FRESH ELECTRIC FOR HOME APPLIANCES Company Cyber Security Posture

Fresh.com.eg

FRESH the biggest and famous Egyptian co. was established in 1987 as a dynamic organization devoted towards developing and manufacturing white household appliances as well as small home appliances. manufacturing factories, know how factories and join venture factories Fresh has become a leader in its field as it manufactures over 680 different models with more than 10000 working staff in 17 factories specialized in household electrical appliances manufacturing. Covering an area of 310,920 mยฌโ‰ค between manufacturing HUBS, WAREHOUSES and SERVICE CENTERS, Fresh currently runs 16 INDEPENDENT factories located in Egypt at 10th of Ramadan City industrial zone, Badr City. Fresh is certified and operates in compliance with requirements of the CE Mark, SASO, G.mark, SONCAP & ISO 9001/2000 from the TUV Rhineland Group. Fresh Policy is to spread out in the international market and find a place for itself in the new up coming markets such as Ethiopia where Fresh extends its operations in 2015 there as it has many advantages that make ease of investment as it has very good location, stability. Driven by 34 years of expertise in the market and a passion to always innovate, Fresh currently exports to over 52 countries serving more than 150 million customers in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Asia while maintaining its position as a leader in the local market. The Company Vision is to be recognized as a leader in our industry by our customers and employees and to be always driven by high quality performance, innovation and commitment to exceed customer's expectations in what we deliver either product or service.

FEHA Company Details

Linkedin ID:

fresh-electric-for-home-appliances

Employees number:

10,001+ employees

Number of followers:

0

NAICS:

335

Industry Type:

Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing

Homepage:

Fresh.com.eg

IP Addresses:

8

Company ID:

FRE_2946833

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreFEHA Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 800 and 900

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

Ailogo

FRESH ELECTRIC FOR HOME APPLIANCES Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 800 and 900

FRESH ELECTRIC FOR HOME APPLIANCES Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
0
Attack Types
0
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView

FRESH ELECTRIC FOR HOME APPLIANCES Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

FRESH the biggest and famous Egyptian co. was established in 1987 as a dynamic organization devoted towards developing and manufacturing white household appliances as well as small home appliances. manufacturing factories, know how factories and join venture factories Fresh has become a leader in its field as it manufactures over 680 different models with more than 10000 working staff in 17 factories specialized in household electrical appliances manufacturing. Covering an area of 310,920 mยฌโ‰ค between manufacturing HUBS, WAREHOUSES and SERVICE CENTERS, Fresh currently runs 16 INDEPENDENT factories located in Egypt at 10th of Ramadan City industrial zone, Badr City. Fresh is certified and operates in compliance with requirements of the CE Mark, SASO, G.mark, SONCAP & ISO 9001/2000 from the TUV Rhineland Group. Fresh Policy is to spread out in the international market and find a place for itself in the new up coming markets such as Ethiopia where Fresh extends its operations in 2015 there as it has many advantages that make ease of investment as it has very good location, stability. Driven by 34 years of expertise in the market and a passion to always innovate, Fresh currently exports to over 52 countries serving more than 150 million customers in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Asia while maintaining its position as a leader in the local market. The Company Vision is to be recognized as a leader in our industry by our customers and employees and to be always driven by high quality performance, innovation and commitment to exceed customer's expectations in what we deliver either product or service.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=fresh-electric-for-home-appliances' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

FEHA Cyber Security News

2025-05-08T07:00:00.000Z
M&S issues fresh cyber attack updateโ€“ and with no end in sight, here's where to shop instead

Nearly three weeks after Marks & Spencer ceased online orders due to a cyber attack, the brand has issued a fresh updateโ€“ and it's not good newsย ...

2023-11-28T08:00:00.000Z
Cyber pros avoid smart devices: there is a good reason

Each new smart device creates a new vulnerability at home by providing a fresh attack vector for attackers. And some devices could cause actual physical harm.

2018-10-16T07:00:00.000Z
When fridges attack: why hackers could target the grid

Cyber criminals gaining control of thousands of high-wattage networked home appliances could launch a co-ordinated attack that would shut down the power grid.

