Comparison Overview

Beckman Coulter Diagnostics

VS

Stryker

Beckman Coulter Diagnostics

250 S Kraemer Blvd, Brea, California, US, 92821
Last Update: 2026-04-03

A global leader in advanced diagnostics, Beckman Coulter has challenged convention to elevate the diagnostic laboratory’s role in improving patient health for more than 80 years. Our mission is to Relentlessly Reimagine Healthcare, One Diagnosis at a Time – and we do this by applying the power of science, technology and the passion and creativity of our teams. Our diagnostic solutions are used in complex clinical testing, and are found in hospitals, reference laboratories and physician office settings around the globe. We exist to deliver smarter, faster diagnostic solutions that move the needle forward from what’s now to what’s next. We do this by accelerating care with an extensive clinical menu, scalable lab automation technologies, insightful clinical informatics, and optimize lab performance services. Headquartered in Brea, Calif., Beckman Coulter Diagnostics has more than 11,000 global team members. Beckman Coulter is proud to be part of Danaher. Danaher is a global science and technology leader. Together we combine our capabilities to accelerate the real-life impact of tomorrow’s science and technology to improve human health.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 10,608
Subsidiaries: 67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stryker

2825 Airview Boulevard, Kalamazoo, MI, US, 49002
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 650 and 699

Stryker is a global leader in medical technologies and, together with our customers, we are driven to make healthcare better. We offer innovative products and services in MedSurg, Neurotechnology and Orthopaedics that help improve patient and healthcare outcomes. Alongside its customers around the world, Stryker impacts more than 150 million patients annually. More information is available at stryker.com and careers.stryker.com. Facts: ● 2024 Sales: $22.6 billion ● Industry: Medical Instruments & Supplies ● Employees: 53,000 worldwide ● 40 years of sales growth leading up to 2020 ● 44+ Manufacturing and R&D Locations Worldwide ● $1.5 billion spent on research and development in 2024 ● ~14,200 patents owned globally in 2024 ● Products sold in ~75 countries ● Fortune 500 Company ● 7 consecutive years as one of Fortune's World's Best Workplaces Stryker’s social media community guidelines: https://www.stryker.com/content/m/legal/social-media-community-guidelines/en/index.html Notice Regarding Employee Conduct on Facebook/LinkedIn Meta/LinkedIn does not permit employers to verify or validate “employees” in the (META: “Works at” LinkedIn: “Experience”) section of users’ profiles. Please be aware that the views expressed by individuals on their personal accounts and do not necessarily represent the views of our company. If you encounter any issues with a person claiming to be our employee, we recommend using the “Report Profile” feature. If you’d like to report concerns to our Ethics Hotline, you may do so at: https://app.convercent.com/en-us/LandingPage/b6bb4e84-9fcb-ea11-a974-000d3ab9f296

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 50,225
Subsidiaries: 25
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beckman-coulter.jpeg
Beckman Coulter Diagnostics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stryker.jpeg
Stryker
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Beckman Coulter Diagnostics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stryker
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beckman Coulter Diagnostics in 2026.

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Stryker has 581.82% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Beckman Coulter Diagnostics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beckman Coulter Diagnostics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stryker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stryker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beckman-coulter.jpeg
Beckman Coulter Diagnostics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stryker.jpeg
Stryker
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Personal Email Compromise
Motivation: Retaliation for U.S.-Iran conflict, Response to FBI's $10 million bounty
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Breach
Motivation: Extortion (response demanded by March 19)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Politically motivated (suspected state-backed cyber sabotage)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stryker company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Stryker company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company has not reported any.

In the current year, Stryker company has reported more cyber incidents than Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company.

Neither Stryker company nor Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Stryker company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Stryker company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company nor Stryker company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Beckman Coulter Diagnostics nor Stryker holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Stryker company.

Stryker company employs more people globally than Beckman Coulter Diagnostics company, reflecting its scale as a Medical Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Beckman Coulter Diagnostics nor Stryker holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Beckman Coulter Diagnostics nor Stryker holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Beckman Coulter Diagnostics nor Stryker holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Beckman Coulter Diagnostics nor Stryker holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Beckman Coulter Diagnostics nor Stryker holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Beckman Coulter Diagnostics nor Stryker holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H