Fauji Foundation Company Cyber Security Posture
fauji.org.pkA Trust for the Welfare of Ex-servicemen and their Families Fauji Foundation was established as a charitable trust in 1954, and operating on a completely self-sustaining basis, channels approximately 80% of the profits from commercial ventures into social protection programs that serve a beneficiary population representing approximately 5% of the country’s population. Spending more than Rs. 31 billion since inception on welfare, the Foundation provides services in the areas of healthcare, education, educational stipends, technical and vocational training. - Over 2.29 million patients treated in 2010 through the FF Healthcare System - Around 45000 students are enrolled in the FF Education System - Approximately 55000 educational stipends are dispersed each year - Around 15,000 individuals are currently enrolled in Vocational & Technical Training Centers Fauji Foundation (Holding Entity) Fully Owned Projects . Fauji Cereals . Foundation Gas . Overseas Employment Services . FF Experimental & Seed Multiplication Farm Associated Companies . Fauji Fertilizer Company Ltd . Fauji Fertilizer Bin Qasim Ltd . Fauji Cement Company Ltd . Fauji Kabirwala Power Company Ltd . Foundation Power Company ( Daharki ) Ltd . Mari Petroleum Company Ltd . Fauji Akbar Portia Marine Terminals . Fauji Oil Terminal & Distribution Company Ltd . Pakistan Maroc Phosphere, S.A . Foundation Securities (Pvt.) Ltd . FWEL -I . FWEL -II . Askari Bank Ltd . Askari Cement Company . FUI
Fauji Foundation Company Details
fauji-foundation
10,001+ employees
15573
none
Non-profit Organizations
fauji.org.pk
Scan still pending
FAU_2114187
In-progress
Fauji Foundation Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 200 and 800
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Fauji Foundation Global Score.png)
Fauji Foundation Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 200 and 800 |
Fauji Foundation Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Fauji Foundation Company Subsidiaries
A Trust for the Welfare of Ex-servicemen and their Families Fauji Foundation was established as a charitable trust in 1954, and operating on a completely self-sustaining basis, channels approximately 80% of the profits from commercial ventures into social protection programs that serve a beneficiary population representing approximately 5% of the country’s population. Spending more than Rs. 31 billion since inception on welfare, the Foundation provides services in the areas of healthcare, education, educational stipends, technical and vocational training. - Over 2.29 million patients treated in 2010 through the FF Healthcare System - Around 45000 students are enrolled in the FF Education System - Approximately 55000 educational stipends are dispersed each year - Around 15,000 individuals are currently enrolled in Vocational & Technical Training Centers Fauji Foundation (Holding Entity) Fully Owned Projects . Fauji Cereals . Foundation Gas . Overseas Employment Services . FF Experimental & Seed Multiplication Farm Associated Companies . Fauji Fertilizer Company Ltd . Fauji Fertilizer Bin Qasim Ltd . Fauji Cement Company Ltd . Fauji Kabirwala Power Company Ltd . Foundation Power Company ( Daharki ) Ltd . Mari Petroleum Company Ltd . Fauji Akbar Portia Marine Terminals . Fauji Oil Terminal & Distribution Company Ltd . Pakistan Maroc Phosphere, S.A . Foundation Securities (Pvt.) Ltd . FWEL -I . FWEL -II . Askari Bank Ltd . Askari Cement Company . FUI
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Fauji Foundation Cyber Security News
Amid India-Pakistan tensions, the US must rebalance its security priorities in South Asia
The US should make Pakistan's Major non-NATO Ally status contingent on Islamabad's counterterrorism performance and economic reform.
SECP urges companies to ramp up cybersecurity amid Indian cyber-attacks threat
The advisory also recommends measures such as stricter access control, reducing network vulnerabilities, building readiness for security ...
Taliban militants say they will target Pakistan Army-owned businesses: report
Islamabad has accused Kabul of allowing TTP militants to use Afghanistan as a base for carrying out attacks on Pakistan. Kabul denies the claims ...
World Bank assures BISP of ‘full support’ in strengthening digital, cybersecurity
ISLAMABAD: Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) has sought the assistance of World Bank (WB) in strengthening digital and cybersecurity, ...
Army chief, PM inaugurate Pakistan’s first corporate farm to modernize agricultural practices
Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif have inaugurated the nation's first corporate farm as part of the Green Pakistan ...
Financial sector sees sharp increase in cyber threats during 2024
Within the financial sector in Pakistan, Kaspersky recorded a 114% rise banking and financial malware during January to October 2024 as compared ...
National Incubation Centre Islamabad Announces New Partner Network
NIC Islamabad has a stellar lineup of global incubators and accelerators in their team, opening doors to an expansive network of mentors, investors, and ...
Security forces kill seven terrorists in KP IBOs
Security Forces killed seven terrorists in two separate engagements in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province on February 8 and 9.
PTI protest, sit-in: Security level elevated to maximum alert in Capital
As part of the security measures, the government has sealed off all entry points to the Red Zone and blocked key roads, including Srinagar ...
Fauji Foundation Similar Companies
YMCA of the USA
YMCA of the USA is the national resource office for the nation's YMCAs. Headquartered in Chicago, IL, YMCA of the USA exists to serve YMCAs. To address the specific needs of communities, each YMCA is an independent organization, autonomous and separate from YMCA of the USA. They are required by the
Quantum Method
Our mission is to help every human being fulfill his true potential by awakening his inner power. We are striving together to build great compassionate community, where the value of every human life will be upheld, where every human being will be able to flourish his unique talents, enlighten his so
Swecha Telangana
Swecha is a non-profit organisation committed to grow Free Software Movement in Telugu States i.e., Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. We have a working system in which most common tasks like writing and printing documents, browsing the web, sending/receiving emails, chatting, editing graphics etc. can
International Rescue Committee
The International Rescue Committee responds to the world’s worst humanitarian crises and help people to survive, recover, and gain control of their future. Founded in 1933 at the request of Albert Einstein, the IRC offers lifesaving care and life-changing assistance to refugees and displaced peopl
Federazione Italiana Cuochi
120 Associazioni Provinciali, 20 Unioni Regionali, numerose Associazioni e Delegazioni Estere, che annoverando ogni anno una media di 20.000 associati fra Cuochi Professionisti, Chef Patron, Ristoratori, Docenti e Allievi degli Istituti Alberghieri di ogni ordine e grado. Tutto questo e altro ancora
Scouts en Gidsen Vlaanderen
Als jeugdbeweging richt scouting zich naar kinderen en jongeren tussen 6 en 18 jaar. Ruim 86.000 jongens en meisjes zijn lid van SCOUTS en GIDSEN VLAANDEREN. Samen met hun leiding beleven ze activiteiten per leeftijdstak in één van onze 500 plaatselijke groepen. Daarmee is SCOUTS en GIDSEN VLAANDERE
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Fauji Foundation CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Fauji Foundation has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Fauji Foundation has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as A Trust for the Welfare of Ex-servicemen and their Families Fauji Foundation was established as a charitable trust in 1954, and operating on a completely self-sustaining basis, channels approximately 80% of the profits from commercial ventures into social protection programs that serve a beneficiary population representing approximately 5% of the country’s population. Spending more than Rs. 31 billion since inception on welfare, the Foundation provides services in the areas of healthcare, education, educational stipends, technical and vocational training. - Over 2.29 million patients treated in 2010 through the FF Healthcare System - Around 45000 students are enrolled in the FF Education System - Approximately 55000 educational stipends are dispersed each year - Around 15,000 individuals are currently enrolled in Vocational & Technical Training Centers Fauji Foundation (Holding Entity) Fully Owned Projects . Fauji Cereals . Foundation Gas . Overseas Employment Services . FF Experimental & Seed Multiplication Farm Associated Companies . Fauji Fertilizer Company Ltd . Fauji Fertilizer Bin Qasim Ltd . Fauji Cement Company Ltd . Fauji Kabirwala Power Company Ltd . Foundation Power Company ( Daharki ) Ltd . Mari Petroleum Company Ltd . Fauji Akbar Portia Marine Terminals . Fauji Oil Terminal & Distribution Company Ltd . Pakistan Maroc Phosphere, S.A . Foundation Securities (Pvt.) Ltd . FWEL -I . FWEL -II . Askari Bank Ltd . Askari Cement Company . FUI.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
