Four-Faith Communication Technology Co., Ltd.. Company Cyber Security Posture
fourfaith.comFour-Faith is a professional provider who specializing in the design, manufacture, marketing of the advanced wireless data transmission terminals, and providing the innovative, customized wireless data terminals, excellent service and solutions for our customers both at home and abroad. We have an enthusiastic team and rich R&D experience, focusing on cellular modem, cellular IP codem, cellular router and 3G Gateway, and we have launched many products to meet our customers'need. Our prouducts as well as solutions cover multiple wireless cellular network worldwide, such as WCDMA/HSUPA/HSDPA, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000 1X EVDO, CDMA2000 1X, EDGE, GPRS and GSM. Following our company motto, "Honesty, Trust, Confidence and Belief", we strive for establishing long-term and mutual trust cooperation relationship with our suppliers, competitors, mobile operator and dealers, etc. In order to ensure that all requirement from our clients would receive our prompt and considerate attention, we have set up branches in Beijing, Wuhan and Shanghai at home, meanwhile, we have authorized more and more dealers and distributors for local market worldwide, and we are still expanding our networking of global distribution to meet more and more our clients'need.
FCTCL Company Details
xiamen-four-faith-communication-technology-co-ltd
35 employees
825.0
517
Telecommunications
fourfaith.com
Scan still pending
FOU_3189938
In-progress
FCTCL Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
FCTCL Global Score.png)
Four-Faith Communication Technology Co., Ltd.. Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Four-Faith Communication Technology Co., Ltd.. Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four-Faith | Cyber Attack | 100 | 1/2025 | XIA000011225 | Link | ||
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack which disrupt the payment process for an e-commerce websiteDescription: The Gayfemboy botnet has been aggressively exploiting a vulnerability, designated CVE-2024-12856, in Four-Faith industrial routers, as well as other devices like Neterbit routers and Vimar smart home devices. This botnet has facilitated widespread DDoS attacks that peaked in October and November. The concentration of botnet activity has resulted in substantial disruptions across various regions, with a significant portion of the infected nodes localized in China, the United States, Iran, Russia, and Turkey. The attacks, which leveraged several N-day and 0-day vulnerabilities, have not only impaired services but also raised concerns about the long-term security implications for affected devices and networks. | |||||||
| Four-Faith | Vulnerability | 100 | 5 | 1/2025 | XIA000010925 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization’s existenceDescription: The Gayfemboy botnet capitalizing on a zero-day vulnerability, CVE-2024-12856, has led to Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks against Four-Faith industrial routers. This exploitation potentially incapacitates critical network resources, causing service interruptions and impairing business operations. The botnet's activity, primarily in major industrial regions including China and the United States, signifies a notable security breach with substantial implications for the infected devices' operability and the broader network reliability. | |||||||
| Four-Faith Industrial | Vulnerability | 100 | 3 | 1/2025 | XIA000011425 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: The Gayfemboy botnet has been exploiting a vulnerability in Four-Faith industrial routers since November 2024 to launch DDoS attacks. This botnet variant, using the Mirai codebase, has integrated N-day and 0-day exploits and has been attacking with over 15,000 daily active nodes. The attacks have targeted various global entities including the U.S and China and have resulted in blackholing traffic and disabling services due to the overwhelming network resources consumed by DDoS. The botnet targets several vulnerabilities across different devices and has disrupted not only Four-Faith routers but also affected other devices like Neterbit routers and Vimar smart home devices. The severity of this attack is predominantly on network resources, causing significant disruption. | |||||||
Four-Faith Communication Technology Co., Ltd.. Company Subsidiaries
Four-Faith is a professional provider who specializing in the design, manufacture, marketing of the advanced wireless data transmission terminals, and providing the innovative, customized wireless data terminals, excellent service and solutions for our customers both at home and abroad. We have an enthusiastic team and rich R&D experience, focusing on cellular modem, cellular IP codem, cellular router and 3G Gateway, and we have launched many products to meet our customers'need. Our prouducts as well as solutions cover multiple wireless cellular network worldwide, such as WCDMA/HSUPA/HSDPA, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000 1X EVDO, CDMA2000 1X, EDGE, GPRS and GSM. Following our company motto, "Honesty, Trust, Confidence and Belief", we strive for establishing long-term and mutual trust cooperation relationship with our suppliers, competitors, mobile operator and dealers, etc. In order to ensure that all requirement from our clients would receive our prompt and considerate attention, we have set up branches in Beijing, Wuhan and Shanghai at home, meanwhile, we have authorized more and more dealers and distributors for local market worldwide, and we are still expanding our networking of global distribution to meet more and more our clients'need.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
FCTCL Cyber Security News
Hackers exploit Four-Faith router flaw to open reverse shells
Threat actors are exploiting a post-authentication remote command injection vulnerability in Four-Faith routers tracked as CVE-2024-12856 to ...
15,000+ Four-Faith Routers Exposed to New Exploit Due to Default Credentials
A high-severity flaw impacting select Four-Faith industrial routers has come under active exploitation in the wild, according to new ...
The FCC Expands Scope of Data Breach Notification Rules
Notice must be provided within seven business days after reasonable determination of a breach. Second, for breaches affecting fewer than 500 ...
FCTCL Similar Companies
Telekom Malaysia
TM is the national connectivity and digital infrastructure provider and Malaysia’s leading integrated telco; offering a comprehensive suite of communication services and solutions in fixed (telephony and broadband), mobility, content, WiFi, ICT, Cloud and smart services. TM is driven by stakeholder
airtel
Airtel was founded to provide global connectivity and unlock endless opportunities. Our organization embodies a unique blend of energy, innovation, creativity, dedication, scale, and ownership, all aimed at being limitless. At Airtel, we strive to go beyond our duties to create impactful solutions f
e& UAE
(Formerly etisalat UAE) For more than four decades, we have connected people and now we’ve evolved to become the digital telco of the future. Our mission is to grow, transform and excel as the region’s technology leader while enhancing digital customer experience and operation agility. e& UAE offe
Telkom Business
Telkom Business is the business unit dedicated to serving businesses of every type, industry and size in and outside South Africa. The businesses that we serve range from small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to large corporations, government organisations and global enterprises. A sub-brand of the
OPPO
Founded in 2004, OPPO is one of the world's leading innovators of smart devices. With operations in over 60 countries and regions, OPPO's more than 290,000 points of sales and 1,900 official service centers share the beauty of technology with users all over the world. To forward our vision of a bett
TDC Song
TDC Song has been part of TDC Group since year 2004. Company's name was changed into TDC in all Nordic countries in 2008. Please see www.tdc.com, www.tdc.se, www.tdc.fi and www.tdc.no. The story of TDC has been termed by many as a true business adventure that started small with only 22 subscribe
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
FCTCL CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, FCTCL has faced 3 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Vulnerability', 'Cyber Attack'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Four-Faith is a professional provider who specializing in the design, manufacture, marketing of the advanced wireless data transmission terminals, and providing the innovative, customized wireless data terminals, excellent service and solutions for our customers both at home and abroad. We have an enthusiastic team and rich R&D experience, focusing on cellular modem, cellular IP codem, cellular router and 3G Gateway, and we have launched many products to meet our customers'need. Our prouducts as well as solutions cover multiple wireless cellular network worldwide, such as WCDMA/HSUPA/HSDPA, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000 1X EVDO, CDMA2000 1X, EDGE, GPRS and GSM. Following our company motto, "Honesty, Trust, Confidence and Belief", we strive for establishing long-term and mutual trust cooperation relationship with our suppliers, competitors, mobile operator and dealers, etc. In order to ensure that all requirement from our clients would receive our prompt and considerate attention, we have set up branches in Beijing, Wuhan and Shanghai at home, meanwhile, we have authorized more and more dealers and distributors for local market worldwide, and we are still expanding our networking of global distribution to meet more and more our clients'need..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Vulnerability'].
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
