Comparison Overview

World Vision

VS

International Rescue Committee

World Vision

London, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.wvi.org

World Vision is the largest child-focused private charity in the world. Our 33,000+ staff members working in nearly 100 countries have united with our incredible supporters to impact the lives of over 200 million vulnerable children by tackling the root causes of poverty. Through World Vision every 60 seconds…a family gets water…a hungry child is fed…a family receives the tools to overcome poverty. Motivated by our faith and guided by our deep experience and expertise, we are a Christian humanitarian, development and advocacy organisation devoted to improving the lives of children, families and their communities around the world and creating lasting impact that will live on in generations to come. We serve all people, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or gender.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19,157
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

International Rescue Committee

122 E 42st , New York, NY, US, 10168
Last Update: 2026-03-30
Between 800 and 849
https://www.rescue.org/

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world’s worst humanitarian crises and help people to survive, recover, and gain control of their future. Founded in 1933 at the request of Albert Einstein, the IRC offers lifesaving care and life-changing assistance to refugees and displaced people forced to flee from war or disaster. At work today in over 50+ countries and in 28 U.S. cities, the IRC restores safety, dignity and hope to millions who are uprooted and struggling to endure.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13,311
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/worldvision.jpeg
World Vision
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-rescue-committee.jpeg
International Rescue Committee
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
World Vision
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
International Rescue Committee
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for World Vision in 2026.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Rescue Committee in 2026.

Incident History — World Vision (X = Date, Y = Severity)

World Vision cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — International Rescue Committee (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Rescue Committee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/worldvision.jpeg
World Vision
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-rescue-committee.jpeg
International Rescue Committee
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

World Vision company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to International Rescue Committee company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, International Rescue Committee company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to World Vision company.

In the current year, International Rescue Committee company and World Vision company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither International Rescue Committee company nor World Vision company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither International Rescue Committee company nor World Vision company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither International Rescue Committee company nor World Vision company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither World Vision company nor International Rescue Committee company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither World Vision nor International Rescue Committee holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

World Vision company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to International Rescue Committee company.

World Vision company employs more people globally than International Rescue Committee company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither World Vision nor International Rescue Committee holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither World Vision nor International Rescue Committee holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither World Vision nor International Rescue Committee holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither World Vision nor International Rescue Committee holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither World Vision nor International Rescue Committee holds HIPAA certification.

Neither World Vision nor International Rescue Committee holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References