Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions

The Facebook company is now Meta. Meta builds technologies that help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology. We want to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together. To do that, we ask that you help create a safe and respectful online space. These community values encourage constructive conversations on this page: • Start with an open mind. Whether you agree or disagree, engage with empathy. • Comments violating our Community Standards will be removed or hidden. So please treat everybody with respect. • Keep it constructive. Use your interactions here to learn about and grow your understanding of others. • Our moderators are here to uphold these guidelines for the benefit of everyone, every day. • If you are seeking support for issues related to your Facebook account, please reference our Help Center (https://www.facebook.com/help) or Help Community (https://www.facebook.com/help/community). For a full listing of our jobs, visit http://www.facebookcareers.com

Facebook A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Facebook

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

facebook

Employees number:

24,784

Number of followers:

406,260

NAICS:

5112

Industry Type:

Software Development

Homepage:

meta.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

FAC_5156420

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreFacebook Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 650 and 699

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/facebook.jpeg
Facebook Software Development
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Get a Score Increase
globalscoreFacebook Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/facebook.jpeg
Facebook Software Development
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Facebook Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
7
Attack Types
3
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
FacebookCyber Attack6027/2023NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The FileFix attack impersonated a Facebook security alert, tricking users into executing malicious commands disguised as a PDF file appeal process. Victims unknowingly ran a multi-stage payload that dropped the StealC infostealer, a malware capable of harvesting credentials from browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Opera, etc.), cryptocurrency wallets (20+ types), messaging apps (Telegram, Discord, Thunderbird), VPNs (OpenVPN, Proton VPN), cloud services (AWS, Azure), and gaming platforms (Ubisoft, Battle.net). The attack leveraged AI-generated decoy images (e.g., houses, doors) embedded with PowerShell scripts and encrypted executables, evading detection by mimicking benign user actions (downloading a JPG). The malware also checked for virtual machines (VMs) to avoid sandbox analysis. While the article does not confirm direct financial losses or data breaches at Facebook, the campaign’s global reach (US, Germany, China, etc.) and sophisticated evasion techniques suggest high-risk exposure for users’ personal, financial, and corporate credentials. The attack’s rapid evolution (from a July 2023 PoC to a 517% surge in 6 months) highlights its effectiveness in bypassing traditional phishing defenses, posing reputational harm to Facebook’s platform security and potential downstream fraud for affected users.

FacebookBreach10066/2021NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: Meta has been fined €265 million ($275.5 million) by the Irish data protection commission (DPC) for the data leak suffered by Facebook. It exposed the data belonging to millions of Facebook users. The Data Protection Commission is also imposing a range of corrective measures on Meta. On April 3rd, 2021, a user leaked the phone numbers and personal data of 533 million Facebook users in a hacking forum for free online. Leaked data included users’ phone numbers, Facebook IDs, full names, locations, birthdates, bios, and for some accounts the associated email addresses.

FacebookData Leak85404/2021NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A threat actor published the phone numbers and account details of about 533 million Facebook users. The leaked data included information that users posted on their profiles including Facebook ID numbers, profile names, email addresses, location information, gender details, and job data. The database also contained phone numbers for all users, information that is not always public for most profiles.

FacebookBreach60205/2020NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Facebook is charged with another fine. This time the social network is handing over CAD$9 million (US$6.5 million / £5.3 million) to Canada as part of a settlement. Facebook “made false or misleading claims about the privacy of Canadians’ personal information on Facebook and Messenger” and improperly shared data with third-party developers. Facebook gave the impression that users could control who could see and access their personal information on the Facebook platform when using privacy features. Facebook also allowed certain third-party developers to access the personal information of users’ friends after they installed certain third-party applications.

FacebookBreach50202/2020NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Russian court fines social media company Facebook $63,000 over data law breach. Facebook failed to comply with a Russian data law. The Tagansky District Court in Moscow fined Facebook for its refusal to put its server holding data about Russian citizens on Russian territory.

FacebookData Leak85305/2018NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Data from millions of Facebook users who used a popular personality app was left exposed online for anyone to access. Academics at the University of Cambridge distributed the data from the personality quiz app myPersonality to hundreds of researchers via a website with insufficient security provisions. It led to it being left vulnerable to access for four years & gaining access illicitly was relatively easy. The data was highly sensitive, revealing personal details of Facebook users, such as the results of psychological tests. Facebook suspended myPersonality from its platform saying the app may have violated its policies due to the language used in the app and on its website to describe how data is shared. More than 6 million people completed the tests on the myPersonality app and nearly half agreed to share data from their Facebook profiles with the project. All of this data was then scooped up and the names removed before it was put on a website to share with other researchers.

FacebookCyber Attack80408/2015NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A Las Vegas man called Spam King had faced federal fraud charges for allegedly luring Facebook users to third-party websites and collecting personal data for spam list. He used to trick people into revealing their login details which he then used to access half a million accounts and used this to send spam to other Facebook users. He also used to target the users with bogus "friend requests" for distributing spam.

Facebook (Meta)
Cyber Attack
Severity: 60
Impact: 2
Seen: 7/2023
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The FileFix attack impersonated a Facebook security alert, tricking users into executing malicious commands disguised as a PDF file appeal process. Victims unknowingly ran a multi-stage payload that dropped the StealC infostealer, a malware capable of harvesting credentials from browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Opera, etc.), cryptocurrency wallets (20+ types), messaging apps (Telegram, Discord, Thunderbird), VPNs (OpenVPN, Proton VPN), cloud services (AWS, Azure), and gaming platforms (Ubisoft, Battle.net). The attack leveraged AI-generated decoy images (e.g., houses, doors) embedded with PowerShell scripts and encrypted executables, evading detection by mimicking benign user actions (downloading a JPG). The malware also checked for virtual machines (VMs) to avoid sandbox analysis. While the article does not confirm direct financial losses or data breaches at Facebook, the campaign’s global reach (US, Germany, China, etc.) and sophisticated evasion techniques suggest high-risk exposure for users’ personal, financial, and corporate credentials. The attack’s rapid evolution (from a July 2023 PoC to a 517% surge in 6 months) highlights its effectiveness in bypassing traditional phishing defenses, posing reputational harm to Facebook’s platform security and potential downstream fraud for affected users.

Facebook
Breach
Severity: 100
Impact: 6
Seen: 6/2021
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: Meta has been fined €265 million ($275.5 million) by the Irish data protection commission (DPC) for the data leak suffered by Facebook. It exposed the data belonging to millions of Facebook users. The Data Protection Commission is also imposing a range of corrective measures on Meta. On April 3rd, 2021, a user leaked the phone numbers and personal data of 533 million Facebook users in a hacking forum for free online. Leaked data included users’ phone numbers, Facebook IDs, full names, locations, birthdates, bios, and for some accounts the associated email addresses.

Facebook
Data Leak
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 04/2021
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A threat actor published the phone numbers and account details of about 533 million Facebook users. The leaked data included information that users posted on their profiles including Facebook ID numbers, profile names, email addresses, location information, gender details, and job data. The database also contained phone numbers for all users, information that is not always public for most profiles.

Facebook
Breach
Severity: 60
Impact: 2
Seen: 05/2020
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Facebook is charged with another fine. This time the social network is handing over CAD$9 million (US$6.5 million / £5.3 million) to Canada as part of a settlement. Facebook “made false or misleading claims about the privacy of Canadians’ personal information on Facebook and Messenger” and improperly shared data with third-party developers. Facebook gave the impression that users could control who could see and access their personal information on the Facebook platform when using privacy features. Facebook also allowed certain third-party developers to access the personal information of users’ friends after they installed certain third-party applications.

Facebook
Breach
Severity: 50
Impact: 2
Seen: 02/2020
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Russian court fines social media company Facebook $63,000 over data law breach. Facebook failed to comply with a Russian data law. The Tagansky District Court in Moscow fined Facebook for its refusal to put its server holding data about Russian citizens on Russian territory.

Facebook
Data Leak
Severity: 85
Impact: 3
Seen: 05/2018
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Data from millions of Facebook users who used a popular personality app was left exposed online for anyone to access. Academics at the University of Cambridge distributed the data from the personality quiz app myPersonality to hundreds of researchers via a website with insufficient security provisions. It led to it being left vulnerable to access for four years & gaining access illicitly was relatively easy. The data was highly sensitive, revealing personal details of Facebook users, such as the results of psychological tests. Facebook suspended myPersonality from its platform saying the app may have violated its policies due to the language used in the app and on its website to describe how data is shared. More than 6 million people completed the tests on the myPersonality app and nearly half agreed to share data from their Facebook profiles with the project. All of this data was then scooped up and the names removed before it was put on a website to share with other researchers.

Facebook
Cyber Attack
Severity: 80
Impact: 4
Seen: 08/2015
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: A Las Vegas man called Spam King had faced federal fraud charges for allegedly luring Facebook users to third-party websites and collecting personal data for spam list. He used to trick people into revealing their login details which he then used to access half a million accounts and used this to send spam to other Facebook users. He also used to target the users with bogus "friend requests" for distributing spam.

Ailogo

Facebook Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for Facebook

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Facebook in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Facebook in 2026.

Incident Types Facebook vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Facebook in 2026.

Incident History — Facebook (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Facebook cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Facebook Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

The Facebook company is now Meta. Meta builds technologies that help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology. We want to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together. To do that, we ask that you help create a safe and respectful online space. These community values encourage constructive conversations on this page: • Start with an open mind. Whether you agree or disagree, engage with empathy. • Comments violating our Community Standards will be removed or hidden. So please treat everybody with respect. • Keep it constructive. Use your interactions here to learn about and grow your understanding of others. • Our moderators are here to uphold these guidelines for the benefit of everyone, every day. • If you are seeking support for issues related to your Facebook account, please reference our Help Center (https://www.facebook.com/help) or Help Community (https://www.facebook.com/help/community). For a full listing of our jobs, visit http://www.facebookcareers.com

Loading...
similarCompanies

Facebook Similar Companies

PayPal

We're championing possibilities for all by making money fast, easy, and more enjoyable. Our hope is to unlock opportunities for people in their everyday lives and empower the millions of people and businesses around the world who trust, rely, and use PayPal every day. For support, visit the PayPal

Bolt

At Bolt, we're building a future where people don’t need to own personal cars to move around safely and conveniently. A future where people have the freedom to use transport on demand, choosing whatever vehicle's best for each occasion — be it a car, scooter, or e-bike. We're helping over 200 mill

Upwork

Upwork is the world’s work marketplace that connects businesses with independent talent from across the globe. We serve everyone from one-person startups to large, Fortune 100 enterprises with a powerful, trust-driven platform that enables companies and talent to work together in new ways that unloc

Meituan

Adhering to the ‘Retail + Technology’ strategy, Meituan commits to its mission that 'We help people eat better, live better'. Since its establishment in March 2010, Meituan has advanced the digital upgrading of services and goods retail on both supply and demand sides. Together with our partners we

GlobalLogic

GlobalLogic, a Hitachi Group company, is a trusted partner in design, data, and digital engineering for the world’s largest and most innovative companies. Since our inception in 2000, we have been at the forefront of the digital revolution, helping to create some of the most widely used digital prod

Daraz

Founded in 2015, Daraz is the leading e-commerce platform in South Asia with operations in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Myanmar. It provides sellers and consumers with cutting-edge marketplace technology, targeting a rapidly growing region of over 500 million people. By building an in

HubSpot

HubSpot is a leading CRM platform that provides software and support to help businesses grow better. Our platform includes marketing, sales, service, and website management products that start free and scale to meet our customers’ needs at any stage of growth. Today, thousands of customers around th

Adobe

Adobe is the global leader in digital media and digital marketing solutions. Our creative, marketing and document solutions empower everyone – from emerging artists to global brands – to bring digital creations to life and deliver immersive, compelling experiences to the right person at the right mo

PhonePe

PhonePe Group is India’s leading fintech company, proudly recognized as India’s #1 Trusted Digital Payments* Brand for three consecutive years. Our flagship product, the PhonePe app was launched in August 2016, has rapidly become the preferred consumer payments app in India. In just eight years, Pho

newsone

Facebook CyberSecurity News

March 13, 2026 02:14 AM
Meta Launches New Anti-Scam Tools on WhatsApp, Facebook and Messenger

Meta introduced anti-scam tools across WhatsApp, Facebook, and Messenger using AI and alerts to combat online scams.

