Comparison Overview

Kaiser Permanente

VS

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Kaiser Permanente

1 Kaiser Plaza, Oakland, 94612, US
Last Update: 2026-03-27
Between 0 and 549

At the heart of health care, you’ll find Kaiser Permanente. As the nation’s leading not-for-profit, integrated health plan, we make a difference in the lives of members, patients, and communities across the country. With 39 hospitals and more than 734 locations in eight states and the District of Columbia, we proudly serve more than 12.7 million members from coast to coast. Whether you choose to join a hospital in the Northwest, a clinic in Southern California, or a medical office in the Mid-Atlantic, we have many opportunities for you to shape the future of care. Our teams are empowered to advance impactful and extraordinary care for all by pioneering health outcomes, encouraging diverse viewpoints, and creating new opportunities for learning and advancement. This covers more than our members and our employees; it also reaches far into our communities. Together, we’re proudly working as one for a healthier today and tomorrow. *Disclaimer: Please do not include any medical, personal, or confidential information in your comments. Comments are encouraged; however, Kaiser Permanente reserves the right to moderate comments on this page as necessary to prevent medical, personal, and confidential information from being posted on this site. In addition, Kaiser Permanente will remove all spam, personal attacks, profanity, and off-topic commentary. Comments containing advertisements about goods or services or announcements about news or events that are not related to Kaiser Permanente will be removed. Please note that your communications with Kaiser Permanente through this page are informal and are not part of Kaiser Permanente’s formal grievance process for members. To get information about the member grievance process or to submit a grievance, go to http://k-p.li/2aToRTn

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 133,680
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
15
Attack type number
4

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

34th St. and Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, 19104, US
Last Update: 2026-03-30
Between 750 and 799

Since its start in 1855 as the nation's first hospital devoted exclusively to caring for children, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia has been the birthplace for many dramatic firsts in pediatric medicine. The Hospital has fostered medical discoveries and innovations that have improved pediatric healthcare and saved countless children’s lives. Today, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia is one of the leading pediatric hospitals and research facilities in the world. Our 150 years of innovation and service to our patients, their families and our community reflect an ongoing commitment to exceptional patient care, training new generations of pediatric healthcare providers and pioneering significant research initiatives.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 17,442
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kaiser-permanente.jpeg
Kaiser Permanente
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-childrens-hospital-of-philadelphia.jpeg
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kaiser Permanente
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Kaiser Permanente has 29.58% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in 2026.

Incident History — Kaiser Permanente (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kaiser Permanente cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kaiser-permanente.jpeg
Kaiser Permanente
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party tracking code
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized data sharing through tracking code
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-childrens-hospital-of-philadelphia.jpeg
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kaiser Permanente company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Kaiser Permanente company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company has not reported any.

In the current year, Kaiser Permanente company has reported more cyber incidents than Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company.

Kaiser Permanente company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Kaiser Permanente company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Kaiser Permanente company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Kaiser Permanente company nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kaiser Permanente company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company.

Kaiser Permanente company employs more people globally than Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024. This affects the function setLanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94.

Description

Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A critical security vulnerability in parisneo/lollms versions up to 2.2.0 allows any authenticated user to accept or reject friend requests belonging to other users. The `respond_request()` function in `backend/routers/friends.py` does not implement proper authorization checks, enabling Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attacks. Specifically, the `/api/friends/requests/{friendship_id}` endpoint fails to verify whether the authenticated user is part of the friendship or the intended recipient of the request. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, privacy violations, and potential social engineering attacks. The issue has been addressed in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N