幣託集團 BitoGroup Company Cyber Security Posture
bitopro.com幣託集團（BitoGroup）成立於2014年，致力於用最簡單的方式讓區塊鏈進入每個人的日常生活，並協助企業與消費者進入Web3時代。幣託集團致力於運用區塊鏈和高頻交易技術，積極打造創新的金融基礎設施。集團旗下擁有多元化業務，包括BitoPro加密貨幣交易所、NFT賦能平台BELS，以及O2 META。 BitoPro為全臺第一家安全、穩定且易於使用的加密貨幣交易所，BitoPro提供加密貨幣錢包和交易所的區塊鏈服務。此外，亦支援在超商購買或點數兌換加密貨幣。BitoPro支援多種主流幣種，如ETH（以太幣）、USDT（泰達幣）、DOGE（狗狗幣）、BTC（比特幣），並提供新臺幣出入金服務。 Founded in 2014, BitoGroup aims to use blockchain technology to achieve the goal of inclusive finance, including assisting companies and consumers to enter the new era of Web3. The businesses of the group include BitoPro (a cryptocurrency exchange), BELS (an NFT empowerment platform), and O2 META (a metaverse-focused social media platform). BitoPro is Taiwan's first secure, stable, and user-friendly cryptocurrency exchange, offering blockchain services for both cryptocurrency wallets and exchanges. Furthermore, it also supports purchasing cryptocurrencies or "Points-to-Crypto" service. BitoPro supports various major cryptocurrencies such as ETH, USDT, DOGE, and BTC, and offers New Taiwan Dollar deposit and withdrawal services.
幣託集團 BitoGroup Company Details
bitogroup
76 employees
1467.0
52
Financial Services
bitopro.com
Scan still pending
幣託集_6172995
In-progress
幣託集團 BitoGroup Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
幣託集團 BitoGroup Global Score.png)
幣託集團 BitoGroup Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
幣託集團 BitoGroup Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BitoPro | Cyber Attack | 85 | 4 | 6/2025 | BIT301062025 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: The Taiwanese cryptocurrency exchange BitoPro experienced a cyberattack by the North Korean hacking group Lazarus, resulting in the theft of $11,000,000 worth of cryptocurrency. The attack occurred during a hot wallet system update, allowing hackers to perform unauthorized withdrawals across multiple blockchains. The stolen funds were laundered through DEXs and mixers. BitoPro's investigation confirmed no internal involvement, but attackers used social engineering and malware to hijack AWS session tokens and gain control over the cloud infrastructure. The company detected the compromise and shut down the hot wallet system, but the theft had already occurred. | |||||||
幣託集團 BitoGroup Company Subsidiaries
幣託集團（BitoGroup）成立於2014年，致力於用最簡單的方式讓區塊鏈進入每個人的日常生活，並協助企業與消費者進入Web3時代。幣託集團致力於運用區塊鏈和高頻交易技術，積極打造創新的金融基礎設施。集團旗下擁有多元化業務，包括BitoPro加密貨幣交易所、NFT賦能平台BELS，以及O2 META。 BitoPro為全臺第一家安全、穩定且易於使用的加密貨幣交易所，BitoPro提供加密貨幣錢包和交易所的區塊鏈服務。此外，亦支援在超商購買或點數兌換加密貨幣。BitoPro支援多種主流幣種，如ETH（以太幣）、USDT（泰達幣）、DOGE（狗狗幣）、BTC（比特幣），並提供新臺幣出入金服務。 Founded in 2014, BitoGroup aims to use blockchain technology to achieve the goal of inclusive finance, including assisting companies and consumers to enter the new era of Web3. The businesses of the group include BitoPro (a cryptocurrency exchange), BELS (an NFT empowerment platform), and O2 META (a metaverse-focused social media platform). BitoPro is Taiwan's first secure, stable, and user-friendly cryptocurrency exchange, offering blockchain services for both cryptocurrency wallets and exchanges. Furthermore, it also supports purchasing cryptocurrencies or "Points-to-Crypto" service. BitoPro supports various major cryptocurrencies such as ETH, USDT, DOGE, and BTC, and offers New Taiwan Dollar deposit and withdrawal services.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
幣託集團 BitoGroup Cyber Security News
DARPA Calls on Industry to Assist With Improving, Strengthening DOD Cybersecurity
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency announced a Resilient Software Systems Accelerator program to kick-start the widespread ...
Are cybersecurity stocks a new safety trade? What the Israel-Iran conflict shows
CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks held up better than the overall market and software peers over the past three days.
The 10 Hottest Cybersecurity Tools And Products Of 2025 (So Far)
The hottest cybersecurity products of 2025 so far include AI-powered tools and agentic capabilities from Zscaler, CrowdStrike, ...
The 6 biggest cybersecurity breaches of 2025 so far
With half of 2025 left to go, Mashable takes a look at the biggest data breaches to be aware of in 2025 — so far. The Coinbase bribes and ransom.
The highest-paying jobs in cybersecurity today
After security architects, security engineers receive the second-highest annual cash compensation ($191,000), with a base salary of $168,000.
Trump-appointed FCC chairman probes Biden cybersecurity program over China concerns
Trump-appointed FCC chairman is probing Biden's U.S. Cyber Trust Mark program to examine national security risks posed by the lead ...
Jamaican government to set up elite cybersecurity unit
The Government of Jamaica plans to bolster its cybersecurity defences with the creation of a cyber incident response team and a security ...
DSU cybersecurity clinic helps students, small businesses
The clinic allows DSU students to work hands-on with small businesses. It also supports those businesses which might not have the money to hire ...
16 billion passwords exposed in record-breaking data breach: are you affected?
16 billion passwords exposed in record-breaking data breach, opening access to Facebook, Google, Apple, and any other service imaginable.
幣託集團 BitoGroup Similar Companies
Navy Federal Credit Union
Navy Federal is the world’s largest credit union, with more than 14 million members, $180 billion+ in assets and 24,000+ employees. Throughout campuses in Vienna, VA Pensacola, FL and Winchester, VA, as well as more than 360 branches, we serve the Armed Forces, Department of Defense, Veterans and th
Swedbank
Since 1820 Swedbank has been the bank for the many households and businesses. We are a modern financial services platform focused on customer satisfaction. Our goal is to encourage people to save for a better future and we aim to help people, businesses and society to grow by promoting a healthy and
Aon
We exist to shape decisions for the better — to protect and enrich the lives of people around the world. Through actionable analytic insight, globally integrated Risk Capital and Human Capital expertise, and locally relevant solutions, our colleagues provide clients in over 120 countries with the cl
ECOVIS International
Ecovis is a leading global consulting firm with its origins in Continental Europe. It has over 12,000 people operating more than 90 countries. Its consulting focus and core competencies lie in the areas of tax consultation, accounting, auditing and legal advice. The particular strength of Ecovis is
Ullink - now part of Broadridge Trading and Connectivity Solutions
Ullink is now part of Broadridge. Broadridge Financial Solutions (NYSE: BR), a global Fintech leader with $5 billion in revenues, provides the critical infrastructure that powers investing, corporate governance, and communications to enable better financial lives. We deliver technology-driven sol
Fidelity Investments
Fidelity’s mission is to strengthen the financial well-being of our customers and deliver better outcomes for the clients and businesses we serve. Fidelity’s strength comes from the scale of our diversified, market-leading financial services businesses that serve individuals, families, employers, we
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
幣託集團 BitoGroup CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, 幣託集團 BitoGroup has faced 1 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as 幣託集團（BitoGroup）成立於2014年，致力於用最簡單的方式讓區塊鏈進入每個人的日常生活，並協助企業與消費者進入Web3時代。幣託集團致力於運用區塊鏈和高頻交易技術，積極打造創新的金融基礎設施。集團旗下擁有多元化業務，包括BitoPro加密貨幣交易所、NFT賦能平台BELS，以及O2 META。 BitoPro為全臺第一家安全、穩定且易於使用的加密貨幣交易所，BitoPro提供加密貨幣錢包和交易所的區塊鏈服務。此外，亦支援在超商購買或點數兌換加密貨幣。BitoPro支援多種主流幣種，如ETH（以太幣）、USDT（泰達幣）、DOGE（狗狗幣）、BTC（比特幣），並提供新臺幣出入金服務。 Founded in 2014, BitoGroup aims to use blockchain technology to achieve the goal of inclusive finance, including assisting companies and consumers to enter the new era of Web3. The businesses of the group include BitoPro (a cryptocurrency exchange), BELS (an NFT empowerment platform), and O2 META (a metaverse-focused social media platform). BitoPro is Taiwan's first secure, stable, and user-friendly cryptocurrency exchange, offering blockchain services for both cryptocurrency wallets and exchanges. Furthermore, it also supports purchasing cryptocurrencies or "Points-to-Crypto" service. BitoPro supports various major cryptocurrencies such as ETH, USDT, DOGE, and BTC, and offers New Taiwan Dollar deposit and withdrawal services..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
