LSEG
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
london-stock-exchange-group
Website:
Employees number:
24,270
Number of followers:
547,817
NAICS:
52
Industry Type:
Homepage:
lseg.com
IP Addresses:
73
Company ID:
LSE_2736575
Scan Status:
Completed
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
LSEG Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score
lseg.comLSEG (London Stock Exchange Group) is a diversified international markets infrastructure business —earning our clients’ trust for over 300 years. That legacy of customer-focused excellence ensures that you can rely on our expertise in capital formation, intellectual property and risk and balance sheet management. As global leaders in financial indexing, benchmarking and analytic services, we offer unrivalled access to international capital markets. Our high-performance technology solutions enable companies worldwide to access funds for growth and development. And with our Data & Analytics, Capital Markets and Post Trade divisions, we provide a comprehensive, integrated suite of trusted financial market infrastructure services that help our customers pursue—and achieve—their ambitions. You can count on our open access model for unparalleled partnership, flexibility, stability, and support across all of our businesses. That’s how we make a difference— ensuring people can meet their potential—worldwide.
LSEG A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
LSEG Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 650 and 699
LSEG
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
LSEG Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
LSEG
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
LSEG Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
2
Collins AerospaceBrussels Airport
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Brussels Airport experienced a cyberattack on Friday evening that crippled its passenger and baggage check-in systems, forcing manual processing and causing significant operational disruptions. The attack, which also affected other European airports, targeted a third-party service provider’s systems. As of Saturday, nine flights were cancelled, and 15 departed with delays, with no immediate resolution expected. Passengers were advised to confirm flight statuses before arriving, as the outage led to processing bottlenecks and potential further cancellations. An investigation is underway to assess the full extent of the damage, but the incident has already resulted in financial losses (e.g., compensation, operational costs), reputational harm due to publicized delays, and potential long-term trust erosion among travelers and partners. The attack disrupted critical infrastructure, highlighting vulnerabilities in supply chain cybersecurity and the cascading effects of third-party breaches on large-scale operations.
Collins Aerospace
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Collins Aerospace, a critical supplier in the aerospace and defense industry, fell victim to a ransomware attack that disrupted European airports by targeting its digital supply chain dependencies. The incident, highlighted in ENISA’s *Threat Landscape 2025* report, exemplifies how cyber-attacks on high-value vendors can cascade into broader operational failures. While specific details on data compromise were not disclosed, the attack caused significant service outages, delaying flights and grounding operations across multiple airports reliant on Collins’ systems. The disruption underscored vulnerabilities in interconnected OT (operational technology) and supply chain networks, where a single breach can paralyze downstream services. ENISA warned that such attacks exploit critical dependency points, amplifying impact beyond the initial target. The incident aligns with a rising trend of threat actors leveraging ransomware to cripple essential infrastructure, with financial and reputational fallout extending to airlines, passengers, and regulatory bodies. No direct mention of data theft was made, but the operational halt suggests severe financial losses, reputational damage, and potential regulatory scrutiny for failing to secure supply chain resilience.
LSEG Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for LSEG
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LSEG in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LSEG in 2026.
Incident Types LSEG vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LSEG in 2026.
Incident History — LSEG (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LSEG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
LSEG Company Subsidiaries
LSEG (London Stock Exchange Group) is a diversified international markets infrastructure business —earning our clients’ trust for over 300 years. That legacy of customer-focused excellence ensures that you can rely on our expertise in capital formation, intellectual property and risk and balance sheet management. As global leaders in financial indexing, benchmarking and analytic services, we offer unrivalled access to international capital markets. Our high-performance technology solutions enable companies worldwide to access funds for growth and development. And with our Data & Analytics, Capital Markets and Post Trade divisions, we provide a comprehensive, integrated suite of trusted financial market infrastructure services that help our customers pursue—and achieve—their ambitions. You can count on our open access model for unparalleled partnership, flexibility, stability, and support across all of our businesses. That’s how we make a difference— ensuring people can meet their potential—worldwide.
