Comparison Overview

Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd

VS

Fidelity National Financial

Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd

Building 19 (T1), Poly International Plaza, Zone 7, Wangjign East Park, Chaoyang District, Beijing, CN
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zhongzhi.com.cn/pages/zz/home_en.html

Founded in 1995, Zhongzhi Enterprise Group ("ZEG") has headquartered in Beijing and currently has more than 10,000 employees. As China's leading asset management group, ZEG adheres to the philosophy of "Growing with Excellent Companies", and gradually develops into a diversified financial services group specializing in investing, financing, industrial funds, and so on.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 108
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Fidelity National Financial

601 Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, 32204, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 700 and 749
http://www.fnf.com

Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (NYSE: FNF) is a leading provider of title insurance and transaction services to the real estate and mortgage industries. Ranked #359 on the FORTUNE 500(r) list for 2023, FNF is the nation's largest title insurance company through our title insurance underwriters (Fidelity National Title, Chicago Title, Commonwealth Land Title, Alamo Title and National Title Insurance of New York) that collectively issue more title insurance policies than any other title company in the United States. Our mission is to advance, expand, and protect the experience of property ownership by making the safety of our customers our primary focus. We pride ourselves on being extremely customer-oriented, motivated, and quick to provide solutions for all of your title insurance needs. We strongly encourage employee ownership of company stock so our FNF family can share in our company’s continuous growth and be a valuable part of something bigger than themselves.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 19,570
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zhongzhi-enterprise-group-co-ltd.jpeg
Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fidelity-national-financial.jpeg
Fidelity National Financial
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fidelity National Financial
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fidelity National Financial in 2026.

Incident History — Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fidelity National Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity National Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zhongzhi-enterprise-group-co-ltd.jpeg
Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fidelity-national-financial.jpeg
Fidelity National Financial
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2013
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fidelity National Financial company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fidelity National Financial company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fidelity National Financial company and Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fidelity National Financial company nor Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Fidelity National Financial company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fidelity National Financial company nor Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd company nor Fidelity National Financial company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd nor Fidelity National Financial holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd company nor Fidelity National Financial company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fidelity National Financial company employs more people globally than Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd nor Fidelity National Financial holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd nor Fidelity National Financial holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd nor Fidelity National Financial holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd nor Fidelity National Financial holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd nor Fidelity National Financial holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zhongzhi Enterprise Group Co., Ltd nor Fidelity National Financial holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References