Cox Communications
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
cox-communications
Website:
Employees number:
16,319
Number of followers:
168,430
NAICS:
517
Industry Type:
Homepage:
cox.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
COX_4584382
Scan Status:
In-progress
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
Cox Communications Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score
cox.comCox Communications is committed to creating more moments of real human connection. We bring people closer to family and friends through technology that’s inspired by a culture that puts people first, and we’re always working to improve life in the communities we serve. Our world-class broadband applications and services are helping create smart homes and smart cities that will bring more comfort, convenience, security, entertainment and connectivity to the lives of the people we serve. Our company is full of dreamers and doers; people who make plans and who make things happen. And, of course, people who have fun doing it. In short, people like you. Join the Cox team and make your mark!
Cox Communications A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Cox Communications Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
Cox Communications
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Cox Communications Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Cox Communications
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Cox Communications Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
6
Attack Types
4
OracleCox Enterprises
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Cox Enterprises, a U.S.-based conglomerate with operations in telecommunications, media, and automotive services (e.g., Cox Communications, Autotrader), suffered a sophisticated data breach via a zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle’s E-Business Suite. Hackers, linked to the Cl0p ransomware group, infiltrated the network between August 9–14, 2025, exfiltrating 1.6TB of data including sensitive personal information of 9,479 individuals (names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and internal documents). The breach was detected in late September 2025, with Cl0p leaking the data on the dark web. The attack exploited an unpatched critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.8) allowing unauthorized database access, heightening risks of identity theft, financial fraud, and reputational damage. Oracle released an emergency patch post-breach, but the delay enabled widespread exploitation across other high-profile targets (e.g., The Washington Post, Harvard University). Cox offered affected parties credit monitoring, though long-term risks persist. The incident underscores vulnerabilities in ERP systems, supply chain security gaps, and the escalating threat of ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) campaigns targeting enterprise software.
Cox Enterprises
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Cox Enterprises disclosed a data breach stemming from a zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite, discovered in late September 2024 after hackers breached its network in August. The Cl0p ransomware group claimed responsibility, exploiting the vulnerability before Oracle released a patch on October 5. While the company confirmed exposure of personal data, the specific types of compromised information (e.g., financial, employee, or customer records) were not disclosed. The delayed detection suggests prolonged unauthorized access, though the full scope of the leak including whether sensitive data like SSNs, financial details, or proprietary business information was exfiltrated remains unclear. The incident underscores the risks of third-party software vulnerabilities and the operational gaps in timely threat detection.
Autotrader US
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: In January 2023, 1.4M records from the Autotrader online vehicle marketplace appeared on a popular hacking forum. The data relates to aged listing data that was generally publicly available on our site at the time and open to automated collection methods. The data contained 20k unique email addresses alongside physical addresses and phone numbers of dealers and vehicle details including VIN numbers.
Cox Communications
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region
Description: Cox Communications suffered a cyber attack that caused an internet outage that affected the Tucson region. no customer information was compromised in the attack. however, the Cox says their efforts to stop the attack were the reason for the internet outage.
Cox Communications
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Cox Communications, a large cable company recently suffered a data breach incident in December 2021. The attackers impersonated a Cox agent through a social engineering attack and managed to access the company's customer data. The compromised data includes address, telephone number, Cox account number, usernames, and other personal information of the customers. The company with the help of cyber security experts investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks and notified the affected customers of the breach.
RapidScale, Inc.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: On May 16, 2019, the Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation reported a data breach involving RapidScale, Inc. The breach affected 2 residents and compromised electronic records, specifically credit and debit numbers. This incident highlights the vulnerability of financial information in digital systems and the potential impact on individuals' financial security.
Cox Communications Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Cox Communications
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cox Communications in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cox Communications in 2026.
Incident Types Cox Communications vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cox Communications in 2026.