March 04, 2026 08:00 AM
Is Facebook Marketplace Safe? 12 Tips for Avoiding Scams

Buying and selling used goods online is a great way to make or save a few bucks, but is Facebook Marketplace safe? It pays to be careful.

March 02, 2026 10:49 AM
Vietnam says Facebook violated controversial cybersecurity law

By Khanh Vu HANOI (Reuters) - Facebook has violated Vietnam's new cybersecurity law by allowing users to post anti-government comments on the platform,...

February 20, 2026 08:00 AM
Cyber Stocks Slide as Anthropic Unveils Claude Security Tool

Shares of cybersecurity software companies tumbled Friday after Anthropic PBC introduced a new security feature into its Claude AI model.

February 17, 2026 08:00 AM
Malicious Chrome Extension Steals Facebook Business Manage 2FA Codes and Analytics Data

Malicious Chrome extension steals Facebook Business Manager 2FA codes and analytics data, targeting Meta Business admins and risking account...

February 11, 2026 04:05 PM
Sheriff’s office Facebook hack highlights growing cybersecurity risks

Following the alleged hijacking of the Wood County Sheriff's Office Facebook account by hackers, it may be time to review how secure social media accounts...

January 24, 2026 08:00 AM
149 million passwords for Gmail, Facebook, Instagram, others leaked online

Cybersecurity researcher reveals that a massive 96 GB database was compromised. He also revealed that financial service accounts,...

January 24, 2026 08:00 AM
Gmail passwords in data leak along with Yahoo, Outlook, and Facebook

Gmail passwords have been uncovered in a data leak along with other mailbox providers Yahoo and Outlook and social media sites including...

January 22, 2026 08:00 AM
New ClickFix Campaign Hijacks Facebook Sessions Using Fake Verification Pages

ClickFix campaign steals Facebook session tokens via fake verification pages, using social engineering to target creators.

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

Facebook CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Facebook

The official website of Facebook is https://www.meta.com.

Facebook’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Facebook’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 670, reflecting their Weak security posture.

How many security badges does Facebook’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Facebook currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Facebook been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Facebook has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Facebook have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Facebook is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Facebook have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Facebook does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Facebook comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Facebook is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Facebook have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Facebook does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Facebook comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Facebook is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Facebook have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Facebook is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Facebook

Facebook operates primarily in the Software Development industry.

Number of Employees at Facebook

Facebook employs approximately 24,784 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Facebook

Facebook presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Facebook’s LinkedIn Followers

Facebook’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 406,260 followers.

NAICS Classification of Facebook

Facebook is classified under the NAICS code 5112, which corresponds to Software Publishers.

Facebook’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Facebook does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Facebook’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Facebook maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/facebook.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Facebook

As of April 02, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Facebook has experienced 7 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Facebook has an estimated 29,306 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Facebook ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak, Cyber Attack and Breach.

What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Facebook ?

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $9.06 million.

How does Facebook detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with acronis threat research unit, and communication strategy with public disclosure via the register, communication strategy with research report by acronis..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution

Title: Spam King Cyber Incident

Description: A Las Vegas man called Spam King faced federal fraud charges for allegedly luring Facebook users to third-party websites and collecting personal data for spam list. He tricked people into revealing their login details which he then used to access half a million accounts and used this to send spam to other Facebook users. He also targeted the users with bogus 'friend requests' for distributing spam.

Type: Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution

Attack Vector: PhishingFriend Requests

Vulnerability Exploited: Social Engineering

Threat Actor: Spam King

Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Collection

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Data Breach of myPersonality App on Facebook

Description: Data from millions of Facebook users who used the myPersonality app was left exposed online for anyone to access due to insufficient security provisions.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Insufficient Security Provisions

Vulnerability Exploited: Inadequate data protection measures

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Facebook Data Leak

Description: A threat actor published the phone numbers and account details of about 533 million Facebook users. The leaked data included information that users posted on their profiles including Facebook ID numbers, profile names, email addresses, location information, gender details, and job data. The database also contained phone numbers for all users, information that is not always public for most profiles.

Type: Data Breach

Incident : Data Leak

Title: Facebook Data Leak

Description: A user leaked the phone numbers and personal data of 533 million Facebook users in a hacking forum for free online.

Date Detected: 2021-04-03

Type: Data Leak

Attack Vector: Hacking Forum

Threat Actor: Unknown

Incident : Data Law Breach

Title: Russian Court Fines Facebook for Data Law Breach

Description: Russian court fines social media company Facebook $63,000 over data law breach. Facebook failed to comply with a Russian data law by refusing to put its server holding data about Russian citizens on Russian territory.

Type: Data Law Breach

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Facebook Fined for Privacy Violations in Canada

Description: Facebook is charged with another fine. This time the social network is handing over CAD$9 million (US$6.5 million / £5.3 million) to Canada as part of a settlement. Facebook made false or misleading claims about the privacy of Canadians’ personal information on Facebook and Messenger and improperly shared data with third-party developers. Facebook gave the impression that users could control who could see and access their personal information on the Facebook platform when using privacy features. Facebook also allowed certain third-party developers to access the personal information of users’ friends after they installed certain third-party applications.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Improper Access Control

Vulnerability Exploited: Privacy Controls

Threat Actor: Third-party Developers

Motivation: Data Access

Incident : Malware

Title: FileFix Attack Dropping StealC Infostealer via Fake Facebook Security Alerts

Description: An attack called FileFix masquerades as a Facebook security alert, tricking victims into executing malicious commands that ultimately drop the StealC infostealer and malware downloader. The attack is a variation of ClickFix, a social-engineering technique that surged by 517% in the past six months. Victims are deceived into copying and pasting a command into a file upload window or File Explorer, which executes the payload. The attack uses AI-generated images (e.g., a bucolic house, intricate doors) embedded with PowerShell scripts and encrypted executables to evade detection. The final payload includes a Go-written loader that checks for VM environments before deploying StealC v2, which targets browsers, cryptocurrency wallets, messaging apps, VPNs, and cloud service credentials (Azure, AWS). The campaign has global reach, with submissions from multiple countries, and leverages BitBucket for hosting malicious images to avoid domain-based detection.

Date Detected: 2024-08-late

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-08-late

Type: Malware

Attack Vector: Fake Facebook Security AlertUser-Executed Command via File ExplorerAI-Generated Image PayloadsPowerShell Script Embedding

Vulnerability Exploited: Human Trust (Social Engineering)

Motivation: Data TheftCredential HarvestingFinancial Gain (Potential Ransomware/Fraud)

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Phishing, Friend Requests and Fake Facebook Security Alert PDFUser-Executed Command in File Explorer.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution FAC222223422

Data Compromised: Personal Data, Login Details

Systems Affected: Facebook Accounts

Identity Theft Risk: High

Incident : Data Breach FAC02721722

Data Compromised: Personal details, Psychological test results

Incident : Data Breach FAC2341251122

Data Compromised: Facebook id numbers, Profile names, Email addresses, Location information, Gender details, Job data, Phone numbers

Incident : Data Leak FAC215421222

Data Compromised: Phone numbers, Facebook ids, Full names, Locations, Birthdates, Bios, Email addresses

Incident : Data Law Breach FAC2011201222

Financial Loss: $63,000

Legal Liabilities: Fine

Incident : Data Breach FAC2050291222

Financial Loss: CAD$9 million (US$6.5 million / £5.3 million)

Data Compromised: Personal Information

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Data Compromised: Browser credentials, Cryptocurrency wallet data, Messaging app data (telegram, discord, etc.), Vpn credentials, Cloud service keys (azure, aws), Game launcher credentials

Systems Affected: Windows (User Devices)Potential Enterprise Systems via Stolen Credentials

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential Reputation Damage for Facebook (Abused Brand Trust)

Identity Theft Risk: High (Stolen PII, Credentials, Financial Data)

Payment Information Risk: High (Cryptocurrency Wallets, Payment App Data)

What is the average financial loss per incident ?

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $1.29 million.

