Harvard University
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
harvard-university
Website:
Employees number:
33,569
Number of followers:
2,772,765
NAICS:
6113
Industry Type:
Homepage:
harvard.edu
IP Addresses:
128
Company ID:
HAR_1851131
Scan Status:
Completed
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
Harvard University Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score
harvard.eduHarvard University is devoted to excellence in teaching, learning, and research, and to developing leaders in many disciplines who make a difference globally. Founded in 1636, Harvard is the oldest institution of higher learning in the United States. The official flagship Harvard social media channels are maintained by Harvard Public Affairs and Communications and aim to provide access to the people, places, events, news and research at our Institution. We ask that all visitors to Harvard’s digital spaces be civil to one another and to the site editors. Personal attacks, profanity, commercial solicitations, spam, misinformation or other inappropriate contributions are grounds for comment removal. We ask that you stay on topic when contributing to a discussion and refrain from duplicate posts. Hateful or discriminatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, religion, gender, disability, sexual orientation, or political beliefs will not be tolerated. The page administrators reserve the right to delete inappropriate or abusive comments and to permanently ban or block users from the Harvard social media accounts.
Harvard University A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Harvard University Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
Harvard University
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Harvard University Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Harvard University
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Harvard University Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
2
OracleDartmouth College, Harvard University, Princeton University, Columbia University and Clemson University: Why Cyberattacks in Higher Ed Keep Proliferating
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Higher Education Under Siege: A Wave of Cyberattacks Exposes Systemic Vulnerabilities In the first half of 2025, a surge of cyberattacks has targeted major U.S. universities, exposing critical weaknesses in higher education’s cybersecurity defenses. The University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, and Princeton University all reported breaches within the past two months, following earlier incidents at Columbia University, Dartmouth College, and New York University. Each institution confirmed the attacks stemmed from social engineering, with Harvard and Princeton specifically citing phone-based phishing as the entry point. Officials at the affected schools stated they acted swiftly to contain the breaches and are reinforcing security measures. However, experts warn that universities face an uphill battle. Mike Corn, a former chief information security officer in higher education and current consultant at Vantage Technology, noted that colleges operate like "small cities," with decentralized networks, personal devices, and diverse user behaviors creating countless vulnerabilities. Even robust investments in cybersecurity, he argued, cannot guarantee immunity from attacks especially as AI-driven threats grow more sophisticated. The challenges extend beyond technology. Brian Nichols, CIO at the University of Kentucky, highlighted that while phishing simulations and training have improved awareness, they are not foolproof. Anita Nikolich, director of research and technology innovation at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, warned that punitive security measures can backfire, alienating faculty who may resist protocols perceived as restrictive. A core tension lies in academic freedom versus centralized IT control: many universities allow individual departments such as medical or business schools to maintain separate IT teams, increasing risk. Nikolich, who previously led IT infrastructure at the University of Chicago, described this fragmentation as a "huge risk factor," as decentralized systems complicate consistent security enforcement. Faculty resistance further complicates the issue. Janice Lanham, a nursing lecturer at Clemson University, nearly fell victim to a phishing scam but caught the deception in time. Yet, as Brian Voss, Clemson’s CIO, observed, some professors view security protocols as obstacles to research and teaching. Voss described a "culture of subservience" in higher-ed IT, where departments prioritize faculty demands over security, often retaining excessive data including sensitive information like Social Security numbers despite the risks. His efforts to reduce data storage have met resistance, with one university even retaining personal data for voter registration purposes, creating what he called "piles of gold for bad guys." The conflict between research needs and security is particularly acute. Nikolich, who also conducts quantum computing research, faced initial pushback when requesting network data for her work. After demonstrating the data’s non-sensitive nature and potential security benefits, she gained access but noted that other universities default to blanket denials. When researchers are blocked, she warned, they often bypass official channels, increasing exposure. The solution, Nikolich suggested, lies in collaboration: IT, security teams, and faculty must treat cybersecurity as a shared priority, balancing innovation with protection. Until then, universities remain prime targets caught between the demands of open academic environments and the escalating sophistication of cyber threats.
Harvard University: Hackers publish personal information stolen during Harvard, UPenn data breaches
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: ShinyHunters Leaks Data from Harvard and UPenn After Ransom Demands Rejected The hacking group *ShinyHunters* has released over one million records each from Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn), following data breaches last year that the institutions confirmed but did not pay ransom to resolve. In November, UPenn disclosed a breach affecting systems tied to development and alumni activities, attributing it to a social engineering attack. The hackers had previously emailed alumni from official university addresses, claiming discontent with affirmative action policies a motive the group later did not clarify when questioned. UPenn’s breach disclosure, now offline, did not specify the exact data compromised. Harvard also confirmed a breach in November, citing a voice phishing attack that targeted alumni systems. The stolen data included email addresses, phone numbers, home and business addresses, donation histories, and other biographical details related to fundraising efforts. *ShinyHunters* published the datasets on their leak site after both universities refused to pay the demanded ransom. The group, known for extortion tactics, typically releases stolen data when victims decline payment. TechCrunch verified portions of the leaked data by cross-referencing it with public records and alumni confirmations. UPenn stated it is analyzing the released data to determine if further notifications are required under privacy regulations. Harvard has not responded to requests for comment.
Harvard University Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Harvard University
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)
Harvard University has 45.05% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Harvard University has 13.79% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types Harvard University vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Harvard University reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — Harvard University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Harvard University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Harvard University Company Subsidiaries
Harvard University is devoted to excellence in teaching, learning, and research, and to developing leaders in many disciplines who make a difference globally. Founded in 1636, Harvard is the oldest institution of higher learning in the United States. The official flagship Harvard social media channels are maintained by Harvard Public Affairs and Communications and aim to provide access to the people, places, events, news and research at our Institution. We ask that all visitors to Harvard’s digital spaces be civil to one another and to the site editors. Personal attacks, profanity, commercial solicitations, spam, misinformation or other inappropriate contributions are grounds for comment removal. We ask that you stay on topic when contributing to a discussion and refrain from duplicate posts. Hateful or discriminatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, religion, gender, disability, sexual orientation, or political beliefs will not be tolerated. The page administrators reserve the right to delete inappropriate or abusive comments and to permanently ban or block users from the Harvard social media accounts.
Loading...
Harvard University Similar Companies
University of Houston
Founded in 1927, the University of Houston is the leading public research university in the vibrant international city of Houston. Each year, we educate more than 47,000 students in more than 250 undergraduate and graduate academic programs, on campus and online. UH awards over 10,000 degrees annual
Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje (SENA)
El Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje, SENA, es un establecimiento público del orden nacional con personería jurídica, patrimonio propio e independiente y autonomía administrativa. Adscrito al Ministerio del Trabajo de Colombia, ofrece formación gratuita a millones de colombianos que se benefician co
Northwestern University
Northwestern is one of the nation’s premier research universities, combining innovative teaching and pioneering research in a highly collaborative, multidisciplinary, and diverse environment. Northwestern provides both students and faculty exceptional opportunities for intellectual, personal, and pr
Boston University School of Public Health
Ranked in the top 10 schools and programs of public health in the world by US News and World Report, Boston University School of Public Health provides the opportunity to engage in world-renowned research, scholarship, social justice, and public health practice. Founded in 1976, BUSPH offers master
Università degli Studi di Padova
Established in 1222, the University of Padova is one of Europe’s oldest and most prestigious seats of learning. Here is where Galileo Galilei taught and Elena Lucrezia Cornaro Piscopia became the first woman in the world to receive a university degree. Traditionally a free-thinking and trailblazing
UNSW
The University of New South Wales (UNSW) is one of Australia's leading research and teaching universities. Established in 1949, UNSW has expanded rapidly and now has more than 52,000 students, including more than 14,000 international students from over 130 different countries. UNSW offers more tha
Ghent University
Ghent University is a top 100 university and one of the major universities in Belgium, founded in 1817. Our 11 faculties offer a wide range of courses and conduct in-depth research within a wide range of scientific domains. We are a pluralistic university that is open to all students, regardless of
University of California, Davis
UC Davis was founded in 1908 to serve the state of California. We do and we always will. Today, that seed planted years ago has grown into one of the world’s top universities. UC Davis has a community of faculty and staff who are leading the way in teaching, research, public service and patient car
Louisiana State University
LSU is the flagship institution of Louisiana and is one of only 30 universities nationwide holding land-grant, sea-grant and space-grant status. Since 1860, LSU has served its region, the nation, and the world through extensive, multipurpose programs encompassing instruction, research, and public
.png)
Harvard University CyberSecurity News
March 26, 2026 04:10 PM
Agentic AI and Cybersecurity: Threats, Governance, and Strategy
The same capabilities that make AI valuable for cybersecurity, including autonomous operation, rapid decision-making at scale, and minimal human oversight,...
March 25, 2026 07:05 PM
Agentic AI and Cybersecurity: Threats, Governance, and Strategy
The same capabilities that make AI valuable for cybersecurity, including autonomous operation, rapid decision-making at scale, and minimal human oversight,...
March 25, 2026 07:00 AM
Robert Knake
Robert Knake is a Venture Partner at Paladin Capital Group and a widely recognized expert on cybersecurity. Rob served as the first Deputy...
February 27, 2026 08:00 AM
Is the new US TikTok safer?
In January 2026, a contingent of investors announced they had agreed to establish a new “U.S.” version of TikTok. The $14 billion deal came...
February 24, 2026 08:00 AM
Top 7 CTO and Cybersecurity Leadership Programs to Build Resilient Operations Skills in 2026
Master CTO and Cybersecurity Leadership in 2026 with elite programs designed for Resilient Operations, C-suite tech strategy, and strategic...
February 18, 2026 08:00 AM
Cybersecurity Requires Collective Resilience
Companies need to rethink what it takes to weather a cybersecurity incident. Most focus on operational resilience: their organization's...
February 08, 2026 08:00 AM
Hackers Leak Over Two Million Records After Harvard, UPenn Refuse Ransom
A notorious cybercrime group has published what it claims are more than two million personal records stolen from Harvard University and the...
February 05, 2026 08:00 AM
Personal data stolen during Harvard and UPenn data breaches leaked online
ShinyHunters leaked over one million records stolen from Harvard and UPenn onto their dark web site; Data includes personal details,...
February 05, 2026 08:00 AM
Hackers dump millions of stolen records in Harvard and UPenn data incidents
Extortion group ShinyHunters publicly dumped over two million records allegedly stolen from Harvard University and the University of...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Harvard University CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Harvard University
The official website of Harvard University is http://harvard.edu.
Harvard University’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Harvard University’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 701, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does Harvard University’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Harvard University currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has Harvard University been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, Harvard University has been affected by a supply chain cyber incident involving Oracle, with the incident ID DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845.
Does Harvard University have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Harvard University is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Harvard University have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Harvard University does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Harvard University comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Harvard University is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Harvard University have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Harvard University does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Harvard University comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Harvard University is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Harvard University have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Harvard University is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Harvard University
Harvard University operates primarily in the Higher Education industry.
Number of Employees at Harvard University
Harvard University employs approximately 33,569 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Harvard University
Harvard University presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Harvard University’s LinkedIn Followers
Harvard University’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 2,772,765 followers.
NAICS Classification of Harvard University
Harvard University is classified under the NAICS code 6113, which corresponds to Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools.
Harvard University’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Harvard University does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Harvard University’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Harvard University maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvard-university.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Harvard University
As of April 02, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Harvard University has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Harvard University has an estimated 15,823 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Harvard University ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach and Ransomware.
How does Harvard University detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with yes, and containment measures with removed hackers' access to internal systems, and remediation measures with stepped up security protocols, and communication strategy with public statements to stakeholders, and communication strategy with public disclosures, alumni notifications..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Multiple University Data Breaches Due to Social Engineering Attacks
Description: In the past two months, the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, and Princeton University have fallen victim to data breaches attributed to social engineering attacks, specifically phone-based phishing. Earlier in 2025, Columbia University, Dartmouth College, and New York University also experienced similar incidents. These breaches highlight vulnerabilities in higher education cybersecurity infrastructure.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering (Phone-based Phishing)
Vulnerability Exploited: Human error, lack of centralized IT control, decentralized IT departments
Title: ShinyHunters Leaks Data from Harvard and UPenn After Ransom Demands Rejected
Description: The hacking group ShinyHunters has released over one million records each from Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn), following data breaches last year that the institutions confirmed but did not pay ransom to resolve. UPenn disclosed a breach affecting systems tied to development and alumni activities, attributed to a social engineering attack. Harvard confirmed a breach citing a voice phishing attack targeting alumni systems, with stolen data including email addresses, phone numbers, addresses, donation histories, and other biographical details.
Type: Data Breach, Ransomware
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Voice Phishing (Vishing)
Threat Actor: ShinyHunters
Motivation: Extortion, Alleged discontent with affirmative action policies (unconfirmed)
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Phone-based phishing (social engineering).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Data Compromised: Personal data of students, faculty, and staff
Systems Affected: Internal university systems
Operational Impact: Disruption of university operations, increased security protocols
Brand Reputation Impact: Reputational damage to affected universities
Identity Theft Risk: High (potential exposure of personally identifiable information)
Incident : Data Breach, Ransomware HAR1770230343
Data Compromised: Over 1 million records per institution
Systems Affected: Alumni and development systems
Brand Reputation Impact: Likely significant
Identity Theft Risk: High
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal data, potentially including personally identifiable information, Email Addresses, Phone Numbers, Home And Business Addresses, Donation Histories, Biographical Details and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: University of Pennsylvania
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: Harvard University
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: Princeton University
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: Columbia University
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: Dartmouth College
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: New York University
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach, Ransomware HAR1770230343
Entity Name: Harvard University
Entity Type: Educational Institution
Industry: Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Alumni
Incident : Data Breach, Ransomware HAR1770230343
Entity Name: University of Pennsylvania (UPenn)
Entity Type: Educational Institution
Industry: Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Alumni
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes
Containment Measures: Removed hackers' access to internal systems
Remediation Measures: Stepped up security protocols
Communication Strategy: Public statements to stakeholders
Incident : Data Breach, Ransomware HAR1770230343
Communication Strategy: Public disclosures, alumni notifications
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes.