Incident History — Cox Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cox Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Cox Communications Company Subsidiaries
Cox Communications is committed to creating more moments of real human connection. We bring people closer to family and friends through technology that’s inspired by a culture that puts people first, and we’re always working to improve life in the communities we serve. Our world-class broadband applications and services are helping create smart homes and smart cities that will bring more comfort, convenience, security, entertainment and connectivity to the lives of the people we serve. Our company is full of dreamers and doers; people who make plans and who make things happen. And, of course, people who have fun doing it. In short, people like you. Join the Cox team and make your mark!
Loading...
Cox Communications Similar Companies
Telkom Indonesia
PT Telkom Indonesia (Persero) Tbk (Telkom) is a state-owned information and communications technology enterprise and telecommunications network in Indonesia. The Government of Indonesia is the majority shareholder with 52.09 percent shares while the remaining 47.91 percent shares belong to public sh
Telstra
We believe it’s people who give purpose to our technology. So we’re committed to staying close to our customers and providing them the best experience. And delivering the best tech. On the best network. Because our purpose is to build a connected future so everyone can thrive. We build techno
Free
Trublion historique des Télécoms, Free reste un opérateur pas comme les autres. Nous continuons de nous distinguer de nos concurrents par nos produits, par notre politique tarifaire ou encore par le ton employé avec nos abonnés. Cette différence a aussi construit la grande entreprise que nous somme
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is part of the Telefónica Group and with more than 94 million customers, of which 75 million mobile and 19 million fixed, we are the largest telecommunications company in Brazil, with nationwide presence and a complete, convergent portfolio of products, combining fixed, mobi
Reliance Communications
Reliance Communications Limited, founded by the late Shri Dhirubhai H Ambani (1932-2002), has Corporate clientele that includes 40,000 Indian and multinational corporations, including small and medium enterprises. Reliance Communications has established a pan-India, Next-Generation, digital network
Ooredoo Group
We are an award-winning international communications company operating across the Middle East, North Africa and Southeast Asia. Serving consumers and businesses in 10 countries, we deliver a leading data experience through a broad range of content and services via our advanced, data-centric mob
Bell
We advance how people connect with each other and the world #ConnectionIsEverything. Bell is Canada's largest communications company providing advanced Bell broadband wireless, Internet, TV, media and business communications services. Founded in Montréal in 1880, Bell is wholly owned by BCE Inc. T
PTCL.Official
𝗩𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻: To be the leading and most admired Telecom and ICT provider in and for Pakistan. 𝐌𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧: To be the partner of choice for our customers, to develop our people and to deliver value to our shareholders. 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗽𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲𝘀: Be resilient Think Big Win Every Battle Value Success PTCL is goin
e& UAE
(Formerly etisalat UAE) For more than four decades, we have connected people and now we’ve evolved to become the digital telco of the future. Our mission is to grow, transform and excel as the region’s technology leader while enhancing digital customer experience and operation agility. e& UAE offe
.png)
Cox Communications CyberSecurity News
March 25, 2026 02:36 PM
U.S. Supreme Court Slashes $1 Billion Piracy Verdict Against Cox Communications
In a landmark decision that resets the boundaries of the digital age, the Supreme Court on Wednesday overturned a massive $1 billion...
March 25, 2026 02:45 AM
Local non-profits encouraged to apply for Cox Charities grants
Cox employees in the Gulf Coast Market are encouraging local non-profits to apply for a Cox Charities Community Investment grant of up to $5,000 to fund a...
March 24, 2026 05:56 PM
Cox Communication opens sponsorship applications for Gulf Coast nonprofits
Cox Communications is inviting Gulf Coast nonprofit organizations to apply for sponsorships to support events and initiatives scheduled for the second half...
March 24, 2026 02:33 PM
Cox named fastest U.S. broadband provider by HighSpeedInternet.com
Cox has been ranked as the fastest internet service provider in the United States, according to HighSpeedInternet.com's 2024 annual review.
March 24, 2026 07:38 AM
Cox fiber lines cut in Fort Walton Beach, causing service disruptions
Cox Communications announced that its underground fiber lines in Fort Walton Beach were cut late yesterday, resulting in service disruptions for some...
March 24, 2026 02:23 AM
Cox Communications opens applications for 2026 Community Grants to Gulf Coast nonprofits
The employee-funded program supports youth education, sustainability and equal opportunity initiatives. Ashley Ward · February 16, 2026; 6:08 am...
March 24, 2026 12:20 AM
Cox to host free electronics recycling event Friday in Crestview
Cox Communications will offer Okaloosa and Walton County residents a chance to dispose of small electronic devices responsibly during a free recycling event...
March 23, 2026 06:55 PM
Cox gives more than $2 million to local charities in 2023
Cox Communications donated over $2 million in cash and in-kind donations to Gulf Coast charities and nonprofits in 2023, continuing its long-standing...
February 22, 2026 08:00 AM
Who's Hiring Cybersecurity Professionals in Atlanta, GA in 2026?
Cybersecurity professionals in Atlanta 2026: Discover who's hiring from Delta to defense contractors, with 2026 salary insights and...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Cox Communications CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Cox Communications
The official website of Cox Communications is http://www.cox.com.
Cox Communications’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 754, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Cox Communications’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has Cox Communications been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications has been affected by a supply chain cyber incident involving Oracle, with the incident ID COX53102453112425.
Does Cox Communications have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Cox Communications have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Cox Communications comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Cox Communications have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Cox Communications comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Cox Communications is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Cox Communications have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Cox Communications is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Cox Communications
Cox Communications operates primarily in the Telecommunications industry.
Number of Employees at Cox Communications
Cox Communications employs approximately 16,319 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Cox Communications
Cox Communications presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Cox Communications’s LinkedIn Followers
Cox Communications’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 168,430 followers.
NAICS Classification of Cox Communications
Cox Communications is classified under the NAICS code 517, which corresponds to Telecommunications.
Cox Communications’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, Cox Communications has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/cox-communications.
Cox Communications’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Cox Communications maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cox-communications.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Cox Communications
As of April 02, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Cox Communications has experienced 6 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Cox Communications has an estimated 10,042 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Cox Communications ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware, Data Leak, Cyber Attack and Breach.
How does Cox Communications detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with cyber security experts, and recovery measures with investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks, and communication strategy with notified the affected customers of the breach, and containment measures with efforts to stop the attack, and and communication strategy with public disclosure emphasizing no customer data compromise, and and third party assistance with potential involvement of mandiant (forensic investigation), and containment measures with patch application (oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04), containment measures with network segmentation (assumed), and remediation measures with free credit monitoring for affected individuals, remediation measures with ongoing forensic investigation, and communication strategy with notification letters to affected parties, communication strategy with public disclosure via maine attorney general’s office filing, and network segmentation with recommended (not explicitly confirmed), and enhanced monitoring with recommended (not explicitly confirmed)..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Cox Communications Data Breach
Description: Cox Communications suffered a data breach incident in December 2021 where attackers impersonated a Cox agent through a social engineering attack and accessed customer data.
Date Detected: December 2021
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Vulnerability Exploited: Human vulnerability through impersonation
Title: Cyber Attack on Cox Communications
Description: Cox Communications suffered a cyber attack that caused an internet outage affecting the Tucson region. No customer information was compromised in the attack. The efforts to stop the attack were the reason for the internet outage.
Type: Cyber Attack
Title: Autotrader Data Breach
Description: In January 2023, 1.4 million records from the Autotrader online vehicle marketplace appeared on a popular hacking forum. The data relates to aged listing data that was generally publicly available on our site at the time and open to automated collection methods. The data contained 20,000 unique email addresses alongside physical addresses and phone numbers of dealers and vehicle details including VIN numbers.
Date Detected: 2023-01-01
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Automated Collection Methods
Vulnerability Exploited: Publicly Available Data
Title: RapidScale, Inc. Data Breach
Description: A data breach involving RapidScale, Inc. was reported by the Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation. The breach affected 2 residents and compromised electronic records, specifically credit and debit numbers.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2019-05-16
Type: Data Breach
Title: CrowdStrike Insider Threat Incident
Description: CrowdStrike confirmed that an insider shared screenshots taken on internal systems. The company emphasized that its systems were not breached, and customers’ data was not compromised. The threat group responsible was not specified.
Type: Insider Threat
Attack Vector: Internal (Insider)
Title: The Silent Siege: Cox Enterprises’ Oracle Breach and the Shadowy World of Zero-Day Exploits
Description: Cox Enterprises, a U.S. conglomerate in telecommunications, media, and automotive services, suffered a data breach due to a zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle’s E-Business Suite. The breach, attributed to the Cl0p ransomware group, exposed sensitive personal data of 9,479 individuals, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and other identifiers. The incident occurred between August 9–14, 2025, but was detected in late September. Cl0p leaked 1.6 TB of stolen data on the dark web, and Cox offered affected parties free credit monitoring. The breach highlights vulnerabilities in ERP systems and the risks of delayed patching, with broader implications for supply chain security and regulatory compliance.
Date Detected: 2025-09-01T00:00:00Z
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-09-30T00:00:00Z
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit (CVE-2025-61882)Unauthenticated AccessMulti-Stage Java ImplantsData Exfiltration
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-61882 (Critical Authentication Bypass in Oracle E-Business Suite)
Threat Actor: Cl0p Ransomware Group (alleged)
Motivation: Financial GainData TheftExtortion
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Data Compromised: Address, Telephone number, Cox account number, Usernames, Other personal information
Incident : Cyber Attack COX2035161122
Systems Affected: Internet Services
Downtime: Internet Outage
Operational Impact: Internet Services Disrupted
Incident : Data Breach AUT221524123
Data Compromised: Email addresses, Physical addresses, Phone numbers, Vehicle details including vin numbers
Incident : Data Breach RAP419072225
Data Compromised: Credit and debit numbers
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Data Compromised: Internal screenshots (no customer data)
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational risk due to insider incident
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Dates of birth, Social security numbers, Personal identifiers, Internal documents, Employee records, Customer details
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Business SuiteERP SystemsDatabases
Operational Impact: Potential disruption to HR, financial, and supply chain operations
Brand Reputation Impact: High (potential erosion of customer trust, regulatory scrutiny)
Legal Liabilities: Potential lawsuits (e.g., Bloomberg Law report on Oracle’s liability)Regulatory fines under GDPR/CCPA
Identity Theft Risk: High (9,479 individuals affected)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Address, Telephone Number, Cox Account Number, Usernames, Other Personal Information, , Email Addresses, Physical Addresses, Phone Numbers, Vehicle Details Including Vin Numbers, , credit and debit numbers, Internal screenshots, Pii (Personally Identifiable Information), Internal Documents, Employee Records, Customer Details and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Entity Name: Cox Communications
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Telecommunications
Size: Large
Incident : Cyber Attack COX2035161122
Entity Name: Cox Communications
Entity Type: Telecommunications Company
Industry: Telecommunications
Location: Tucson Region
Incident : Data Breach AUT221524123
Entity Name: Autotrader
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Online Vehicle Marketplace
Incident : Data Breach RAP419072225
Entity Name: RapidScale, Inc.
Entity Type: Company
Customers Affected: 2
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Entity Name: CrowdStrike
Entity Type: Cybersecurity Company
Industry: Technology
Location: Global (HQ: USA)
Customers Affected: None (no customer data compromised)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Entity Name: Cox Enterprises
Entity Type: Conglomerate
Industry: Telecommunications, Media, Automotive Services
Location: United States
Size: 55,000+ employees, $23B+ annual revenue
Customers Affected: 9,479 individuals
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Cyber security experts
Recovery Measures: Investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks
Communication Strategy: Notified the affected customers of the breach
Incident : Cyber Attack COX2035161122
Containment Measures: Efforts to stop the attack
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure emphasizing no customer data compromise
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Potential Involvement Of Mandiant (Forensic Investigation).
Containment Measures: Patch application (Oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04)Network segmentation (assumed)
Remediation Measures: Free credit monitoring for affected individualsOngoing forensic investigation
Communication Strategy: Notification letters to affected partiesPublic disclosure via Maine Attorney General’s Office filing
Network Segmentation: Recommended (not explicitly confirmed)
Enhanced Monitoring: Recommended (not explicitly confirmed)
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Cyber security experts, Potential involvement of Mandiant (forensic investigation), .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Type of Data Compromised: Address, Telephone number, Cox account number, Usernames, Other personal information
Incident : Data Breach AUT221524123
Type of Data Compromised: Email addresses, Physical addresses, Phone numbers, Vehicle details including vin numbers
Number of Records Exposed: 1,400,000
Incident : Data Breach RAP419072225
Type of Data Compromised: credit and debit numbers
Number of Records Exposed: 2
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Type of Data Compromised: Internal screenshots
Sensitivity of Data: Moderate (internal systems)
File Types Exposed: Screenshots
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Type of Data Compromised: Pii (personally identifiable information), Internal documents, Employee records, Customer details
Number of Records Exposed: 9,479 individuals
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes SSNs, dates of birth, addresses)
Data Exfiltration: 1.6 TB of data leaked on the dark web
File Types Exposed: DatabasesDocumentsHR/Employee Records
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Free credit monitoring for affected individuals, Ongoing forensic investigation, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by efforts to stop the attack, patch application (oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04), network segmentation (assumed) and .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks.
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Regulations Violated: Potential GDPR (EU), CCPA (California), State breach notification laws (e.g., Maine),
Legal Actions: Potential lawsuits (e.g., against Oracle for delayed patching),
Regulatory Notifications: Maine Attorney General’s Office filingCISA alerts for related vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61757)
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Potential lawsuits (e.g., against Oracle for delayed patching), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Lessons Learned: Zero-day exploits in ERP systems pose severe risks due to their central role in operations., Delayed detection (weeks between breach and discovery) exacerbates impact., Supply chain vulnerabilities (e.g., Oracle software) require proactive patch management., Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) models enable scalable, sophisticated attacks., Public disclosure strategies must balance transparency with investigative integrity.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Recommendations: Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Zero-day exploits in ERP systems pose severe risks due to their central role in operations.,Delayed detection (weeks between breach and discovery) exacerbates impact.,Supply chain vulnerabilities (e.g., Oracle software) require proactive patch management.,Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) models enable scalable, sophisticated attacks.,Public disclosure strategies must balance transparency with investigative integrity.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering. and Network segmentation to limit lateral movement..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach RAP419072225
Source: Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation
Date Accessed: 2019-05-16
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Source: BleepingComputer
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Source: BleepingComputer
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Source: Maine Attorney General’s Office (Breach Notification)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business RegulationDate Accessed: 2019-05-16, and Source: BleepingComputer, and Source: BleepingComputerUrl: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com, and Source: SecurityWeekUrl: https://www.securityweek.com, and Source: The Hacker NewsUrl: https://thehackernews.com, and Source: TechRadarUrl: https://www.techradar.com, and Source: Bloomberg LawUrl: https://news.bloomberglaw.com, and Source: Maine Attorney General’s Office (Breach Notification), and Source: CISA AlertsUrl: https://www.cisa.gov, and Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach ReportUrl: https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Investigation Status: Confirmed (insider incident)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Investigation Status: Ongoing (forensic investigation, potential third-party involvement)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Notified the affected customers of the breach, Public disclosure emphasizing no customer data compromise, Notification Letters To Affected Parties and Public Disclosure Via Maine Attorney General’S Office Filing.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Customer Advisories: No customer data compromised
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Stakeholder Advisories: Notification Letters To Affected Individuals, Public Statements Via Regulatory Filings.
Customer Advisories: Free credit monitoring offered to affected parties
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were No customer data compromised, Notification Letters To Affected Individuals, Public Statements Via Regulatory Filings and Free credit monitoring offered to affected parties.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Entry Point: Zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite
Reconnaissance Period: Potentially since July 2025 (part of broader Cl0p campaign)
Backdoors Established: ['Multi-stage Java implants']
High Value Targets: Erp Databases, Hr Systems, Financial Records,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Erp Databases, Hr Systems, Financial Records,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Root Causes: Insider threat (unauthorized screenshot sharing)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Root Causes: Unpatched Zero-Day Vulnerability (Cve-2025-61882) In Oracle E-Business Suite., Delayed Detection (Weeks Between Intrusion And Discovery)., Lack Of Proactive Threat Hunting For Erp-Specific Attacks., Potential Gaps In Network Segmentation Or Access Controls.,
Corrective Actions: Applied Oracle’S Emergency Patch (2025-10-04)., Enhanced Monitoring For Erp Systems., Review Of Third-Party Software Patching Policies., Potential Restructuring Of Incident Response Protocols To Reduce Detection Lag.,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Cyber security experts, Potential Involvement Of Mandiant (Forensic Investigation), , Recommended (not explicitly confirmed).
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Applied Oracle’S Emergency Patch (2025-10-04)., Enhanced Monitoring For Erp Systems., Review Of Third-Party Software Patching Policies., Potential Restructuring Of Incident Response Protocols To Reduce Detection Lag., .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Cl0p Ransomware Group (alleged).
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on December 2021.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-09-30T00:00:00Z.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Address, Telephone number, Cox account number, Usernames, Other personal information, , Email addresses, Physical addresses, Phone numbers, Vehicle details including VIN numbers, , credit and debit numbers, , Internal screenshots (no customer data), Names, Addresses, Dates of Birth, Social Security Numbers, Personal Identifiers, Internal Documents, Employee Records, Customer Details and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Oracle E-Business SuiteERP SystemsDatabases.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was Cyber security experts, potential involvement of mandiant (forensic investigation), .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Efforts to stop the attack and Patch application (Oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04)Network segmentation (assumed).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Addresses, Social Security Numbers, Address, Vehicle details including VIN numbers, credit and debit numbers, Phone numbers, Employee Records, Internal screenshots (no customer data), Usernames, Internal Documents, Cox account number, Names, Customer Details, Other personal information, Dates of Birth, Telephone number, Physical addresses, Personal Identifiers and Email addresses.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 1.4M.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Potential lawsuits (e.g., against Oracle for delayed patching), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Public disclosure strategies must balance transparency with investigative integrity.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering. and Network segmentation to limit lateral movement..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Bloomberg Law, SecurityWeek, BleepingComputer, The Hacker News, Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, CISA Alerts, IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report, TechRadar and Maine Attorney General’s Office (Breach Notification).
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.bleepingcomputer.com, https://www.securityweek.com, https://thehackernews.com, https://www.techradar.com, https://news.bloomberglaw.com, https://www.cisa.gov, https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Confirmed (insider incident).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Notification letters to affected individuals, Public statements via regulatory filings, .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an No customer data compromised and Free credit monitoring offered to affected parties.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite.
What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was Potentially since July 2025 (part of broader Cl0p campaign).
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Insider threat (unauthorized screenshot sharing), Unpatched zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite.Delayed detection (weeks between intrusion and discovery).Lack of proactive threat hunting for ERP-specific attacks.Potential gaps in network segmentation or access controls..
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Applied Oracle’s emergency patch (2025-10-04).Enhanced monitoring for ERP systems.Review of third-party software patching policies.Potential restructuring of incident response protocols to reduce detection lag..
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
A vulnerability was found in Nothings stb up to 1.26. Impacted is the function stbtt_InitFont_internal in the library stb_truetype.h of the component TTF File Handler. Performing a manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read in VS6ComFile!get_macro_mem_COM. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain a stack-based buffer overflow in VS6ComFile!CSaveData::_conv_AnimationItem. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to arbitrary code execution on the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6MemInIF!set_temp_type_default. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6ComFile!load_link_inf. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=cox-communications' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