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Data, Login Details, Personal Details, Psychological Test Results, , Personal Information, , Phone Numbers, Facebook Ids, Full Names, Locations, Birthdates, Bios, Email Addresses, , Personal Information, Credentials, Session Cookies, Cryptocurrency Wallet Data, Messaging App Data, Vpn Configurations, Cloud Service Keys, Pii (Potential) and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution FAC222223422

Entity Name: Facebook

Entity Type: Social Media Platform

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Size: Large

Customers Affected: 500,000

Incident : Data Breach FAC02721722

Entity Name: Facebook

Entity Type: Social Media Platform

Industry: Technology

Customers Affected: 6000000

Incident : Data Breach FAC2341251122

Entity Name: Facebook

Entity Type: Company

Industry: Social Media

Customers Affected: 533 million

Incident : Data Leak FAC215421222

Entity Name: Meta

Entity Type: Company

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Customers Affected: 533 million

Incident : Data Law Breach FAC2011201222

Entity Name: Facebook

Entity Type: Social Media Company

Industry: Technology

Incident : Data Breach FAC2050291222

Entity Name: Facebook

Entity Type: Social Network

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Size: Large

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Entity Name: Facebook (Brand Abused)

Entity Type: Social Media Platform

Industry: Technology

Location: Global

Customers Affected: Users Worldwide (US, Bangladesh, Philippines, Tunisia, Nepal, Dominican Republic, Serbia, Peru, China, Germany, etc.)

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Entity Name: Individual Victims

Entity Type: End Users

Location: Global (Multi-Country)

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Third Party Assistance: Acronis Threat Research Unit.

Communication Strategy: Public Disclosure via The RegisterResearch Report by Acronis

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Acronis Threat Research Unit, .

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution FAC222223422

Type of Data Compromised: Personal Data, Login Details

Number of Records Exposed: 500,000

Sensitivity of Data: High

Personally Identifiable Information: Yes

Incident : Data Breach FAC02721722

Type of Data Compromised: Personal details, Psychological test results

Number of Records Exposed: 6000000

Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Data Breach FAC2341251122

Type of Data Compromised: Personal information

Number of Records Exposed: 533 million

Personally Identifiable Information: Facebook ID numbersprofile namesemail addresseslocation informationgender detailsjob dataphone numbers

Incident : Data Leak FAC215421222

Type of Data Compromised: Phone numbers, Facebook ids, Full names, Locations, Birthdates, Bios, Email addresses

Number of Records Exposed: 533 million

Incident : Data Breach FAC2050291222

Type of Data Compromised: Personal Information

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Type of Data Compromised: Credentials, Session cookies, Cryptocurrency wallet data, Messaging app data, Vpn configurations, Cloud service keys, Pii (potential)

Sensitivity of Data: High

Data Exfiltration: Likely (StealC Capabilities)

Data Encryption: Partial (Payload Encrypted in Images)

File Types Exposed: JPG (Malicious Images)PowerShell ScriptsExecutables

Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (Browser Autofill, Saved Logins)

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution FAC222223422

Legal Actions: Federal Fraud Charges

Incident : Data Leak FAC215421222

Fines Imposed: €265 million ($275.5 million)

Incident : Data Law Breach FAC2011201222

Regulations Violated: Russian Data Law,

Fines Imposed: $63,000

Incident : Data Breach FAC2050291222

Fines Imposed: CAD$9 million (US$6.5 million / £5.3 million)

How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Federal Fraud Charges.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Lessons Learned: Evolution of social engineering tactics beyond traditional phishing (e.g., user-executed commands via fake file prompts)., Effectiveness of AI-generated imagery in evading detection and luring victims., Rapid weaponization of proof-of-concept (PoC) attacks (75 days from PoC to global campaign)., Need for updated anti-phishing training to address 'Fix'-type attacks (ClickFix/FileFix)., Shift from malicious domains to legitimate platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for payload hosting.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Recommendations: Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs, file upload prompts)., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration).

