics has a new target: the cybersecurity official who defied him in 2020

A new Trump memo orders an investigation into former CISA Director Chris Krebs—and strips his company of security clearances.

2025-03-02T08:00:00.000Z
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth orders a halt to offensive cyber operations against Russia

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered U.S. Cyber Command to halt offensive cyber operations and information operations against Russia, a ...

2025-02-17T08:00:00.000Z
Gayle Harrell advocates for strengthened cybersecurity

Harrell wants to enhance Florida's digital resilience to better protect against cyber threats and reduce risks.

2025-04-09T07:00:00.000Z
Trump orders probe of former cybersecurity chief for declaring 2020 election secure

President Donald Trump on Wednesday ordered a federal investigation into two former top Department of Homeland Security officials.

2025-04-09T07:00:00.000Z
Trump is dismantling election security networks. State officials are alarmed

State officials warn upcoming elections will be vulnerable as the Trump administration dismantles key parts of election security networks.

2025-03-02T08:00:00.000Z
Hegseth Orders Pentagon to Stop Offensive Cyberoperations Against Russia

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered U.S. Cyber Command to halt offensive operations against Russia, according to a current official ...

2024-12-20T08:00:00.000Z
TP-Link Router Ban Is Mostly About Politics

a proposed ban of the company's popular routers is more about geopolitics than actual cybersecurity — and that may not be a bad thing ...

2025-04-28T07:00:00.000Z
The Impact of Politics on Cybersecurity: CVE’s and the Chris Krebs Executive Order

What would happen if the US government halted funding for the CVE program? In this episode, we explore the controversies surrounding the ...

2025-04-01T07:00:00.000Z
Social Security isn’t the third rail of American politics any more

Team Trump seems to have concluded that Social Security is no longer the “third rail of American politics” — that they can touch it and live ...

similarCompanies

Politi Similar Companies

POLICIA NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA

La Policía Nacional es un cuerpo permanente de naturaleza civil, a cargo de la nación, cuyo fin primordial es el mantenimiento de las condiciones necesarias para el ejercicio de los derechos y libertades públicas, y para asegurar que los habitantes de Colombia convivan en paz.

Hong Kong Police Force

Vision That Hong Kong remains one of the safest and most stable societies in the world Our Common Purpose The Hong Kong Police Force will ensure a safe and stable society by : •upholding the rule of law •maintaining law and order •preventing and detecting crime •safeguarding and protecti

Politie Nederland

Politiemensen staan midden in de maatschappij, dicht op het nieuws. De politie is daar waar het gebeurt. Het optreden van agenten ligt altijd onder een vergrootglas. Bij de politie ben je 24 uur per dag en voor iedereen in onze diverse samenleving. Integer, moedig, betrouwbaar en verbindend zijn daa

GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA

Gendarmería Nacional Argentina (GNA) es una Fuerza de Seguridad de naturaleza militar, que cumple funciones en la seguridad interior, defensa nacional, auxilio a la Justicia Federal y apoyo a la Política Exterior de la RA. Es una de las cuatro Fuerzas que integran el Ministerio de Seguridad de l

Australian Border Force

The Australian Border Force is Australia's frontline border law enforcement agency. The border is our greatest national asset and so the ABF works with domestic and international partners to combat a wide range of threats while facilitating legitimate trade and travel. We are responsible for border

FBI Virtual Training Academy

The FBI Virtual Academy is the portal to all FBI training opportunities offered to our external partners. FBI Virtual Academy registration is open to all personnel serving in any agency within the criminal justice or intelligence community – including state, local, tribal, and international law enfo

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

Politi CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Politi has faced 0 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Politi has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as MANGE FAGLIGHEDER SAMMEN I politiet arbejder mere end 16.000 medarbejdere sammen om at forebygge og forhindre kriminalitet, så Danmark er et trygt og sikkert sted at bo og leve. Vi er alle dybt engagerede og motiverede for at gøre en forskel for andre mennesker og for samfundet som helhed. Langt størstedelen af politiets medarbejdere er uddannede fra Politiskolen, men derudover arbejder cirka 4.500 personer med andre fagligheder hver dag med opgaver inden for it-udvikling, juridisk rådgivning, presse og kommunikation, indkøb af politiets udstyr, forebyggelse af kriminalitet, samarbejde med kommuner og organisationer, personale og uddannelse, kriminalteknik og store efterforskningsopgaver. Her på politiets LinkedIn-profil vil vi gerne give dig et indblik i de mange opgaver i politiet, som du ikke hører om hver dag. Hvad laver analytikeren og datalogen fx i vores efterforskningsafdeling? Hvordan sikrer vores softwareudvikler eller softwarearkitekt at den mobilapp, de udvkler, opfylder de behov som politikollegerne på gaden har? Hvordan håndterer vores økonomer og jurister store indkøb af politiudstyr? Hvordan indgår journalisten i krisehåndtering? Hvad underviser psykologen i på Politiskolen? Følg os, hvis du vil orienteres om nye ledige stillinger i politiet. Vi kan slet ikke fortælle om dem alle her på LinkedIn, så klik ind på www.politi.dk/job-i-politiet for det fulde overblik..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge