Columbia University
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
columbia-university
Website:
Employees number:
23,329
Number of followers:
740,462
NAICS:
6113
Industry Type:
Homepage:
columbia.edu
IP Addresses:
614
Company ID:
COL_3351048
Scan Status:
Completed
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
Columbia University Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score
columbia.eduFor more than 250 years, Columbia has been a leader in higher education in the nation and around the world. At the core of our wide range of academic inquiry is the commitment to attract and engage the best minds in pursuit of greater human understanding, pioneering new discoveries and service to society.
Columbia University A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Columbia University Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
Columbia University
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Columbia University Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Columbia University
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Columbia University Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
OracleDartmouth College, Harvard University, Princeton University, Columbia University and Clemson University: Why Cyberattacks in Higher Ed Keep Proliferating
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Higher Education Under Siege: A Wave of Cyberattacks Exposes Systemic Vulnerabilities In the first half of 2025, a surge of cyberattacks has targeted major U.S. universities, exposing critical weaknesses in higher education’s cybersecurity defenses. The University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, and Princeton University all reported breaches within the past two months, following earlier incidents at Columbia University, Dartmouth College, and New York University. Each institution confirmed the attacks stemmed from social engineering, with Harvard and Princeton specifically citing phone-based phishing as the entry point. Officials at the affected schools stated they acted swiftly to contain the breaches and are reinforcing security measures. However, experts warn that universities face an uphill battle. Mike Corn, a former chief information security officer in higher education and current consultant at Vantage Technology, noted that colleges operate like "small cities," with decentralized networks, personal devices, and diverse user behaviors creating countless vulnerabilities. Even robust investments in cybersecurity, he argued, cannot guarantee immunity from attacks especially as AI-driven threats grow more sophisticated. The challenges extend beyond technology. Brian Nichols, CIO at the University of Kentucky, highlighted that while phishing simulations and training have improved awareness, they are not foolproof. Anita Nikolich, director of research and technology innovation at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, warned that punitive security measures can backfire, alienating faculty who may resist protocols perceived as restrictive. A core tension lies in academic freedom versus centralized IT control: many universities allow individual departments such as medical or business schools to maintain separate IT teams, increasing risk. Nikolich, who previously led IT infrastructure at the University of Chicago, described this fragmentation as a "huge risk factor," as decentralized systems complicate consistent security enforcement. Faculty resistance further complicates the issue. Janice Lanham, a nursing lecturer at Clemson University, nearly fell victim to a phishing scam but caught the deception in time. Yet, as Brian Voss, Clemson’s CIO, observed, some professors view security protocols as obstacles to research and teaching. Voss described a "culture of subservience" in higher-ed IT, where departments prioritize faculty demands over security, often retaining excessive data including sensitive information like Social Security numbers despite the risks. His efforts to reduce data storage have met resistance, with one university even retaining personal data for voter registration purposes, creating what he called "piles of gold for bad guys." The conflict between research needs and security is particularly acute. Nikolich, who also conducts quantum computing research, faced initial pushback when requesting network data for her work. After demonstrating the data’s non-sensitive nature and potential security benefits, she gained access but noted that other universities default to blanket denials. When researchers are blocked, she warned, they often bypass official channels, increasing exposure. The solution, Nikolich suggested, lies in collaboration: IT, security teams, and faculty must treat cybersecurity as a shared priority, balancing innovation with protection. Until then, universities remain prime targets caught between the demands of open academic environments and the escalating sophistication of cyber threats.
Columbia University Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Columbia University
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)
Columbia University has 45.05% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Columbia University has 13.79% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types Columbia University vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Columbia University reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — Columbia University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Columbia University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Columbia University Company Subsidiaries
For more than 250 years, Columbia has been a leader in higher education in the nation and around the world. At the core of our wide range of academic inquiry is the commitment to attract and engage the best minds in pursuit of greater human understanding, pioneering new discoveries and service to society.
Loading...
Columbia University Similar Companies
Florida International University
FIU is Miami's public research university. Offering bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees, both on campus and fully online. Designated a Preeminent State Research University, FIU emphasizes research as a major component in the university's mission. For more than 50 years, FIU has positioned
University of Utah
The University of Utah, located in Salt Lake City in the foothills of the Wasatch Mountains, is the flagship institution of higher learning in Utah. Founded in 1850, it serves over 31,000 students from across the U.S. and the world. With over 72 major subjects at the undergraduate level and more tha
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Página oficial. La Universidad Nacional de Colombia fue creada en 1867 por medio de la expedición de la Ley 66 del Congreso de la República, como un ente universitario con plena autonomía vinculado al Ministerio de Educación Nacional, con régimen especial, de carácter público y perteneciente al Esta
USP - Universidade de São Paulo
A Universidade de São Paulo (USP) é uma universidade pública, mantida pelo Estado de São Paulo e ligada à Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Econômico, Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (SDECTI). O talento e dedicação dos docentes, alunos e funcionários têm sido reconhecidos por diferentes rankings mundiais
New York University
Founded in 1831, NYU is one of the world’s foremost research universities and is a member of the selective Association of American Universities. The first Global Network University, NYU has degree-granting university campuses in New York and Abu Dhabi, and has announced a third in Shanghai; has a do
Kansas State University
Kansas State University, often referred to as K-State, is an institution of higher learning located in Manhattan, Kansas, in the United States. A branch campus, including the College of Technology and Aviation, is located in Salina, Kansas. A third campus, K-State Olathe, officially opened on Apri
Stanford University
Stanford is a place of discovery, creativity and innovation located in the San Francisco Bay Area on the ancestral land of the Muwekma Ohlone Tribe. Dedicated to our founding mission—benefitting society through research and education—we are working toward a sustainable future, accelerating the impac
North Carolina State University
With more than 34,000 students and 7,000 faculty and staff, North Carolina State University is a comprehensive university known for its leadership in education and research, and globally recognized for its science, technology, engineering and mathematics leadership. NC State students, faculty and
Uppsala University
Uppsala University strives to bring new perspectives to the basic questions of science as well as knowledge contributing to sustainable development and human health. We offer 39 different master programmes covering over 60 different specialisations. In Uppsala you walk in the gardens of Linnaeus, fo
.png)
Columbia University CyberSecurity News
March 31, 2026 06:06 PM
A Faculty Perspective: Preparing to Study Cyber at SIPA
There's nothing better than when we have a celebrity sub-in for a blog post! Welcome, Jason Healey! One of SIPA's extraordinary faculty...
March 03, 2026 08:00 AM
U. Hawaii Cancer Center confirms data compromised
A ransomware attack last year has reportedly caused the personal information of more than 1 million people to have been compromised.
February 24, 2026 08:00 AM
Top 7 CTO and Cybersecurity Leadership Programs to Build Resilient Operations Skills in 2026
The professional landscape for technology leaders is undergoing a seismic shift as we approach 2026. With the global cybersecurity workforce...
February 20, 2026 08:00 AM
Cyberattack disrupts care at University of Mississippi Medical Center
The medical center canceled all elective procedures and shut off many systems, reverting to paper-based processes to keep emergency care...
February 11, 2026 12:54 PM
The Deepfake Scam Era Is Upon Us. Here’s How to Get Ready.
If you've fallen for an online scam or hack recently, you're far from alone. Experts say that both the volume and sophistication of online attacks are...
January 12, 2026 08:00 AM
Columbia University warns community about personal information stolen months after ‘politically motivated’ hack
The hack came during the summer of 2025, when Columbia was negotiating with the Trump administration to restore hundreds of millions of...
January 07, 2026 11:27 AM
Executive Webinar Series
Bringing Cutting-Edge Faculty Expertise and Policy Insights on Today's Most Urgent Global Challenges to Leaders Around the World.
January 06, 2026 08:00 AM
Updating Our Community on 2025 Cyber Incident
On July 2, 2025, we informed the Columbia University community that an unauthorized party had accessed our network, stolen data,...
December 19, 2025 08:00 AM
Lawsuits filed against University after cybersecurity incidents
Multiple lawsuits have been filed against Princeton in the wake of a widespread cybersecurity breach.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Columbia University CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Columbia University
The official website of Columbia University is http://columbia.edu.
Columbia University’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 752, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Columbia University’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has Columbia University been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University has been affected by a supply chain cyber incident involving Oracle, with the incident ID DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845.
Does Columbia University have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Columbia University have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Columbia University comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Columbia University have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Columbia University comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Columbia University is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Columbia University have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Columbia University is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Columbia University
Columbia University operates primarily in the Higher Education industry.
Number of Employees at Columbia University
Columbia University employs approximately 23,329 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Columbia University
Columbia University presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Columbia University’s LinkedIn Followers
Columbia University’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 740,462 followers.
NAICS Classification of Columbia University
Columbia University is classified under the NAICS code 6113, which corresponds to Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools.
Columbia University’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Columbia University does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Columbia University’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Columbia University maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/columbia-university.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Columbia University
As of April 02, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Columbia University has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Columbia University has an estimated 15,823 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Columbia University ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
How does Columbia University detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with yes, and containment measures with removed hackers' access to internal systems, and remediation measures with stepped up security protocols, and communication strategy with public statements to stakeholders..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Multiple University Data Breaches Due to Social Engineering Attacks
Description: In the past two months, the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, and Princeton University have fallen victim to data breaches attributed to social engineering attacks, specifically phone-based phishing. Earlier in 2025, Columbia University, Dartmouth College, and New York University also experienced similar incidents. These breaches highlight vulnerabilities in higher education cybersecurity infrastructure.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering (Phone-based Phishing)
Vulnerability Exploited: Human error, lack of centralized IT control, decentralized IT departments
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Phone-based phishing (social engineering).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Data Compromised: Personal data of students, faculty, and staff
Systems Affected: Internal university systems
Operational Impact: Disruption of university operations, increased security protocols
Brand Reputation Impact: Reputational damage to affected universities
Identity Theft Risk: High (potential exposure of personally identifiable information)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal data and potentially including personally identifiable information.
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: University of Pennsylvania
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: Harvard University
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: Princeton University
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: Columbia University
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: Dartmouth College
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entity Name: New York University
Entity Type: University
Industry: Higher Education
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Thousands of students, faculty, and staff
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes
Containment Measures: Removed hackers' access to internal systems
Remediation Measures: Stepped up security protocols
Communication Strategy: Public statements to stakeholders
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes.
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Type of Data Compromised: Personal data, potentially including personally identifiable information
Sensitivity of Data: High (personal and potentially sensitive information)
Personally Identifiable Information: Likely (e.g., Social Security numbers, payroll data)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Stepped up security protocols.
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by removed hackers' access to internal systems.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Lessons Learned: Universities are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks due to decentralized IT structures, lack of centralized control, and human error. Cybersecurity training and awareness are critical but not sufficient alone. There is a need for better collaboration between IT departments and faculty to balance security with academic freedom.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Recommendations: Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs, focusing on non-punitive approaches., Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Universities are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks due to decentralized IT structures, lack of centralized control, and human error. Cybersecurity training and awareness are critical but not sufficient alone. There is a need for better collaboration between IT departments and faculty to balance security with academic freedom.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Source: Chronicle of Higher Education
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Chronicle of Higher Education.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Investigation Status: Ongoing
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public statements to stakeholders.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Stakeholder Advisories: Universities have issued public statements to stakeholders about the breaches and steps taken to mitigate risks.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: was Universities have issued public statements to stakeholders about the breaches and steps taken to mitigate risks..
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Entry Point: Phone-based phishing (social engineering)
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach DARHARPRICOLCLE1767881845
Root Causes: Human Error (Falling For Phishing Attacks), Decentralized It Departments Creating Inconsistent Security Protocols, Lack Of Centralized Control Over Technology Use, Excessive Data Retention (E.G., Storing Social Security Numbers Unnecessarily), Faculty Resistance To It Policies Due To Perceived Restrictions On Academic Freedom,
Corrective Actions: Removing Hackers' Access To Systems, Stepping Up Security Protocols, Enhancing Cybersecurity Training For Faculty And Staff,
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Removing Hackers' Access To Systems, Stepping Up Security Protocols, Enhancing Cybersecurity Training For Faculty And Staff, .
Additional Questions
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal data of students, faculty and and staff.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Removed hackers' access to internal systems.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Personal data of students, faculty and and staff.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Universities are highly vulnerable to cyberattacks due to decentralized IT structures, lack of centralized control, and human error. Cybersecurity training and awareness are critical but not sufficient alone. There is a need for better collaboration between IT departments and faculty to balance security with academic freedom.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Limit data retention to reduce the risk of exposure (e.g., avoid storing unnecessary sensitive data like Social Security numbers)., Adopt adaptive security measures like behavioral WAFs and enhanced monitoring to detect and respond to threats more effectively., Foster partnerships between IT, security teams, and faculty to align research needs with cybersecurity protocols., Implement more centralized IT control to reduce vulnerabilities from decentralized departments., Enhance cybersecurity training and awareness programs and focusing on non-punitive approaches..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is Chronicle of Higher Education.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Universities have issued public statements to stakeholders about the breaches and steps taken to mitigate risks., .
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Phone-based phishing (social engineering).
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
A vulnerability was found in Nothings stb up to 1.26. Impacted is the function stbtt_InitFont_internal in the library stb_truetype.h of the component TTF File Handler. Performing a manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read in VS6ComFile!get_macro_mem_COM. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain a stack-based buffer overflow in VS6ComFile!CSaveData::_conv_AnimationItem. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to arbitrary code execution on the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6MemInIF!set_temp_type_default. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6ComFile!load_link_inf. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=columbia-university' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
