
GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA Company Cyber Security Posture
https://prensagendarmeria.gob.arGendarmerāā a Nacional Argentina (GNA) es una Fuerza de Seguridad de naturaleza militar, que cumple funciones en la seguridad interior, defensa nacional, auxilio a la Justicia Federal y apoyo a la Polāā tica Exterior de la RA. Es una de las cuatro Fuerzas que integran el Ministerio de Seguridad de la Naciāā„n. Historia Durante la presidencia del Dr. Roberto M Ortiz, Gendarmerāā a Nacional fue creada el 28 de julio del aā±o 1938 por el Congreso Nacional. Las particularidades del territorio donde debāā a cumplir la misiāā„n y el carā°cter de āĀ©sta, determinaron que la Fuerza naciera como un Cuerpo con organizaciāā„n, formaciāā„n militar y fāĀ©rrea disciplina, circunstancia que a la fecha se mantiene. Esa es la gāĀ©nesis de su creaciāā„n y el espāā ritu que los legisladores imprimieron en el proyecto que luego fue promulgado como Ley N¬⫠12.367:āĆĆŗcontribuir decididamente a mantener la identidad nacional en ā°reas limāā trofes, a preservar el territorio nacional y la intangibilidad del lāā mite internacionalāĆù. Su personal fue sujeto a un rāĀ©gimen disciplinario castrense, con estructura, capacitaciāā„n, doctrina militar y formaciāā„n jurāā dica que le permitiera cumplir funciones policiales en tiempo de paz, y en tiempo de guerra integrar el componente terrestre militar: Caso concreto, fue su participaciāā„n en la Guerra de Malvinas en el aā±o 1982. La instituciāā„n se encuentra enmarcada dentro de la Ley Orgā°nica N¬⫠19.349 que regula su organizaciāā„n, misiāā„n, funciones, jurisdicciāā„n y competencias, como el rāĀ©gimen legal de su personal. #gendarmeria
GNA Company Details
gendarmeria-nacional-argentina
10,001+ employees
0
922
Law Enforcement
https://prensagendarmeria.gob.ar
Scan still pending
GEN_4697329
In-progress

Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

.png)

GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA Company Scoring based on AI Models
Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA Company Cyber Security News & History
Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
---|
GENDARMERIA NACIONAL ARGENTINA Company Subsidiaries

Gendarmerāā a Nacional Argentina (GNA) es una Fuerza de Seguridad de naturaleza militar, que cumple funciones en la seguridad interior, defensa nacional, auxilio a la Justicia Federal y apoyo a la Polāā tica Exterior de la RA. Es una de las cuatro Fuerzas que integran el Ministerio de Seguridad de la Naciāā„n. Historia Durante la presidencia del Dr. Roberto M Ortiz, Gendarmerāā a Nacional fue creada el 28 de julio del aā±o 1938 por el Congreso Nacional. Las particularidades del territorio donde debāā a cumplir la misiāā„n y el carā°cter de āĀ©sta, determinaron que la Fuerza naciera como un Cuerpo con organizaciāā„n, formaciāā„n militar y fāĀ©rrea disciplina, circunstancia que a la fecha se mantiene. Esa es la gāĀ©nesis de su creaciāā„n y el espāā ritu que los legisladores imprimieron en el proyecto que luego fue promulgado como Ley N¬⫠12.367:āĆĆŗcontribuir decididamente a mantener la identidad nacional en ā°reas limāā trofes, a preservar el territorio nacional y la intangibilidad del lāā mite internacionalāĆù. Su personal fue sujeto a un rāĀ©gimen disciplinario castrense, con estructura, capacitaciāā„n, doctrina militar y formaciāā„n jurāā dica que le permitiera cumplir funciones policiales en tiempo de paz, y en tiempo de guerra integrar el componente terrestre militar: Caso concreto, fue su participaciāā„n en la Guerra de Malvinas en el aā±o 1982. La instituciāā„n se encuentra enmarcada dentro de la Ley Orgā°nica N¬⫠19.349 que regula su organizaciāā„n, misiāā„n, funciones, jurisdicciāā„n y competencias, como el rāĀ©gimen legal de su personal. #gendarmeria
Access Data Using Our API

Get company history
.png)
GNA Cyber Security News
To keep pace with digital devices used in the course of crimes, Argentinaās border guard force uses a combination of technology and teamwork
When investigators in the field first obtain digital devices at crimes scenes or in the course of their investigations, they use UFED,Ā ...

GNA Similar Companies

Australian Border Force
The Australian Border Force is Australia's frontline border law enforcement agency. The border is our greatest national asset and so the ABF works with domestic and international partners to combat a wide range of threats while facilitating legitimate trade and travel. We are responsible for border

Politie Nederland
Politiemensen staan midden in de maatschappij, dicht op het nieuws. De politie is daar waar het gebeurt. Het optreden van agenten ligt altijd onder een vergrootglas. Bij de politie ben je 24 uur per dag en voor iedereen in onze diverse samenleving. Integer, moedig, betrouwbaar en verbindend zijn daa

Swedish Police Authority
Vi gƶr hela Sverige tryggt och sƤkert! Att arbeta inom polisen Ƥr ett av de finaste uppdrag man kan ha. Du bidrar till samhƤllet genom att gƶra hela Sverige tryggt och sƤkert. Oavsett om du jobbar i en civil roll eller som polis, Ƥr mƶjligheterna att vƤxa med en stƶrre uppgift mƄnga. Vi Ƥr Sverig

Singapore Police Force
The Singapore Police Force (SPF) is a uniformed organisation under the purview of the Ministry of Home Affairs. The mission of the SPF is to prevent, deter and detect crime to ensure the safety and security of Singapore. The Singapore Police ForceāĆĆ“s official LinkedIn page should NOT be used for

Metropolitan Police
The Metropolitan Police Service is famed around the world and has a unique place in the history of policing. Our headquarters at New Scotland Yard - and its iconic revolving sign - has provided the backdrop to some of the most high profile and complex law enforcement investigations the world has e

FBI Virtual Training Academy
The FBI Virtual Academy is the portal to all FBI training opportunities offered to our external partners. FBI Virtual Academy registration is open to all personnel serving in any agency within the criminal justice or intelligence community ā including state, local, tribal, and international law enfo

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
GNA CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, GNA has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, GNA has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Gendarmerāā a Nacional Argentina (GNA) es una Fuerza de Seguridad de naturaleza militar, que cumple funciones en la seguridad interior, defensa nacional, auxilio a la Justicia Federal y apoyo a la Polāā tica Exterior de la RA. Es una de las cuatro Fuerzas que integran el Ministerio de Seguridad de la Naciāā„n. Historia Durante la presidencia del Dr. Roberto M Ortiz, Gendarmerāā a Nacional fue creada el 28 de julio del aā±o 1938 por el Congreso Nacional. Las particularidades del territorio donde debāā a cumplir la misiāā„n y el carā°cter de āĀ©sta, determinaron que la Fuerza naciera como un Cuerpo con organizaciāā„n, formaciāā„n militar y fāĀ©rrea disciplina, circunstancia que a la fecha se mantiene. Esa es la gāĀ©nesis de su creaciāā„n y el espāā ritu que los legisladores imprimieron en el proyecto que luego fue promulgado como Ley N¬⫠12.367:āĆĆŗcontribuir decididamente a mantener la identidad nacional en ā°reas limāā trofes, a preservar el territorio nacional y la intangibilidad del lāā mite internacionalāĆù. Su personal fue sujeto a un rāĀ©gimen disciplinario castrense, con estructura, capacitaciāā„n, doctrina militar y formaciāā„n jurāā dica que le permitiera cumplir funciones policiales en tiempo de paz, y en tiempo de guerra integrar el componente terrestre militar: Caso concreto, fue su participaciāā„n en la Guerra de Malvinas en el aā±o 1982. La instituciāā„n se encuentra enmarcada dentro de la Ley Orgā°nica N¬⫠19.349 que regula su organizaciāā„n, misiāā„n, funciones, jurisdicciāā„n y competencias, como el rāĀ©gimen legal de su personal. #gendarmeria.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
