Galanz Company Cyber Security Posture

galanz.com

Galanz Enterprises, founded in September 28th, 1978, is a world-class integrated white goods brand enterprise, and one of the most influential leading enterprises in the Chinese household electrical appliances industry. Galanz has the world's largest microwave oven R&D and manufacturing center, as well as the world's leading manufacturing facilities of professional air conditioners, refrigerators, washing machines, dishwashers, electric ovens and other household appliances. Under the leadership of President Leung Chiu Yin, Galanz has upheld the industrial spirit of hard work and innovation, concentrated on real economy, and focused on household appliances manufacturing. At Galanz, driving forces are talent, innovation, and consumption. With focus of the New Modernization Drive, namely manufacturing automation, management informationization, international branding, and humanized management as priorities, and needs of the development of two-oriented society, Galanz operates subsidiaries around the world including USA, UK, Canada, Chile, Russia, Japan, and Germany.

Galanz Company Details

Linkedin ID:

galanz

Employees number:

10,001+ employees

Number of followers:

5741

NAICS:

335

Industry Type:

Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing

Homepage:

galanz.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

GAL_2124751

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreGalanz Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

globalscoreGalanz Global Score
blurone
Ailogo

Galanz Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

Galanz Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
0
Attack Types
0
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView

Galanz Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Galanz Enterprises, founded in September 28th, 1978, is a world-class integrated white goods brand enterprise, and one of the most influential leading enterprises in the Chinese household electrical appliances industry. Galanz has the world's largest microwave oven R&D and manufacturing center, as well as the world's leading manufacturing facilities of professional air conditioners, refrigerators, washing machines, dishwashers, electric ovens and other household appliances. Under the leadership of President Leung Chiu Yin, Galanz has upheld the industrial spirit of hard work and innovation, concentrated on real economy, and focused on household appliances manufacturing. At Galanz, driving forces are talent, innovation, and consumption. With focus of the New Modernization Drive, namely manufacturing automation, management informationization, international branding, and humanized management as priorities, and needs of the development of two-oriented society, Galanz operates subsidiaries around the world including USA, UK, Canada, Chile, Russia, Japan, and Germany.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=galanz' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

Galanz Cyber Security News

2025-06-29T08:55:00.000Z
5 Cybersecurity Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade

While most tech investors are focused on artificial intelligence (AI), cybersecurity remains an important and growing market.

2025-06-29T04:32:44.000Z
CrowdStrike or Check Point: Bank of America Selects the Superior Cybersecurity Stock to Buy

Bank of America has taken note, and is looking at CrowdStrike (NASDAQ:CRWD) and Check Point (NASDAQ:CHKP), two major names in the cybersecurityย ...

2025-06-27T00:36:43.000Z
A cybersecurity โ€˜awakeningโ€™ at the VA

The 2006 VA data breach shined a spotlight on cybersecurity challenges facing government. Many of those issues persist to this day.

2025-06-27T12:59:00.000Z
Microsoft transfers a top cybersecurity exec: As we continue to ..., says internal memo

Microsoft has transferred its chief information security officer, Igor Tsyganskiy, out of the company's security organisation, a reportย ...

2025-06-26T21:40:43.000Z
Fall River Public Schools releases public summary report concerning cybersecurity incident

Wednesday, the Fall River Public Schools issued the following summary report on a cybersecurity incident that recently took place: Overview.

2025-06-27T20:42:55.000Z
Stop & Shop Parent Gives Update On Major Security Breach

Ahold Delhaize USA Services Wednesday announced an "update" about a major cybersecurity breach that disclosed last fall.

2025-06-26T18:31:00.000Z
Japan to establish guidelines for chip industry cybersecurity

TOKYO -- The Japanese government will compile guidelines by around this fall for semiconductor plants on how to deal with cyberattacks,ย ...

2025-06-27T16:18:00.000Z
Mosaic Life Care notified that outside vendor experienced cybersecurity breach

According to Mosaic, an unknown party contacted the hospital claiming they had patient information in their possession, which was verified onย ...