Loading...
LSEG Similar Companies
Empower
At Empower, we’ve always been guided by strong values with a focus on helping people achieve the financial freedom they deserve. It’s been an incredible journey so far, but our story is just getting started. From the very beginning, we’ve prided ourselves on putting our customers first in every
BNP Paribas CIB
In a changing world, we aim at anticipating transformation and driving your company for success. We are convinced to have the expertise and networks you need to develop your business. BNP Paribas Corporate and Institutional Banking is a leading global financial partner, offering you a wide range of
Manappuram Finance Ltd. is one of India’s largest and most trusted gold loan companies, with 4,199 branches across the length and breadth of the country. It currently has nearly Rs. 157.65 billion worth assets under management (AUM), and 20,185 employees. Promoted by Shri. V.P. Nandakumar, the curr
Wells Fargo
Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE: WFC) is a diversified, community-based financial services company with approximately $1.9 trillion in assets. Wells Fargo’s vision is to satisfy our customers’ financial needs and help them succeed financially. Founded in 1852 and headquartered in San Francisco, Wells Fa
Truist Financial Corporation is a purpose-driven financial services company committed to inspiring and building better lives and communities. As a leading U.S. commercial bank, Truist has leading market share in many of the high-growth markets across the country. Truist offers a wide range of produc
Sicoob
O Sicoob é o maior sistema financeiro cooperativo do país, com mais de 9 milhões de cooperados e mais de 4,6 mil pontos de atendimento distribuídos em todo o Brasil. Somos uma cooperativa financeira que oferece aos cooperados serviços de conta corrente, crédito, investimento, cartões, previdência, c
People are living longer, and we are excited about the possibilities this brings. We see longevity, aging, and changing life patterns as an opportunity for our customers, our employees, and society as a whole. And we want to support everyone in building the financial means to explore the possibiliti
Credicorp
Somos el grupo financiero líder en el Perú con una vasta experiencia en el mercado peruano. Contamos con una sólida plataforma de Banca Comercial reforzada por una importante presencia en Banca de Inversión en Latinoamérica destinada a desarrollar el potencial de la región y acompañar a nuestros cli
NN Group
NN Group is an international financial services company, active in 10 countries, with a strong presence in a number of European countries and Japan. We are rooted in the Netherlands and have a rich history spanning 180 years. With our 16,000 colleagues, NN Group provides retirement services, pensio
.png)
LSEG CyberSecurity News
March 03, 2026 08:00 AM
CrowdStrike makes its case on AI with an excellent quarter — here's where we stand
Founder and CEO George Kurtz made a compelling argument that we agree with, so why can't the rest of the market get behind him?
February 23, 2026 12:24 PM
Market news
Source: Sharecast. At 1215 GMT, NCC Group shares were down 4.1%, LSEG and Sage Group were both 1.9% lower, France's Atos was off 2.8%, SAP was 2.2% lower...
February 18, 2026 08:00 AM
Mastercard develops cybersecurity tools for small businesses
Mastercard will roll out new tools to help small businesses defend themselves against cyber threats.
February 17, 2026 08:00 AM
Palo Alto Networks slumps 7% as third-quarter profit guidance falls short
Palo Alto Networks topped Wall Street's fiscal second-quarter estimates. The cybersecurity company's fiscal third-quarter earnings forecast...
February 16, 2026 08:00 AM
Here are the 3 big things we're watching in the stock market this week
We're awaiting earnings from Palo Alto Networks and Texas Roadhouse.
January 27, 2026 08:00 AM
Global M&A industry trends: 2026 outlook
AI is transforming everything. What's the deal for M&A? AI investments and megadeals create a K-shaped M&A market.
January 07, 2026 08:00 AM
It’s Raining Investment Banking Fees in Singapore
Hi, it's Elffie Chew in Singapore, where investment banking fees are on the up and likely to continue heading that way.