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Evolution of social engineering tactics beyond traditional phishing (e.g., user-executed commands via fake file prompts).,Effectiveness of AI-generated imagery in evading detection and luring victims.,Rapid weaponization of proof-of-concept (PoC) attacks (75 days from PoC to global campaign).,Need for updated anti-phishing training to address 'Fix'-type attacks (ClickFix/FileFix).,Shift from malicious domains to legitimate platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for payload hosting.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Source: The Register

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Source: Acronis Threat Research Report

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Source: ESET Research (ClickFix/FileFix Surge Data)

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Source: VirusTotal Submissions

URL: https://www.virustotal.com

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: The Register, and Source: Acronis Threat Research Report, and Source: ESET Research (ClickFix/FileFix Surge Data), and Source: VirusTotal SubmissionsUrl: https://www.virustotal.com.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Investigation Status: Ongoing (Active Campaign)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public Disclosure Via The Register and Research Report By Acronis.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Customer Advisories: Acronis Blog/Report (Expected)Potential Facebook Security Notices

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Acronis Blog/Report (Expected), Potential Facebook Security Notices and .

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution FAC222223422

Entry Point: Phishing, Friend Requests

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Entry Point: Fake Facebook Security Alert Pdf, User-Executed Command In File Explorer,

Backdoors Established: Potential (StealC's Secondary Payload Capabilities)

High Value Targets: Cryptocurrency Wallets, Cloud Service Credentials, Enterprise Vpn Access,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Cryptocurrency Wallets, Cloud Service Credentials, Enterprise Vpn Access,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Phishing, Unauthorized Access, Spam Distribution FAC222223422

Root Causes: Social Engineering

Incident : Malware FAC4793447091625

Root Causes: Lack Of User Awareness About 'Fix'-Type Social Engineering., Over-Reliance On Domain Reputation For Detection (Attackers Used Bitbucket)., Effective Evasion Via Image Steganography And Ai-Generated Lures., Rapid Iteration Of Attack Infrastructure (New Variants Deployed Frequently).,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Acronis Threat Research Unit, .

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Spam King, Unknown and Third-party Developers.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2021-04-03.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2024-08-late.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was $63,000.

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal Data, Login Details, Personal details, Psychological test results, , Facebook ID numbers, profile names, email addresses, location information, gender details, job data, phone numbers, , phone numbers, Facebook IDs, full names, locations, birthdates, bios, email addresses, , Personal Information, Browser Credentials, Cryptocurrency Wallet Data, Messaging App Data (Telegram, Discord, etc.), VPN Credentials, Cloud Service Keys (Azure, AWS), Game Launcher Credentials and .

What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Windows (User Devices)Potential Enterprise Systems via Stolen Credentials.

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was acronis threat research unit, .

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Personal details, gender details, job data, Cryptocurrency Wallet Data, Personal Information, Browser Credentials, full names, Facebook ID numbers, Messaging App Data (Telegram, Discord, etc.), Cloud Service Keys (Azure, AWS), Psychological test results, VPN Credentials, email addresses, birthdates, location information, Personal Data, Login Details, Game Launcher Credentials, phone numbers, locations, Facebook IDs, profile names and bios.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 1.1B.

Regulatory Compliance

What was the highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation ?

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was €265 million ($275.5 million), $63,000, CAD$9 million (US$6.5 million / £5.3 million).

What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Federal Fraud Charges.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Shift from malicious domains to legitimate platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for payload hosting.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Enhance email/phishing filters to detect fake social media alerts., Monitor for unusual PowerShell activity originating from image files., Implement behavioral detection for malware using image steganography., Block execution of scripts from temporary directories (e.g., %Temp%)., Deploy endpoint detection for StealC indicators (e.g., targeted app data exfiltration)., Restrict access to file-sharing platforms (e.g., BitBucket) for untrusted sources., Educate users on 'Fix'-style attacks (e.g., fake CAPTCHAs and file upload prompts)..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are VirusTotal Submissions, The Register, Acronis Threat Research Report and ESET Research (ClickFix/FileFix Surge Data).

What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.virustotal.com .

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (Active Campaign).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an Acronis Blog/Report (Expected)Potential Facebook Security Notices.

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an Phishing and Friend Requests.

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Social Engineering, Lack of user awareness about 'Fix'-type social engineering.Over-reliance on domain reputation for detection (attackers used BitBucket).Effective evasion via image steganography and AI-generated lures.Rapid iteration of attack infrastructure (new variants deployed frequently)..

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=facebook' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge