Comparison Overview

Krispy Kreme

VS

Sysco

Krispy Kreme

2116 Hawkins St, Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28203
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.krispykreme.com

Headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., Krispy Kreme is one of the most beloved and well-known sweet treat brands in the world. Our iconic Original Glazed® doughnut is universally recognized for its hot-off-the-line, melt-in-your-mouth experience. Krispy Kreme operates in more than 40 countries through its unique network of fresh doughnut shops, partnerships with leading retailers, and a rapidly growing digital business. Our purpose of touching and enhancing lives through the joy that is Krispy Kreme guides how we operate every day and is reflected in the love we have for our people, our communities, and the planet.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 10,305
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Sysco

1390 Enclave Parkway, Houston, 77079, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 700 and 749
http://www.sysco.com

Sysco is the global leader in selling, marketing and distributing food and related products to customers who prepare meals away from home. This includes restaurants, healthcare and educational facilities, lodging establishments, entertainment venues, and more. Sysco operates almost 340 distribution centers, in over 10 countries, with 76,000 colleagues serving approximately 730,000 customer locations. The company generated sales of more than $81 billion in fiscal year 2025 that ended June 28, 2025. As the world’s largest food-away-from-home distributor, Sysco offers customized supply chain solutions, bespoke specialty product offerings, and culinary support to drive customers to innovate and optimize their operations. We act as a trusted business partner to our customers, helping them grow through our industry-leading portfolio that includes fresh produce, premium proteins, specialty products, sustainably focused items, equipment and supplies, and innovative culinary solutions. For more information, visit www.sysco.com.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 32,467
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/krispy-kreme.jpeg
Krispy Kreme
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sysco.jpeg
Sysco
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Krispy Kreme
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sysco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Krispy Kreme in 2026.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sysco in 2026.

Incident History — Krispy Kreme (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Krispy Kreme cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sysco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sysco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/krispy-kreme.jpeg
Krispy Kreme
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploitation of vulnerabilities in SimpleHelp RMM software, Initial access brokers
Motivation: Financial gain, Data extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: financial gain, data theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sysco.jpeg
Sysco
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sysco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Krispy Kreme company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Krispy Kreme company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Sysco company.

In the current year, Sysco company and Krispy Kreme company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Krispy Kreme company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Sysco company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Sysco company and Krispy Kreme company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Krispy Kreme company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Sysco company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Krispy Kreme company nor Sysco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Krispy Kreme nor Sysco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sysco company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Krispy Kreme company.

Sysco company employs more people globally than Krispy Kreme company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither Krispy Kreme nor Sysco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Krispy Kreme nor Sysco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Krispy Kreme nor Sysco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Krispy Kreme nor Sysco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Krispy Kreme nor Sysco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Krispy Kreme nor Sysco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References