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Type of Data Compromised: Personal data, potentially including personally identifiable information
Sensitivity of Data: High (personal and potentially sensitive information)
Personally Identifiable Information: Likely (e.g., Social Security numbers, payroll data)
Incident : Data Breach, Ransomware HAR1770230343
Type of Data Compromised: Email addresses, Phone numbers, Home and business addresses, Donation histories, Biographical details
Number of Records Exposed: Over 1 million per institution
Sensitivity of Data: High (Personally Identifiable Information)
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Stepped up security protocols.
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by removed hackers' access to internal systems.
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach, Ransomware HAR1770230343
Ransom Demanded: Yes
Ransom Paid: No
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach, Ransomware HAR1770230343
Regulatory Notifications: Under analysis (UPenn)
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Lessons Learned: Universities are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks due to decentralized IT structures, lack of centralized control, and human error. Cybersecurity training and awareness are critical but not sufficient alone. There is a need for better collaboration between IT departments and faculty to balance security with academic freedom.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Recommendations: Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Universities are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks due to decentralized IT structures, lack of centralized control, and human error. Cybersecurity training and awareness are critical but not sufficient alone. There is a need for better collaboration between IT departments and faculty to balance security with academic freedom.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Source: Chronicle of Higher Education
Incident : Data Breach, Ransomware HAR1770230343
Source: TechCrunch
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Chronicle of Higher Education, and Source: TechCrunch.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Investigation Status: Ongoing
Incident : Data Breach, Ransomware HAR1770230343
Investigation Status: Ongoing (UPenn analyzing released data)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public statements to stakeholders, Public disclosures and alumni notifications.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Stakeholder Advisories: Universities have issued public statements to stakeholders about the breaches and steps taken to mitigate risks.
Incident : Data Breach, Ransomware HAR1770230343
Customer Advisories: Alumni notifications
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Universities have issued public statements to stakeholders about the breaches and steps taken to mitigate risks. and Alumni notifications.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entry Point: Phone-based phishing (social engineering)
Incident : Data Breach, Ransomware HAR1770230343
High Value Targets: Alumni systems
Data Sold on Dark Web: Alumni systems
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Root Causes: Human Error (Falling For Phishing Attacks), Decentralized It Departments Creating Inconsistent Security Protocols, Lack Of Centralized Control Over Technology Use, Excessive Data Retention (E.G., Storing Social Security Numbers Unnecessarily), Faculty Resistance To It Policies Due To Perceived Restrictions On Academic Freedom,
Corrective Actions: Removing Hackers' Access To Systems, Stepping Up Security Protocols, Enhancing Cybersecurity Training For Faculty And Staff,
Incident : Data Breach, Ransomware HAR1770230343
Root Causes: Social Engineering Attack (Upenn), Voice Phishing Attack (Harvard),
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Removing Hackers' Access To Systems, Stepping Up Security Protocols, Enhancing Cybersecurity Training For Faculty And Staff, .
Additional Questions
General Information
Has the company ever paid ransoms ?
Ransom Payment History: The company has Paid ransoms in the past.
What was the amount of the last ransom demanded ?
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was Yes.
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an ShinyHunters.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal data of students, faculty, and staff and Over 1 million records per institution.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Removed hackers' access to internal systems.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Personal data of students, faculty, and staff and Over 1 million records per institution.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 1.0M.
Ransomware Information
What was the highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident ?
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was Yes.
What was the highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident ?
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was No.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Universities are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks due to decentralized IT structures, lack of centralized control, and human error. Cybersecurity training and awareness are critical but not sufficient alone. There is a need for better collaboration between IT departments and faculty to balance security with academic freedom.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs and focusing on non-punitive approaches..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Chronicle of Higher Education and TechCrunch.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Universities have issued public statements to stakeholders about the breaches and steps taken to mitigate risks., .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Alumni notifications.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Phone-based phishing (social engineering).
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Human error (falling for phishing attacks)Decentralized IT departments creating inconsistent security protocolsLack of centralized control over technology useExcessive data retention (e.g., storing Social Security numbers unnecessarily)Faculty resistance to IT policies due to perceived restrictions on academic freedom, Social engineering attack (UPenn)Voice phishing attack (Harvard).
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Removing hackers' access to systemsStepping up security protocolsEnhancing cybersecurity training for faculty and staff.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
A vulnerability was found in Nothings stb up to 1.26. Impacted is the function stbtt_InitFont_internal in the library stb_truetype.h of the component TTF File Handler. Performing a manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read in VS6ComFile!get_macro_mem_COM. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain a stack-based buffer overflow in VS6ComFile!CSaveData::_conv_AnimationItem. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to arbitrary code execution on the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6MemInIF!set_temp_type_default. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6ComFile!load_link_inf. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=harvard-university' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