2025-06-29T07:05:25.000Z
Hackers Spying on Android Phones in Real Time, Targeting 500+ Bank, Crypto and Payment Apps To Steal Sensitive Data: Cybersecurity Firm

A new version of a notorious banking malware is hitting Android phones, allowing hackers to steal login details and control banking apps inย ...

similarCompanies

Galanz Similar Companies

Founded in 1961, WEG is a global electric-electronic equipment company, operating mainly in the capital goods sector with solutions in electric machines, automation and paints for several sectors, including infrastructure, steel, pulp and paper, oil and gas, mining, among many others. WEG stands ou

Eaton

Eaton is an intelligent power management company dedicated to improving the quality of life and protecting the environment for people everywhere. We are guided by our commitment to do business right, to operate sustainably and to help our customers manage power โ”€ today and well into the future. By c

Haier

Established in 1984, Haier Group is a world-leading provider of solutions to better life. Focusing on user experience, Haier has been included on the list of BrandZโ„ข Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands for two consecutive years as the worldโ€™s first and only IoT ecosystem brand. Haier has topped Glob

FRESH ELECTRIC FOR HOME APPLIANCES

FRESH the biggest and famous Egyptian co. was established in 1987 as a dynamic organization devoted towards developing and manufacturing white household appliances as well as small home appliances. manufacturing factories, know how factories and join venture factories Fresh has become a leader in

Nikon

ใƒ‹ใ‚ณใƒณใฏใ€100ๅนดใฎๆญดๅฒใงๅŸนใฃใฆใใŸใ€Œๅ…‰ๅˆฉ็”จๆŠ€่ก“ใ€ใจใ€Œ็ฒพๅฏ†ๆŠ€่ก“ใ€ใ‚’ใ‚‚ใจใซใ€ๅคšๅฝฉใชๆŠ€่ก“ใƒป่ฃฝๅ“ใƒปใ‚ตใƒผใƒ“ใ‚นใ‚’ใ‚ฐใƒญใƒผใƒใƒซใซๅฑ•้–‹ใ—ใฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚ ๆ˜ ๅƒใฎๅฏ่ƒฝๆ€งใฎ่ฟฝๆฑ‚ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ใ‚นใƒžใƒผใƒˆใƒ‡ใƒใ‚คใ‚นใ‚„ใƒใ‚คใ‚ชใ‚ตใ‚คใ‚จใƒณใ‚นใฎ้€ฒๅŒ–ใ€้ซ˜ๅบฆใชใ‚‚ใฎใฅใใ‚Šใ€ใ•ใ‚‰ใซๆ•ฐๅๅ„„ๅ…‰ๅนดๅฝผๆ–นใฎๅฎ‡ๅฎ™ใ‚’ๆ‰ใˆใ‚‹ๆŒ‘ๆˆฆใพใงใ€‚ไธ–็•Œไธญใฎไบบใ€…ใฎๆšฎใ‚‰ใ—ใ‚’ใ€ๆœชๆฅใ‚’้–‹ใๆœ€ๅ…ˆ็ซฏ็”ฃๆฅญใ‚’ใ€ใใ—ใฆไบบ้กžใฎๆŒ‘ๆˆฆใ‚’ใ€ใƒ‹ใ‚ณใƒณใฏใ“ใ‚Œใ‹ใ‚‰ใ‚‚ๆ”ฏใˆ็ถšใ‘ใพใ™ใ€‚ At Nikon, we use opto-electronics and precision technologies cultivated during our 100-year history to provide a wide

Foster Electric

Since the foundation in 1949, Foster Electric Co., Ltd. ("Foster" or "the Company") have earned the trust from many customers as a โ€œSpecialist of Soundโ€ and as a partner in the acoustic business through addressing the market need appropriately. The Company is committed to fulfilling corporate socia

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

Galanz CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Galanz has faced 0 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Galanz has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Galanz Enterprises, founded in September 28th, 1978, is a world-class integrated white goods brand enterprise, and one of the most influential leading enterprises in the Chinese household electrical appliances industry. Galanz has the world's largest microwave oven R&D and manufacturing center, as well as the world's leading manufacturing facilities of professional air conditioners, refrigerators, washing machines, dishwashers, electric ovens and other household appliances. Under the leadership of President Leung Chiu Yin, Galanz has upheld the industrial spirit of hard work and innovation, concentrated on real economy, and focused on household appliances manufacturing. At Galanz, driving forces are talent, innovation, and consumption. With focus of the New Modernization Drive, namely manufacturing automation, management informationization, international branding, and humanized management as priorities, and needs of the development of two-oriented society, Galanz operates subsidiaries around the world including USA, UK, Canada, Chile, Russia, Japan, and Germany..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge