Comparison Overview

Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law

VS

Matthew Charles Law

Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law

53rd Street, Marbella, Panama, Panama, undefined, PA
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799

WILLIAMS & WILLIAMS is an innovative law firm created by a group of successful professionals that decided to join their strength and knowledge in order to provide a more comprehensive array of services by using their individual skills and experience, acquired after having important roles within the Government, Private Companies and Non for Profit Organizations. We believe that our clientele is the most valuable asset, therefore we are committed to offer real and timely solutions by applying the knowledge and efficacy of the firm, while offering a high quality personalized service to our clients. With an excellent network and reputation with government and private institutions, WILLIAMS & WILLIAMS is prepared to achieve the goals set by our domestic and international clientele, with dynamism and efficacy. WILLIAMS & WILLIAMS’ main office is located in Panama City, Panama’s social, cultural and economic heart and has correspondent offices in other territories of the region to satisfy the needs of the clients requesting the legal services of the firm.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Matthew Charles Law

210 North Columbia, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, US
Last Update: 2026-03-16

Matthew Charles Law offers high quality and affordable legal services. The firm's practice includes criminal defense, civil litigation, business law, and more. Founded in 2009, the firm has office locations in Durham and Chapel Hill. It serves clients throughout the triangle region of North Carolina and is actively involved in the region's communities.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williams-&-williams-attorneys-at-law.jpeg
Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/matthew-charles-law.jpeg
Matthew Charles Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Matthew Charles Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Matthew Charles Law in 2026.

Incident History — Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Matthew Charles Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Matthew Charles Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/williams-&-williams-attorneys-at-law.jpeg
Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/matthew-charles-law.jpeg
Matthew Charles Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Matthew Charles Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Matthew Charles Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company.

In the current year, Matthew Charles Law company and Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Matthew Charles Law company nor Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Matthew Charles Law company nor Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Matthew Charles Law company nor Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company nor Matthew Charles Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law nor Matthew Charles Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company nor Matthew Charles Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Matthew Charles Law company employs more people globally than Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law nor Matthew Charles Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law nor Matthew Charles Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law nor Matthew Charles Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law nor Matthew Charles Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law nor Matthew Charles Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Williams & Williams Attorneys at Law nor Matthew Charles Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.