BARMER Company Cyber Security Posture

barmer.de

Wir sind eine der größten Krankenversicherungen in Deutschland und es gibt viele Gründe, bei uns zu arbeiten. Aber eines haben unsere rund 16.000 Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter gemeinsam: Wer bei uns arbeitet, setzt sich täglich für die Gesundheit von Millionen von Menschen ein. Weil wir helfen, gesünder zu leben, bei Krankheit die bestmögliche Versorgung sicherstellen und bei Vorsorge unterstützen. Mit diesem Anspruch entwickeln wir uns weiter. Hin zu einem dynamischen Unternehmen in einem digitalen Markt, mit Freiraum für neue Impulse und gesellschaftlicher Verantwortung. Unsere besondere Kultur macht es möglich: Wir stehen füreinander ein, über Standorte, Fachrichtungen und Karrierelevel hinweg. Wir arbeiten miteinander, denn nur gemeinsam können wir das höchste Gut des Menschen erhalten und Gesundheit weiterdenken. Finden Sie Ihren Grund, bei uns zu arbeiten. Jetzt bewerben unter www.barmer.de/karriere

BARMER Company Details

Linkedin ID:

barmer

Employees number:

2550 employees

Number of followers:

15231

NAICS:

524

Industry Type:

Insurance

Homepage:

barmer.de

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

BAR_1452012

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreBARMER Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

globalscoreBARMER Global Score
blurone
Ailogo

BARMER Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

BARMER Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView
BARMERCyber Attack60207/2023BAR02724723Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: A hacking attack has been launched against a BARMER service provider. There are now investigations being conducted to see if Barmer's data was also accessed during this assault. The provider of the service filled the associated security hole. The checkout service provider was the only target of the attack. No connection to the Barmer IT environment ever existed. The incident has been reported to the appropriate authorities as a precaution.

BARMER Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Wir sind eine der größten Krankenversicherungen in Deutschland und es gibt viele Gründe, bei uns zu arbeiten. Aber eines haben unsere rund 16.000 Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter gemeinsam: Wer bei uns arbeitet, setzt sich täglich für die Gesundheit von Millionen von Menschen ein. Weil wir helfen, gesünder zu leben, bei Krankheit die bestmögliche Versorgung sicherstellen und bei Vorsorge unterstützen. Mit diesem Anspruch entwickeln wir uns weiter. Hin zu einem dynamischen Unternehmen in einem digitalen Markt, mit Freiraum für neue Impulse und gesellschaftlicher Verantwortung. Unsere besondere Kultur macht es möglich: Wir stehen füreinander ein, über Standorte, Fachrichtungen und Karrierelevel hinweg. Wir arbeiten miteinander, denn nur gemeinsam können wir das höchste Gut des Menschen erhalten und Gesundheit weiterdenken. Finden Sie Ihren Grund, bei uns zu arbeiten. Jetzt bewerben unter www.barmer.de/karriere

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=barmer' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

BARMER Cyber Security News

2025-03-25T07:00:00.000Z
Cyber Battlegrounds: FCRF Unveils India's Top 10 Cybercrime Hotspots & Vulnerable Districts

Discover India's cybercrime landscape with FCRF's groundbreaking research, exposing vulnerabilities and urging action for a safer digital ...

2025-05-10T07:00:00.000Z
Tamil Nadu Cyber Crime Wing warns of rising cyberattack threat as conflict with Pakistan escalates

NEW DELHI: In the wake of the escalating conflicts between India and Pakistan, there is an elevated risk of cyberattacks, particularly from ...

2025-05-13T07:00:00.000Z
India-Pak ceasefire LIVE: “Will not see terrorists and their state sponsors separately,” says PM Modi

DGMOs of both nations spoke earlier this evening. Now, the Prime Minister has warned the ceasefire is just a pause unless Pakistan ...

2025-05-12T07:00:00.000Z
India Pakistan Ceasefire LIVE Updates: "Night Remained Largely Peaceful Across J&K, Border Areas," Says Army

IAF Sergeant, BSF Sub-Inspector Killed In Pak Cross-Border Firing. Two Indian Armed forces personnel were martyred - an Indian Air Force officer ...

2025-05-07T07:00:00.000Z
India resilient to economic fallout from escalating tensions with Pakistan

Experts say India can withstand economic shocks from the escalating tensions with Pakistan due to its strong macroeconomic fundamentals.

2025-05-07T07:00:00.000Z
Deepfakes And Disinformation Surge As Operation Sindoor Sparks Cyber War Of Lies

Deepfakes And Disinformation Surge As Operation Sindoor Sparks Cyber War Of Lies · Cyber experts warn that AI-driven fake news, deepfakes, and ...

2025-05-09T07:00:00.000Z
Pakistani drone attack on Srinagar airport, Awantipora air base foiled | Latest News India - Hindustan Times

Pakistani drone attack on Srinagar airport, Awantipora air base foiled · Loud blasts and sirens were heard in Jammu and south Kashmir due to ...

2025-05-08T07:00:00.000Z
Operation Sindoor 2025: Where are schools closed amid rising border tensions?

Following Operation Sindoor, launched by India on May 7, 2025, schools and educational institutions have been closed across several border ...

2023-07-13T07:00:00.000Z
Deutsche Bank customer data leaked

Four major European banks – Deutsche Bank, ING Bank, Postbank, and Comdirect – are reporting customer data leaks.

similarCompanies

BARMER Similar Companies

AIA Group Limited and its subsidiaries (collectively “AIA” or the “Group”) comprise the largest independent publicly listed pan-Asian life insurance group. It has a presence in 18 markets – wholly-owned branches and subsidiaries in Mainland China, Hong Kong SAR(1), Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Aus

MAPFRE

At MAPFRE, we are committed to protecting what is most important to you. That's why, we are the largest Spanish insurer in the world, the largest multinational insurance company in Latin America and one of the 10 largest European groups in terms of premium volume. With 90 years of experience, we are

Farmers Insurance

The companies comprising the Farmers Insurance Group of Companies® currently make up one of the country's largest insurers of vehicles, homes and small businesses, and provide a wide range of other specialty insurance and financial services products. In business since 1928, today at Farmers® we pr

SOGAZ

SOGAZ is the largest universal insurance group in the Russian Federation. We offer more than 100 insurance programs covering all kinds of property, personal and liability insurance. We see our main goal in minimizing risks for companies and assisting in building most efficient and successful busine

Axis Max Life Insurance Limited

Axis Max Life Insurance Limited (earlier known as Max Life Insurance Company Limited)  is a Joint Venture between Max Financial Services Limited and Axis Bank Limited. Max Financial Services Ltd. is a part of the Max Group, an Indian multi-business corporation. Axis Max Life Insurance Limited has a

USI Insurance Services

USI is one of the largest insurance brokerage and consulting firms in the world, delivering property and casualty, employee benefits, personal risk, program and retirement solutions to large risk management clients, middle market companies, smaller firms and individuals. Headquartered in Valhalla, N

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

BARMER CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, BARMER has faced 1 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack'].

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Wir sind eine der größten Krankenversicherungen in Deutschland und es gibt viele Gründe, bei uns zu arbeiten. Aber eines haben unsere rund 16.000 Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter gemeinsam: Wer bei uns arbeitet, setzt sich täglich für die Gesundheit von Millionen von Menschen ein. Weil wir helfen, gesünder zu leben, bei Krankheit die bestmögliche Versorgung sicherstellen und bei Vorsorge unterstützen. Mit diesem Anspruch entwickeln wir uns weiter. Hin zu einem dynamischen Unternehmen in einem digitalen Markt, mit Freiraum für neue Impulse und gesellschaftlicher Verantwortung. Unsere besondere Kultur macht es möglich: Wir stehen füreinander ein, über Standorte, Fachrichtungen und Karrierelevel hinweg. Wir arbeiten miteinander, denn nur gemeinsam können wir das höchste Gut des Menschen erhalten und Gesundheit weiterdenken. Finden Sie Ihren Grund, bei uns zu arbeiten. Jetzt bewerben unter www.barmer.de/karriere.

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge