Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 Company Cyber Security Posture
fubon.com以「成為亞洲一流的金融機構」為發展願景的富邦金控，旗下主要子公司包括富邦人壽、台北富邦銀行、富邦銀行(香港)、富邦華一銀行、富邦產險、富邦證券及富邦投信等，擁有最完整多元的金融產品與服務，經營績效耀眼，位居市場領導地位。富邦金控深耕台灣逾60年，以「正向力量 成就可能™」為品牌理念，致力以正向的力量及全方位的金融服務，支持人們追尋美好未來。 截至2024年底，富邦金控總資產達12兆673億元，為台灣總資產第二大、市值第一大金融控股公司， 2024年稅後淨利為1508.20億元，每股盈餘(EPS)10.77元。富邦金控已連續16年榮登台灣金控業每股盈餘獲利王。富邦金控及子公司優異的永續經營表現也深獲國際專業肯定，已連續八年入選道瓊永續指數(DJSI)之最高榮譽「世界指數」成分股，連續九年入選道瓊永續指數「新興市場指數」成分股。 Intent on becoming one of Asia’s first-class financial institutions, Fubon Financial Holdings has the most complete portfolio of financial products and services in the industry, provided through a strong lineup of subsidiaries that includes Fubon Life, Taipei Fubon Bank, Fubon Bank (Hong Kong), Fubon Bank (China), Fubon Insurance, Fubon Securities and Fubon Asset Management. These subsidiaries ensure that Fubon delivers consistently strong results and remains a market leader. Fubon Financial Holdings has nurtured its presence in Taiwan for more than 60 years, and its brand concept – “Be positive All possible” – reflects its commitment to support those pursuing a better future with positive energy and an unrivaled array of financial services. As of the end of 2024, Fubon Financial Holdings had total assets of NT$12.07trillion, the second highest among financial holding companies, and its market capitalization was the highest in the sector. After-tax net profit totaled NT$150.82 billion in 2024, with earnings per share (EPS) of NT$10.77, the highest in the sector for a 16th consecutive year. The efforts made on sustainability by Fubon Financial Holdings and its subsidiaries have earned widespread recognition internationally. Fubon has been selected as a constituent of the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices’ top index, the DJSI World Index, for eight straight years and to the DJSI Emerging Markets Index for nine years in a row.
FFHCL富 Company Details
fubon
10,001+ employees
0
522
Banking
fubon.com
Scan still pending
FUB_1712736
In-progress
FFHCL富 Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
FFHCL富 Global Score.png)
Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. 富邦金控 Company Subsidiaries
以「成為亞洲一流的金融機構」為發展願景的富邦金控，旗下主要子公司包括富邦人壽、台北富邦銀行、富邦銀行(香港)、富邦華一銀行、富邦產險、富邦證券及富邦投信等，擁有最完整多元的金融產品與服務，經營績效耀眼，位居市場領導地位。富邦金控深耕台灣逾60年，以「正向力量 成就可能™」為品牌理念，致力以正向的力量及全方位的金融服務，支持人們追尋美好未來。 截至2024年底，富邦金控總資產達12兆673億元，為台灣總資產第二大、市值第一大金融控股公司， 2024年稅後淨利為1508.20億元，每股盈餘(EPS)10.77元。富邦金控已連續16年榮登台灣金控業每股盈餘獲利王。富邦金控及子公司優異的永續經營表現也深獲國際專業肯定，已連續八年入選道瓊永續指數(DJSI)之最高榮譽「世界指數」成分股，連續九年入選道瓊永續指數「新興市場指數」成分股。 Intent on becoming one of Asia’s first-class financial institutions, Fubon Financial Holdings has the most complete portfolio of financial products and services in the industry, provided through a strong lineup of subsidiaries that includes Fubon Life, Taipei Fubon Bank, Fubon Bank (Hong Kong), Fubon Bank (China), Fubon Insurance, Fubon Securities and Fubon Asset Management. These subsidiaries ensure that Fubon delivers consistently strong results and remains a market leader. Fubon Financial Holdings has nurtured its presence in Taiwan for more than 60 years, and its brand concept – “Be positive All possible” – reflects its commitment to support those pursuing a better future with positive energy and an unrivaled array of financial services. As of the end of 2024, Fubon Financial Holdings had total assets of NT$12.07trillion, the second highest among financial holding companies, and its market capitalization was the highest in the sector. After-tax net profit totaled NT$150.82 billion in 2024, with earnings per share (EPS) of NT$10.77, the highest in the sector for a 16th consecutive year. The efforts made on sustainability by Fubon Financial Holdings and its subsidiaries have earned widespread recognition internationally. Fubon has been selected as a constituent of the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices’ top index, the DJSI World Index, for eight straight years and to the DJSI Emerging Markets Index for nine years in a row.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
FFHCL富 Cyber Security News
Sustaining Select Efforts to Strengthen the Nation's Cybersecurity and Amending Executive Order 13694 and Executive Order 14144
The People's Republic of China presents the most active and persistent cyber threat to United States Government, private sector, and critical ...
Trump scraps Biden software security, AI, post-quantum encryption efforts in new executive order
The White House accused the Biden administration of trying to “sneak problematic and distracting issues into cybersecurity policy.”
