Comparison Overview

Lee Enterprises

VS

The Wall Street Journal

Lee Enterprises

4600 E 53rd St, None, Davenport, Iowa, US, 52807
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 0 and 549

Lee Enterprises is a major subscription and advertising platform and a leading provider of local news and information, with daily newspapers, rapidly growing digital products and nearly 350 weekly and specialty publications serving 72 markets in 25 states. Lee's markets include St. Louis, MO; Buffalo, NY; Omaha, NE; Richmond, VA; Lincoln, NE; Madison, WI; Davenport, IA; and Tucson, AZ. Lee Common Stock is traded on NASDAQ under the symbol LEE. For more information about Lee, please visit www.lee.net.

NAICS: 51111
NAICS Definition: Newspaper Publishers
Employees: 1,597
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

The Wall Street Journal

1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, 10036, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 800 and 849

Winner of 40 Pulitzer Prizes for outstanding journalism, The Wall Street Journal includes coverage of U.S. and world news, politics, arts, culture, lifestyle, sports, health and more. It's a critical resource of curated content in print, online and mobile apps, complete with breaking news streams, interactive features, video, online columns and blogs. Since 1889, readers have trusted the Journal for accurate, objective information to fuel their decisions as well as enlighten, educate and inspire them. On LinkedIn, we will share articles to help you navigate your career, including stories from our business, management, leisure and technology sections. Subscribe: http://on.wsj.com/1n1uvCH Job opportunities: http://www.dowjones.com/careers

NAICS: 51111
NAICS Definition: Newspaper Publishers
Employees: 13,868
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lee-enterprises.jpeg
Lee Enterprises
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-wall-street-journal.jpeg
The Wall Street Journal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lee Enterprises
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Wall Street Journal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lee Enterprises in 2026.

Incidents vs Newspaper Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Wall Street Journal in 2026.

Incident History — Lee Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lee Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Wall Street Journal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Wall Street Journal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lee-enterprises.jpeg
Lee Enterprises
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-wall-street-journal.jpeg
The Wall Street Journal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Wall Street Journal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lee Enterprises company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Lee Enterprises company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The Wall Street Journal company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Wall Street Journal company and Lee Enterprises company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Lee Enterprises company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while The Wall Street Journal company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The Wall Street Journal company nor Lee Enterprises company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Wall Street Journal company nor Lee Enterprises company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lee Enterprises company nor The Wall Street Journal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lee Enterprises nor The Wall Street Journal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Wall Street Journal company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lee Enterprises company.

The Wall Street Journal company employs more people globally than Lee Enterprises company, reflecting its scale as a Newspaper Publishing.

Neither Lee Enterprises nor The Wall Street Journal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lee Enterprises nor The Wall Street Journal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lee Enterprises nor The Wall Street Journal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lee Enterprises nor The Wall Street Journal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lee Enterprises nor The Wall Street Journal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lee Enterprises nor The Wall Street Journal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H