Comparison Overview

Kaiser Permanente

VS

Amil

Kaiser Permanente

1 Kaiser Plaza, Oakland, 94612, US
Last Update: 2026-03-27
Between 0 and 549

At the heart of health care, you’ll find Kaiser Permanente. As the nation’s leading not-for-profit, integrated health plan, we make a difference in the lives of members, patients, and communities across the country. With 39 hospitals and more than 734 locations in eight states and the District of Columbia, we proudly serve more than 12.7 million members from coast to coast. Whether you choose to join a hospital in the Northwest, a clinic in Southern California, or a medical office in the Mid-Atlantic, we have many opportunities for you to shape the future of care. Our teams are empowered to advance impactful and extraordinary care for all by pioneering health outcomes, encouraging diverse viewpoints, and creating new opportunities for learning and advancement. This covers more than our members and our employees; it also reaches far into our communities. Together, we’re proudly working as one for a healthier today and tomorrow. *Disclaimer: Please do not include any medical, personal, or confidential information in your comments. Comments are encouraged; however, Kaiser Permanente reserves the right to moderate comments on this page as necessary to prevent medical, personal, and confidential information from being posted on this site. In addition, Kaiser Permanente will remove all spam, personal attacks, profanity, and off-topic commentary. Comments containing advertisements about goods or services or announcements about news or events that are not related to Kaiser Permanente will be removed. Please note that your communications with Kaiser Permanente through this page are informal and are not part of Kaiser Permanente’s formal grievance process for members. To get information about the member grievance process or to submit a grievance, go to http://k-p.li/2aToRTn

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 133,680
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
15
Attack type number
4

Amil

Rua Arquiteto Olavo Redig de Campos, 105, Bloco B, São Paulo, 04711-905, BR
Last Update: 2026-03-27
Between 750 and 799

A Amil é uma empresa do setor de saúde que atua no Brasil combinando expertise e liderança para coordenar todos os agentes desse mercado - criando relações sustentáveis para conhecer e atender às necessidades de cada cliente e permitir que ele aproveite o melhor da vida. Diariamente, nos preocupamos em utilizar o melhor da nossa criatividade e foco, oferecendo transparência, eficiência, inovação e acolhimento tanto para a área na qual atuamos quanto aos nossos clientes e a sociedade em geral. Por isso, apresentamos diversas linhas de serviços. Líder no segmento premium, a Amil One alia conveniência e exclusividade para entregar a melhor experiência em saúde e bem-estar. Amil Fácil, criada com os conceitos de simplicidade, eficiência e cuidado, oferece planos regionais com excelente custo-benefício. Já a Amil Dental conta com uma ampla rede de dentistas, com acesso rápido e fácil, além de contratação totalmente online. Somos a operadora que mais inovou no setor de saúde, ajudando a moldar esse mercado no Brasil - e estamos dispostos a fazer com que esse setor funcione cada vez melhor para todos. ANS nº 326305 Siga-nos em nossas demais redes sociais: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/amil Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/amilcuidadocerto/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/amilinstitucional TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@amil

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,437
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kaiser-permanente.jpeg
Kaiser Permanente
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amil.jpeg
Amil
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kaiser Permanente
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amil
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Kaiser Permanente has 29.58% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amil in 2026.

Incident History — Kaiser Permanente (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kaiser Permanente cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kaiser-permanente.jpeg
Kaiser Permanente
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party tracking code
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized data sharing through tracking code
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amil.jpeg
Amil
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Amil company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kaiser Permanente company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Kaiser Permanente company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Amil company has not reported any.

In the current year, Kaiser Permanente company has reported more cyber incidents than Amil company.

Kaiser Permanente company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Amil company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Kaiser Permanente company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Amil company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Kaiser Permanente company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Amil company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Kaiser Permanente company nor Amil company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Amil holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kaiser Permanente company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Amil company.

Kaiser Permanente company employs more people globally than Amil company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Amil holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Amil holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Amil holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Amil holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Amil holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kaiser Permanente nor Amil holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024. This affects the function setLanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94.

Description

Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A critical security vulnerability in parisneo/lollms versions up to 2.2.0 allows any authenticated user to accept or reject friend requests belonging to other users. The `respond_request()` function in `backend/routers/friends.py` does not implement proper authorization checks, enabling Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attacks. Specifically, the `/api/friends/requests/{friendship_id}` endpoint fails to verify whether the authenticated user is part of the friendship or the intended recipient of the request. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, privacy violations, and potential social engineering attacks. The issue has been addressed in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N