Harris-Walz campaign may have been targeted by iPhone hackers, cybersecurity firm says
High-profile Americans' iPhones may have been targeted in hacking campaign, cybersecurity firm for Harris-Walz says ... Apple strongly disagreed ...
Google scam: Gmail, Google Calendar, Meet invites with phishing links used to deceive and defraud, cybersecurity experts warn
Scammers are using Gmail, Google Calendar and Meet invites with phishing links to deceive and defraud victims, Chicago cybersecurity experts ...
How cybersecurity standout CrowdStrike aims to capitalize on the AI agent gold rush
CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz sees big business in helping companies safeguard their AI agents.
Cybersecurity Training in Africa Aims to Bolster Professionals' Ranks
Facing significant increases in cybercrime, African organizations have teamed up with international educational institutions to train ...
Kettering Health: Ransomware group believed to be responsible for cybersecurity incident
Kettering Health shared an update on its cybersecurity incident, sharing they identified what they believe is the reason behind the incident ...
Trump revokes digital identity actions in new cyber executive order
President Donald Trump has signed a new cybersecurity executive order that continues many of the policies of his predecessors, ...
CYBERCOM elevates defensive office in ‘net positive’ for cybersecurity mission: Analysts
JFHQ-DODIN will now be known as the sub-unified command Department of Defense Cyber Defense Command.
FFHCL富 Similar Companies
Promsvyazbank
OJSC Promsvyazbank (PSB) is a Russian privately-owned universal commercial bank. Founded in 1995, PSB currently ranks 9th by assets among Russian banks (Interfax as of 01/01/13). PSB offers a comprehensive range of banking services to corporate and individual customers. PSB’s domestic and interna
Bank Saderat Iran
As a private bank , BSI was established in 1952 . with around 3000 active branches , BSI runs the largest banking network in Iran . In 2000 , BSI started offering electronic online services , and now pioneers in the number of online branches ATM . machines , and point of sale terminals with remarkab
KeyBank
At KeyBank we’ve made a promise to our clients that they will always have a champion in us. To deliver on our promise, we’re committed to building a team of engaged employees who do the right thing for our clients and shareholders, and help them achieve financial wellness each and every day. Headqu
Maybank
Maybank Group is the leading financial services provider in Malaysia catering to the needs of consumers, investors, entrepreneurs, non-profit organisations and corporations. The Group, which has expanded internationally, has the largest network among Malaysian banks of over 2,400 branches and office
CIMB Niaga
CIMB Niaga was established as Bank Niaga in 1955. CIMB Group holds around 97.9% of the stakes in CIMB Niaga (including PT Commerce Kapital 1.02%). The Bank offers a comprehensive suite of both conventional and Islamic banking products and services, through an expanding delivery channel network of 91
Aryavart Bank
Aryavart Bank, a Regional Rural Bank,was constituted on 1st April, 2019 after amalgamation of two Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) namely Gramin Bank of Aryavart and Allahabad UP Gramin Bank as per Government of India Gazette notification No. 338 dated 25-01-2019. Gramin Bank of Aryavart was sponsored by
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
FFHCL富 CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, FFHCL富 has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, FFHCL富 has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as 以「成為亞洲一流的金融機構」為發展願景的富邦金控，旗下主要子公司包括富邦人壽、台北富邦銀行、富邦銀行(香港)、富邦華一銀行、富邦產險、富邦證券及富邦投信等，擁有最完整多元的金融產品與服務，經營績效耀眼，位居市場領導地位。富邦金控深耕台灣逾60年，以「正向力量 成就可能™」為品牌理念，致力以正向的力量及全方位的金融服務，支持人們追尋美好未來。 截至2024年底，富邦金控總資產達12兆673億元，為台灣總資產第二大、市值第一大金融控股公司， 2024年稅後淨利為1508.20億元，每股盈餘(EPS)10.77元。富邦金控已連續16年榮登台灣金控業每股盈餘獲利王。富邦金控及子公司優異的永續經營表現也深獲國際專業肯定，已連續八年入選道瓊永續指數(DJSI)之最高榮譽「世界指數」成分股，連續九年入選道瓊永續指數「新興市場指數」成分股。 Intent on becoming one of Asia’s first-class financial institutions, Fubon Financial Holdings has the most complete portfolio of financial products and services in the industry, provided through a strong lineup of subsidiaries that includes Fubon Life, Taipei Fubon Bank, Fubon Bank (Hong Kong), Fubon Bank (China), Fubon Insurance, Fubon Securities and Fubon Asset Management. These subsidiaries ensure that Fubon delivers consistently strong results and remains a market leader. Fubon Financial Holdings has nurtured its presence in Taiwan for more than 60 years, and its brand concept – “Be positive All possible” – reflects its commitment to support those pursuing a better future with positive energy and an unrivaled array of financial services. As of the end of 2024, Fubon Financial Holdings had total assets of NT$12.07trillion, the second highest among financial holding companies, and its market capitalization was the highest in the sector. After-tax net profit totaled NT$150.82 billion in 2024, with earnings per share (EPS) of NT$10.77, the highest in the sector for a 16th consecutive year. The efforts made on sustainability by Fubon Financial Holdings and its subsidiaries have earned widespread recognition internationally. Fubon has been selected as a constituent of the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices’ top index, the DJSI World Index, for eight straight years and to the DJSI Emerging Markets Index for nine years in a row..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
