Comparison Overview

Ventia

VS

Fugro

Ventia

155 Miller St, Level 27, North Sydney, New South Wales, AU, 2060
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ventia.com

Ventia provides essential services to make infrastructure work for communities in Australia and New Zealand. We pride ourselves on safe and sustainable services for our corporate and government clients across a broad range of sectors, including transport, telecommunications, utilities, defence, water, energy, resources and social infrastructure. In July 2020, Ventia acquired Broadspectrum. In November 2021, Ventia listed on the ASX and NXZ under the ticker VNT.

NAICS: 237
NAICS Definition: Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees: 10,203
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Fugro

Veurse Achterweg 10, Leidschendam, 2264 SG, NL
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fugro.com

We are the world’s leading Geo-data specialist, collecting and analysing comprehensive information about the Earth and the structures built upon it. Through integrated data acquisition, analysis and advice, we unlock insights from Geo-data to help our clients design, build and operate their assets in a safe, sustainable and efficient manner. Learn more about us: https://www.youtube.com/fugro https://www.facebook.com/fugro https://twitter.com/fugro https://www.instagram.com/fugro/

NAICS: 237
NAICS Definition: Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees: 10,678
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vnt.jpeg
Ventia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fugro.jpeg
Fugro
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ventia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fugro
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ventia in 2026.

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fugro in 2026.

Incident History — Ventia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ventia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fugro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fugro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vnt.jpeg
Ventia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fugro.jpeg
Fugro
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fugro company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ventia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fugro company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ventia company.

In the current year, Fugro company and Ventia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fugro company nor Ventia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fugro company nor Ventia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fugro company nor Ventia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ventia company nor Fugro company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ventia nor Fugro holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fugro company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ventia company.

Fugro company employs more people globally than Ventia company, reflecting its scale as a Civil Engineering.

Neither Ventia nor Fugro holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ventia nor Fugro holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ventia nor Fugro holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ventia nor Fugro holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ventia nor Fugro holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ventia nor Fugro holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References