2022-01-26T08:00:00.000Z
Why the global chip shortage threatens the economy, national security and Americans' 'status quo'

The report identified the main issue as the need for additional semiconductor factories (also called semiconductor fabrication plants or fabs).

similarCompanies

FEHA Similar Companies

Belton Technology Group

Established in 1988, Belton Technology Group is ISO 9001, 14001, QS9000 certified and UL listed components and full turnkey contract manufacturer of - Flexible Printed Circuit Boards - SMT Flip Chip, PCB and FPCB Assemblies - Micro Module Packaging and Assemblies - Plastic Injection and Ov

Vertiv

Vertiv (NYSE: VRT) brings together hardware, software, analytics and ongoing services to enable its customersโ€™ vital applications to run continuously, perform optimally and grow with their business needs. Vertiv solves the most important challenges facing todayโ€™s data centers, communication networks

Midea Group

Midea Group aspires to the vision of โ€œBringing Great Innovations to Lifeโ€, upholding the Foundersโ€™ philosophy of creating a better life through technology. Midea Group has evolved into a global leading technology company specializing in five major business areas: Smart Home Business, Industrial and

Nikon

ใƒ‹ใ‚ณใƒณใฏใ€100ๅนดใฎๆญดๅฒใงๅŸนใฃใฆใใŸใ€Œๅ…‰ๅˆฉ็”จๆŠ€่ก“ใ€ใจใ€Œ็ฒพๅฏ†ๆŠ€่ก“ใ€ใ‚’ใ‚‚ใจใซใ€ๅคšๅฝฉใชๆŠ€่ก“ใƒป่ฃฝๅ“ใƒปใ‚ตใƒผใƒ“ใ‚นใ‚’ใ‚ฐใƒญใƒผใƒใƒซใซๅฑ•้–‹ใ—ใฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚ ๆ˜ ๅƒใฎๅฏ่ƒฝๆ€งใฎ่ฟฝๆฑ‚ใ‹ใ‚‰ใ€ใ‚นใƒžใƒผใƒˆใƒ‡ใƒใ‚คใ‚นใ‚„ใƒใ‚คใ‚ชใ‚ตใ‚คใ‚จใƒณใ‚นใฎ้€ฒๅŒ–ใ€้ซ˜ๅบฆใชใ‚‚ใฎใฅใใ‚Šใ€ใ•ใ‚‰ใซๆ•ฐๅๅ„„ๅ…‰ๅนดๅฝผๆ–นใฎๅฎ‡ๅฎ™ใ‚’ๆ‰ใˆใ‚‹ๆŒ‘ๆˆฆใพใงใ€‚ไธ–็•Œไธญใฎไบบใ€…ใฎๆšฎใ‚‰ใ—ใ‚’ใ€ๆœชๆฅใ‚’้–‹ใๆœ€ๅ…ˆ็ซฏ็”ฃๆฅญใ‚’ใ€ใใ—ใฆไบบ้กžใฎๆŒ‘ๆˆฆใ‚’ใ€ใƒ‹ใ‚ณใƒณใฏใ“ใ‚Œใ‹ใ‚‰ใ‚‚ๆ”ฏใˆ็ถšใ‘ใพใ™ใ€‚ At Nikon, we use opto-electronics and precision technologies cultivated during our 100-year history to provide a wide

FOXCONN EMEA

Foxconn EMEA is a regional network of factories and warehouses, responsible for providing in region manufacturing & supply chain solutions to Computer, Communication and Consumer-electronics ("3C") leaders. As part of the Hon Hai technology Group, the world leading partner for joint-design, joint-d

Mettler-Toledo International, Inc

At METTLER TOLEDO, our mission is to empower industries worldwide with precision instruments and services that drive progress toward a better and more #sustainable future. Our teams operate at the forefront of #innovation, delivering cutting-edge instruments to a diverse range of industries, from #L

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

FEHA CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, FEHA has faced 0 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, FEHA has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as FRESH the biggest and famous Egyptian co. was established in 1987 as a dynamic organization devoted towards developing and manufacturing white household appliances as well as small home appliances. manufacturing factories, know how factories and join venture factories Fresh has become a leader in its field as it manufactures over 680 different models with more than 10000 working staff in 17 factories specialized in household electrical appliances manufacturing. Covering an area of 310,920 mยฌโ‰ค between manufacturing HUBS, WAREHOUSES and SERVICE CENTERS, Fresh currently runs 16 INDEPENDENT factories located in Egypt at 10th of Ramadan City industrial zone, Badr City. Fresh is certified and operates in compliance with requirements of the CE Mark, SASO, G.mark, SONCAP & ISO 9001/2000 from the TUV Rhineland Group. Fresh Policy is to spread out in the international market and find a place for itself in the new up coming markets such as Ethiopia where Fresh extends its operations in 2015 there as it has many advantages that make ease of investment as it has very good location, stability. Driven by 34 years of expertise in the market and a passion to always innovate, Fresh currently exports to over 52 countries serving more than 150 million customers in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Asia while maintaining its position as a leader in the local market. The Company Vision is to be recognized as a leader in our industry by our customers and employees and to be always driven by high quality performance, innovation and commitment to exceed customer's expectations in what we deliver either product or service..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge