Comparison Overview

Xunta de Galicia

VS

Southern Company

Xunta de Galicia

San Caetano, s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15781, ES
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

A Xunta aparece definida no Estatuto de Autonomía, aprobado en 1981, como órgano colexiado do Goberno de Galicia. Na actualidade, a Xunta está composta polo presidente e dez conselleiros. A comunidade exerce as súas funcións administrativas a través da Xunta e dos seus entes e órganos dependentes. Correspóndelle á Xunta aprobar os regulamentos xerais dos seus propios tributos e elaborar as normas regulamentarias precisas para xestionar os impostos estatais cedidos de acordo cos termos desta cesión e a elaboración e aplicación do orzamento da Comunidade Autónoma de Galicia, que deben ser examinados polo Parlamento. A Xunta tamén se encarga de coordinar a actividade das Deputacións Provinciais do seu territorio naquelo que afecte dun xeito directo ao interese xeral de Galicia, e para iso unirá os orzamentos que elas elaboren de seu. Así mesmo, poderá encomendar a execución dos seus acordos ás devanditas deputacións, que serán as encargadas de levar a cabo as funcións transferidas polo Executivo autonómico.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 10,790
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Southern Company

30 Ivan Allen Jr Blvd, Atlanta, GA, US, 30308
Last Update: 2026-03-28

Together with our subsidiaries, we deliver clean, safe, reliable and affordable energy to our 9 million customers. Our focus is doing so with service excellence. That means we are leaders who take action to meet our customers’ and communities’ needs while advancing our commitment to net zero emissions by 2050. We create community value through energy, social, economic, and environmental progress. We do this through electric operating companies in three states and natural gas distribution companies in four. Our family of companies draw on diverse energy sources to create the best mix for our service areas, including electricity, natural gas, solar power, carbon-free nuclear, and other sustainable sources. We leverage our leading distributed energy infrastructure company and other innovative technology to better serve every customer. Our competitive, national generation company serves wholesale customers, and our family includes a fiber optics network, and telecommunications services.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 11,829
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xunta-de-galicia.jpeg
Xunta de Galicia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southern-company.jpeg
Southern Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Xunta de Galicia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Southern Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xunta de Galicia in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern Company in 2026.

Incident History — Xunta de Galicia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xunta de Galicia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Southern Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xunta-de-galicia.jpeg
Xunta de Galicia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southern-company.jpeg
Southern Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Southern Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Xunta de Galicia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Southern Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Xunta de Galicia company.

In the current year, Southern Company company and Xunta de Galicia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Southern Company company nor Xunta de Galicia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Southern Company company nor Xunta de Galicia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Southern Company company nor Xunta de Galicia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Xunta de Galicia company nor Southern Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Xunta de Galicia nor Southern Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Southern Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Xunta de Galicia company.

Southern Company company employs more people globally than Xunta de Galicia company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Xunta de Galicia nor Southern Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Xunta de Galicia nor Southern Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Xunta de Galicia nor Southern Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Xunta de Galicia nor Southern Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Xunta de Galicia nor Southern Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Xunta de Galicia nor Southern Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H