December 22, 2025 08:00 AM
A comprehensive list of 2025 tech layoffs
The tech layoff wave is still kicking in 2025. Last year saw more than 150,000 job cuts across 549 companies, according to independent...
December 18, 2025 08:00 AM
BlackBerry lifts lower end of annual revenue forecast on cybersecurity demand
BlackBerry on Thursday raised the lower end of its fiscal 2026 revenue forecast, signalling strong demand for its cybersecurity software as...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
LSEG CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of LSEG
The official website of LSEG is http://www.lseg.com.
LSEG’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, LSEG’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 697, reflecting their Weak security posture.
How many security badges does LSEG’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, LSEG currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has LSEG been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, LSEG has been affected by multiple supply chain cyber incidents. The affected supply chain sources and their corresponding incident IDs are:
- Collins Aerospace (Incident ID: BRU0093500092025)
- Collins Aerospace (Incident ID: COL5132151100225)
Does LSEG have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, LSEG is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does LSEG have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, LSEG does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does LSEG comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, LSEG is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does LSEG have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, LSEG does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does LSEG comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, LSEG is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does LSEG have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,LSEG is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of LSEG
LSEG operates primarily in the Financial Services industry.
Number of Employees at LSEG
LSEG employs approximately 24,270 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by LSEG
LSEG presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
LSEG’s LinkedIn Followers
LSEG’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 547,817 followers.
NAICS Classification of LSEG
LSEG is classified under the NAICS code 52, which corresponds to Finance and Insurance.
LSEG’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, LSEG does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
LSEG’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, LSEG maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/london-stock-exchange-group.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving LSEG
As of April 02, 2026, Rankiteo reports that LSEG has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
LSEG has an estimated 31,537 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at LSEG ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware and Cyber Attack.
How does LSEG detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with yes (in-depth investigation underway), and recovery measures with manual passenger processing, and communication strategy with public statement, communication strategy with advisories to travelers to confirm flight status before arriving..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Cyberattack on Brussels Airport Disrupts Passenger and Baggage Check-in Systems
Description: Brussels Airport was hit by a cyberattack on Friday evening, disabling its passenger and baggage check-in systems. The attack also affected other European airports. Passenger processing is being carried out manually, leading to delays and flight cancellations. The cyberattack targeted systems of a service provider, and an in-depth investigation is underway to assess the damage. Nine flights have been cancelled, and 15 have departed with delays. No immediate solution is expected in the coming hours.
Date Detected: 2024-02-23T18:00:00Z
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-02-23T18:00:00Z
Type: cyberattack
Title: ENISA Threat Landscape 2025: Phishing and Vulnerability Exploitation Dominate EU Cyber Incidents (July 2024 - June 2025)
Description: Phishing and vulnerability exploitation accounted for the majority of initial access in cyber-attacks against EU organizations over the past year, according to ENISA. The report analyzed 4,875 incidents, with phishing (60%) and vulnerability exploitation (21%) as the top attack vectors. DDoS attacks dominated in volume (77% of incidents), though only 2% caused service disruption. Hacktivists, led by Russian actor NoName057(16), were the primary threat actors (79% of attacks), often targeting public administration (38%) and leveraging geopolitical tensions. Ransomware was deemed the most impactful threat, while AI-powered phishing surged to 80% of social engineering activity. Outdated mobile/OT systems and supply chain dependencies were flagged as high-risk targets.
Date Detected: 2024-07-01
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-07-01
Type: Phishing
Attack Vector: Phishing (60%)Vulnerability Exploitation (21%)Botnets (10%)Malicious Applications (8%)DDoS (77% of incidents)AI-Powered Phishing (80% of social engineering)Supply Chain Compromise
Threat Actor: Name: NoName057(16), Type: Hacktivist (Russian-aligned), Motivation: Geopolitical (anti-EU/EU-aligned causes), Tools: ['DDoSia platform'], Name: Unspecified State-Sponsored Actors, Type: State-Sponsored (blended with hacktivism), Motivation: ['Cyber-Espionage (7%)', 'Geopolitical Influence'], Tactics: ['Faketivism (posing as hacktivists)'], Name: Financially Motivated Actors, Type: Cybercriminal, Motivation: Financial Gain (13%), Methods: ['Ransomware', 'Data Theft'].
Motivation: Geopolitical (79%, e.g., elections, EU support for opposition groups)Financial (13%)Cyber-Espionage (7%)
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Cyber Attack.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Phishing (60%)Vulnerability Exploitation (21%)Botnets (10%)Malicious Applications (8%).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : cyberattack BRU0093500092025
Systems Affected: passenger check-in systemsbaggage check-in systems
Downtime: ongoing (as of 2024-02-24, no solution expected in the coming hours)
Operational Impact: manual passenger processingflight delaysflight cancellations
Brand Reputation Impact: potential negative impact due to service disruptions
Incident : Phishing COL5132151100225
Systems Affected: Outdated Mobile DevicesOperational Technology (OT) SystemsPublic Administration (38% of attacks)Critical Supply Chain Dependencies (e.g., Collins Aerospace)European Airports (disruption example)
Downtime: Limited (2% of DDoS attacks caused disruption)
Operational Impact: Supply Chain Ripple EffectsAirport Disruptions (via Collins Aerospace ransomware)Public Sector Targeting (38%)
Brand Reputation Impact: Erosion of trust in public administrationSupply chain vulnerability exposure
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : cyberattack BRU0093500092025
Entity Name: Brussels Airport
Entity Type: airport
Industry: aviation/transportation
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Customers Affected: passengers (exact number unspecified, but delays and cancellations reported)
Incident : cyberattack BRU0093500092025
Entity Name: Unnamed service provider
Entity Type: third-party service provider
Industry: IT/aviation services
Incident : cyberattack BRU0093500092025
Entity Name: Other European airports (unspecified)
Entity Type: airports
Industry: aviation/transportation
Location: Europe
Incident : Phishing COL5132151100225
Entity Name: European Union Organizations (General)
Entity Type: Multinational
Industry: Cross-Sector (Public Administration, Critical Infrastructure, Supply Chain)
Location: European Union
Incident : Phishing COL5132151100225
Entity Name: Collins Aerospace
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Aerospace/Defense
Location: Global (impacted European airports)
Incident : Phishing COL5132151100225
Entity Name: Public Administration (EU)
Entity Type: Government
Industry: Public Sector
Location: European Union
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : cyberattack BRU0093500092025
Incident Response Plan Activated: yes (in-depth investigation underway)
Recovery Measures: manual passenger processing
Communication Strategy: public statementadvisories to travelers to confirm flight status before arriving
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Phishing COL5132151100225
Data Encryption: Likely (most impactful threat)
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through manual passenger processing, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Phishing COL5132151100225
Lessons Learned: AI amplification of phishing (80% of social engineering by 2025) requires adaptive defenses., Supply chain dependencies create systemic risks (e.g., Collins Aerospace airport disruptions)., Convergence of hacktivism and state-sponsored TTPs complicates attribution., Outdated OT/mobile systems remain high-value targets., DDoS volume (77% of incidents) masks low disruption rate (2%), but still strains resources.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Phishing COL5132151100225
Recommendations: Prioritize patching for OT and mobile systems to reduce vulnerability exploitation., Enhance supply chain cybersecurity resilience (e.g., third-party risk assessments)., Deploy AI-driven phishing detection to counter AI-powered attacks., Improve attribution capabilities to distinguish hacktivism from state-sponsored faketivism., Public administration should harden defenses against geopolitically motivated DDoS., Collaborate on EU-wide incident response (e.g., ENISA’s €36m scheme).Prioritize patching for OT and mobile systems to reduce vulnerability exploitation., Enhance supply chain cybersecurity resilience (e.g., third-party risk assessments)., Deploy AI-driven phishing detection to counter AI-powered attacks., Improve attribution capabilities to distinguish hacktivism from state-sponsored faketivism., Public administration should harden defenses against geopolitically motivated DDoS., Collaborate on EU-wide incident response (e.g., ENISA’s €36m scheme).Prioritize patching for OT and mobile systems to reduce vulnerability exploitation., Enhance supply chain cybersecurity resilience (e.g., third-party risk assessments)., Deploy AI-driven phishing detection to counter AI-powered attacks., Improve attribution capabilities to distinguish hacktivism from state-sponsored faketivism., Public administration should harden defenses against geopolitically motivated DDoS., Collaborate on EU-wide incident response (e.g., ENISA’s €36m scheme).Prioritize patching for OT and mobile systems to reduce vulnerability exploitation., Enhance supply chain cybersecurity resilience (e.g., third-party risk assessments)., Deploy AI-driven phishing detection to counter AI-powered attacks., Improve attribution capabilities to distinguish hacktivism from state-sponsored faketivism., Public administration should harden defenses against geopolitically motivated DDoS., Collaborate on EU-wide incident response (e.g., ENISA’s €36m scheme).Prioritize patching for OT and mobile systems to reduce vulnerability exploitation., Enhance supply chain cybersecurity resilience (e.g., third-party risk assessments)., Deploy AI-driven phishing detection to counter AI-powered attacks., Improve attribution capabilities to distinguish hacktivism from state-sponsored faketivism., Public administration should harden defenses against geopolitically motivated DDoS., Collaborate on EU-wide incident response (e.g., ENISA’s €36m scheme).Prioritize patching for OT and mobile systems to reduce vulnerability exploitation., Enhance supply chain cybersecurity resilience (e.g., third-party risk assessments)., Deploy AI-driven phishing detection to counter AI-powered attacks., Improve attribution capabilities to distinguish hacktivism from state-sponsored faketivism., Public administration should harden defenses against geopolitically motivated DDoS., Collaborate on EU-wide incident response (e.g., ENISA’s €36m scheme).
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are AI amplification of phishing (80% of social engineering by 2025) requires adaptive defenses.,Supply chain dependencies create systemic risks (e.g., Collins Aerospace airport disruptions).,Convergence of hacktivism and state-sponsored TTPs complicates attribution.,Outdated OT/mobile systems remain high-value targets.,DDoS volume (77% of incidents) masks low disruption rate (2%), but still strains resources.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : cyberattack BRU0093500092025
Source: Brussels Airport public statement (via local media)
Date Accessed: 2024-02-24
Incident : Phishing COL5132151100225
Source: ENISA Threat Landscape 2025 Report
Date Accessed: 2025-07-01
Incident : Phishing COL5132151100225
Source: Infosecurity Magazine: ENISA to Coordinate €36m EU-Wide Incident Response Scheme
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Brussels Airport public statement (via local media)Date Accessed: 2024-02-24, and Source: ENISA Threat Landscape 2025 ReportDate Accessed: 2025-07-01, and Source: Infosecurity Magazine: ENISA to Coordinate €36m EU-Wide Incident Response Scheme.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : cyberattack BRU0093500092025
Investigation Status: ongoing (in-depth investigation underway to assess damage)
Incident : Phishing COL5132151100225
Investigation Status: Completed (report published)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Statement and Advisories To Travelers To Confirm Flight Status Before Arriving.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : cyberattack BRU0093500092025
Stakeholder Advisories: Travelers Advised To Confirm Flight Status Before Arriving At The Airport.
Customer Advisories: expect delays and cancellations; manual check-in procedures in place
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Travelers Advised To Confirm Flight Status Before Arriving At The Airport, Expect Delays And Cancellations; Manual Check-In Procedures In Place and .
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Phishing COL5132151100225
Entry Point: Phishing (60%), Vulnerability Exploitation (21%), Botnets (10%), Malicious Applications (8%),
Backdoors Established: Likely (68% of intrusions led to malware deployment)
High Value Targets: Outdated Mobile Devices, Operational Technology (Ot) Systems, Critical Supply Chain Nodes,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Outdated Mobile Devices, Operational Technology (Ot) Systems, Critical Supply Chain Nodes,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Phishing COL5132151100225
Root Causes: Overreliance On Outdated Ot/Mobile Systems With Unpatched Vulnerabilities., Insufficient Supply Chain Cybersecurity Controls (E.G., Collins Aerospace Case)., Lack Of Adaptive Defenses Against Ai-Enhanced Phishing., Geopolitical Tensions Exploited By Hacktivist/State-Sponsored Actors., Difficulty In Attributing Blended Hacktivism/State-Sponsored Attacks.,
Corrective Actions: Eu-Wide Coordination (E.G., Enisa’S €36M Incident Response Scheme)., Mandatory Ot/Mobile System Updates In Critical Sectors., Supply Chain Cybersecurity Frameworks (E.G., Third-Party Audits)., Public-Private Collaboration To Counter Ddos/Hacktivism., Investment In Ai-Driven Threat Detection And Attribution Tools.,
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Eu-Wide Coordination (E.G., Enisa’S €36M Incident Response Scheme)., Mandatory Ot/Mobile System Updates In Critical Sectors., Supply Chain Cybersecurity Frameworks (E.G., Third-Party Audits)., Public-Private Collaboration To Counter Ddos/Hacktivism., Investment In Ai-Driven Threat Detection And Attribution Tools., .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Name: NoName057(16)Type: Hacktivist (Russian-aligned)Motivation: Geopolitical (anti-EU/EU-aligned causes)Tools: DDoSia platform, Name: Unspecified State-Sponsored ActorsType: State-Sponsored (blended with hacktivism)Motivation: Cyber-Espionage (7%), Motivation: Geopolitical Influence, Tactics: Faketivism (posing as hacktivists), Name: Financially Motivated ActorsType: CybercriminalMotivation: Financial Gain (13%)Methods: Ransomware, Methods: Data Theft and .
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2024-02-23T18:00:00Z.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-07-01.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were passenger check-in systemsbaggage check-in systems and Outdated Mobile DevicesOperational Technology (OT) SystemsPublic Administration (38% of attacks)Critical Supply Chain Dependencies (e.g., Collins Aerospace)European Airports (disruption example).
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was DDoS volume (77% of incidents) masks low disruption rate (2%), but still strains resources.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Prioritize patching for OT and mobile systems to reduce vulnerability exploitation., Public administration should harden defenses against geopolitically motivated DDoS., Improve attribution capabilities to distinguish hacktivism from state-sponsored faketivism., Collaborate on EU-wide incident response (e.g., ENISA’s €36m scheme)., Enhance supply chain cybersecurity resilience (e.g., third-party risk assessments). and Deploy AI-driven phishing detection to counter AI-powered attacks..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are ENISA Threat Landscape 2025 Report, Infosecurity Magazine: ENISA to Coordinate €36m EU-Wide Incident Response Scheme and Brussels Airport public statement (via local media).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is ongoing (in-depth investigation underway to assess damage).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was travelers advised to confirm flight status before arriving at the airport, .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an expect delays and cancellations; manual check-in procedures in place.
Initial Access Broker
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
A vulnerability was found in Nothings stb up to 1.26. Impacted is the function stbtt_InitFont_internal in the library stb_truetype.h of the component TTF File Handler. Performing a manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read in VS6ComFile!get_macro_mem_COM. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain a stack-based buffer overflow in VS6ComFile!CSaveData::_conv_AnimationItem. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to arbitrary code execution on the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6MemInIF!set_temp_type_default. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6ComFile!load_link_inf. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=london-stock-exchange-group' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
